[“Adding Value”, which I sent out in the newsletter recently. You can buy the print here etc.]
A decade ago Howard Schultz, the founder of Starbuck’s wrote a great little book about entrepreneurship, “Pour Your Heart into It: How Starbucks Build a Company One Cup at a Time”.
One story from the book that really stuck with me, was about Starbuck’s first REAL BIG crisis, sometime in the 1980s.
Basically, the international coffee market suffered a REALLY bad crop that year, which drove the wholesale price sky high, enough to totally mess up the company’s economic model.
Starbuck’s was left with one of two choices, neither of them good:
1. Start using cheaper coffee.
2. Raise prices.
Research had indicated that, if they lowered the quality with cheaper coffee, only 10% of their customers would have sufficient palates to be able to tell the difference. However if they raised their prices, EVERYBODY would be able to tell right away.
The accountants, predictably, recommended that they go with the cheaper coffee option. Numbers don’t lie etc, it was better to tick off 10% of their customers than 100% etc, cheaper coffee was the “obvious” thing to do etc etc.
Howard didn’t do that in the end. Instead, he raised the prices accordingly, and left a note in every store, telling people why his company was forced to regretfully raise their prices. And he also told them about the option he could’ve taken but chose not to i.e. cheapen the coffee.
And you know what? The customers understood his reasoning, and stood by the business.
Eventually wholesale coffee prices came down again, allowing Starbuck’s to lower their prices as well. The company weathered the storm and the brand ended up all the stronger for it. Life was good again.
Sorry, Bean Counters. Numbers do lie. Sometimes pathologically so…
[Bonus link from Cheryl:] “Live in the market, not in the spreadsheet”. Brilliant way of putting it.
While this commitment to their customers is admirable, that was indeed over 25 years ago. Now that they’ve established their brand, would they do the same thing? And more importantly, would the prices go down afterward?
I do agree with the gist of your post, however.
Also, 25 years ago Starbuck’s was a private company. Once a company goes public, it becomes legally bound to try to increase shareholder value on a quarterly basis, regardless of every other stakeholder group in the mix.
That certainly complicates things…
The directors of public companies are not “legally bound to try to increase shareholder value on a quarterly basis.” They are legally bound to act in the best interest of the company and that would include raising coffee prices instead of lowering quality if they desired.
Sorry if my financial law is a bit rusty đ
As someone very close to me, who took her private company public (with disasterous results, I might add) once told me, “What’s good for the company and what’s good for the shareholders isn’t always the same thing”.
Interesting story.
But the numbers weren’t lying, they just appeared to point to a decision that would have been the wrong one.
Make a stand for quality. Nice story.
@: They lied by omission. 10% detect worse coffee, and 100% detect higher prices, but 100% also enjoy a good marketing story.
Good blog post. Nothing against the choice of title, but as James mentioned, this is more the case of a confounding variable than numbers lying.
It is a great warning against the danger of using numbers without understanding all the variables.
In the spirit of sharing, its Howard Schultz not Schwartz and he was not the founder.
Why does that matter? Because the principles here are more readily found in Jerry Baldwin (one of three founders of Starbucks) and the story of Peet’s Coffee.
“English teacher Jerry Baldwin, history teacher Zev Siegel, and writer Gordon Bowker were the original founding partners and opened the first Starbucks store in Seattle, Washington in 1971. The three collected $8000 in cash and loans as start-up capital.
The original concept, inspired by their friend Alfred Peet (Peet’s Coffee and Tea), was to open a store in Seattle’s Pike Place Market to sell premium coffee beans and specialty coffee equipment. Zev Siegel actually worked in Peet’s Berkeley, California store for a summer to learn the trade.
The founders of Starbucks, with the permission of Alfred Peet, fashioned their first store after Peet’s popular Berkeley coffee house. Peet supplied the green coffee beans for roasting in their new store. Very likely, Starbucks wouldn’t be where they are today without the early influence of Alfred Peet.”
Peet’s Coffee is the business card art of the Coffee World.
Yeah, I remember hearing somewhere that Schultz (not Schwartz, typo corrected, thanks) worked at Peet’s at one point in his early career.
I also remember that not being mentioned in the book đ
Good work star bucks. I think the bean counters were wrong on the raising of prices, you wouldn’t annoy 100% of people by raising prices, I think most wouldn’t even notice
So I guess what you’re trying to say is that the moral of the story is that 90% of the people wouldn’t have noticed the difference anyway, but because they are gullible for a good marketing story, it becomes easy to manipulate them.
Business is not a coin-operated spreadsheet.
Interesting info about Peet’s. I only thought they were in airport lobbies.
Nice Blogpost… Thats why now Starbucks is one of the renowned company… One should never compromise with the quality of the product and services… because it is thing which brings Name,Fame and Money.
[…] the first post, Hugh MacLeod describes the decision Howard Schultz of Starbucks tells about in his book, Pour Your […]
Ahh numbers, the trap of the “Clever men behind the curtain.” I somehow wish we could stop playing off on those numbers and focus on value and attention instead. Those are the real resources.
Liked the doodle đ
[…] in the market, not in the spreadsheetâ | gapingvoid via gapingvoid.com ["Adding Value", which I sent out in the newsletter recently. You can buy the print here etc.] A […]