smarter conversations: “how do i want to change the way i talk to people?”


[The “Life Is Too Short” print…]

I first star­ted pla­ying with the idea of “Smarter-Conversations” way back in 2004, the same year gaping­void really star­ted get­ting trac­tion in the blogopsphere.

Though not something I talk about day-in-day-out, it’s always been there somewhere in the back­ground, infor­ming everything I work on. Here are some notes:

1. In the semi­nal book, “The Clue­train Mani­festo”, the great Doc Searls famously dec­la­red, “Mar­kets are con­ver­sa­tions”. If you buy that pre­mise (and I do, who­lehear­tedly), then quod erat demons­tra­tum, if you want your mar­ke­ting to be smar­ter (i.e. more effec­tive), you need to be having a “Smar­ter Conversation”.

2. “Con­ver­sa­tion” is a metaphor. Making your pro­duct sleek, ele­gant and gra­ce­ful while all your other com­pe­ti­tors make their pro­duct look cheap, plas­tic and clunky is a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion. Not all con­ver­sa­tions need words.

3. It’s not just what you say, its how you say it. Calling it the “iPod” is a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion than say, the “MZT-2300-B Elec­tro­nic Por­ta­ble MP3 Digi­tal Audio Device”.

4. Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tions scale. That’s what I really like about it. Anyone can have a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion– from a mom n’ pop pizza joint to a For­tune 500 com­pany. It can hap­pen in a Super­bowl ad or prin­ted on the back of a paper nap­kin. You can start one on a blog today, for free. Or on Twit­ter or Face­book. The tools don’t neces­sa­rily have to change, the way you talk to peo­ple has to change.

5. Deci­ding to have a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion isn’t a busi­ness deci­sion, it’s a moral deci­sion. Like I said in the last point, the barriers to entry are zero. While your com­pe­ti­tion treats their cus­to­mers like idiots, you treat your cus­to­mers like inte­lli­gent human beings. You don’t do that because your accoun­tant told you to, you do that because that’s who you are.

6. The Smar­ter Conversation’s value comes from, I believe, not by yet more inc­rea­sed busi­ness effi­cien­cies, but by its huma­nity. For exam­ple, take two well-known air­li­nes. They both per­form a use­ful ser­vice. They both deli­ver value. They both cost about the same to fly to New York or Hong Kong. Both have nice Boeings and Air­bu­ses. Both serve pea­nuts and drinks. Both serve “air­line food”. Both use the same air­ports. But one air­line has friendly peo­ple wor­king for them, the other air­line has surly peo­ple wor­king for them. One air­line has a sense of fun and adven­ture about it, one has a tired, jaded business-commuter vibe about it. Guess which one takes the human dimen­sion of their busi­ness more seriously than the other? Guess which one still will be around in twenty years? Guess which one will lose billions of dollars worth of sha­rehol­der value over the next twenty years? What para­llels do you see in your own industry? In your own company?

7. If Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tions work, it’s because they help huma­nize the com­pany. I wrote about this years ago in an article I called “The Porous Mem­brane”. To paraph­rase: Ideally, you want the con­ver­sa­tion bet­ween cus­to­mers [the exter­nal mar­ket] to be as iden­ti­cal as the con­ver­sa­tion bet­ween your­sel­ves [the inter­nal mar­ket]. The things that your cus­to­mer is pas­sio­nate about, you should also be pas­sio­nate about. This we call “align­ment”. A good exam­ple would be Apple. The peo­ple at Apple think the iPod is cool, and so do their cus­to­mers. They are alig­ned. When you are no lon­ger alig­ned with your cus­to­mers is when the com­pany starts get­ting into trou­ble. When you start saying your gizmo is great and your cus­to­mers are telling every­body it sucks, then you have serious misa­lign­ment. So how do you keep misa­lign­ment from hap­pe­ning? The ans­wer lies the cul­tu­ral mem­brane that sepa­ra­tes you from them. The more porous the mem­brane, the easier it is for con­ver­sa­tions bet­ween you and them, the inter­nal and exter­nal, to hap­pen. The easier for the con­ver­sa­tions on both sides to adjust to the other, to become like the other. And nothing pokes holes in the mem­brane bet­ter than blog­ging.

8. Social Media is not about reaching a mass audience. Social Media is not about crea­ting yet another sales chan­nel. Social Media is about allo­wing the Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion to hap­pen. That’s all. Why do some com­pa­nies lose, while other com­pa­nies win? Because the lat­ter has a smar­ter “con­ver­sa­tion” with its cus­to­mers. Zap­pos had a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about the power of cus­to­mer ser­vice and the power of com­pany cul­ture. Peet’s Cof­fee came along 20 years ago and began a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about cof­fee with millions of peo­ple within a very short space of time. Target’s recent mas­sive suc­cess star­ted from a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about good design. Savile Row tai­lor, Tho­mas Mahon came along and, with his blog, had a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about $4000 English bes­poke suits. Lucky’s Juice Joint had a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about fresh-squeezed. Big com­pa­nies, medium com­pa­nies and tiny com­pa­nies, wha­te­ver– it was never about size, it was never about the choice of media (social or other­wise), it was all about lan­guage.

9. Social Media allows you to cheaply and quickly begin a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion. And once you get it going, that con­ver­sa­tion starts blee­ding out into all other areas of your busi­ness– inc­lu­ding adver­ti­sing, PR and cor­po­rate communications.

10. Ask not what tools you want to use, ask how you want to change how you talk to peo­ple. All evo­lu­tions in mar­ke­ting are evo­lu­tions in lan­guage. Those who can raise the level of con­ver­sa­tion in any mar­ket, win.

11. Start today. It’s never too late to begin a Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion. Like I said, money or time is not the issue. Making the deci­sion is the issue, and only you can do that.