Archive for the ‘Uncategorized’ Category

January 18, 2007

marketing exists…

Send to Kindle

From Woods­tock:

Put simply: Mar­ke­ting exists to tell you that you’re defi­cient and point out the ways in which Com­pany A’s pro­duct can help you make up for that here­to­fore unk­nown defi­ciency in ways that are so much more pro­duc­tive, effi­cient, and have a higher pro­ba­bi­lity of get­ting you laid — because crea­ting the illu­sion that a pro­duct will inc­rease your pro­ba­bi­lity of get­ting laid is really what mar­ke­ting is all about — than Com­pany B’s product.

Disa­gree. If mar­ke­ting was that easy, every­body would be rich.

January 17, 2007

xbox, blogs and wine

Send to Kindle

lovehate37.jpg
[One of the new Stormhoek label designs.]
I was han­ging out the other day with two gamer friends of mine who play a lot of X-Box. Though the con­ver­sa­tion bent in many dif­fe­rent direc­tions that eve­ning, one nug­get stuck out for me:

The Short Ver­sion: X-Boxers and blog­gers aren’t really that dif­fe­rent. They’re just trying to con­nect, just X-boxers use games and the inter­net, and blog­gers use the writ­ten word and the inter­net. The tools dif­fer, but the pri­mal need [i.e. the need to con­nect] remains the same.

Perhaps this is why in the early days of Web 1.0 there was so much porn, cyber­sex and flame wars going on. We blog­gers are used to seeing the inter­net in con­tem­po­rary and/or futu­rist terms. But these days I’ve star­ted seeing the inter­net as just a mani­fes­ta­tion of something far more pri­mal and ancient.
Of course, being in the wine busi­ness, I can see why. Wine has been used as a social object for thou­sands of years. So seeing the con­nec­tions bet­ween a $10 bottle of South Afri­can vino and other social objects i.e. X-Box and blogs, isn’t that far of a stretch for me. It’s all about Human Con­nec­tion. Love. Everything else is secon­dary.
Ran­dom Thought: As any for­mer choir­boy will know, wine is men­tio­ned a lot in The Bible. Funny how they don’t talk about the qua­lity much.
You read “Jesus, kno­wing that tonight was his last night on earth, offe­red his dis­ci­ples wine”, or “King David, being full of inter­nal con­flict, drank a lot of wine, and then went home to give Queen Bathsheba a good seeing-to.“
But you don’t read, “Jesus, kno­wing that tonight was his last night on earth, offe­red his dis­ci­ples an unpre­ten­tious little Sau­ving­non with under­to­nes of black­cu­rrant and lemons.“
Or “King David, being full of inter­nal con­flict, dow­ned a few sips of a delight­fully cha­rac­ter­ful Cha­teau Le Feuvre, and then went home to give Queen Bathsheba a good seeing-to.“
Why not? Because maybe, just maybe, all that wine gee­kery doesn’t mat­ter in the grand scheme of things. If it mat­te­red, they would’ve fit it in there somehow.

blue monster update

Send to Kindle

bluemonster333small.jpg
Steve Clayton’s sig­ned “Blue Mons­ter” litho is now bid­ding on e-Bay at £62.00 GBP [approx. $120 US]. Thanks to every­body who bid on it so far.
At time of pos­ting, the auc­tion has just over 24 hours to go. Exci­ting!
[UPDATE:] All pro­ceeds are going to cha­rity [the NSPCC]. Steve just announ­ced: “If we hit £100 I’ll add £100 to it myself. How’s that?“
Thanks, Steve!
[UPDATE:] Final bid was £113.00 GBP. Wow. Tell Steve to get his check­book out. Heh.

January 16, 2007

the parenting manifesto project

Send to Kindle

It seems the gaping­void main­festo thread has ins­pi­red a Paren­ting Mani­festo Pro­ject, cour­tesy of Rebel­Dad.
Very cool. I think it’s won­der­ful. Heads up to Superha for poin­ting me to it [She’s got a great little Mommy blog, by the way. Ashley’s a real cutie…].
Yes. I like kids, believe it or not.

January 15, 2007

thanks, guy

Send to Kindle

millionaire556.jpg
Many thanks to Guy Kawa­saki, one of my “wri­ter heroes” for saying such nice things about “How To Be Crea­tive”, which he recently read for the first time.
Guy read the Chan­geThis ver­sion [PDF file], though if you pre­fer you can also read it in its ori­gi­nal blog for­mat here.
[Bonus Links:] Guy’s Chan­geThis mani­festo, The Art Of The Start, which is exce­llent, and his book of the same title.
Thanks again, Guy…
[P.S. I wrote HTBC in Sum­mer 2004, but as you can see from Tech­no­rati, it’s still doing the rounds.]

interview with david sifry

Send to Kindle

i'm a speaker.jpg
Last month in Paris, Este­lle and Marc con­duc­ted an abso­lu­tely fas­ci­na­ting inter­view with David Sifry, the foun­der and CEO of Tech­no­rati. You can watch it here.
Besi­des making an indis­pen­sa­ble ser­vice for the blo­gosphere, David is one of those rare chaps I know that I would desc­ribe as pas­sio­nate and lucid as he is visio­nary. Besi­des that, he’s a lot of fun to hang out with.
If you’re seriously inte­res­ted in the inter­net, you can’t afford to miss this one. Rock on.

January 14, 2007

random thoughts on being an entrepreneur

Send to Kindle

zzzzzz7654259.jpg
Ran­dom thoughts on being an entre­pre­neur.

I wouldn’t say I was an autho­rity on entre­pre­neurship, cer­tainly not in the same lea­gue as peo­ple like Fred Wil­son or Jason Cala­ca­nis. That being said, the last cou­ple of years haven’t been too shabby, either. With that in mind, here are a few thoughts I have on the sub­ject, in no par­ti­cu­lar order. The list, by the way, is far from com­plete– I’ll pro­bably be adding to it soo­ner than later etc.

1. Everything takes three times lon­ger than it should. Espe­cially the money part.
2. The best way to get appro­val is not to need it.
3. Peo­ple want what they can’t have. In fact, that’s pretty much all they do want.
4. Once you become an entre­pre­neur, you find the com­pany of non-entrepreneurs a lot har­der to be around. You’ve seen things they haven’t; the wave­lengths alter, it’s that sim­ple.
5. In a world of over-supply and com­mo­di­fi­ca­tion, you are no lon­ger paid to supply. You’re being paid to deli­ver something else. What that is exactly, is not always obvious.
6. Word of mouth is the best adver­ti­sing medium of all. The best word of mouth comes from dis­rup­ting mar­kets.
7. Peo­ple buy your pro­duct because it helps fill in the narra­tive gaps in their lives.
8. You can either be chea­pest or the best. I know which one I pre­fer.
9. Some peo­ple think that once they secure ven­ture fun­ding, their pro­blems will be over. Wrong. That’s when your pro­blems REALLY begin.
10. It’s bet­ter to be under­fun­ded than over­fun­ded.
11. If an ave­rage guy in a bar can unders­tand what you do for a living, chan­ces are you’re half­way to beco­ming a com­mo­dity.
12. It’s easier to turn an ally into a cus­to­mer than vice versa.
13. If you’re happy in your career before the age of thirty, you’re pro­bably doing something wrong. Heck, if you’re happy in your career before the age of seventy, you’re pro­bably doing something wrong.
14. Smart, young, artis­tic peo­ple are always asking me which is a bet­ter career path, “Crea­ti­vity” or “Money”. I always ans­wer that it doesn’t mat­ter. What mat­ters is “Effec­tive” and/or “Inef­fec­tive”.
15. Write the follo­wing on a piece of paper, have it fra­med, and stick it on your office wall: “Have you hug­ged your cus­to­mer today?”
16. Peo­ple will always, always be in the mar­ket for a story that reso­na­tes with them. Your pro­duct will either have this qua­lity or it won’t. If your pro­duct fails this test, quit your job and go find something else. Just making the pro­duct inc­re­men­tally chea­per or bet­ter won’t help you.
17. Pro­ducts are idea ampli­fiers. The mole­cu­les and/or bytes are secon­dary.
18. Peo­ple remem­ber the qua­lity long after they’ve for­got­ten the price. Unless you try to rip them off.
19. Mar­kets serve entre­pre­neurs bet­ter if the lat­ter can keep the for­mer under­sup­plied. Over­supply is the kiss of death.
20. I per­so­nally know a for­mer CEO who, once he attai­ned con­trol of the com­pany, ran an EXTREMELY pro­fi­ta­ble busi­ness into the ground in less than two years. From a mar­ket cap of $100 million to ZERO, just like that. Why? Short ans­wer: He loved being “The” CEO, but he didn’t much care for being “a” CEO.
21. In terms of beco­ming an entre­pre­neur, pro­bably the most use­ful thing I lear­ned in the last twenty years was how to enjoy my own com­pany for long stretches of time.
22. One suc­cess­ful entre­pre­neur I know well has a won­der­ful qua­lity, namely that he never, ever com­pa­res him­self to other peo­ple. He just does his own thing, which actually ser­ves him rather well. Just because his com­pe­ti­tor has bought him­self a big­ger motor boat, doesn’t mean he feels the need have a big­ger motor boat. This qua­lity helps him to build his busi­ness the way he sees fit, not the way the motor boat peo­ple see fit.
23. Run­ning a star­tup is full of extreme ups and downs. Which is why so many suc­cess­ful and happy entre­pre­neurs I know lead such nor­mal, sta­ble, ungla­mo­rous, “boring”, family-centered lives. Somehow they need the lat­ter in order to balance out the for­mer. Extra-curricular drama looks great in the tabloids, but that’s all it’s ulti­ma­tely good for.
24. MBAs are con­di­tio­ned to use their brains in much the same way as sex wor­kers are con­di­tio­ned to use their geni­tals. Nice work if you can get it.
25. Bill Gates may have a million times more money than me, but he isn’t going to live a million times lon­ger than me, watch a million times more sun­sets than me, make love to a million times more women than me, drink a million times more fine wines than me, lis­ten to a million times more Beetho­ven String Quar­tets than me, nor sire a million times more chil­dren than me. Human beings don’t scale.
26. F. Scott Fitz­ge­rald once wrote, “There are no second acts in Ame­ri­can lives.” F. Scott was a drun­kard and a fool.

random notes on blogging

Send to Kindle

talktalk48.jpg
Ran­dom Notes On Blog­ging.
1. The First Rule of Blog­ging: “Blogs don’t write them­sel­ves.” It’s the har­dest and most frus­tra­ting part of pro­fes­sio­nally hel­ping others to blog.
2. Most blog­gers I have met I would desc­ribe as smart, decent, pas­sio­nate peo­ple. This inc­lu­des blog­gers that I don’t par­ti­cu­larly like on a per­so­nal level. I have yet to meet a blog­ger who I would desc­ribe as a “Tho­rough­bred Scum­bag”.
3. Blog­ging is an art, same as any other method of self-expression. Some are bet­ter at it than others.
4. Stay as honest as you can, for as long as you can. Once you cross the line it’s hard to go back.
5. A lot of serious blog­gers became so because frankly, they had a lot of time on their hands. And often there were good rea­sons for that.
6. Blog­ging is a great way to make things hap­pen indi­rectly. I say that all the time, and will KEEP saying it till peo­ple finally get it [I’m not hol­ding my breath].
7. Far too much time and energy is spent watching peo­ple make money directly off their blogs [e.g. via adver­ti­sing reve­nues etc], as oppo­sed to indi­rectly [e.g. beco­ming an autho­rity on something, and using said autho­rity to enhance your already-existing busi­ness]. I believe the lat­ter [which Doc Searls call The “Because” Effect] is a far more plea­sant, effec­tive and likely way to suc­ceed.
8. So you a read lot of A-Listers. Con­gra­tu­la­tions. You now know a lot of stuff every­body else knows.
9. It’s damn hard not to read a lot of A-Listers. They got to where they are for a rea­son.
10. I hardly ever leave com­ments on other people’s blogs any more.
11. If some­body makes a harsh remark about me in the com­ments or somewhere else, usually my first reac­tion is to ask, “Yeah, and what is it THAT YOU DO that is so fuc­king inte­res­ting, Asshole?”
12. Cube-dwellers-with-attitude are pathe­tic.
13. When I first star­ted blog­ging, I was living the Cum­brian boo­nies, being a bit of a rec­luse. When busi­ness finally pic­ked up, as I star­ted tra­ve­ling more often and mee­ting more peo­ple, my “audience” became far less abs­tract to me. Conc­lu­sion: It’s far nicer wri­ting for real peo­ple that you know per­so­nally, than for demo­graphic “eye­balls”. I think when tal­king about the for­mer, Doc Searls’ embo­dies this bet­ter than any one I know.
14. I agree with Doc Searls’ thought that “Wuf­fie is ear­ned”.
15. Why aren’t there more women blog­gers in the circ­les I tra­vel in? The ans­wer is a three-letter word, begin­ning with the let­ter “M”.
16. The day you can write as com­pe­llingly and con­sis­tently as say, Kathy Sie­rra, Jeff Jar­vis, Guy Kawa­saki or Michael Arring­ton, will be the day I start taking your com­plaints of low traf­fic seriously.
17. Cor­po­rate Ame­rica doesn’t really like blogs. Like I care.
18. If your goal is to have a large, influen­tial online rea­dership, I’d say give your­self five years. That’s how long it took Om Malik. Some do it in less, of course, but they seem to be quite excep­tio­nal.
19. For us serious blog evan­ge­lists, it’s temp­ting to think “Every­body should have a blog”. About as temp­ting as the thought, “Every­body should be able to write well.” And about as rea­lis­tic.
20. Blog­ging will never be a mains­tream acti­vity so long as being able to write [A] well, [B] often and [C] about stuff THAT PEOPLE ACTUALLY CARE ABOUT remain the main barriers to entry.
21. Barely a week goes by without me con­tem­pla­ting per­ma­nently tur­ning off the com­ment sec­tion.
22. How to know you’ve arri­ved: When you sud­denly rea­lize that to stop blog­ging would be tan­ta­mount to an act of eco­no­mic sui­cide. That moment came for me at Les Blogs 1, in Paris back in early 2005.
23. Another way to know you’ve arri­ved: When you rea­lize that every busi­ness rela­tionship you’ve esta­blished in the last twelve months was a direct result of blog­ging.
24. You think A-Listers are arro­gant bas­tards? You should meet the B-List.
25. There is no A-List. If you think there is, you’ve mis­sed the whole point.
26. There is an A-List. Fuck with us and we’ll have you des­tro­yed like stray dogs.
27. The best way to raise you pro­file in the blo­gosphere [besi­des wri­ting good stuff] is to attend the various con­fe­ren­ces; the more, the merrier. I am [at least] fifty times more likely to link to you if I’ve already met you in real life. The other good way is to attend the geek din­ners.
28. I wish I were bet­ter at lin­king to other peo­ple. The list of peo­ple I should have lin­ked to, but haven’t, would fill a phone book.
29. Sixty million blogs. Sixty million busi­ness models.
30. Yes, the blo­gosphere is a great place to get laid. No, I’m not telling you how I found this out.
31. If you ever for­get your man­ners, you will pay, and quickly.
32. You are not car­ving in stone. You die, the blog dies.
33. It’s temp­ting to think that peo­ple read your blog. Sadly, they don’t. They skim them. So always make your con­tent skim-friendly. Write it with “skim­ma­bilty” baked-in.
34. Any­body who har­bors the idea that Madi­son Ave­nue EVEN SLIGHTLY unders­tands the inter­net is a fool. I’ve been loo­king for YEARS for evi­dence to the con­trary and simply can’t find any.
35. In this internet-enabled world of ours, Madison’s Avenue’s loss is PR’s gain. Which is why, as a for­mer adver­ti­sing hack, I follow the Edel­man story very clo­sely.
36. Get­ting other peo­ple to “blog for you” is a big mis­take.
37. Z-Listers are every bit as sel­fish, self-important and psycho­lo­gi­cally fla­wed as A-Listers. Except the for­mer don’t have large armies of peo­ple with real and ima­gi­ned incen­ti­ves for trip­ping them up.
38. I like and res­pect Robert Sco­ble a lot, but I find his high tole­rance for trolls in his com­ments bor­de­ring on the cli­ni­cally insane.
39. If a blog doesn’t allow com­ments, then yes, it’s still a blog. Peo­ple who say other­wise are just get­ting in touch with their “Inner Idea­lis­tic Wan­ker”.
40. When peo­ple ask me what the future of media is, I always ans­wer, “RSS”. Thank you, Winer & Co. Seriously.
41. Most of the stuff on this list is wrong.

January 12, 2007

the london culturally-deprived geek day out: sunday 21st january

Send to Kindle

zzzmkghilkj15.jpg
Having spent most of the last few years in front of a com­pu­ter screen, immer­sed in a tan­gled web of blog­ging, busi­ness and car­too­ning, I’m star­ting to feel a bit depri­ved of cul­ture. And I’m sure a lot of techie/geek/entrepreneurs types out there feel the same.
It’s been ages since I went to an art museum. Months and months. I think it’s time I went and visi­ted one, here in Lon­don. Not only that, I think it would be more fun if I brought along some fellow cuturally-deprived techie/geek/entrepreneurs types along with me. We could all use a dose etc.
So all you geeks out there, feel free to join me. I’m plan­ning on going Sun­day, the 21st of January. Let’s meet somewhere for lunch at noon, check out a museum [my vote would be for the Tate Modern], then maybe go grab a beer after­wards. Drop me an e-mail if you fancy coming, also please add your name to the wilki. It should be fun!
One sti­pu­la­tion: Taking a page out of the Lon­don Girl Geeks’ book, I find this kind of event is always far more jolly if there’s a good balance of men and women. So the rule is: Every­body who attends must bring along another per­son of the oppo­site sex. Easy.
If enough peo­ple turn up maybe we can turn this into a regu­lar event…

the social customer manifesto

Send to Kindle

eatchildren537.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]
Chris­topher Carfi is one of my favo­rite mar­ke­ting blog­gers. His wri­tings are mostly based around the follo­wing:

THE SOCIAL CUSTOMER MANIFESTO
* I want to have a say.
* I don’t want to do busi­ness with idiots.
* I want to know when something is wrong, and what you’re going to do to fix it.
* I want to help shape things that I’ll find use­ful.
* I want to con­nect with others who are wor­king on simi­lar pro­blems.
* I don’t want to be called by another sales­per­son. Ever. (Unless they have something use­ful. Then I want it yes­ter­day.)
* I want to buy things on my sche­dule, not yours. I don’t care if it’s the end of your quar­ter.
* I want to know your selling pro­cess.
* I want to tell you when you’re scre­wing up. Con­ver­sely, I’m happy to tell you the things that you are doing well. I may even tell you what your com­pe­ti­tors are doing.
* I want to do busi­ness with com­pa­nies that act in a trans­pa­rent and ethi­cal man­ner.
* I want to know what’s next. We’re in partnership…where should we go?

Thanks, Chris! Always an ins­pi­ra­tion.
[Mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.] [Mani­festo archive is here.]

January 11, 2007

growing pains

Send to Kindle

thingamybanner443.jpg
Looks like Thin­gamy is having short-term gro­wing pains. Sigurd explains:

And it wouldn’t be bad to speed up things a notch either, now that the stuff is gelling.
So when some [finan­cial] “friends of the house” sho­wed inte­rest last autumn I was lis­te­ning.
I’m not a com­plete novice in such mat­ters — have done six LBOs for my own purse in my ear­lier life and arran­ged many an acqui­si­tion for others, so the tech­ni­cal side and other aspects of deal making is not an unk­nown.
That said, the rest of the path, the last few meters to the bank seems to drag out as even rich peo­ple have cons­traints on their cash-flow. Alas, a fact not always inc­lu­ded in the discussions.

Ah, the joys of boots­trap­ping. Like it says on the Alarm Clock blog:

He’s [Sigurd’s] the entre­pre­neur behind Thin­gamy, an appli­ca­tion deve­lop­ment tool for busi­ness apli­ca­tions. Based on recent blog posts, it looks like VCs are cour­ting him, seeing Thin­gamy as an exam­ple of Enter­prise 2.0, no doubt.

[Disc­lo­sure: I have a small stake in Thingamy.]

January 10, 2007

blue monster update

Send to Kindle

bluemonster333small.jpg
Usually I’m fairly deligh­ted when one of my prints hits above the $50 mark. Steve Clayton’s sig­ned “Blue Mons­ter” litho is now bid­ding on e-Bay at £31.00 GBP [approx. $60 US] which, con­si­de­ring the auc­tion still has over a week to go, isn’t too shabby.
If I ever manage crack the art mar­ket, it won’t be through the usual London/New York fashio­nista crowd… it’ll be through Sili­con Valley. That’s my guess, any­way.
[UPDATE:] Now bid­ding at £52.00. Heh.

Kris Hoet [Windows Live]

Send to Kindle

When I was in Paris last month one of the peo­ple I enjo­yed han­ging out with was Kris Hoet, who works for Microsoft’s Win­dows Live.
Here’s a wee 10-minute inter­view I did with him.
[Key Ques­tion we tal­ked about:] Why isn’t Win­dows Live con­si­de­red “Web 2.0″ by the Web 2.0 crowd?
Is that Nature or Nur­ture? You decide.

January 9, 2007

MacYawn

Send to Kindle

zzzzzz7654246.jpg
Everyone’s been get­ting all exci­ted about Apple’s new “iPhone”, but somehow I just can’t be bothe­red.
I feel much the same way about my new Mac­Book Pro lap­top, which I’ve had since Novem­ber. The most inte­res­ting thing so far has been ope­ning the card­board box it came in. Since then it’s been all downhill.
Though to be fair, one can never get too exci­ted about good pac­kage design.…
[Note to Sty­list:] The guy who can look good in a turt­le­neck hasn’t been born.
[UPDATE:] A fairly infor­mal reac­tion from Nokia.

January 8, 2007

scoble & co. interview bill gates

Send to Kindle

[Video Pod­cast:] My friend, Robert Sco­ble and some other tech blog­gers inter­view Bill Gates during his lunch­break. Inte­res­ting stuff.

worth reading

Send to Kindle

Den­nis How­lett does a guest column in ZDNet.

Fellow Enter­prise Irre­gu­lar, blog­ger and IT/finance con­sul­tant Den­nis How­lett offers a guest post on the state of busi­ness appli­ca­tion soft­ware, con­nec­ting the dots bet­ween Era­sure, Last.fm, social media, atten­tion, Paris Hil­ton, James Gover­nor, Jeff Nolan, Oracle, SAP, Fresh­books, thin­gamy, Eter­nal Recu­rrence, Sage, Infor, Larry Elli­son and Marc Benioff.

Says Den­nis:

In the mean­time, I won­der if Oracle’s mar­ke­ting depart­ment is thin­king of gaming Ms. Hilton’s assets. After all, ring­mas­ter Larry Elli­son has gone awfully quiet of late. The busi­ness apps busi­ness could do with a new come­dian show­per­son on whom we could lavish atten­tion. I’m tired of Marc Benioff’s hyper­bole. And in any event, the idea that Oracle could game Ms Hil­ton with a one-liner like: ‘Great ass gets a great ride with Oracle seems almost appropriate.

Thin­gamy gets a wee men­tion. Nice one, Den.
[Disc­lo­sure: I have a small stake in Thingamy.]

tfolm blog

Send to Kindle

After publishing his “Future of Lear­ning Mani­festo” and get­ting a lot of feed­back on it, Chris­tian Long went ahead and crea­ted a new blog around the same sub­ject, appro­pria­tely entit­led “The Future of Lear­ning Mani­festo”.
What a great idea. Gods­peed, Chris­tian!
[Mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.] [Mani­festo archive is here.]

January 7, 2007

the future of learning manifesto

Send to Kindle

corporate has-beens.jpg
Chris­tian Long wrote “The Future of Lear­ning Mani­festo”. Short ver­sion:

1. “Pla­ying Small Does Not Serve the World.“
2. What Would Soc­ra­tes Do?
3. Nobody Cares if You Wal­ked Up Hill Both Ways Bare­foot in the Snow.
4. Got Pas­sion? If Not, I’ll Tell You What To Care About.
5. My Memory Is Only As Big As My Heart. Other­wise, I’ll Stick with Goo­gle
6. Look it Up or Die.
7. Colla­bo­ra­tion Ain’t About Hol­ding Hands. It’s about Going Cool Pla­ces Fast.
8. This Will Go Down on Your Per­ma­nent Record.
9. It Ain’t About the Tech­no­logy. It’s About Being Inside the Story.
10. Nobody Knows the Ans­wer. Get Comfy with the Questions.

You can read the entire long ver­sion here. Thanks, Chris­tian!
PS: Yeah, I know, the long ver­sion is much lon­ger than 500 words, which is the maxi­mum I nor­mally “allow” for the mani­fes­tos. Then again, the abrid­ged ver­sion he e-mailed was me was well under 500 words, so I thought, what the hell, cut him some slack etc.
[Mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.] [Mani­festo archive is here.]

the super-smart women’s love manifesto

Send to Kindle

zzzbambam31.jpg
The Super-Smart Women’s Love Mani­festo
1. Come here often?
2. You work for Sun Mic­rosys­tems? Never heard of them.
3. You? Make more money than me? As if.
4. To hell with your mind. Where are the big boobs, tight ass, long blonde hair and cute little gig­gle? Jeeze, get with the pro­gram, Girl.
5. Can I have your phone num­ber any­way?
[Ins­pi­red by Nia.]
[Mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.] [Mani­festo archive is here.]

sister ray

Send to Kindle

888888914.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]
As I write this, I am lis­te­ning to “Sis­ter Ray” by the Vel­vet Under­ground.
Thank you, Dave Mac­ken­zie, for first tur­ning me on to this song, back during that magi­cal sum­mer of ours, back in 1984.

[Recent Con­ver­sa­tion:]

Friend: I don’t think you can truly unders­tand The Vel­vet Under­ground until you’ve lived in New York for at least a year.

Hugh:
I’d say the same is true for Char­lie Par­ker.

Fun­nily enough, I first heard of Char­lie Par­ker, han­ging out with Dave in the now-defunct Edin­burgh Wine Bar in Hano­ver Street, back in 1985. While Dave was busy hit­ting on some girls, I got into a long con­ver­sa­tion with this old jazz enthu­siast, who enligh­te­ned me. I was on a real Cole­man Haw­kins kick at the time. The rest is his­tory etc.

new marketing blog

Send to Kindle

zzzzzz7654240.jpg
This is my favo­rite new blog for a while:

“Art, Adver­ti­sing, Sex + Technology”

Ummmm.… who does THAT remind you of? Heh.
Thanks, Ariel. Damn glad to meet you etc.
[Another good recent find:] “Wai­ter Rant”. The title is self-explanitory.

January 6, 2007

the overachieving women manifesto

Send to Kindle

zzzzzz7654128.jpg
[This car­toon is one of my old favo­ri­tes.]
Based on some some thoughts she had after rea­ding my recent post about super-smart women and dating, Nia Andino sent me this one:

Ove­rachie­ving women and love.
1. No one can tell you how to find a part­ner. Don’t ask for advice: every case is dif­fe­rent and if you lis­ten to other people’s love advice, you’ll end up fee­ling guilty and con­fu­sed. This inc­lu­des this mani­festo.
2. This is not the 1950’s. This is not Cin­de­re­lla. This is the real world and having a part­ner is like having a car: it has advan­ta­ges AND disad­van­ta­ges, and wha­te­ver the mar­ke­ting makes you think, the fact that you want one does not mean you need one.
Now, for women who are already with someone.
3. Ask your­self if you want the rest of your life to be exactly like the last six months. If the asn­wer is yes, con­gra­tu­la­tions. If the ans­wer is no, break up with him today. You are not going to make him change.
4. You have inc­rea­sing chan­ces of making more money than your part­ner. Don’t fool your­self: he cares. He hates it. Maybe in a gene­ra­tion, chil­dren will get used to the idea that mom­mies some­ti­mes earn more than dad­dies. In the mean­time, be very disc­reet and get your­self a pen­sion plan. Your extra money will be invi­si­ble that way, and besi­des, the sta­tis­tics say you are going to out­live him, so the savings will come him handy in 30 years.

Thanks, Nia!
[Mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.] [Mani­festo archive is here.]
[Bonus Link:] Some very dry humor from John Dodds.

January 3, 2007

the lawyer’s client manifesto

Send to Kindle

image12345703.jpg
Thanks to Matthew Homann for this one, which was ori­gi­nally published here:

The Lawyer’s Client Mani­festo
1. You have wants. You have needs. Focus on the needs first. Wants are bonus.
2. If you are seeing a law­yer because your dis­pute is “not about the money, but about the prin­ci­ple of the thing” don’t be sur­pri­sed if your law­yer runs away. You can never be satis­fied. Also, it’s really about the money.
3. Your case/matter is the most impor­tant thing hap­pe­ning to you right now. It is not the most impor­tant thing hap­pe­ning to your law­yer right now. It may not even be in his top ten.
4. If you think your law­yer is trying to kill your deal, remem­ber this: though there may only be a “one per­cent” chance your deal will go bad, your law­yer sees that “one per­cent” over and over again. She’s loo­king out for you. She cares about you and your busi­ness. She also doesn’t want her mal­prac­tice pre­miums to go up.
5. You want to buy results, not time. Most law­yers sell time, not results. Make sure you both unders­tand the dif­fe­rence before your first bill arri­ves. You will cer­tainly unders­tand the dif­fe­rence after.
6. If you want to find a law­yer who sells results, look hard. There are a few of them out there. They are the ones who can still smile because they get to see their chil­dren before 9:00 at night.
7. Big firm law­yers are not more effi­cient. Or smar­ter. Or chea­per. They are cer­tainly not chea­per.
8. Make sure your law­yer unders­tands your busi­ness. If your law­yer doesn’t unders­tand your busi­ness, find out if he’s going to learn about it on his time, or yours.
9. You are your lawyer’s boss. You are not her only boss. She has hun­dreds of other bos­ses too. Each one of them thinks their mat­ter is more impor­tant than yours.
10. How messy is your lawyer’s desk? When they bill you for thirty minu­tes of “file review,” how much of that time was spent loo­king for your file?
11. When you call a law­yer for the first time, how long does it take for him to return your calls? After you hire that law­yer, expect it to take at least three times as long. Same goes for e-mails.
12. Does your law­yer have repu­ta­tion for being a “bull­dog?” That pro­bably means they are an asshole. To ever­yone.
13. Look for a law­yer with a tech­no­logy IQ no more than fifty points less than yours. If you live in e-mail and your law­yer doesn’t, learn to like your mail carrier.
14. If you hate your law­yer, fire him. He pro­bably deser­ves it, and you aren’t get­ting his best work any­way.
15. You wouldn’t auto­ma­ti­cally marry the first per­son you date, so don’t auto­ma­ti­cally hire the first law­yer you see. A great lawyer-client rela­tionship can last a life­time. Your law­yer can be your advi­sor, coun­se­lor, con­fi­dant, and friend. Find one you like, stick with him or her, and spread the word. Oh, and stop telling law­yer jokes. They aren’t really that funny. ;-)

[Mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.] [Mani­festo archive is here.]

lovemarks, part deux

Send to Kindle

lovemarks3334.png
On the Saatchi & Saatchi Love­marks home­page they have a little invite for rea­ders to “Join the com­mu­nity”. Ummmm… Com­mu­nity? What com­mu­nity? [See chart above]
Two years ago I spent a bit of time pan­ning the whole “Love­marks” idea [e.g. “The Lovemarks-Cluetrain Death­match”]. So much so that I heard well-sourced rumors that I was alle­gedly pis­sing off some very senior peo­ple within the orga­ni­za­tion etc.
Now I see Kevin Roberts, CEO of Saatchi’s has come up with a sequel: “The Love­marks Effect”. Fair enough. The first book, “Love­marks”, was theory. This one, I unders­tand, is more con­cer­ned with appli­ca­tion.
No, I’m not going to start another anti-Lovemarks meme. Here’s why:
1. Though I might have issues with Saatchi’s advertising-centric exe­cu­tion, basi­cally I think Kevin is right. Yes, in fact, all you need is love after all. That’s pretty much what I said at Le Web 3 last month:

This mar­ket and com­mu­ni­ca­tion tran­si­tion we’re going through is not about tech­no­logy, and it sure as hell isn’t about mar­ke­ting. It’s about Love. Love ena­bled. Love re-asserting itself in the busi­ness bet­ween people.

2. I’m not quite so “anti” adver­ti­sing as I used to be. When all is said and done, adver­ti­sing is just a sub­set of mar­ke­ting. And all mar­ke­ting is, is fin­ding ways to sell stuff, bet­ter than your com­pe­ti­tion. And nothing wrong with wan­ting to make a living.
So I was gra­te­ful to Edelman’s David Brain for poin­ting me to a recent video inter­view of Kevin Roberts, where he talks about how The Love Thing affects what he does for a living, how it affects the future of bran­ding etc. There is food for thought there, cer­tainly.
Note how the offi­cial Saatchi’s line is now “We’re an ideas com­pany, not an adver­ti­sing agency”. Again, I think that is sound thin­king. They’ve seen the wri­ting on the wall, and they’re wor­king like hell to evolve away from the big-media-world-domination model they grew up with, and towards something more use­ful and mea­ning­ful. With any luck, they’ll suc­ceed, but only if they can unders­tand “The Porous Mem­brane” idea, and not fall into the trap of “Bagel­no­mics”.
As I’m fond of saying, I believe the future of adver­ti­sing is inter­nal. It’s hard to get the cus­to­mer to love the com­pany, if the com­pany doesn’t love the com­pany.
Whether big com­pa­nies like Saatchi’s can evolve fully into this new mind­set, or whether they’ll be repla­ced by youn­ger, hun­grier com­pa­nies that unders­tand it bet­ter, only time will tell. But the mar­ket for selling isn’t going anywhere soon… and the­rein lies the oppor­tu­nity.
[Bonus Link:] From 2 years ago. “Dino­saurs­peak”:

gaping­void is the per­fect web­site to get your daily blog­ging fix. Filled to the brim with hila­rious car­toons, it also offers timely and insight­ful com­men­tary on the new rea­li­ties of adver­ti­sing and mar­ke­ting. Indeed, some peo­ple would say it’s just not the blo­gosphere without gaping­void to enhance their qua­lity blog­ging expe­rience. Start your day the switched on way– subsc­ribe here to get gaping­void on your RSS fee­der today!

January 2, 2007

ok, so what’s the deal…

Send to Kindle

hardwired316.jpg
…When all you’re trying to do is be a good boyfriend/girlfriend/lover etc, and all the other per­son seems to want to do is drive you nuts?
Is there’s some kind of “It’s impe­ra­tive that I drive your nuts” gene that we inhe­ri­ted from the chimps? Were chimps ever that crazy? What’s the deal with that?
Also, a female friend asked me this last night:
Why is it that so many super-smart women inva­riably insist on being smart in every aspect of their life, EXCEPT when it comes to dating?
“Hi, sorry, but you’re not STUPID or DAMAGED or POVERTY-STRICKEN or INEFFECTUAL enough for me. Get lost.“
Here’s my short ans­wer: Fema­les are gene­rally not encou­ra­ged by society to be super-smart, at least, not overtly. And ESPECIALLY not in the techie/geeky super-smart way.
So as a result, by the time these super-smart young girl geeks have grown up to be women, society will have mana­ged to inject them with all sorts of serious self-esteem issues. Which rarely comes in handy in the mate-choosing depart­ment.
Just my opinion.

January 1, 2007

five things you don’t know about me

Send to Kindle

1. I dis­like you inten­sely.
2. I love it when bad things hap­pen to you.
3. When your name is men­tio­ned I imme­dia­tely try to change the sub­ject.
4. I wouldn’t read your blog if you paid me.
5. If we were trap­ped on a desert island together I would kill myself.
[Link One.] [Link Two.]

the end-user manifesto

Send to Kindle

Danny V. sent me this mani­festo, howe­ver it came without a URL:

The End-User Mani­festo
Things that need to be in the mind of anyone buil­ding soft­ware, par­ti­cu­larly for the Web.
1. Don’t waste my time.
2. Help me do the right thing.
3. Res­pect my deci­sions.
4. Design well, and guide me to make the right deci­sions by that design.
5. Don’t lie to me — if I see something in front of me, then I should be able to act on it unless the inter­face tells me I can’t.
5.1. If I see a text area, I expect to be able to type as much as that text area holds.
Scroll­bars indi­cate to me that it is big­ger than can be dis­pla­yed in the space avai­la­ble, and I’m ok with that up to a point.
If there’s a cha­rac­ter limit, show me that by stop­ping me from typing past a cer­tain point.mIf there are limits on the types of cha­rac­ters I can enter, tell me that before I move on to something else.
6. Keep your pop-ups to your­self. The only thing that’s help­ful in a pop-up for­mat is your help sys­tem, where I can learn something without losing my place.
7. Adver­ti­sing.
7.1. I have music, thanks. No sound effects or music with your adver­ti­se­ments, if you must have them.
7.2. No flashing colors, mini-videos, stro­bing effects, blin­king idiot car­toons, or anything else that’s the equi­va­lent of yelling at me.
7.3. Don’t con­fuse loud with appro­priate. Goo­gle appears to unders­tand con­text and con­tent, and shows things that are SOMEHOW RELATED to what I’m doing. No, I will never want a mort­gage from you.
8. Get to the point. Put the focus of your page on what I’m loo­king there to learn, not on someone else’s adver­ti­sing with your infor­ma­tion hid­den below the flashing duck.
9. I can print things without your assis­tance. When I click on “Printer-friendly”, I really just want a page of the text I’m inte­res­ted in saving to my com­pu­ter without the blin­king adver­ti­se­ments.
10. W3C stan­dards com­pliance. How I get to your site is my deci­sion. No, I’m not buying a spe­ci­fic type of com­pu­ter just to fill out your form because you deci­ded that Acti­veX com­po­nents were the quick way out of the deve­lop­ment cycle. If you’re going to be Web-based, then attempt to unders­tand that the Web is not yours.
11. Test your stuff. I’m not your emplo­yee, and you’re not paying me to test your site or your soft­ware. Please re-read 1 – 4 above.
12. Please also proof-read what you’ve writ­ten, or have someone else do so.
13. Keep the noise level lower by not using ani­ma­ted graphics to illus­trate your mood, or plug you into social net­works. Yes, kids in junior high think it’s cute, but it gets very old very quickly.
14. Tell me a com­pe­lling story. This applies to weblogs, cor­po­rate sites, fan sites, any site. I’m visi­ting you to learn something, even if it’s just a good story about something you’re selling or the day you had. Good sto­ries ins­pire con­ver­sa­tions, and mar­kets are built on those.

Thanks, Danny!
[gaping­void mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.] [Mani­festo archive is here.]

December 31, 2006

budgets, shmudgets

Send to Kindle

thingamybanner003241.jpg
Sigurd thinks bud­gets aren’t as use­ful as a lot of peo­ple think:

Mea­su­ra­ble results is the cor­ners­tone of the command-and-control struc­ture, the rall­ying cry for “good” mana­ge­ment. But mea­su­ra­ble has no mea­ning unless you have something to mea­sure against, thus the bud­get — the nai­vety scene of the future.
Real life correc­tive mea­su­res using a fic­ti­tious map — what value does that have? None wha­tsoe­ver of course.
Worse, it beco­mes a paci­fier, an ersatz rea­lity, nai­vety embodied.

I can­not wait to hear Den­nis’ res­ponse. Heh.
Tal­king on the phone with Sigurd tonight, he tells me there’s a cul­tu­ral shift going on with Thin­gamy. Away from IT peo­ple, more towards peo­ple who actually run busi­nes­ses. The lat­ter seem to have less trou­ble get­ting their heads around Thin­gamy than the for­mer.
Crea­ting apps and crea­ting value are not the same thing. Ima­gine that.
[Disc­lo­sure: I have a small stake in Thingamy.]

quintura search clouds

Send to Kindle

11444661481.jpg
[A Quin­tura search cloud for “gaping­void”.]
About a month ago at one of these geek par­ties I met a young Rus­sian chap named Yakov Sadchi­kov. I liked Yakov.
It turns out Yakov is a very bright guy. He’s got this new search engine start-up called Quin­tura. And there’s a Kid’s Quin­tura as well.
Quin­tura is pretty cle­ver because it arran­ges its search results in tag clouds. “Visua­li­sed Search”, as it were. I’ve been pla­ying around with it these last few weeks.
Do I like it? Sure. Do I like it so much that I’ve stop­ped using Goo­gle as a result? No. But anyone who does even a half-decent job of trying to move “Search” for­ward gets my res­pect. So hats off to Yakov.
Michael Arring­ton recently wrote that Goo­gle will have to still live up to its famous “Don’t be evil” tagline, even though now they have tons of money, with lots of adver­ti­sers and sha­rehol­ders to keep happy.
I’ll believe it when I see it. Goo­gle is no lon­ger in the search busi­ness, Goo­gle is now in the cash cow busi­ness. And money, like Cyndi Lau­per once sang, chan­ges everything.
Maybe they should change their tagline to “Don’t be THAT evil”. More belie­va­ble, somehow.

thoughts on the last day of 2006

Send to Kindle

zzzbambam35.jpg
I’m having a bliss­fully slow week. Rea­ding books, lis­te­ning to jazz records, and stro­lling up to Not­ting Hill once a day to grab some din­ner. That is my current life in a nutshell.
This phase won’t last fore­ver, of course. Peo­ple will start get­ting back in town after tomo­rrow and I’ll soon be busy again. But I’m enjo­ying the peace and quiet while it lasts.
No, I’m not doing anything for New Year’s Eve. Sta­ying in and going to bed early, that is the plan. I loathe star­ting the year with a han­go­ver.
My main pro­fes­sio­nal goal for 2007 is tes­ting my theo­ries of “Ooze” i.e. Objects of Socia­bi­lity to their limits. My first salvo with this will hope­fully be the “Blue Mons­ter” thing I’ve got going with Mic­ro­soft.
My long-term pro­fes­sio­nal goal is to get Stormhoek to a point where it’s ship­ping a million cases a year [We’re already quar­ter of the way there, so it seems doa­ble].
I am no lon­ger inte­res­ted in being a “pro­fes­sio­nal blog­ger”, wha­te­ver that means. I like blogs, blog­ging and blog­gers, but I think we’re in “post-revolution” times now. The train has already left the sta­tion. If you mana­ged to get a seat on it, great. If not, it’s not that big a deal, either. There are plenty of other good ways of expres­sing your­self. Suc­cee­ding at that is far more impor­tant than what pre­cise method you use.
Another long-term goal of mine is to spend my win­ters in Anti­bes, say, two to four months per year. I’ve already loo­ked into ren­ting a place down there in January, 2008. It’s sur­pri­singly cheap in the off-season.
Lord knows what’s going to hap­pen with the car­toons. Since I first came up with the “car­toon on the back of busi­ness cards” for­mat in Decem­ber, 1997, I’ve drawn well over 5,000 of them. I often won­der how long I can keep it going for. You’d think after so many, I’d finally run out of things to say, run out of pic­tu­res I want to make. But that point in time still remains elu­sive.
I’ve drawn a ton of them in the last week. I’ll be pos­ting some of them soon…
All in all, 2006 was a very good year. But it wasn’t an easy one. Lots of stress. I sup­pose once the Stormhoek gig gets to cri­ti­cal mass I can relax more. Until then I shall remain my usual mono­ma­nia­cal self.
The high­light of my year was, of course, simply get­ting to know all these won­der­fully inte­res­ting peo­ple, through my work and elsewhere. This to me is the grea­test bene­fit of being a blog­ger, above all else. Human Beings are ama­zing crea­tu­res, and I must say I’m gra­te­ful to be one.
Have a Happy New Year, Everybody!

December 29, 2006

the “nobody cares” manifesto

Send to Kindle

11444661477.jpg
Thanks to Den­nis How­lett for this one:

The “Nobody Cares” Mani­festo For Accoun­tants
* It’s impor­tant to remem­ber debits are on the left and cre­dits on the right — nobody cares. Pro­bably because the sys­tem was inven­ted in 1494 and hasn’t chan­ged since.
* We work hard to earn let­ters behind our names — nobody cares. Impor­tance isn’t deri­ved from aca­de­mic achie­ve­ment but what you do for others.
* ROI is an impor­tant con­cept — nobody cares. ROI cal­cu­la­tions are something you do when you really don’t want to help your client but to demons­trate to him/her how impor­tant you are. For which read 2.
* It’s impor­tant to keep good records — nobody cares. Clients aren’t in busi­ness to be admi­nis­tra­tors. If you can’t figure out how to help clients then expect to be outsour­ced. Pro­bably the day after tomo­rrow.
* A tidy office implies a tidy mind — nobody cares. A tidy mind is often com­part­men­ta­li­sed to the point of tun­nel vision. You don’t see tidy at the edge of inno­va­tion. Which is where you should be when your clients come up with great ideas.
* Pro­fes­sio­nals should always wear top qua­lity suits — nobody cares. How you look may be impor­tant if your name’s Anina but it sure as heck doesn’t mat­ter when you’re traip­sing around a pig farm. You do that occa­sio­nally don’t you?
* Your pro­fes­sio­nal sta­tus among the com­mu­nity demons­tra­tes inte­grity — nobody belie­ves you. Pro­fes­sio­nal sta­tus is over-rated. Those sch­muks from KPMG in court on fraud char­ges sor­ted that one out once and for all.
* Adding value is the most impor­tant thing you have to do — nobody belie­ves you. Clients can read a 1,000 web­si­tes and see that same vacuuous sta­te­ment. Stuff your web­site with client sto­ries, pre­fe­rably writ­ten by clients and not some PR outfit.

[gaping­void mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.][Mani­festo archive is here.]

john edwards

Send to Kindle

Sco­ble is videoing the John Edwards pre­si­den­tial cam­paign. Pod­tech is pic­king up the tab.
I see it as a smart move. Scoble/Podtech will most likely get some natio­nal expo­sure on TV from all this [if they don’t I’ll be REALLY sur­pri­sed], for a lot less money than run­ning commercials.

December 28, 2006

more edelmany goodness

Send to Kindle

zzzzzz7654196.jpg
B. L. Och­man sees another Edel­man scan­dal bre­wing:

Edel­man Has New Ethics Scan­dal Bre­wing With Microsoft’s Blog­ger Bribe Cam­paign
Edel­man PR, the folks who brought you Wal-mart flogs, has a new ethics scan­dal bre­wing. And this time they’re in bed with Mic­ro­soft and a group of high-profile blog­gers.
Edel­man, is hand­ling the launch of the new Mic­ro­soft Vista OS, and they’re run­ning, and pro­bably also con­cei­ved, a cam­paign to give a group of blog­gers free Acer Ferrari 1000 and 5000 note­books loa­ded with Microsoft’s new Vista. Retail value — $1899.99 — $2,299.99 for the com­pu­ter, plus the cost of the soft­ware.
A group of high-profile blog­gers star­ted get­ting the gifts seve­ral days ago. Robert Sco­ble quip­ped, “Talk about Pay Per Post.”

Having both recei­ved and given out free stuff in the blo­gosphere, I’m not sure if I see what the big deal is. I cer­tainly don’t have trou­ble with it ethi­cally, as long as all par­ties are being upfront about it. And it seems like they are to me.
My expe­rience with blog­ger pro­duct cam­paigns tells me that, if you’re just trying to turn blog­gers into pro­duct pimps, you will fail. But if you see it as a way of star­ting inte­res­ting con­ver­sa­tions with equally inte­res­ting peo­ple, your chan­ces of suc­cee­ding are far grea­ter.
As I’m fond of saying, a well-executed blog­ging cam­paign is an act of love. I per­so­nally know both Edel­man and Mic­ro­soft well enough to know they unders­tand this. So good luck to them.

global neighborhoods

Send to Kindle

My friend Shel Israel, co-author of the semi­nal blog­ging book, Naked Con­ver­sa­tions, is wor­king on a new book:

Glo­bal Neigh­borhoods
–How Social Media are moving power from ins­ti­tu­tions to people

Here’s the over­view.

These are glo­bal neigh­borhoods. They may not be tan­gi­ble, but they are far from vir­tual.
Real peo­ple sepa­ra­ted by miles, oceans and poli­ti­cal bor­ders are con­nec­ting with others of like mind. They are con­duc­ting a great deal of busi­ness, making deci­sions based on the influence of peers rather than mar­ke­ting cam­paigns. In a few cases, friendships are being for­med bet­ween peo­ple whose govern­ments are waging hos­ti­li­ties. Even the pro­found barrier of diverse lan­guage is being lowe­red by the uni­ver­sal com­mu­ni­ca­tions abi­li­ties of music and pictures.

Good luck, Shel!

December 27, 2006

you lie for a living [revisited]

Send to Kindle

zzzzazzdfff15.jpg
[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted exactly two years ago today]

You lie for a living.
You’re not a bad per­son, not really, but telling the truth at your current com­pany tends to get peo­ple fired.
And you can’t afford to be fired. You’re thirty seven, you’ve got three kids, you’ve got a big house to pay for, your wife would leave you within nano­se­conds if the cash­flow ever dried up, and it’s been well over over a decade since a cute, ran­dom girl in the street loo­ked at you with anything even faintly resem­bling a spar­kle in her eye.
Society only needs you because they need the pro­duct your com­pany makes. Lose the job and you are no lon­ger nee­ded.
Without your job you’re just a mere stain.
So lying equals sur­vi­val.
You have to lie because you have no other ideas about how not to be killed. How not to lose everything.
Lying repla­ced ideas long ago. Lying repla­ced great sex long ago. Lying repla­ced your marriage long ago. Lying repla­ced joy long ago.
Your lies became the pain­less can­cer.
Yes, I’ve read your resume. Very impres­sive.
Look, I already said I’d get back to you next week.

drawing in bars…

Send to Kindle

26122006145.jpg
1. I usually carry two wee tins around with me. One for blank busi­ness cards, and one for com­ple­ted dra­wings. I usually have a mini­mum of two or three pens on me– they’re quite tem­pe­ra­men­tal things, so I like having bac­kup etc.
26122006146.jpg
2. Here’s a stack of 25 or so new dra­wings, all done in the last few days.…
29112006112.jpg
3. Beer! Hurrah!
4. Bars are good for dra­wing. So is Starbuck’s. Japa­nese res­tau­rants I usually find very pro­duc­tive.
5. To this day, I have no idea where ideas come from. I gave up trying to pre­dict ins­pi­ra­tion years ago.
6. Get­ting your hands on one of my ori­gi­nals is get­ting har­der. I don’t give them out like I used to.
7. Suc­cess is also a curse.
8. I agree. Car­toons are so much coo­ler than lap­tops.
9. The roman­tic notion of ine­bria­ted, boozed-up artist is a load of crock.
10. Ban­kers talk about art. Artists talk about money.
11. Sili­con Valley is far more inte­res­ting than Chel­sea.

winners announced

Send to Kindle

microsoftbizcard219border.jpg
Steve Clay­ton announ­ces the win­ners of the “Blue Mons­ter” litho­graph.
I was in my local pub four days ago, han­ging out with an old acquain­tance. Another guy walks in, an Ame­ri­can who my friend knows, who I’ve never met before. We get tal­king. Even­tually the Ame­ri­can asks me what I do for a living. I men­tion the “blog­ging” thing.
“Really?” he says. “My com­pany is a Mic­ro­soft part­ner. There’s a blog­ger I know who works there, named Steve Clay­ton…“
Small world.
[Meanwhile:] Jim Nice, one of the first blog­gers I ever met online, was shop­ping in South Flo­rida the other day, where he stum­bled across a bottle of Stormhoek in the super­mar­ket. Rock on.

December 26, 2006

the duke

Send to Kindle

A great You­Tube video of Duke Ellington’s band pla­ying “The Mooche”.
The Elling­ton Band is a great exam­ple of an orga­ni­za­tion that was [1] totally great, [2] totally ori­gi­nal and [3] totally pro­fes­sio­nal. These guys just didn’t mess around.
Any­body who doubts Ellington’s genius as a pia­nist should go check out his 1963 “Money Jun­gle” album. He makes it look so damn easy…
[Bonus Link:] If jazz has an equi­va­lent of “Beethoven’s Ninth”, it would surely have to be Char­les Min­gus’ “Hai­tian Fight Song” on “The Clown” album. Here’s a You­Tube video for some Japa­nese high school stu­dents making a pretty decent go of it. Rock on.

business is brisk on the row

Send to Kindle

From the Lon­don Eve­ning Stan­dard:

Bonus boom fuels £1bn luxury gift spree
Today London’s most expen­sive retai­lers said they had never known such strong demand — in con­trast to lac­klus­tre sales on high streets elsewhere in Bri­tain.
[…]
In Savile Row sales have risen 10% on last year. Tai­lors’ shop Henry Poole said it had sold almost 50 bes­poke £3,500 din­ner jac­kets in two months. Another tai­lor, Richard Ander­son, said one client had spent £22,000 on two bla­zers made of Hima­la­yan moun­tain goat and finished with 22-carat gold buttons.

We’re not exactly com­plai­ning at English Cut, either.

metaphors etc

Send to Kindle

From my old high school buddy, SAP guru Hamish:

I came across this article on the DRM in Vista. No much won­der it is late. First they had to build it, then they had to break it.
What this fails to unders­tand is that the idea of a file, a com­pu­ter, and a user are all metaphors.
001100011001010101100111111000011101010101010100001111100001
All the infor­ma­tion is binary, and in the same envi­ron­ment, it is like asking someone to lift them­sel­ves by the boots­traps. The notion of impo­sing the same metapho­ri­cal limits, like “this is a file of con­tent, “, “this is an exe­cu­ta­ble”, is like asking mat­ter to divide itself into fire and ice. it may suit your metaphor, but it does not corres­pond to reality.

wikipedia to launch google rival

Send to Kindle

This is the big Web 2.0 story over the Christ­mas break: “Jimmy Wales, the foun­der of Wiki­pe­dia, the online encyc­lo­pae­dia, is set to launch an inter­net search engine with amazon.com that he hopes will become a rival to Goo­gle and Yahoo!…“
Lots of blog­gers have been tal­king about it, but I like Dave Winer’s take on it the best:

Today Google’s pro­fits come from ads, and that busi­ness gives them a rea­son to keep search weak. They want you to do a lot of searching to find what you’re loo­king for — and the stuff they find for you for free is com­pe­ting with the stuff they make money on. So Goo­gle actually has a disin­cen­tive to make search better.

[Bonus Link from Fred Wil­son:] Web 2.0 Is A Gift, Not A Threat, To VCs.

December 24, 2006

pic of me

Send to Kindle

sifryhugh.jpg
David Sifry took this pic­ture of me back in Paris a cou­ple of weeks ago. I sup­pose I’ve loo­ked worse. Thanks, Dave! [Click on image to enlarge etc.]
[Music:] Been lis­te­ning to this album all night. Cat Ste­vens meets Lloyd Cole meets William Blake. Ama­zing. Genius.

December 23, 2006

current stuff

Send to Kindle

zzzkjurhgu10.jpg
1. It looks like I’ll be based full-time in Lon­don for at least for the next two years. Not quite sure what I think about that. But I’m here for the busi­ness, not the lifestyle.
2. I feel the con­ver­sa­tion I want to have the world is chan­ging. Small is beau­ti­ful etc.
3. At last count there are over 1400 uni­que car­toons uploa­ded onto gaping­void.
4. Current books: Re-reading “War And Peace” by Tols­toy, which I first read 12 years ago. Mag­ni­fi­cent. “Spit­fire. The Bio­graphy” by Jonathan Glan­cey, who’s an old friend of mine. Jonathan’s father flew Spit­fi­res in World War Two. The guy at the bookshop up the road says the book is currently selling like hot­ca­kes.
5. 2007 is going to be an insa­nely busy year for Stormhoek. I get tired just thin­king about it.
6. New Year’s Reso­lu­tions: Quit smo­king [Ha!]. Join a decent gym [I used to train at free weights and Kung Fu quite avidly back in my New York days, and wouldn’t mind get­ting the ol’ mojo back].
7. I’ve been dra­wing a lot on paper recently. Will start uploa­ding some new stuff next week, once I get access to my scan­ner. Recently I’ve gone off dra­wing on the Tablet PC. Though the lat­ter is a won­der­fully ver­sa­tile tool, it lacks a cer­tain magic.
8. In the last year the main focus of my career has switched from buil­ding gaping­void up, to what I call “ship­ping cases”. Unlike web stats, how many cases of Stormhoek ship­ped in any given time period are EXTREMELY easy to mea­sure.
9. Unlike a lot of peo­ple with rela­ti­vely well-known blogs, I am not a con­sul­tant. I have no day rate. When peo­ple ask me to get invol­ved with their pro­jects, the quid pro quo is hel­ping Stormhoek “ship cases”, other­wise it’s hard to get me too inte­res­ted. The only excep­tions to this are English Cut and Thin­gamy, which I treat mostly as side pro­jects. Stormhoek I treat as my main day job.

“when advertising meets the ‘because’ effect”

Send to Kindle

From JP Ran­gas­wami:

And that got me thin­king. As we move to an age where the only true adver­ti­se­ments are recom­men­da­tions, what is the role of the tra­di­tio­nal adver­ti­se­ment going forward?

microsoft vs thingamy

Send to Kindle

11444661469.jpg
From Sigurd:

Noted that Mic­ro­soft is coming out with a soft­ware update to make the Zune com­pa­ti­ble with Vista. Good for them.
The patch is 22 Mb.
Thin­gamy is 14 Mb.
With Zune you can play some music, with Thin­gamy you can run Mic­ro­soft.
Are they paid by line-of-code in Seattle?

[Disc­lo­sure: I have a small stake in Thingamy.]

December 22, 2006

holiday manifesto

Send to Kindle

Good stuff. David Armano gives us his “Holi­day Mani­festo”. Here’s a tas­ter:

Stay away from malls
Gather around a table
Re-discover family tra­di­tion
Re-live fond memo­ries
For­get bad ones
Play with a toy
Play chess with a friend
Just play
Spike the Egg­nog
Think of someone in need

[gaping­void mani­festo sub­mis­sion gui­de­li­nes are here.][Mani­festo archive is here.]

back in london for christmas

Send to Kindle

zzzzzz7654310.jpg
I’m back in Lon­don for Christ­mas.
I’m house-sitting for a friend and loo­king after her cat while she spends Xmas in Ame­rica.
It’ll be a quiet cou­ple of weeks. Ever­yone clears out of town for the holidays.

December 21, 2006

unique currency

Send to Kindle

grey 100.jpg
I’m thin­king a lot these days about what I call “Uni­que Currency”.
Back­ground: With what I’m doing doing pro­fes­sio­nally, the Stormhoek story isn’t just about the wine in the bottle. It’s a hybrid. It’s also about the blog­ger din­ners, the Thresher virus, the Techc­runch prints etc etc.
This allows us to have something rather uni­que in the mar­ket­place. Wine plus Hugh­train equals something uni­que to trade.
“Uni­que Curren­cies” are a good thing to have. Without it my busi­ness would be dead. Indeed.
So fast for­ward to ear­lier this week. I was tal­king to an old adver­ti­sing buddy of mine, Eric, who left the busi­ness over 10 years ago to pur­sue a career in TV ani­ma­tion.
To make a long story short, after a decade in the busi­ness he’s con­tem­pla­ting lea­ving it alto­gether, and going back into adver­ti­sing. He feels he’s got­ten everything out of TV that he wan­ted, and thinks there’s some oppor­tu­ni­ties in the ad busi­ness that he could make good use of.
So I said to Eric, “Well, above all else use something from what you’ve lear­ned in the TV busi­ness, in order to create your own ‘uni­que currency’ within the ad industry. Other­wise you’re just one more sch­muck adver­ti­sing crea­tive over the age of 35, loo­king for a gig. The mar­ket is already floo­ded with those guys. And they rarely have an easy time of it. There’s just too many peo­ple cha­sing adver­ti­sing work out there. Bru­tal. Mise­ra­ble. Don’t even think of going there.“
“My thoughts exactly,” said Eric.
Wha­te­ver busi­ness you work in, whether you’re an emplo­yee or have your own busi­ness, you have a currency that you trade in. The more uni­que your currency, the easier time you’ll have of things. And no, we’re not tal­king “money”, “labor” or “ser­vice”.
We’re tal­king about something far more indi­rect and mys­te­rious. This is what The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand is all about.
I think “Uni­que Currency” mat­ters more and more in the circ­les I tra­vel in. You?

savile row and sarah blow

Send to Kindle

zzzzzz7654130.jpg
From Podtech’s “The Sco­ble Show”:

What hap­pens when we get a bunch of geeks get together on a Fri­day after­noon in Lon­don? The “Pis­sed as Newts” tour! Here’s a small part of the tour (we visi­ted five pubs). You get to watch Hugh Mac­Leod draw one of his famous little dra­wings on the backs of busi­ness cards for his blog at www.gapingvoid.com. In the back­ground are about 20 Lon­don geeks. The rest of the tour? It was off the record. :-)
In the second half of the video, we speak with Hugh during a Lon­don taxi ride — you’ll also meet soft­ware deve­lo­per Sarah Blow, foun­der of Girl Geek Din­ners — where we have a fun conversation.

Thanks, Sco­ble. It was a fun after­noon. And I thought you did a great job of fil­ming it all.
It was kinda cool, sho­wing Savile Row to all these geeks.
[BONUS VIDEO:] Mar­yam Sco­ble inter­views Sarah Blow about how the Girl Geek Din­ners came about.

December 18, 2006

when bloggers start losing the plot #47

Send to Kindle

11444661468.jpg
[Link:] Michael Arring­ton.