Archive for the ‘#smarter conversations’ Category

December 20, 2010

“the high-end microaudience”: the most likely way to make money on the internet

[A dif­fe­rent angle on the Angel Gabriel etc. You can get the print here etc.]

This is why I love the internet…

In the old, pre-internet days, if you were a car­too­nist like me and wan­ted to be suc­cess­ful, you pretty much had to be famous.

Not hugely famous neces­sa­rily, but some­body with a pretty major publishing gig. Like Pea­nuts, Doo­nes­bury, Dil­bert, Gar­field or Bloom County, or some of The New Yor­ker heavy­weights like Stein­berg or Ronald Searle.

And those gigs were hard to come by. You nee­ded a big time publi­ca­tion syn­di­cate or media com­pany to back you. And then the news­pa­pers, the adver­ti­sers and the media lands­cape in gene­ral had to be on board as well.

And of course, all this requi­red a VERY large audience. Millions of peo­ple, lite­rally. Just so you could make an OK living.

As we all know, the more peo­ple you need to keep happy, the less likely that’s going to hap­pen, or at least, the less you can con­trol. Mass audien­ces are a fic­kle, unpre­dic­ta­ble bunch. And they have a nasty habit of igno­ring peo­ple like you com­ple­tely, and going for peo­ple like Jus­tin Bie­ber or Paris Hil­ton instead.

Which is why I never took this route. Too many varia­bles I couldn’t con­trol. And my work was never mains­tream enough, anyway.

Thank God the inter­net came along and chan­ged everything. Sud­denly I found myself making a damn good living, without having all those mains­tream hoops to jump through first. Just by dood­ling wee, non-mainstream car­toons all day, to what by old mains­tream stan­dards would be a TINY audience that I reach via this blog, Twit­ter and my news­let­ter.

This is made pos­si­ble because the web, as we all know, is  a SUPERB way to sell rela­ti­vely high-end pro­ducts. In my case, pri­vate, client-based com­mis­sions are worth THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of times more than the adver­ti­sing eye­balls that ulti­ma­tely pay for the news­pa­per cartoonist’s mort­gage. Of course they are. Not to men­tion, the com­mis­sions are fun and inte­llec­tually inte­res­ting to work on.

Which is why my advice for anyone trying to suc­ceed on the web is, make the highest-end pro­duct you can, and then tar­get the tiny hand­ful of peo­ple– the mic­roau­dience- who are likely to buy it. For­get the mas­ses. Tar­ge­ting the lat­ter is too much like trying to win the lot­tery– though great when it hap­pens (howe­ver unli­kely), there are just too many damn varia­bles outside your control.

Any ques­tions?

November 27, 2010

the futility of “keeping up with the e-joneses”

[“It’s Com­pli­ca­ted”. You can buy the print here etc.]

So somehow or other you found your­self online in a big way.

Somehow or other you deci­ded, like millions of other peo­ple, that if the future is online, it would be silly not to join in. So you decide to get with the program.

And so you get your­self hoo­ked up with the usual stuff… a blog, Twit­ter, Face­book, Flickr, Tumblr, and wha­te­ver Robert Sco­ble is using that week. And then wait for that afo­re­men­tio­ned future thing to start happening.

While you’re wai­ting for that future thing to begin, you can’t help noti­cing that cer­tain peo­ple in the same field as you– peo­ple far more suc­cess­ful and well-known than you, peo­ple who you aspire to be like one day– have fifty times the amount of Twit­ter follo­wers as you do. Or whatever.

So you spend the next two years of your life trying to get as many Twit­ter follo­wers as those peo­ple. Not only do you fail, meanwhile, your wife lea­ves you, your car is repos­ses­sed, and you have to move back in with your parents.

The futi­lity of “Kee­ping up with the e-Joneses”. You’re bet­ter off spen­ding that time and energy trying to have a “smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion”. Of course you are.

[Bonus link:] Seth has a few thoughts on the sub­ject, as well. Well worth a look.

November 25, 2010

“art with purpose. work with purpose”

[One of the cube gre­na­des I did for Racks­pace etc.]

Here’s something to think about this Thanksgiving:

A year and a half ago I coi­ned the term, “Cube Gre­nade”, and since then, we’ve tried to build a busi­ness around it.

Art that you hang in your cubicle, in order to affect change, in order to start a con­ver­sa­tion. Art that you “toss” into the work/corporate envi­ron­ment, that hope­fully cau­ses a small “explo­sion”. Hence the term, Cube Grenade.

“Art with pur­pose. Work with purpose”.

Exactly.

Thanks to the Inter­net, the nature of work is chan­ging in so many ama­zing ways, and we’re all so damn lucky to be caught right in the middle of it.

As a car­too­nist, my work is totally ins­pi­red and infor­med by this– this is exactly why the work took the direc­tion it did.

And your work, wha­te­ver it may be, should also be affec­ted in the same way. I can’t think of a bet­ter time to be alive; I really can’t.

So besi­des friends and family, what bet­ter rea­son is there to cele­brate Thanks­gi­ving? Seriously…

November 21, 2010

things i wish my phone did 12

Another car­toon from the ThingsIWishMyPhoneDid.com riff….

November 18, 2010

things i wish my phone did 11

Another car­toon from the ThingsIWishMyPhoneDid.com riff….

live or die

[down­load the prin­ta­ble ver­sion here etc.]

This is the latest cube gre­nade I just did for Racks­pace.

It’s one of my favo­ri­tes I’ve done so far. [More Racks­pace work is here.]

I hope you like it, but it’s OK if you don’t. Here’s why I’m partial:

  • I like the ele­gance of the drawing.
  • I like the way it’s tal­king about something spe­ci­fic to the busi­ness (i.e. the cloud), not just some vague, “Go Team!” cul­tu­ral platitude.
  • I like the direct honesty of it. “We live or die by the cloud” etc. is basi­cally the God’s honest truth; it doesn’t mat­ter if one agrees with it or not. That IS Rackspace’s busi­ness stra­tegy, in black and white.
  • It just works. Straight and to the point. It does everything a good car­toon ought to do.

I am enjo­ying my gig with Racks­pace. Even if it’s still early days, they’re let­ting me play around with a new, HUGE idea. Yes, I am stoked.

November 10, 2010

“if you want to be more successful, you have to take a leadership position on something that matters”

So this is my latest #Evil­Plan for my client, HNI Insu­rance.

I drew the car­toon above.

What I’m going to do is recom­mend to the CEO, Mike Nata­li­zio to get it made up into a stack of sig­ned, limi­ted edi­tion prints. Say, 30 or 50 of them.

Then get them framed.

Then send them off as gifts to the the 30 or 50 most influen­tial peo­ple in the truc­king busi­ness. As a con­ver­sa­tion starter.

“Let’s talk about the issues, People.”

The truc­king busi­ness is full of messy issues [e.g. peo­ple dying in road acci­dents every day, which HNI is in the front line of], so why not address them more openly, more forthrightly?

Like it says in “Tri­bes”, by Seth Godin, the way to suc­ceed is to be a leader.

HNI hired gaping­void because they wan­ted to be more successful.

And I’m saying right back, OK,  if you want to be more suc­cess­ful, you have to take a lea­dership posi­tion on something that matters.

Which means having a “smar­ter conversation”.

And these prints would be their ope­ning salvo.

None of this is roc­ket science, all that’s requi­red is that a deci­sion be made.

A deci­sion to be a lea­der. A deci­sion to have a smar­ter conversation.

Not roc­ket science.

Easy.

[PS: We’ll see what Mike says. At time of pos­ting this, Mike hasn’t seen the car­toon yet. I’m sur­pri­sing him! Heh.]

[The Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion archive is here.]

November 7, 2010

a human being

Another car­toon for hackthephonecompany.com.

[Phone car­toon archive here.]

a big company can choose


[down­load the prin­ta­ble ver­sion here etc.]

Another cube gre­nade I just did for my client, Racks­pace.

They were a small com­pany not that long ago. They no lon­ger are. Figure it out.

[Racks­pace car­toon archive.]

November 5, 2010

hack the phone company!

The latest car­toon. The latest cam­paign from gapingvoid.

hackthephonecompany.com

AT&T’s mono­poly was bro­ken apart in 1984, when the com­pany was split into seven parts.

But for iPhone users, AT&T is pretty much a mono­poly again, with their exc­lu­sive deal with Apple.

AT&T, Veri­zon, Orange, T-Mobile, Vodaphone, it really doesn’t mat­ter. They’re gene­rally expen­sive, they’re res­tric­tive, often the ser­vice sucks, so you’re always trying to bypass what they have on offer– trying to hack your way around it.

Line2 with their VoIP ser­vice, is trying to do the same.

We all are.

Click on the link (or click here) and see what we’ve done. There’s just a fun car­toon right now–

It’s a start. We’re hoping to make this the start of something big­ger. Much big­ger. We want to “hack” the phone com­pany. So do you. So does every­body else.

[PS: Here’s a link to what NYT Tech wri­ter, David Pogue, has to say about Line2.]

the red bit

A cube gre­nade I just did for our ciient, HNI Insu­rance.

A lot of HNI’s truc­king clients ope­rate with pro­fit mar­gins of around 2%. Ouch.

I like the car­toon just because it’s bru­tally in-your-face and to the point. No mes­sing around.

Of course, the easiest way for their clients to inc­rease their mar­gin, is to lower their risk. Which is where HNI comes in. Ker-chiing.

[More HNI car­toons here etc.]

October 29, 2010

“ideas that do not risk offense, aren’t.”

[Moles­kine dra­wing from 2009: “Tried Mea­ning­ful”. You can see the enlar­ged image here. See more like this over at the Moles­kine archive etc.]

“Ideas that do not risk offense, aren’t.”

And yes, your busi­ness is an idea. Your pro­duct is an idea. The con­ver­sa­tion you’re trying to have with your mar­ket is also an idea.

Hey, I didn’t say any of this stuff was easy…

[#smar­ter­con­ver­sa­tions]

the REAL reason why brands screw up on social media

[I drew this car­toon back in New York, 1998. Backs­tory here.]

Mark Earls, one of the grea­test mar­ke­ting minds on the pla­net, is bored of social media. Or at least, the con­ver­sa­tion about social media.

So let’s try to get at least this thing really straight:

Social net­works are not chan­nels for adver­ti­sers or for the adverts/memes you, your clients or any of your so-called “influen­tials” create, social net­works are for all of the peo­ple who par­ti­ci­pate in the network.

Being a social crea­ture means you spend your life in social net­works; being part of a social net­work gives each indi­vi­dual a num­ber of bene­fits —  sha­red pro­tec­tion, sha­red resour­ces and most impor­tantly sha­red lear­ning. Our abi­lity to learn from each other (the appropriately-named Social Lear­ning) is one of our all-too-mutual spe­cies’ most cha­rac­te­ris­tic capa­bil­ties and the engine by which stuff gets pulled through popu­la­tions (from tech­no­lo­gies to health habits).

In other words, social media (and the brands that want to be part of it) are at their most power­ful when they offer two things:

Sha­red learning.

Sha­red teaching.

Great art teaches. Great artists teach. What do you teach? What does your busi­ness teach? What is actually lear­ned, impar­ted? Not just the prac­ti­cal stuff, but the deep, messy stuff about ourselves?

Just thought I’d ask…

[UPDATE] Darren left a great comment:

I fre­quently talk to peo­ple and com­pa­nies who are loo­king to take their first stab at social media pre­sence spe­ci­fi­cally for the pur­pose of adver­ti­sing their pro­duct or ser­vice. No! No! No! Its about enga­ging your audience in mea­ning­ful con­ver­sa­tion. Ine­vi­tably, they push for­ward, create a Face­book page and Twit­ter account, post for a few weeks. They have almost no fans or follo­wers and won­der why their 27 posts with 10% cou­pon codes brought no inc­rease in revenue!

Because their 27 posts and 10% cou­pon code pla­yed no part in sha­red lear­ning or sha­red teaching, that’s why.

[#smar­ter­con­ver­sa­tions]

wicked problem #47: the lucky trucker

So I just did this car­toon for my client, HNI.

Basi­cally, the truc­kers that are most pro­fi­ta­ble for any truc­king com­pany are gene­rally the most hard to insure. The ones who score highest on safety make less make less money for the com­pany… and then you’ve got these Feds coming in with “CSA 2010″, making it even more com­pli­ca­ted. Lucky truckers…

The car­toon by itself, is not that interesting.

The fact that HNI are the only peo­ple in the insu­rance industry willing to talk about it in the open, are willing to have a “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion” about it, is inte­res­ting.

At least to me…

October 27, 2010

“if you’re david, fighting goliath, don’t let goliath choose the weapons”

Our client, Line 2, is a small VoIP start-up, aiming to take some busi­ness from Goliaths like AT&T.

So Line 2, like David in The Bible, has to choose its own wea­pons i.e. like the car­toon above. Heh.

[More Line 2 car­toons etc here…]

[PS: The “Don’t let Goliath choose the wea­pons” line is an idea I sha­me­lessly stole from my old buddy, Sigurd. Hence the quo­ta­tion marks etc.]

rackspace: die trying



[Down­load the prin­ta­ble ver­sion here.]

I did this print a few months back– I thought the sen­ti­ment would also make a good cube gre­nade for our client, Racks­pace. Et Voila…

[Bonus link] From Euan Sem­ple, 2006:

Maybe love does have a place in busi­ness after all. Maybe more and more of us will start to have the cou­rage to begin to talk about what really mat­ters to us about work and our rela­tionships with each other and to push back the ste­rile lan­guage of busi­ness that we have been trai­ned to accept. Maybe we will rea­lise that accep­ting love into the work­place reminds us of the ori­gi­nal pur­pose of work – not to maxi­mise sha­rehol­der value but to come together to do good things, to help each other and hope­fully to make the world a bet­ter place.

Maybe …. Oh and by the way if the above is too new age and namby pamby for you I rec­kon social com­pu­ting is capa­ble of tal­king 25% out of the run­ning costs of most busi­nes­ses – so there!

[@euan]

October 18, 2010

“how do do you amplify a start-up culture inside a big company?”

[Down­load the prin­ta­ble ver­sion here.]

A cou­ple of days ago my buddy, Robert Sco­ble (him­self a Racks­pace emplo­yee) twit­te­red the ques­tion, “How do do you amplify a start-up cul­ture inside a big company?”

A damn good ques­tion, Robert. I thought it would make a good piece of art, hence the car­toon above. More spe­ci­fi­cally, I thought it would make a good image to go on the back of  a Racks­pace busi­ness card.

Racks­pace is a big com­pany (3,000 emplo­yees), but not big enough where they can no lon­ger remem­ber when they were a small com­pany. So maybe it’s bet­ter to start a con­ver­sa­tion (which is what han­ding out a busi­ness card does, ideally) with a per­ti­nent ques­tion, rather than the usual “Here’s why you should buy our stuff” shpeel…

October 16, 2010

things i wish my phone did 09

[Down­load prin­ta­ble ver­sion here.]

[#Smar­ter­Con­ver­sa­tions]

crap jobs

[Down­load the prin­ta­ble ver­sion here etc.]

[#Smar­ter­Con­ver­sa­tions]

san antonio

[Down­load the prin­ta­ble ver­sion here etc.]

[#Smar­ter­Con­ver­sa­tions]

October 6, 2010

fanatical

[Down­load the prin­ta­ble ver­sion here etc.]

Racks­pace likes to desc­ribe their cus­to­mer sup­port as “Fana­ti­cal” [It’s right there on their home­page. Go see.].

Which got me thin­king, what does being “fana­ti­cal” actually mean? What are its real-world implications?

So I drew a car­toon with my take on it…

[#Smar­ter­Con­ver­sa­tions]

October 5, 2010

just a paycheck

[Down­load the prin­ta­ble ver­sion here.]

I find something rather amu­sing about the idea of peo­ple at Racks­pace prin­ting out this cube gre­nade, and han­ging it up everywhere in their San Anto­nio office. It would sure send a mes­sage to the newbies…

HR may not be able to say things like this, but hell, I’m a cartoonist…

[#Smar­ter­Con­ver­sa­tions]

October 4, 2010

things i wish my phone did 06

[Down­load prin­ta­ble ver­sion here.] [thingsiwishmyphonedid.com] [#smar­ter­con­ver­sa­tions]

October 3, 2010

“don’t be the best in the world at what you do; be the only one in the world who does what you do.”

[Last Fri­day I was sig­ning prints– 175 of these pup­pies. SAP, the large, Ger­man enter­prise tech com­pany put in a very large order, to give out to cer­tain key peo­ple within the orga­ni­za­tion. Trying to have a Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion. Exactly.]

“Don’t be the best in the world at what you do; be the only one in the world who does what you do.”

That quote is me paraph­ra­sing Jerry Gar­cia, lead gui­tar of The Gra­te­ful Dead. The thought always reso­na­ted with me.

If peo­ple like what you’re doing, and you’re the only one who’s doing it, you win.

Which is why I like doing Cube Gre­na­des. Com­pa­red to what most peo­ple are selling out there, they’re fairly unique.

It’s also what makes blogs so power­ful a mar­ke­ting device. Peo­ple can just see your own uni­que shtick evol­ving right there on the page, over time. They’ll either get it even­tually or they won’t. No sales pitch nee­ded. No need to com­pare your­self to some­body else. No need to fit into some pre-existing model, if you don’t want to.

It has never been a bet­ter time to be unlike anyone else. I hope you’re already taking full advantage…

September 30, 2010

thingsiwishmyphonedid 04

[thingsiwishmyphonedid.com]

[#smar­ter­con­ver­sa­tions]

September 29, 2010

rackspace cube grenade 01

A cube gre­nade I drew for Rob La Gesse, Scoble’s boss over at Racks­pace. [UPDATE: Rob blogs about it here as well.]

[Feel free to down­load the high-res ver­sion here.]

Disc­lo­sure: I’m currently doing a wee bit of con­sul­ting work for Racks­pace. This car­toon was ins­pi­red after tal­king to La Gesse the other day. He tells me that with all their assets– and with over 3,000 emplo­yees, they have many– their cul­ture is the thing that they’re collec­ti­vely most proud of. Rock on.

[#Smar­ter­Con­ver­sa­tions]

#thingsiwishmyphonedid 02


[#Smar­ter­Con­ver­sa­tions]

do more

I just desig­ned this cube gre­nade for one of my clients, the insu­rance bro­ker HNI.

As always, it’s basi­cally something to be down­loa­ded [from here], prin­ted out and hung up round the office. A “con­ver­sa­tion star­ter” etc.

Most insu­rance com­pa­nies want to sell you a lot of insu­rance, the more the merrier. One part of HNI’s shtick is, well, “More” is not always the most help­ful thing for the client etc.

The guy in the car­toon looks so unhappy simply because the very thought of actually “Doing” something actually frigh­tens a lot of peo­ple. Which is why the world is filled with so many clock-watchers.

Though this was desig­ned for HNI, if the mes­sage has any value to your busi­ness, feel free to print it out as well, thanks.

September 28, 2010

how american family insurance, a $10 billion asset insurer is having a smarter conversation

[NB: This post was writ­ten by my busi­ness part­ner, Jason Kor­man. Expect to hear more of him round here in future etc. –Hugh]

Back in the Spring, we were approached by Troy Janisch, Digi­tal Mar­ke­ting Mana­ger at Ame­ri­can Family Insu­rance about crea­ting a Cube Gre­nade that encou­ra­ged their 8,000+ emplo­yees to par­ti­ci­pate in their social media program.

Troy said that they wan­ted their 3,800+ agents to build stron­ger ties with their com­mu­ni­ties and also engage other emplo­yees who the com­pany want to have a voice and share in the new vision for the business.

AmFam has a very par­ti­cu­lar mar­ket: Local com­mu­ni­ties in eigh­teen sta­tes in the West and Mid­west, selling home and life poli­cies to middle income fami­lies. For their local insu­rance agents, com­mu­nity is everything and the stron­ger their ties, the bet­ter their busi­ness– it’s that simple.

With this in mind, the goal was to have 50% of all agents online, using at least Face­book, but hope­fully some other tools by year’s end.

If you think about it, its hard to ima­gine a more ele­gant use of tools like Face­book for buil­ding business.

On our side, Hugh’s goal was to create a ‘con­ver­sa­tion star­ter’ – something that would, on the face of it, explain to the digi­tally uni­ni­tia­ted (a) why they should make deve­lo­ping online con­nec­tions, a top prio­rity, and b) remind the reps what buil­ding THEIR busi­ness is really all about. The solu­tion ulti­ma­tely was two dra­wings: “Busi­ness is Con­nec­ti­vity” above, and “We’re not in the insu­rance busi­ness, We’re in the Con­nec­tion Busi­ness”, below.

A few weeks ago, I chec­ked back in with Troy to see how things were going. For Troy, he wan­ted to nudge along a Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion on a num­ber of fronts and had a plan that not only called for the orga­nic spread of the Cube Gre­na­des through the busi­ness, but also, one that was an overt, front and cen­ter cha­llenge to the cul­ture of the busi­ness. As Troy said, his goal was to ‘Nudge the cul­ture For­ward’ i.e. “To Change the cul­ture from Sales Orien­ta­tion to one of Cus­to­mer Orientation,”

After com­mis­sio­ning the Cube Gre­nade, AmFam, put up an exhi­bit of about a dozen of Hugh’s more ins­pi­ring works. They inc­lu­ded: Into­xi­ca­ted, X,Y,Z and the clean ver­sion of “Qua­lity”. The exhi­bi­tion was put up in a “bold loca­tion” in their head­quar­ters in Madi­son, where it would be seen by all the emplo­yees over the period it was up.

While the spread of the Cube Gre­na­des is hap­pe­ning. Peo­ple are prin­ting them out, and put­ting them on their email sig­na­tu­res, the art exhi­bi­tion really got people’s atten­tion, and not in the way that was ori­gi­nally planned.

A lot of atten­tion was focu­sed on the “Qua­lity” image, one of Hugh’s most popu­lar car­toons, and one that was redrawn in a Safe for Work mode for soft­ware giant, SAP, ear­lier this year. It seems that in Madi­son, Wis­con­sin, “Fric­king”, is not yet quite Safe for Work, so it pro­vo­ked a lot of ‘dis­cus­sion’ about the appro­pria­te­ness of the piece. Howe­ver, this was the ope­ning that Troy wan­ted. He tur­ned the con­ver­sa­tion into what the idea of “Fric­kin’ Ama­zing” means to a com­pany like Ame­ri­can Family, and ulti­ma­tely, he had is objec­tive in the crosshairs: “Cus­to­mer Service”.

As Troy says “ Nobody starts the day thin­king that they will give bad cus­to­mer ser­vice, but it’s the cul­ture that makes the dif­fe­rence as to whether it gets deli­ve­red,” he con­ti­nued, “Ever­yone says that they have Cus­to­mer Ser­vice, and many do, but Cus­to­mer Ser­vice is not simply top down, it is how ever­yone actually acts, as oppo­sed to aspi­res to act.”

And the­rein lied the rub, and the notion of having a “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion” inter­nally about Cus­to­mer Ser­vice, what’s wrong with it, and how to make it “Totally Fric­kin’ Ama­xing”, and more impor­tantly, how do you create a cul­ture that sup­ports peo­ple taking the risks neces­sary to deli­ver ‘Totally Fric­king Ama­zing Ser­vice”. Crea­ting that inter­nal dia­lo­gue is not something that hap­pens by itself, but if the goal is to nudge along the cul­ture of an 8,000 per­son busi­ness, dis­rup­tion is the order of the day.

We’ll be chec­king back in with Troy to see how things are pro­gres­sing. But as Troy says, “The Con­nec­ti­vity Cube Gre­nade is about remin­ding peo­ple at HQ that the busi­ness is out in small com­mu­ni­ties, which is the heart of their busi­ness’ and whether the folks are on the front line, or in the call cen­ter in Madi­son, every voice is part of the brand, and ever­yone makes a difference.”

September 25, 2010

things i wish my phone did dot com

Things I wish my phone did. Dot com. It’s a web­site we’re buil­ding for our client, Line2.

It should be up in a wee bit… we’re hoping to have a lot of fun with it– an “Idea Ampli­fier”, as it were.

Re. The car­toon above: No mat­ter how much you love your new state-of-the-art phone, it can’t love you back [For now, that is].

[Food for thought] From Seth Godin, May, 2007:

Now, of course, most blogs are one-person ope­ra­tions. Which means that suc­cess­ful blogs are often run by rest­less, outward-bound peo­ple in a hurry. And a lot of blog­gers either have day jobs or pas­sio­nate side­li­nes. I think that’s a good thing, even when they fail. It’s frus­tra­ting for me to hear, “stick to your blog­ging,” when peo­ple cri­ti­cize a pro­ject crea­ted by a blog­ger – because it’s part of the blog­ging, part of the lear­ning, part of what’s unfol­ding. I’d rather read a book that’s infor­med by the acti­vi­ties (not the repor­ting) of the wri­ter, and I’d rather read a blog that’s based on the suc­ces­ses (and fai­lu­res) of the blogger.

Which brings us to Hugh Mac­Leod and his work for Mic­ro­soft. Some cri­tics think he’s selling out. I don’t. I think he’s having a huge impact on an orga­ni­za­tion –from the outside– at the same time that he demons­tra­tes how just about any large orga­ni­za­tion can rethink its role in the world. And he’s doing it in front of all of us, without a net.

September 19, 2010

the idea amplifier

On Fri­day I was tal­king to Peter Sis­son, gapingvoid’s new client, the guy behind Tok­tumi and Line2.

We were tal­king about “The Cock­tail Party Rule”- what’s true at cock­tail par­ties is also true in mar­ke­ting i.e. If you want to be boring, talk about your­self. If you want to be inte­res­ting, talk about something else.

Luc­kily, Peter concurs…

The way I see it, a pro­duct is an “Idea Ampli­fier”. You have an idea about something– pho­nes or wha­te­ver– and you build a pro­duct as an expres­sion of that idea.

For exam­ple, Zap­pos’ cen­tral idea is not really about shoes per se, it’s about com­pany cul­ture and cus­to­mer ser­vice– “Deli­ve­ring Hap­pi­ness”, as its CEO, Tony Hsieh calls it.

Simi­larly, with Line2 the cen­tral idea is not about an iPhone app, it’s about, and I’m quo­ting Peter here, “What pho­nes could be”.

And what can a phone be? I’m curious to find out. I think we all are.

September 17, 2010

smarter conversations: psfk.com

I’m a huge fan of PSFK.com. I’ve been follo­wing Piers and his team for years. Recently I’ve even star­ted publishing weekly car­toons on PSFK, for no other rea­son than I think it’s a very groovy crowd to be part of.

PSFK is a well-known stra­tegy, trends and ideas blog, focu­sing mostly on adver­ti­sing and design. In the early days Piers mostly wrote it all him­self, but these days he has this vast army of volun­teers wri­ting guest posts on PSFK’s behalf.

The point of PSFK is to give its rea­ders a cons­tant stream of ins­pi­ra­tion and new ideas, stuff they can use to inform their own work.

And it works. Close to three quar­ters of a million peo­ple read it a month, mostly from the ad and design com­mu­nity. In that space, it’s extre­mely well known [For an industry niche blog, trust me, three quar­ters of a million peo­ple is A LOT].

So how does PSFK make money? Hint: It’s not by selling adver­ti­sing, like a lot of the big blogs out there.

The thing is, PSFK’s pri­mary busi­ness is not publishing blogs. Its main reve­nue stream is as con­sul­tants in the adver­ti­sing busi­ness. They’ve got a small hand­ful of clients and a small staff of super smart adver­ti­sing futu­rists, who get paid top dollar to share their brain power with large, glo­bal brands.

The blog is just a way to get the PSFK name out, to get their name on the radar screen of poten­tial clients.

Basi­cally, the PSFK blog is just an adver­ti­se­ment for the PSFK con­sul­tancy, even if on the blog there’s hardly any men­tion of the latter.

A “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion”, a smar­ter way of tal­king to poten­tial clients, than say, just buying adver­ti­sing space in one of the big trade publications.

Would this kind of model work for your busi­ness? If not, wouldn’t it be great if it did? Just askin’…

[The “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion” archive is here.]

to be “incredible beings” in the very early days of a revolution

[“Losing Our Touch”, the latest car­toon I did for PSFK.]

Like I said in my last post (and I am by no means the first per­son to say this), we are in the early days of the lar­gest com­mu­ni­ca­tion revo­lu­tion in the his­tory of the planet.

Which basi­cally means, it has never been easier to start a Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion.

Nor has it ever been more essen­tial.

And like I also said more than once, we’re inc­re­di­ble beings.

To be “inc­re­di­ble beings” in the very early days of this revo­lu­tion, to not want to do something about it, to not want to go out there and take full advan­tage of the situation…

I just don’t get why some peo­ple would pre­fer to pass the oppor­tu­nity up. You?

[The Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion archive is here…]

new gapingvoid client: line2 voip

gaping­void has lan­ded itself a new client. Line2, the new VoIP app from Tok­tumi. Hurrah!

To find out more about them, Techc­runch wrote a really good piece about them last year.

“The Apple/Google Voice fiasco just got more inte­res­ting. Tok­tumi, a star­tup that lets small busi­nes­ses build office-caliber phone sys­tems with their mobile pho­nes and com­pu­ters, just had its appli­ca­tion Line2 appro­ved by Apple —  nearly three months after it was ori­gi­nally sub­mit­ted. The power­ful ser­vice allows busi­ness emplo­yees to assign two phone num­bers to their iPhone: one that they can give to family and friends, and another that can be given to busi­ness con­tacts, with fea­tu­res that allow for call fil­te­ring and a professional-grade voi­ce­mail sys­tem. But it’s also nota­ble for its many simi­la­ri­ties to Goo­gle Voice, an appli­ca­tion that Apple has kept out of the App Store for months now.

“The story so far: late last July, Apple abruptly pulled all third party Goo­gle Voice appli­ca­tions from the App Store, explai­ning that they somehow were dupli­ca­ting the iPhone’s native func­tio­na­lity. Later that day, we broke the news that Google’s offi­cial Goo­gle Voice client had been barred from the App Store, spar­king a media storm and a FCC inquiry into Apple’s ratio­nale for the ban.”

It’s basi­cally a second line for your phone– your iPhone, in particular.

I’ve never been much of a VoIP geek, so why did I get involved?

It was a sim­ple little fac­toid that got my interest:

The Line2 ser­vice costs $14.95 per month. Not a huge amount, but costly enough when you con­si­der that Goo­gle Voice is free. Line2 has a first month trial offer, which allows you to try it out for free. After that, they start char­ging. Fair enough.

So how many peo­ple start sig­ning on at $14.95, once their free trial expi­res? Five per­cent? Ten per­cent? That’s what I was guessing…

Nope. Thirty percent.

Thirty per­cent! I thought that was huge. They must be doing something right etc.

The second rea­son is purely inte­llec­tual. As many blog­gers have been spou­ting on for a while now (inc­lu­ding me), we are in the early days of the lar­gest com­mu­ni­ca­tion revo­lu­tion in the his­tory of the pla­net. VOIP is in the fore­front of this revo­lu­tion, so get­ting invol­ved should give me a front row seat. And we car­too­nists need inte­res­ting stuff to keep our brains occu­pied etc.

I have no idea where this is going; I’m just along for the ride. Hope­fully a Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion will come out of it in the end. Watch this space. Rock on.


[Bonus link: Last March, Masha­ble did a good piece on Line2 as well, inc­lu­ding the video inter­view above.]

hni & ‘change the game’

Late last year, Mike Nata­li­zio, Pre­si­dent & CEO of HNI (a medium sized insu­rance bro­ke­rage out of the Mid­west) com­mis­sio­ned me to draw some “Cube Gre­nade” car­toons for the company.

It was a nice wee car­toon pro­ject; it went well.

We kept on tal­king, after that… we’ve been hel­ping them with what a Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion might mean for their business.

HNI’s cor­po­rate tagline is “Change The Game”.

The insu­rance busi­ness is gene­rally known as a fairly staid affair– it’s rela­ti­vely con­ser­va­tive game– no sur­pri­ses there.

“Change The Game”. I like the pre­mise, it gets me thinking:

  • What part of the game does it want to change?
  • What can it actually change?
  • What needs to be chan­ged, anyway?

And at what cost, per­so­nal or otherwise?

What needs to happen?

Let’s find out…

September 3, 2010

smarter conversations: “how do i want to change the way i talk to people?”

[The “Life Is Too Short” print…]

I first star­ted pla­ying with the idea of “Smarter-Conversations” way back in 2004, the same year gaping­void really star­ted get­ting trac­tion in the blogopsphere.

Though not something I talk about day-in-day-out, it’s always been there somewhere in the back­ground, infor­ming everything I work on. Here are some notes:

1. In the semi­nal book, “The Clue­train Mani­festo”, the great Doc Searls famously dec­la­red, “Mar­kets are con­ver­sa­tions”. If you buy that pre­mise (and I do, who­lehear­tedly), then quod erat demons­tra­tum, if you want your mar­ke­ting to be smar­ter (i.e. more effec­tive), you need to be having a “Smar­ter Conversation”.

2. “Con­ver­sa­tion” is a metaphor. Making your pro­duct sleek, ele­gant and gra­ce­ful while all your other com­pe­ti­tors make their pro­duct look cheap, plas­tic and clunky is a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion. Not all con­ver­sa­tions need words.

3. It’s not just what you say, its how you say it. Calling it the “iPod” is a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion than say, the “MZT-2300-B Elec­tro­nic Por­ta­ble MP3 Digi­tal Hand Device”.

4. Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tions scale. That’s what I really like about it. Anyone can have a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion– from a mom n’ pop pizza joint to a For­tune 500 com­pany. It can hap­pen in a Super­bowl ad or on prin­ted on the back of a paper nap­kin. You can start one on a blog today, for free. Or on Twit­ter or Face­book. The tools don’t neces­sa­rily have to change, the way you talk to peo­ple has to change.

5. Deci­ding to have a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion isn’t a busi­ness deci­sion, it’s a moral deci­sion. Like I said in the last point, the barriers to entry are zero. While your com­pe­ti­tion treats their cus­to­mers like idiots, you treat your cus­to­mers like inte­lli­gent human beings. You don’t do that because your accoun­tant told you to, you do that because that’s who you are.

6. The Smar­ter Conversation’s value comes from, I believe, not by yet more inc­rea­sed busi­ness effi­cien­cies, but by its huma­nity. For exam­ple, take two well-known air­li­nes. They both per­form a use­ful ser­vice. They both deli­ver value. They both cost about the same to fly to New York or Hong Kong. Both have nice Boeings and Air­bu­ses. Both serve pea­nuts and drinks. Both serve “air­line food”. Both use the same air­ports. But one air­line has friendly peo­ple wor­king for them, the other air­line has surly peo­ple wor­king for them. One air­line has a sense of fun and adven­ture about it, one has a tired, jaded business-commuter vibe about it. Guess which one takes the human dimen­sion of their busi­ness more seriously than the other? Guess which one still will be around in twenty years? Guess which one will lose billions of dollars worth of sha­rehol­der value over the next twenty years? What para­llels do you see in your own industry? In your own company?

7. If Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tions work, it’s because they help huma­nize the com­pany. I wrote about this years ago in an article I called “The Porous Mem­brane”. To paraph­rase: Ideally, you want the con­ver­sa­tion bet­ween cus­to­mers [the exter­nal mar­ket] to be as iden­ti­cal as the con­ver­sa­tion bet­ween your­sel­ves [the inter­nal mar­ket]. The things that your cus­to­mer is pas­sio­nate about, you should also be pas­sio­nate about. This we call “align­ment”. A good exam­ple would be Apple. The peo­ple at Apple think the iPod is cool, and so do their cus­to­mers. They are alig­ned. When you are no lon­ger alig­ned with your cus­to­mers is when the com­pany starts get­ting into trou­ble. When you start saying your gizmo is great and your cus­to­mers are telling every­body it sucks, then you have serious misa­lign­ment. So how do you keep misa­lign­ment from hap­pe­ning? The ans­wer lies the cul­tu­ral mem­brane that sepa­ra­tes you from them. The more porous the mem­brane, the easier it is for con­ver­sa­tions bet­ween you and them, the inter­nal and exter­nal, to hap­pen. The easier for the con­ver­sa­tions on both sides to adjust to the other, to become like the other. And nothing pokes holes in the mem­brane bet­ter than blog­ging.

8. Social Media is not about reaching a mass audience. Social Media is not about crea­ting yet another sales chan­nel. Social Media is about allo­wing the Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion to hap­pen. That’s all. Why do some com­pa­nies lose, while other com­pa­nies win? Because the lat­ter has a smar­ter “con­ver­sa­tion” with its cus­to­mers. Zap­pos had a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about the power of cus­to­mer ser­vice and the power of com­pany cul­ture. Peet’s Cof­fee came along 20 years ago and began a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about cof­fee with millions of peo­ple within a very short space of time. Target’s recent mas­sive suc­cess star­ted from a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about good design. Savile Row tai­lor, Tho­mas Mahon came along and, with his blog, had a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about $4000 English bes­poke suits. Lucky’s Juice Joint had a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion about fresh-squeezed. Big com­pa­nies, medium com­pa­nies and tiny com­pa­nies, wha­te­ver– it was never about size, it was never about the choice of media (social or other­wise), it was all about lan­guage. 

9. Social Media allows you to cheaply and quickly begin a smar­ter con­ver­sa­tion. And once you get it going, that con­ver­sa­tion starts blee­ding out into all other areas of your busi­ness– inc­lu­ding adver­ti­sing, PR and cor­po­rate communications.

10. Ask not what tools you want to use, ask how you want to change how you talk to peo­ple. All evo­lu­tions in mar­ke­ting are evo­lu­tions in lan­guage. Those who can raise the level of con­ver­sa­tion in any mar­ket, win.

11. Start today. It’s never too late to begin a Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tion. Like I said, money or time is not the issue. Making the deci­sion is the issue, and only you can do that.


how to have a “smarter conversation”

zzzzazzdggg65.jpg

[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted  August, 2004. Some of it is a bit dated but there’s still a lot there worth che­wing on etc.]

How to have smar­ter conversations.

Somewhere along the the line I deci­ded that embra­cing “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tions” was pre­fe­ra­ble to pre­ma­tu­rely con­sig­ning my career to the dust­bin of his­tory. I just wrote down some ran­dom thoughts:

1. Unders­tand why what you’re offe­ring to do for other peo­ple is inte­res­ting, impor­tant, mea­ning­ful etc then start telling peo­ple about it.

Think about this one. Hard. If you don’t know, then how will other peo­ple know? Exactly. They won’t.

2. Live like you know the dif­fe­rence bet­ween remar­ka­ble and unre­mar­ka­ble, like it mat­ters to you.

The more “remar­ka­ble” mat­ters to you, the more likely that it will appear in the pro­duct you’re selling. The more likely other peo­ple will notice it.

3. Seek out the excep­tio­nal minds.

This is my basic man­tra. It’s a good one to have. Not every­body gets it. Their loss.

4. Start a blog.

Blogs are funny things. Say something smart, peo­ple pay atten­tion. Say something dumb, you’re igno­red. We big media folk just can’t seem to get our heads around that con­cept, for some rea­son. Regu­lar blog­ging can help train you to bet­ter dis­cern bet­ween smart and dumb. Makes it easier to extend this to the rest of one’s business.

5. Ruth­lessly avoid wor­king for com­pa­nies that “don’t get it”.

Yeah, you may have to turn down a few gigs, and that can really hurt when the rent is due. Still, anything that’s easy to get isn’t worth having.

6. Ruth­lessly avoid wor­king for com­pa­nies that think they know bet­ter than you.

Luc­kily, if you get the whole “smar­ter con­ver­sa­tions” thing, their “Yes, Buts” will just seem rather empty. Making them easier to “toss out like old furniture”.

7. Be nice.

Smar­ter con­ver­sa­tions are fue­lled by good­will. Lose it and die.

8. Be honest.

Again, smar­ter con­ver­sa­tions are fue­lled by good­will etc.

9. Karma is key.

But you already know that. Or you’re stu­pid. No middle ground on this one, sorry.

10. Lis­ten.

Ton­gues are dum­ber than brains, brains are dum­ber than ears etc.

“smarter conversations” is a moral decision

zzaaaaaaa01.jpg

[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted Sep­tem­ber, 2005]

An offline dis­cus­sion I’ve been having a lot recently:

1. If you want to become an autho­rity in wha­te­ver industry you are in, you must engage in what I call “Smar­ter Con­ver­sa­tions”.

2. Deci­ding to do so is not a busi­ness deci­sion. It’s a moral decision.

Your call.

September 1, 2010

all big ideas start life out as small ideas

Back in the mid-90s, when the Inter­net was still the size of a tad­pole and TV was still the Big Kahuna, I was wor­king in a large adver­ti­sing agency that had many big, blue-chip clients.

We were given a brief to work on, a well-known laundry detergent.

All the other teams went away and came back with ideas for big-production TV com­mer­cials. Except me.

I had this idea about using GoCards, those free adver­ti­sing post­cards I star­ted seeing around in all the trendy bars at the time.

It wasn’t roc­ket science. For pen­nies on the dollar, I rec­ko­ned you could try out a lot of dif­fe­rent ideas– dozens of them, lite­rally– and from tall­ying which cards were being pic­ked up by peo­ple and which ones weren’t, you could could easily mea­sure which ideas were wor­king or not. Not unlike today’s Inter­net, the same way you can tell which blog posts of yours are wor­king from the num­ber of ret­weets they get. Stuff we all take for gran­ted now.

Secondly, because the client was a laundry deter­gent, you’d really have to push the enve­lope to get people’s atten­tion inside these trendy bars. It would force you to work your ideas fas­ter, chea­per, bet­ter and har­der. It would push you, it would push the client and the brand.

If any the ideas took off, I mean, REALLY took off, then you’d have enough info to go on to scale up the cam­paign into big­ger media– TV, large maga­zi­nes and whatnot.

Unlike most ad cam­paigns out there at the time, you’d would already have enough infor­ma­tion to know that the cam­paign– the idea– was WAS ALREADY WORKING BEFORE your dear client had spent any real money.

It was cheap, it was dis­rup­tive, and… it was accountable.

The suits didn’t like the idea. My boss didn’t like it, either. Even my art direc­tor was a bit grumbly and doubt­ful. The idea never left the buil­ding. The client never saw it. The idea was killed in the first round.

The agency’s pers­pec­tive was, they didn’t earn its money from “little” ideas. The agency ear­ned its money for “BIG” ideas.… ones that cost lots of money and nee­ded “a cast of thou­sands” etc. Super­bowl ads and whatnot.

They had for­got­ten that all big ideas start life out as small ideas.

Make of this what you will.

is your business co-dependent on external factors?… or, any startup who thinks success or failure depends on whether techcrunch covers them or not, deserves everything they get.

I just wrote the [very long] blog head­line above just to give y’all something to chew on…

I’m gues­sing most of us here are fami­liar with Techc­runch, yes?

Like I said ear­lier, we’re inc­re­di­ble beings. So fric­kin’ go do something about it. Fric­kin’ go do something that mat­ters. Exactly.

God Bless…

we’re incredible beings.

[“Awake”, the print I fea­tu­red in this Monday’s news­let­ter etc.]

We’re inc­re­di­ble beings. And I want to make and sell art that maybe, just maybe, makes peo­ple think, even for a short while, that I’m not wrong, either.

[I can think of worse ways to make a living. Lord knows, we’ve all tried a few of those…]

So yeah, we’re inc­re­di­ble beings. But it’s not enough to believe it; you actually have to live it. Even if you’re going to fail. most of the time. That’s where the REAL work lies.

But hey, at least you tried.

Life is short, Peo­ple. You’re going to be dead soon. So fric­kin’ go do something about it. Fric­kin’ go do something that mat­ters. Seriously.

Thanks for hea­ring my rant. God Bless…

“content marketing” or, it’s much easier to get paid work out of people if they’re already your fanboy

I don’t know if it was Brian Clark over at Copy­blog­ger who first popu­la­ri­zed the term, “Con­tent Mar­ke­ting”, but it’s he I most asso­ciate it with.

Con­tent Mar­ke­ting is exactly what is sounds like– crea­ting con­tent in order to more effec­ti­vely mar­ket wha­te­ver it is you’re selling.

Copy­blog­ger itself is a really good exam­ple of con­tent mar­ke­ting. It’s basi­cally a daily advice column for anyone trying to do con­tent mar­ke­ting pro­fes­sio­nally. You get to read it for free, but hey, Brian and his team have other pro­ducts they sell which are all desig­ned to be inte­res­ting, use­ful and valua­ble to their core audience.

And Copy­blog­ger rakes it in as a result; it’s now a seven-figure business.

Back in 2003, eons ago in Inter­net time, I remem­ber tal­king to Henry Cope­land, the foun­der of Blogads.com. This was well before the huge adver­ti­sing mar­ket emer­ged for large sites like Techc­runch, Gaw­ker, Masha­ble and Boing­Boing, back when even the lar­gest blogs were far sma­ller and far more per­so­nal than they are today.

We were chat­ting about poten­tial busi­ness models for blogs, short and long-term. This was still very early days, remember…

“As far as I can tell,” said Henry, “the most via­ble busi­ness model for blog­ging these days is for under-employed con­sul­tants to show off how smart they are.”

Con­sul­tants sho­wing off how smart they are? Under-employed or over-employed, that is con­tent mar­ke­ting. Exactly.

You write a blog. You build a dedi­ca­ted follo­wing. You leave a disc­reet, non-pushy trail of breadc­rumbs to what your busi­ness actually does for money. If X per­cent of your rea­ders take the bait and become paying cus­to­mers, hey, you win.

Like the head­line of this post says, it’s much easier to get paid work out of peo­ple if they’re already your fanboy.

What I like about this model is that it’s sim­ple. It isn’t roc­ket science. And perhaps more impor­tantly, it’s free from the tyranny of wan­ting or nee­ding huge traffic.

[War­ning– VERY rough math to follow:] English Cut can only make and sell about 100 hand-tailored Savile Row suits a year. I can only handle a small hand­ful of Cube Gre­nade clients at one time. Same with James Gover­nor at Red­monk or Piers Faw­kes at PSFK. And if say, our blogs can con­vert one or two per­cent of our hard­core rea­ders into cus­to­mers, in theory, the total rea­dership per blog only needs to be fifty or a hun­dred times that in order to make the busi­ness via­ble. A few hun­dred peo­ple, maybe a cou­ple of thou­sand– very attai­na­ble (and sus­tai­na­ble) numbers.

So if you get it right, you can just do your thing, deligh­ting, thri­lling (and selling to) the audience that you already have, without obses­sing over which “A-Lister” is lin­king to you (or not),  or how many new Twitt­ter follo­wers you’ve got­ten (or haven’t) since last month. Nor do you have slee­pless nights fret­ting over the fact that your blog doesn’t have the same num­ber of rea­ders as The Atlan­tic, The New Yor­ker, The Eco­no­mist, Wired etc. Or wha­te­ver silly, energy-draining neu­ro­ses that so many other social media mavens seem to fall prey to.

That’s the good news. The bad news is, effec­tive con­tent mar­ke­ting requi­res two things: world-class con­tent and a world-class pro­duct. Har­der than it looks. Life is unfair.

August 30, 2010

the cleopatra effect

[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted Octo­ber, 2006.]

One of the main rea­sons I never really pur­sued cor­po­rate blog con­sul­ting as a career, even though I’ve had some defi­nite oppor­tu­ni­ties in this depart­ment, is because of what I call “The Cleo­pa­tra Effect”.

I remem­ber when I was a kid watching this old black & white movie about Cleo­pa­tra.

I can’t remem­ber the name of the movie, but one scene always stuck with me:

Cleo­pa­tra is wal­king through the palace, when she’s sud­denly stop­ped by the sound of pretty music, being pla­yed off in the distance.

She follows the sound of the music through the palace, till even­tually she finds one of her cour­tiers in the gar­den, pla­ying the harp.

“What pretty music,” she says to the cour­tier. “You play beautifully.”

“Thank you, Your Majesty,” says the cour­tier, obviously flattered.

“I would love to play music like that,” says Cleo­pa­tra. “Do you think you could teach me?”

The cour­tier, now that he’s fee­ling flat­te­red, tries to win even more of her favor.

“Well, yes,” he gushes. “I’m sure a Queen as talen­ted as you in so many things, would be talen­ted at this as well.”

“Oh, good,” says Cleo­pa­tra, obviously deligh­ted. “Here’s the deal. You teach me to play the harp. If I can­not play as well as you within one month, I will have you flog­ged. If I can­not play as well as you within three months, I will have you executed.”

The courtier’s face turns white. Cleo­pa­tra gives the cour­tier an evil smirk and then turns and walks off.

Make of this what you will.

i believe that both our economic and spiritual future, good or bad, is directly related to our ability to unlock the latent creativity within us.


[Buy the “Create Or Die” print here etc.]

I believe that both our eco­no­mic and spi­ri­tual future, good or bad, is directly rela­ted to our abi­lity to unlock the latent crea­ti­vity within us.

There. I’ve said it.

It’s been six years since I first star­ted blog­ging what would even­tually end up being my first book, Ignore Every­body.

The book didn’t really start off with a plan. Like I said at the very beginning,

“So you want to be more crea­tive, in art, in busi­ness, wha­te­ver. Here are some tips that have wor­ked for me over the years.”

That was it. One person’s ram­blings. No big, autho­ri­ta­tive volume with lots of prac­ti­cal how-to’s, case stu­dies and aca­de­mic citations.

Some peo­ple didn’t care for that. “I paid $23.00 for a hard­back edi­tion and I expect RESULTS, dammit!”

Results!

Ah. But I never said anything about results. There was no plan, you see. That’s because there is no plan. There never is.

Wri­ting about crea­ti­vity is a messy busi­ness because crea­ti­vity is a messy business.

Even using the word “crea­ti­vity” in con­ver­sa­tion is going to get you in trou­ble from some quar­ters. Stick your head above the para­pet for just a few seconds and watch the arrows start flying at you.

Yet somewhere in the back of our minds, we all know it’s too impor­tant a sub­ject to ignore, too impor­tant a rea­lity not to confront.

Why? Because when I first star­ted wri­ting Ignore Every­body, I was coming at it from a very per­so­nal angle. Con­fron­ting one’s exis­ten­tial need to be “crea­tive”, to express one­self etc. Which is why the book did so well with tee­na­gers, college stu­dents and young adults just star­ting out in the wor­king world. That’s the time of life to be thin­king about all that.

But now, six years later I’m a bit older and bit more expe­rien­ced. Maybe a lot more.

And time and expe­rience has led me to conc­lude that even if we hate the word “crea­ti­vity”, even if it’s a nasty, anno­ying, sopho­mo­ric, hipster-dipster, New Age gag­fest that really should have no place among the serious, results-orientated world of equally serious, result-orientated grownups…

It’s where all mea­ning­ful growth is going to come from, both inter­nal and exter­nal, whether we like it or not.

I don’t believe crea­ti­vity can be taught, not really, but I do believe:

  • That with a bit of prod­ding in the right pla­ces, indi­vi­duals can train them­sel­ves to be more creative.
  • That with a bit of prod­ding in the right pla­ces, indi­vi­duals wor­king as a team can train them­sel­ves to be more creative.
  • That with a bit of prod­ding in the right pla­ces, com­pa­nies and orga­ni­za­tions can train them­sel­ves to be more creative.
  • That with a bit of prod­ding in the right pla­ces, socie­ties can train them­sel­ves to be more creative.

And that if they can do this, the value they create will be off the scale.

I’ll say it again: I believe that both our eco­no­mic and spi­ri­tual future, good or bad, is directly rela­ted to our abi­lity to unlock the latent crea­ti­vity within us.

Let the jour­ney begin…

August 15, 2010

“with porn, all things are possible.”

[“Wings”, which I sent out in the news­let­ter recently. You can get the print here etc.]

[Ori­gi­nally published Novem­ber, 2005:]

I was having a long con­ver­sa­tion with a friend last night about “Busi­ness Porn”:

Busi­ness Porn is just like Ordi­nary Porn or Real Estate Porn, except ins­tead of it being about the women we wished we could sleep with, or the hou­ses we wish we owned, it’s about all those cool, luc­ra­tive, exci­ting jobs and busi­nes­ses that we wish we had, ins­tead of the nor­mal, tedious, sch­leppy crap most of us end up doing to pay the bills.

Does your blog suf­fer from low traf­fic? It’s pro­bably because there’s not enough porn on it. Sex Porn, Real Estate Porn, Wine Porn, Biz Porn, Emo­tio­nal Porn, it doesn’t matter.

Porn = Traf­fic.
Porn = Mar­ke­ting.
Porn = Sales.

With Porn, all things are possible.

So now you know.

August 5, 2010

you just have to do what you do with reverence

[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted Sept., 2004]

There are a lot of great mar­ke­ting books and blogs out there. That being said, I still think the best mar­ke­ting sto­ries come from per­so­nal, first-hand experience.

Here’s a favo­rite one of mine:

Back when I lived in New York there was this fabu­lous, crazy-ass juice bar on West Hous­ton called Lucky’s Juice Joint. I think it’s no lon­ger there. I hear it’s moved.

It was the most out-of-place busi­ness south of 14th Street. Hard to des­cibe, except as a “hard­core hip­pie haven”. Just had this weird, crazy, psychedelic-rainforest vibe. But damn, it had the best juice in town. It was ama­zing stuff. Tas­ted like the fruits and vege­ta­bles were pic­ked that mor­ning. Fresher than anything else I found in New York. And yes, I had searched high and low for even bet­ter alter­na­ti­ves, but never found one. In New York, this was really it.

The boss was this crazy loo­king tie-dye wea­ring guy who loo­ked and tal­ked like he had done too many drugs back in the ’six­ties. A big ol’ middle aged, acid-head teddy bear. One day we struck up a brief con­ver­sa­tion. I com­pli­men­ted the hell out of his pro­duct. “Wow,” I quietly gushed, “Your stuff is the best. It really is…”

“Sure it is,” said the guy. “That’s because we make it with reverence.”

You don’t have to get a job with a famous com­pany or hot-shot industry in order to have a spec­ta­cu­lar career. You just have to do what you do with reverence.

July 25, 2010

“treat it like an adventure. an adventure worth sharing.”

[“Break­fast”, which I sent out in the news­let­ter recently. You can buy the print here etc.]

“TREAT IT LIKE AN ADVENTURE. AN ADVENTURE WORTH SHARING.”

1. Now that Evil Plans is at the publisher’s and in pro­duc­tion (Release date: February 17th), the news­let­ter and the art gallery chug­ging along nicely, I’m star­ting to think about my next adventure.

Some peo­ple live paycheck to paycheck. Some peo­ple live pro­ject to pro­ject. I pre­fer living “adven­ture to adventure”.

I rec­kon that if you can’t treat what you’re doing like an adven­ture, it’s not worth doing. You might as well be dead.

What’s my next adven­ture about? Haven’t quite deci­ded yet. Something to do with Cube Gre­na­des and the next book I plan to write. Plus the car­too­ning, of course.

It’ll all fit together somehow…

2. Here’s what I’ve always noti­ced about us humans: We all want the fee­ling of adven­ture. It’s just about the clo­sest you can get to God while you’re still alive.

And often, we fail to heed the call. We’re too busy with IMPORTANT things. Cars to buy, bills to pay, peo­ple to sch­mooze and mee­tings to attend.

It’s not the Ame­ri­can Dream if it kills you for stu­pid rea­sons. Sorry.

3. I wrote this little rant ear­lier today, while in a grumpy mood:

Fuck y’all.

You know who you are.

Your end­less dro­ning on about nothing, the end­less tedium that is your career…

Well, it makes the CEO of your emplo­yer rich, but does little else.

Surroun­ding your­self with the over­pri­ced, plas­tic bau­bles you lear­ned about from TV, like anyone actually cares.

And you’re rai­sing your kids the same way, rai­sing them to be the same fine spe­ci­men of nowhe­res­vi­lle. Lucky them.

You are boring. You are bore­dom. And that’s what you peddle.

Every day. To anyone who is des­pe­rate enough to listen.

An empty life, follo­wed by an equally empty death.

Fuck y’all and good riddance.

My defi­ni­tion of “Medioc­rity” is: A Trium­vi­rate of small minds, sma­ller hearts and even sma­ller deeds. Usually with some lame-ass, entit­le­ment power trip going on. One rarely has to look very hard to find it; it’s everywhere.

To have an adven­ture, is to reject that.

4. The Cube Gre­nade idea is all about making dra­wings about other people’s adventures.

That’s why I star­ted the Cube Gre­nade givea­way com­pe­ti­tion. That’s why I hope you’ll nomi­nate some­body. That’s why I hope you’ll go read some of the nominations.

It’s all about the adven­ture, People.

5. [TO BE CONTINUED…]

June 14, 2010

the four big moments of writing a book

[“Suc­cess­ful”, which I sent out in the news­let­ter a few weeks ago. You can buy the print here etc.]

This wee­kend I sent the final, edi­ted draft of “Evil Plans” off to my publisher. It  comes out in April.

A few hours later, a cou­ple of peo­ple were asking me, “Why aren’t you cele­bra­ting? I’d be hit­ting the bars right now…”

Heh. Finishing the book is really not that big a deal. All it marks is the end of a mas­sive, fairly tedious, weeks-long edi­ting and “polishing” ses­sion, LONG AFTER you’re done with the meaty, crea­tive, fun part.

To me, there are four really big moments in get­ting a book out. Finishing the book isn’t one of them:

1. Coming up with an idea for the book. That’s big. A big EUREKA moment that cuts through all the clut­ter like a sharp blade. The big ini­tial flash of ins­pi­ra­tion that gets the ball rolling. That’s all very exci­ting, but you never know how long you can keep the momen­tum going. It all might die out after a cou­ple of days, it might last until you get the thing published and it hits The New York Times Bes­tse­ller list. You never know.

2. Lan­ding the publishing deal. That’s what every aspi­ring wri­ter dreams of. It’s a HUGE moment, espe­cially the first time, though the eupho­ria doesn’t last long. Once you’ve sig­ned the con­tract and cashed the advance check, within nano­se­conds all that exci­te­ment is sud­denly repla­ced with the heavy weight of “Damn, now I have write the bloody thing.” And the bet­ter job you’ve done con­vin­cing the publisher what a rocks­tar you are, the hea­vier the weight is.

3. Relea­sing the book. Seeing it hit the bookshel­ves. All those months and months of work, put to the test. That’s quite thri­lling, espe­cially the first time, though if your book bombs (and if it bombs, it bombs quickly), that can be devastating.

But the big­gest moment for me, hap­pens about half­way bet­ween Num­bers 2 and 3:

4. The moment you rea­lize that your book isn’t going to be shit, after all. That moment when you rea­lize that, “Hey, this is actually going to work, after all”. That moment when you rea­lize that the publisher didn’t waste his money giving you an advance, after all. That moment when you first rea­lize that all the work you’ve done up to that point, wasn’t in vain. The moment you rea­lize that all the peo­ple who had put their faith in you in get­ting this book of the ground, also didn’t do it in vain.

That’s the best time to hit the bars, if you ask me.

And don’t worry, I did…

May 20, 2010

“take the cream off the top, leave the milk behind”

[“Love Fore­ver”, which I sent out in the news­let­ter recently. You can buy the print here etc.]

Ear­lier I was tal­king on the phone to my friend and men­tor, Jerry Colonna. I drew the wee mons­ter ‘Cube Gre­nade” on his blog a few months ago.

During our con­ver­sa­tion, while I was moa­ning and groa­ning about the relent­less day-to-day pres­sure of being a small-time entre­pre­neur, Jerry, in his kind, gene­rous, lucid and laser-focus way, remin­ded me that in spite of my trials and tri­bu­la­tions, somehow in the past year I had mana­ged to morph from a “mar­ke­ting con­sul­tant” to full-time artist.

I guess that’s exactly what has been hap­pe­ning. I don’t quite know how I mana­ged to pull that off– although long hours, low overheads and a superb busi­ness part­ner cer­tainly helped.

Jerry then tal­ked about his own career evo­lu­tion– from suc­cess­ful New York ven­ture capi­ta­list, to pri­vate busi­ness coach with a thri­ving practice.

Jerry told me that he simply crea­med off the part of being a VC that he liked the most– i.e. hel­ping good peo­ple make a dif­fe­rence– and for­got about the rest.

During this con­ver­sa­tion, I sud­denly rea­li­zed that I’m now trying to do EXACTLY what Jerry has already mana­ged to do for him­self. Take the cream off the top, leave the milk behind.

I can think of worse ways to spend the next cou­ple of years. You?

April 5, 2010

are you a “waker”?

[“I Choose This Life”, which I sent out in the news­let­ter recently. You can buy the print here etc.]

Are you a “Waker”?

If the ans­wer is no, I’m sorry to hear that. Wakers are my favo­rite people.

A waker is someone who is very good at waking other peo­ple up from their metapho­ri­cal slumber.

Some peo­ple just have the gift. Being around them or their work just makes you feel more alive, more ins­pi­red, more moti­va­ted, more awake. The best wakers will make you do crazy-ass things, like quit your boring job and start your own busi­ness, write that song, move to Thai­land, for­give that someone who once hurt you, or finally tell that girl that you love her.

A waker reminds you on a cons­tant basis,  just how alive you really are. Just how much human poten­tial you really have inside of you. And there’s something about their influence that makes you utterly una­ble to go back to “sleep” ever again, in spite of your best efforts.

Wakers can be great artists– Jeff Buc­kely, Picasso, Har­per Lee, Beetho­ven, Char­lie Par­ker, Leo Tols­toy, Tilda Swin­ton, Louis Arms­trong, Ralph Stead­man, Saul Stein­berg etc– but they don’t have to be.

Wakers can be great spi­ri­tual lea­ders– Jesus, Gandhi, Moham­med, Buddha, The Dalai Lama, Mar­tin Luther King, Joseph Camp­bell etc– but they don’t have to be.

Wakers can be great public figu­res– Steve Jobs, Wins­ton Churchill, Simone de Beau­voir, Diana Vree­land, Carl Sagan, John Peel, Susan Son­tag, Alis­tair Cooke, Mar­ga­ret Thatcher,  etc– but they don’t have to be.

I know great wakers who are bar­ten­ders, bus dri­vers, teachers, recep­tio­nists, plum­bers. Theirs is a gift, not a job title.

If you are a waker, I’m happy for you. There is no bet­ter way to spend one’s life than being a waker, I truly believe that.

The human race needs you, like flo­wers need sunshine. The human race would die out within three gene­ra­tions without you. Thanks for being here. Seriously.

If you’re not a waker, don’t you think you should be? Serious question.

[The “Remem­ber Who You Are” archive is here.]

[Down­load the high-res “Remem­ber Who You Are” pos­ter here.]