Archive for the ‘advertising’ Category

May 25, 2009

work with hugh: everything you always wanted to know about ‘cube grenades’ but were afraid to ask

dinosaur001jpeg800.jpg

[“Dino­saur” Cube Gre­nade.]

[I’m currently accep­ting both pri­vate and cor­po­rate com­mis­sions for car­toons, com­pany logos, ‘Cube Gre­na­des’, large pie­ces, Moles­ki­nes,  spea­king enga­ge­ments, workshops and wha­te­ver else you might be in the mar­ket for. Please read on for more details, Thanks! E-mail: gapingvoid@gmail.com.]

‘Cube Gre­na­des’, I believe, is where my art works the best– small Social Objects that you “throw” in there in order to cause some damage– to start a con­ver­sa­tion, to cause dis­rup­tion, to spread an idea etc. And I want to work with clients to make more of them. That’s my busi­ness. That’s my busi­ness model. Exactly.

[P.S. The Cube Gre­nade blog archive is here.]

1. HOW ‘CUBE GRENADES’ ARE RE-INVENTING THE ADVERTISING BUSINESS [AT LEAST FOR ME]

scc001B

In Sep­tem­ber, 2009, I wrote about how Shit Creek Con­sul­ting had hired me to draw the above “Cube Gre­na­de” for them.

As a car­toon, it works. As a piece of adver­ti­sing, it works. As a piece of com­mu­ni­ca­tion, it works. As a Cube Gre­nade, it works. As a social object it works. As a con­ver­sa­tion star­ter, it REALLY works. I was happy; so was the client.

Like a lot of blog­gers with an adver­ti­sing back­ground, I have spent a lot of time over the years asking the ques­tion, “What is the future of advertising?”

Sure, in the last decade there’s been a lot of spe­cu­la­tion about how Web 2.0 is going to change EVERYTHING in the industry– everything from put­ting mains­tream agen­cies out of busi­ness, to Goo­gle ruling the world with an iron fist. But in spite of all the talk out there, a defi­ni­tive ans­wer has always remai­ned somewhat elusive.

I think I may have FINALLY had a major breakthrough:

These last few weeks, while I have been VERY busy wor­king on some new Cube Gre­nade busi­ness, it occurs to me that the Cube Gre­nade con­cept somehow mana­ges to get both my back­grounds in car­too­ning and adver­ti­sing wor­king seam­lessly together.

The Cube Gre­na­des aren’t really desig­ned to “sell”, like tra­di­tio­nal adver­ti­sing. They’re desig­ned to hit a nerve and start con­ver­sa­tions. Maybe that will help lead to sales down the road, but it’s not the pri­mary pur­pose. Its pri­mary pur­pose takes a more indi­rect, perhaps more dis­rup­tive path.

So what is the future of adver­ti­sing? Well, I don’t know what yours is, but mine is The Cube Gre­nade. If that’s what you want, you come to me. If you want something dif­fe­rent, go elsewhere.

Some peo­ple will get this, some peo­ple won’t, but that’s pro­bably a good thing. Rock on.

[If you think the Cube Gre­nade idea could help your busi­ness, as always, feel free to e-mail me, Thanks.]

[Backs­tory: About Hugh. E-mail Hugh. Twit­ter. News­let­ter. Book. Inter­view One. Inter­view Two. EVIL PLANS. Limi­ted Edi­tion Prints. Pri­vate Com­mis­sions. Cube Gre­na­des.]

2. THE ORIGINAL ‘CUBE GRENADE’ PAGE

[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted here, May, 2009.]

cg555.jpg

Above is a photo that one of my friends on Twit­ter sent me. He basi­cally down­loa­ded one of my car­toons off my blog, prin­ted it out, and stuck it outside his cube at work, for other peo­ple to see, hope­fully to com­ment on, and hope­fully, to start a conversation.

Again, this, I believe, is where my car­toons work the best– “Cube Gre­na­des”- small Social Objects that you “throw” in there in order to cause some damage– to start a con­ver­sa­tion, to cause dis­rup­tion, to spread an idea etc.

bm999A3.jpg

[The Blue Monster]

The Mic­ro­soft Blue Mons­ter is pro­bably my best-known Cube Gre­nade, which is why I made it into a limi­ted edi­tion print eventually.

carton888.jpg

Seth Godin first put his Pur­ple Cow book into a pur­ple milk car­ton for the same rea­son– he gues­sed [quite rightly, as it tur­ned out] that peo­ple would see the car­ton on somebody’s desk, inquire about it, and a con­ver­sa­tion about the mar­ke­ting ideas con­tai­ned in the book would be started.

PCsmall124.jpeg

[The Pur­ple Cow print]

And the Pur­ple Cow print was desig­ned the same way. OK, it might be a bit big to dis­play in a cube– you need a lot of wall space for this one– but the idea is the same– Con­ver­sa­tions that hap­pen around the object are more inte­res­ting than the actual object itself.

“Cube Gre­na­des”. Exactly. Car­toons desig­ned to affect change as “Social Objects”. Exactly.

[Check out some of my limi­ted edi­tion prints over at gapingvoidgallery.com.]

MORE NOTES:

cg22222.jpeg

[More “Cube Gre­na­des” in action. Click on image to enlarge etc.]

1. Like I said, my car­toons work best when they’re used as “Cube Gre­na­des” i.e. small objects that you “throw” in there in order to cause some damage– to start a con­ver­sa­tion, to spread an idea etc. But other social objects can be used as well– pur­ple milk car­tons, home­made coo­kies, funky mou­se­pads, rub­ber toys, news­pa­per clip­pings etc. It’s the peo­ple that mat­ter, not the object they socia­lize around. I don’t claim to have a monopoly.

2. Repeat After Me: Cube Gre­na­des are Social Objects. Cube Gre­na­des are Social Objects. Cube Gre­na­des are Social Objects

3. All big change in com­pa­nies come from the peo­ple in the trenches, who do the actual day-to-day work. To change their beha­vior, you have to change the way they inte­ract. Peo­ple inte­ract around social objects. Change the social objects, and you change the company.

4. My friend, Mark Earls once told me a story about a friend of his. The friend pla­yed a key role in the mas­si­vely suc­cess­ful cor­po­rate tur­na­round recently under­ta­ken by McDonald’s.

His friend told him, “We knew we were scre­wed, NOT when the nutri­tion and green issues star­ted hit­ting the news­pa­pers, but by the sim­ple fact that our staff on the floor just weren’t clea­ning the tables and the bath­rooms like they used to. We knew THEN that our peo­ple had lost faith in our company.”

What social objects were peo­ple using, both during the company’s dec­line and during its tur­na­round? What cube gre­na­des were being thrown about, both before and after? I bet you they weren’t the same.

5. Yes, I am fully aware that your cus­to­mers are paying for the qua­lity of the pro­ducts and ser­vi­ces your busi­ness pro­vi­des, not for the qua­lity of the cube gre­na­des flying around your cor­po­rate head­quar­ters. But they are all rela­ted. Everything of value that your busi­ness crea­tes is the pro­duct of a already-existing social dyna­mic. Busi­nes­ses are peo­ple, not machi­nes. And peo­ple socia­lize around objects.

6. An Open Let­ter to Ad Agen­cies: Guys, you are NOT selling mes­sa­ges any­more. You are selling social objects. The work that you create will affect the cube gre­na­des and social objects, that your clients and their cus­to­mers use to inte­ract with each other.

my_desk_222.png

[More Cube Gre­na­des. “I use them as covers for my bin­ders strewn about my desk, to start con­ver­sa­tions”, says the per­son who e-mailed me the photo. Click on image to enlarge etc.]

7. You see a guy wal­king out of an Apple store, loo­king all exci­ted about his new Apple com­pu­ter he’s carr­ying under his arm? Why is he so exci­ted? Sure, he just got him­self a nice-looking piece of kit, but what REALLY exci­tes him is all of the COOL, DISRUPTIVE STUFF he’s going to MAKE with his new machine. Videos, music mixes, wha­te­ver. For his FRIENDS and his PEERS. Again, it’s the SOCIAL that makes it inte­res­ting. Apple makes cube gre­na­des, just like the ad agen­cies. Just like you do.

8. Peo­ple down­load my car­toons and stuck them on their walls by the THOUSANDS. A much sma­ller num­ber spend money to buy the more expen­sive ver­sions i.e. my prints. But the idea is the same i.e. a way for peo­ple to inte­ract. As I’m fond of saying: The con­ver­sa­tions AROUND the object are FAR more inte­res­ting than the object itself. And what is true for me is true of your pro­duct, as well. “Peo­ple Mat­ter. Objects don’t.” Exactly.

9. So when do I start char­ging? You can down­load my stuff for free, so why should you buy a print? Who says you should? I’m gues­sing that if one of my car­toons is mea­ning­ful enough to you, you’ll get tired of seeing it prin­ted on the office laser­prin­ter paper in low-resolution, get­ting all worn and torn, with the Scotch tape get­ting all yellow and crinkly. If you like the dra­wing enough, even­tually you’ll want to upgrade. The same way, back in college, that I would upgrade to vinyl or CDs, once the cheap and nasty cas­sette tape of my favo­rite band star­ted get­ting all fuzzy and worn out. The same way I gladly paid $20 to hear the band play live, rather than hear the same songs on the cas­sette. “Mea­ning Sca­les”. The more cube gre­na­des I throw out there, the more mea­ning­ful inte­rac­tion I create for other peo­ple, the more peo­ple will want to pay for it even­tually. If I loc­ked it all down as a cash-only tran­sac­tion, it would all die a horri­ble death overnight.

10. My long-term goal is to make more privately-commissioned “Cube Gre­na­des” for more clients like agen­ciac­lick. It was a won­der­ful wor­king expe­rience for me, and I want to spend more time in that busi­ness. If you find this idea inte­res­ting, please feel free to e-mail me at gapingvoid@gmail.com. Thanks.

3. CUBE GRENADES: LIMITED-EDITION, FINE ART PRINTS

agenciaclick334.JPG

[Privately-commissioned “Cube Gre­na­des” i.e. limi­ted edi­tion, fine art prints that I did for my Bra­zi­lian client, agen­ciac­lick. Click on image to enlarge etc.]

“This, I believe, is where my car­toons work the best– ‘Cube Gre­na­des’- small social objects that you ‘throw’ in there in order to cause some damage– to start a con­ver­sa­tion, to spread an idea etc.”

Pro­bably the job I’m most proud of recently, is when I was hired by a Bra­zi­lian ad agency, agen­ciac­lick to create a pri­va­tely com­mis­sio­ned edi­tion of cube gre­na­des i.e. fine art prints. See photo above.

They didn’t want these prints for them­sel­ves; they wan­ted to give these out to their clients, as con­ver­sa­tion starters.

“All brands are open brands? Huh? What does that mean? Do you agree with it? Why? What does “open” actually mean? What does “brand” actually mean…?” You get the pic­ture. The same idea that made The Blue Mons­ter so suc­cess­ful. Again, it wasn’t about the mes­sage, the object. It was all about the social.

My long-term goal is to make more privately-commissioned “Cube Gre­na­des” for more clients like agen­ciac­lick. It was a won­der­ful wor­king expe­rience for me, and I want to spend more time in that business.

[The Cube Gre­nade archive is here..]

4. “THE AD AGENCY PITCH”

To keep everything on the same page, I copied & pas­ted the entire “Ad Agency Pitch” from May 30th below. Thanks.

P4220004.JPG

[Sig­ning the agen­ciac­lick cube gre­nade a cou­ple of weeks ago…]

Over the last cou­ple of weeks I’ve been tal­king with various adver­ti­sing and PR folk about the Cube Gre­nade idea. Here are some notes:

1. In terms of the adver­ti­sing and PR indus­tries, the Cube Gre­nade is basi­cally con­cei­ved as a rela­ti­vely cheap and effec­tive Social Object to arti­cu­late the Purpose-Idea of a brand or company.

2. If the agency has an idea they REALLY want to sell to their client, they might have bet­ter luck if they first arti­cu­late the idea via a Cube Gre­nade desig­ned by me, rather than the tra­di­tio­nal “agency pitch” model. The agency’s idea is somehow arti­cu­la­ted as a com­mis­sio­ned print, the print is given out as a gift, to peo­ple within the rele­vant cons­ti­tuency. The print hangs on a wall, other peo­ple see it, and if the idea is any good then peo­ple will start tal­king about it. That con­ver­sa­tion will lead to other con­ver­sa­tions. If the idea is any good, other ideas [and oppor­tu­ni­ties] will be spaw­ned from it.

3. The Cube Gre­nade is not a glo­ri­fied adver­ti­sing pos­ter. I’m not pri­ma­rily inte­res­ted in why peo­ple should buy the client’s pro­duct per se. I’m far more inte­res­ted in the human dyna­mic, the collec­tive human drive that makes the client’s peo­ple want to get up in the mor­ning and go to work. That is where THE REAL VALUE is created.

4. Because the Cube Gre­nade is given as a gift– an act of love, as it were– AND NOT A DELIVERABLE WANTING TO BE SOLD, it will break through the cul­tu­ral barriers of the client com­pany a lot more cheaply and quickly than your stan­dard “Big Adver­ti­sing Idea”. The game here is not about “Selling An Ad”, the point is to make the client more alive, more human, more aware of their own human poten­tial. Again, this is where is where THE REAL VALUE for the client-agency rela­tionship is created.

5. Whether the Cube Gre­nade “works” or not in the end, both agency and client will find out if the thought behind it works A LOT soo­ner and inex­pen­si­vely than exe­cu­ting your ave­rage ad cam­paign. Like all com­mu­ni­ca­tion, the idea needs to RISK FAILURE if it’s ever to be any good. “Fail cheap, fail often”, as the great ven­ture capi­ta­list, Esther Dyson likes to say.

6. As I’ve said before to the ad agen­cies: “Guys, you are NOT selling mes­sa­ges any­more. You are selling Social Objects. The work that you create will affect the Cube Gre­na­des and Social Objects, that your clients and their cus­to­mers use to inte­ract with each other.” This is why I’m tal­king to adver­ti­sing folk. At the end of the day, we’re both in the same business.

7. To get more back­ground rea­ding, please visit my Cube Gre­nade archive here. You might also want to check out “The Hugh­train” to get a bet­ter unders­tan­ding of where my ideas are coming from.

8. As always, if this idea is of any inte­rest to you, please feel free to con­tact me at gapingvoid@gmail.com. Or if you know someone in the adver­ti­sing industry, please send them along to this page [Here’s the link]. Thanks!

5. “OFFICE ART”

Ori­gi­nally pos­ted on this blog, Sep­tem­ber, 2009: a little bit of the phi­lo­sophy behind my work:

recessions0909.jpg

[This could make a nice print, one day…]

Recently on Twit­ter, I wrote:

Art that brigh­tens up the office vs Art that brigh­tens up the home. Two dif­fe­rent vibes alto­gether. I pre­fer making the former.

To which my friend, Kathy Sie­rra replied:

Good! Homes are less likely to *need* brigh­te­ning the way offi­ces do. I can brigh­ten my home just by making toast.

Whether we’re tal­king wee cube gre­nade laser copies or something much lar­ger, like The Pur­ple Cow Print, when I launched the gaping­void gallery ear­lier this year, that was my inten­tion– to make art for the workspace.

This desire goes back to my early years wor­king as an adver­ti­sing crea­tive. There was always cool stuff– fine art, pos­ters, graphic design, car­toons– han­ging up everywhere. Stuff to amuse and ins­pire us, stuff to tweak our brains in the right direc­tion. And though its effect on the agency’s bot­tom line would’ve been hard to mea­sure, somehow it wor­ked– or at least, helped.

Why can’t all offi­ces be more like this? Is there some law that requi­res cer­tain types of busi­nes­ses to main­tain a dull, gray, machine-like, life-sucking visual envi­ron­ment? You could ague that maybe for some com­pa­nies, sure, but that’s not a world I’ve ever aspi­red to belong to.

“Office Art” tends to come in two main cate­go­ries: 1. REALLY expen­sive. 2. REALLY cheesy.

I wan­ted to make office art that was neither…

[Afterthought:] Of course, a lot of my collec­tors work from home, the­re­fore their offi­ces are in the house, not in an office buil­ding. But the prints were made with the works­pace in mind, not the “living” space, regardless.

6. “Art And The Real World”.

[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted on this blog, Octo­ber, 2009]

P1080889A.jpeg

[“Port­fo­lio Num­ber One”, han­ging in a collector’s office in Germany.]

I’ve been pla­ying around with this line  a lot recently: “Art For The Real World”.

I’m inte­res­ted in how art affects what some peo­ple call “The Real World”- the work­place, the world of work, the world of busi­ness. That’s what the Cube Gre­nade idea is all about.

My adver­ti­sing buddy, Vinny Warren, grew up in a Roman Catho­lic hou­sehold in Ire­land. He was telling me that his parents would always have a few reli­gious icons han­ging on the wall somewhere. Pic­tu­res of Saints, Mary & Baby Jesus, that kind of thing.

Why? Says Vinny, “To remind us who we were.”

Art that reminds you who you are. Exactly. What applies in Catho­lic hou­seholds also applies in pla­ces of busi­ness. Sha­red Mea­ning. Exactly. Social Objects. Exactly.

I don’t think any of this is roc­ket science…

[Update:] John left a good com­ment:

I think surroun­ding our­sel­ves with icons, art, books and such to remind our­sel­ves of who we are, where we have been and where we hope to go is essen­tial to kee­ping our hearts alive. It is too easy to lose our way. My office is full of these things.

7. MOLESKINES:

moleskineframed123.JPG

[“Moles­kine 42″ in a nice woo­den frame. Click on image to enlarge etc.]

moleskine42vvv.JPG

[“Moles­kine 42″ before the fra­ming, approx 5“x7”: Click on image to enlarge etc.]

moleskine42%20closupA.jpg

[Close-up view]

In May, 2008 I blog­ged about a new dra­wing, “Moles­kine 42″.

Since then I’ve got­ten a lot of requests for them. So I plan to be doing more in future.

ADVERTISING MOLESKINE:

2222fde.jpg

[“Adver­ti­sing Moles­kine”. 5“x7”. Fra­med. Click on image to enlarge etc.]

advertising%20moleskine%20001.jpg

[Unfra­med. Click on image to enlarge etc.]

Dave Whittle, an adver­ti­sing exe­cu­tive down in Aus­tra­lia, com­mis­sio­ned me to draw him a Moles­kine, based on an old car­toon print-out of mine, that he had han­ging on his office wall. A Cube Gre­nade. Exactly. I sold my first Moles­kine to a collec­tor in Paris. This one is going to some­body in the South Paci­fic. I love the way the Inter­net gives rela­ti­vely small ope­ra­tions like my own a glo­bal reach. Thanks, Dave!.

[The Moles­kine archive is here.]

[Backs­tory: About Hugh. E-mail Hugh. Work with Hugh. Twit­ter. Car­toon Archive. News­let­ter. Book. Inter­view One. Inter­view Two. EVIL PLANS. Limi­ted Edi­tion PrintsCube Gre­na­des.]

May 23, 2009

dreck intolerance


[“Gin And The Cog­ni­tive Sur­plus”. The REAL rea­son why Madi­son Ave­nue is in cri­sis, the rea­son nobody in the industry ever talks about. Watch Clay Shirky’s video above, or read his blog post on the same sub­ject.]
Some years ago, me and some fellow adver­ti­sing crea­ti­ves gathe­red at Dave Carlson’s apart­ment in Chi­cago, to watch a TV show, drink some alcohol and gene­rally socia­lize. I can’t remem­ber what TV show we were watching; I do remem­ber that the show was two hours long and had LOTS of com­mer­cials.
So like the “industry-insiders” that we were, while the com­mer­cials were broad­cas­ting we’d do run­ning com­men­tary on them. “Oh, that’s shit.” “Nice boobs.” “Wow, I like that car!” “Man, who wrote THAT godaw­ful tagline…?”
Two hours later, the show ended. Every­body came to the same conc­lu­sion. Two hours of com­mer­cial bom­bard­ment later, only TWO of the com­mer­cials we thought were even remo­tely good, from a crea­tive and/or pro­fes­sio­nal stand­point. The rest– dozens of them– were com­plete, use­less, noisy dreck.
This 95%-5% Dreck/Quality ratio is about right. An adver­ti­sing crea­tive wins the occa­sio­nal award now and then, but 95% of the time, she’s pro­du­cing dreck. Work three years in an ad agency if you don’t believe me.
The inter­net, which now dic­ta­tes the terms of media to TV, a lot more than vice versa, doesn’t handle dreck very well. On the inter­net, dreck is really easy to ignore, dreck is really easy to kill. So peo­ple do ignore it. Sadly, Madi­son Ave­nue is not cul­tu­rally equip­ped to handle this kind of Dreck Into­le­rance. Their busi­ness model won’t allow it. And like the news­pa­pers, their Pen­sion Fund sha­rehol­ders won’t allow them to change their busi­ness model, no mat­ter what’s hap­pe­ning out there in Reality-ville.
Yes, it’s a bit of a problem…