Print is the new Artisanal

It happened again: More mass layoffs as the illustrious old magazine, Newsweek discontinues its print edition.

And the blogosphere rings out with with the usual “What will become of print” questions, yada, yada, yada.

I know exactly what’s going to happen to print; the same thing that happened to horses once the automobile came along.

Automobiles may have ended the horse n’ buggy era, but hey, according to my friend, Kathy Sierra, horses are still a FORTY* billion dollar industry in the United States.

I buy most of my books on Kindle. But I buy hardback editions when the book when it has real totemic power for me. Like “Decline and Fall of The Roman Empire”. Or “Tribes”. Or “Moby Dick”.

Or I buy them when they’re simply not made for Kindle, like the artist, Chris Wool’s beast of a coffee table book. Magnificent!

Or I buy the print version of The Economist when I’m getting on an airplane. Keeps me busy when the captain makes me turn my Kindle off during take off and landing.

As far as mainstream journalism and journalists, well, my blogging buddy Mathew Ingram moved over from writing for the Toronto Globe & Mail to writing for the much leaner Giga Om. His move is just one example of what already happening to thousands. Or if it isn’t, they’re in trouble.

Print just going to increasingly be a little “artisnal” niche; the ones who disagree are old and dying off.

I don’t know why this is even a debate anymore. It’s been happening for years.

So I drew a cartoon about it…

[*Not three billion $, as previously stated]

[UPDATE:] Kathy Sierra left a great comment below:

Only when a thing is made obso­lete can we dis­co­ver if there was some underl­ying value?—?beyond uti­lity?—?that some peo­ple found com­pe­lling enough to keep alive or evolve into something new. The hor­ses bred today for “rec­rea­tion” are dra­ma­ti­cally dif­fe­rent from the workhor­ses of the past, but they are still… horses.

What ELSE is being made obso­lete now that might emerge from the ashes in a new, power­ful form?