February 20, 2013

Do people really want to be “Everyone”?

Send to Kindle

image9869

It always exci­tes me to see someone trying to shake up the art industry, so I was sad to learn about Jen Bekman’s fine art retail site, “20x200” sus­pen­ding ope­ra­tions. Though I didn’t know the peo­ple per­so­nally, I’d been roo­ting for them. It see­med like a neat idea, and I loved the name.

So why did it fail? In retros­pect, it isn’t too hard to see why: High overheads (Since when did you need a fancy office in SoHo, New York to sell art prints online?). Inves­tors vs Foun­der con­flicts. Beau­coup Emplo­yees, Pas Beau­coup sales. Nothing that any of us haven’t seen before…

But here’s another thought:

20x200’s offi­cial tagline was “Art For Ever­yone”. Or to put it through a Mar­xist lens, art for the masses.

“Brin­ging Art To The Mas­ses” is a well-meaning idea, sure, but hardly a new one. The early Soviets tried the same thing, coin­ci­den­tally, around the same time they also dis­co­ve­red that ruth­lessly exter­mi­na­ting peo­ple en masse (no pun inten­ded) was good for business.

John Rus­kin, William Blake, Durer, La Trec, Hogarth, etc etc were trying even before that [Though Ashi­lle Gorky, one of my favo­rite artists, didn’t like the idea so much. He famously called 1930’s Social Rea­lism  “Poor art for poor peo­ple”, but I digress…]

The thing is, like Seth Godin says, does any­body really belong to “The Mas­ses” any­more? We’re all weird, we’re all niche, and thanks to the Inter­net, we’re all get­ting weir­der and nichier by the day.

In other words, “Art For Ever­yone” is a nice enough thought, until you rea­lize that few poten­tial cus­to­mers actually like being put in the “Ever­yone” basket.

So what bas­ket do peo­ple like being put in? A bas­ket with a strong, pas­sio­nate, rela­ti­vely uni­que sense of PURPOSE that defi­nes it. A niche that matters.

And yes, you gues­sed it, what is true for the online art sales mar­ket is also pro­bably true for your industry as well.

It’s either that, or get crushed by Amazon…

[UPDATE:] Jen just sent me a nice email– Ope­ra­tions are sus­pen­ded, not cea­sed. So it seems there’s going to be a second act, they’re going to regroup… Stay tuned. Hurrah! :)

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , , ,

7 Responses to “Do people really want to be “Everyone”?”

  1. Mars Dorian says:

    Inte­res­ting, I just watched a talk with her tal­king about how pas­sio­nate their fan base was, but some­ti­mes you never know what’s going on behind the scenes.

    I think you’re dead-on the “Art for everyone” — I know what the mes­sage implies, but I don’t see myself as ever­yone, so it’s almost a slight offense. Maybe the next slo­gan will be :

    “Loathed by many, loved by those who know bet­ter “
    ?

  2. Elizabeth says:

    I was ins­pi­red by her idea, and con­si­de­red doing something simi­lar when I first arri­ved in China. Her ele­gant pri­cing method was a fan­tas­tic idea, and with the NYC gallery space they had a place for the ‘fine art’ aspect which gave them cre­di­bi­lity in the art world. (Art­world as antithe­sis to the “ever­yone” tagline of course).

    Any­way, last time I chec­ked, the site had got­ten unwieldy: too much art, not enough ways to search it. Loo­king for­ward to their next incarnation.

  3. Jeremy says:

    Nail on head. What just came up for me is that in many ways, I would favor an orga­ni­za­tion that reflects my aesthe­tic rather than one that has a cate­gory box for me. A lot of indie record labels (and even majors with their sma­ller sub­si­diary labels like None­such) have this down as if you like one of their artists, you’ll pro­bably be inte­res­ted in another. Sma­ller art galle­ries often have a niche mar­ket as oppo­sed to fee­ling like you’re wal­king into a college town pos­ter shop with your Bob Mar­ley pos­ters over here, your Eins­tein pos­ters over here, your bikini pos­ters there, and your sports pos­ters in the back…

  4. JuicyCanvas says:

    Spea­king of for­mer Com­mu­nists brin­ging art to ‘the masses’

    Yes we are all uni­que.
    Yes we are crea­tive.
    Yes we all need more art that ‘speaks’ to you and have meaning.

    We’ve con­coc­ted a nifty new take on that at : http://JuicyCanvas.com

    ‘open-sourced’ art is here.
    check out our full manis­festo : http://juicycanvas.com/manifesto/

    i would really love your thoughts.

    thanks

    artur | founder

  5. Gracy says:

    Nice post..thanks for sha­ring “Art For Ever­yone” it make me ins­pi­red to learn in every field.

  6. Gretchen DeAndre says:

    I loved the 20x200 con­cept, but I pla­ced a $500 order in January. My cre­dit card was char­ged, but I never got the print. I got one mass email explai­ning that they were in a tran­si­tion, but I have not been able to reach them since. It’s really disap­poin­ting. I know I am not the only one whose money they have taken.

  7. Elhaam says:

    Gretchen, same thing hap­pe­ned to me. Pla­ced and order, char­ged in full and 3 months later, nothing has been ship­ped to me. Got the same pathe­tic email about their “tran­si­tion”, which is NOT my pro­blem. They should have infor­med us before making our purcha­ses that they have “hic­cups” in pro­gress, ins­tead they lied, and took our money. They’re dis­gus­ting. I’ve emai­led 20 times, left voi­ce­mails, went to Jen’s gallery, I’ve done everything I can think of and no reply back yet. I will be reaching out to the Bet­ter Busi­ness Bureau next!

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter