May 1, 2012

“I’m sorry my last book was so long, but I didn’t have time to write a short one”

Send to Kindle

[Click on image to acti­vate ani­ma­tion etc.]

This is one of the coo­ler “Social Object Fac­tory” mini-projects we’ve done lately– a little ani­ma­ted Gif for Seth Godin’s lovely little book, Poke The Box.

[Yes. I know. We didn’t use my dra­wing style this time. The Fac­tory is really about Social Objects, not about Hugh etc.]

One thing Seth and I always had in com­mon, is that we both believe in wri­ting short books. My per­so­nal rule is: All my books have to be short enough to be read on a plane ride bet­ween Miami and New York. And they are.

A book that makes you feel hope­fully really ins­pi­red and really exci­ted, that you close and put away satis­fied, just as they’re drop­ping the lan­ding gear, coming into La Guar­dia. It’s sim­ple enough goal to aim for; cer­tainly a lot less delu­ded than “Write the next ‘Sun Also Rises’ or ‘Ulysses’”.

Seth talks about his “short for­mat” phi­lo­sophy some more in a bri­lliant post, “Tracts and Books”:

The Com­mu­nist Mani­festo is 80 pages long. Cer­tainly long enough to make an impact.

It has never taken me beyond a hun­dred pages to be per­sua­ded. Sure, there are times when the pages after page 100 help me pile on, give me more depth and unders­tan­ding. But a hun­dred (and usually fifty) is enough to get under my skin.

Or to steal hea­vily from George Ber­nard Shaw, “I’m sorry my last book was so long, but I didn’t have time to write a short one”.

It’s dirty little sec­ret that most of my business-book author friends (and I have more than a few) will freely admit off the record: Most busi­ness books are lucky if peo­ple read more than the first hun­dred pages.

So why write more than a hun­dred pages? You tell me…

It’s never quite that sim­ple, of course. There are as many ways to write a book as there are authors. If you want to spend the next seven years teaching junior college in order to be able to write the next Great Ame­ri­can Novel in your spare time, that works too, go for it.

But if you’re just trying to get ideas to spread– if it’s the ideas that actually mat­ter, not the book itself– I’d pay atten­tion to what Seth is up to, very carefully.

Like I’ve said many times before about Media, we’re now living in the era of #Chea­pEasy­Glo­bal. And thanks to that, I do honestly believe, it’s never been a more exci­ting time to be a writer.

Make of that what you will.

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , ,

One Response to ““I’m sorry my last book was so long, but I didn’t have time to write a short one””

  1. Peter says:

    I really hate long books with really small print. They just drone on, are bloa­ted and self ser­ving. I remem­ber rea­ding Rework which makes this point and says how they hal­ved their boo­ked to 27,000 words. What makes peo­ple write 100,000 words of repe­ti­tion and bore­dom. If you have that many words why not write 4 books. Didn’t someone once say “Small is Beautiful.”

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter