February 16, 2012

“Redefine Entrepreneurship”: It’s the “Who”, not the “What” that matters. cc: @Babson

Our friends at Bab­son College have asked us to help out on their new cam­paign, “Rede­fine Entre­pre­neurship”. [Catch the backs­tory here, and watch the video here to get a rough idea etc etc.]

It’s a sim­ple enough idea: If they can own a new idea of what entre­pre­neurship is, or at least, be a prime mover in the con­ver­sa­tion, then peo­ple will go to them to get a piece of the action. Good for the stu­dents and faculty, good for the brand and good for the sta­kehol­ders. Exactly.

Of course, the mea­ning of the word has been rede­fi­ned over and over many times already, from in its ori­gins in the Indus­trial Revo­lu­tion of yes­ter­day, to Sili­con Valley today, to India and China and Africa tomo­rrow. Lan­guage is orga­nic and fluid, after all, and to hope to come up with the all-encompassing, defi­ni­tive wor­ding for it, isn’t going to hap­pen in our life­time. The word already has a million defi­ni­tions, anyway.

But as I pon­de­red this, more and more, I star­ted thin­king that the really inte­res­ting ques­tion isn’t, “What is entre­pre­neurship?”, but “Who is an entrepreneur?”

As Reid Hoff­man dec­la­red in his won­der­ful new book, you can still think like an entre­pre­neur and hold a job down in a large com­pany. In fact, it’s now pretty much essen­tial for sur­vi­val that you do so.

So I quickly drew the t-shirt idea above: “YOU ARE AN ENTREPRENEUR”.

The idea is not a “BIG STATEMENT” per se, but desig­ned more as a con­ver­sa­tion starter.

When peo­ple see the mes­sage, the peo­ple who already see them­sel­ves an entre­pre­neurs will think, “Yeah, so, I know that already.”

They’re not the peo­ple nee­ding to hear the it.

But the peo­ple who DON’T see them­sel­ves that way, THEY WILL  ques­tion why some­body would think they’re entrepreneurs.

Which could start a lot of con­ver­sa­tions right from the get-go. Ima­gine what your favo­rite Star­bucks barista would say about the t-shirt. Or that guy you know who works at The Gap. Or your college room­mate, Dan who works deep in the bowels of Zap­pos’ call centers.

Or think about the four­teen peo­ple you now have on the pay­roll, and how you’re going to con­vince them to think of their time with you as more than just a paycheck.

Aren’t they ALL entre­pre­neurs? Shouldn’t they feel that way? And if not, isn’t that a problem?

I think it is.

I mean, we’re tal­king about actual flesh-and-blood live­lihoods here, surely that’s something worth giving thought to?

T-shirt-as-conversation-starter is far more inte­res­ting that T-shirt-as-advertisement, don’t you think?

Any­way, that’s my first salvo. I hope you like

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

4 Responses to ““Redefine Entrepreneurship”: It’s the “Who”, not the “What” that matters. cc: @Babson”

  1. John Dodds says:

    It’s an out­look, not an output.

  2. I don’t know how the terms “busi­ness­man” and “entre­pre­neur” play out in the US. But in India, there is a dis­tinct class and gene­ra­tion cons­cious­ness about it.

    While busi­ness­man can mean anything from a small shop owner to a tycoon, entre­pre­neur implies the new media and tech industry.

    Moreo­ver, the term entre­pre­neur does not carry any of the nega­tive con­no­ta­tions that busi­ness­man does. Which in this con­text can mean lack of good edu­ca­tion and pedigree.

    Pre­ci­sely why, the new and young busi­ness class never for­gets to use entre­pre­neur some where in their list of credentials.

  3. […] need to know more about entre­pre­neurship, read “Ran­dom Thoughts on Being an Entre­pre­neur” and “Rede­fine Entre­pre­neurship” in […]

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter