“Because unless businesses and brands get their head around the Social Object concept, their marketing will fail, end of story.”

[Buy the print here etc.]

With my recent post, “Rec­laim Blog­ging: Why I’m giving up Twit­ter and Face­book” making all that fuss all around the Web, obviously I’ve been reflec­ting a lot on blog­ging in general.

What is blog­ging for?

More spe­ci­fi­cally, what is gapingvoid.com for?

Even more spe­ci­fi­cally, what is gapingvoid.com actually ABOUT?

Blog­ging is the same as careers: Every now and then it helps to take some time off, to reflect, to regroup and refo­cus. Which is EXACTLY what I’ve been doing these last cou­ple of days.

Having a big ol’ think.…

My conc­lu­sion?

Besi­des dra­wing and pos­ting car­toons, which I’ve always done and will always do until I die, I believe the focus of gaping­void should be something it’s rif­fed on nons­top for the last half-decade.

i.e. Social Objects.

i.e. Why Social Objects are, I believe, the future of marketing.

And why are they the future of mar­ke­ting, exactly?

Because unless busi­nes­ses and brands get their head around the Social Object con­cept, their mar­ke­ting will fail, end of story.

And Mar­ke­ting is too impor­tant to fail, not just for busi­nes­ses, but for society in general.

This is a con­ver­sa­tion that HAS to hap­pen, end of story. And where bet­ter to start this con­ver­sa­tion than on gaping­void? Exactly.

And yes, I expect some REALLY COOL art to be made in the process…

Rock on.

Comments

  1. Jerome Hughes says:

    fyi… there’s a typo in the /so link… http://gapinbgvoid.com/so thanks, Hugh!

  2. Social objects are the main rea­son I still read your blog.

    I actually don’t like your dra­wing style — it’s way too sim­ple and abs­tract for me.
    But I simply luv the mes­sa­ges, and the ove­rall mis­sion they repre­sent, and
    that’s why I eagerly await each new one.
    They are so emo­tio­nally powe­red with that belief that equals mine, and that’s why they con­nect with me.

    It’s still ama­zing that major brands don’t get that mission/belief “bran­ding”, as it’s the future, espe­cially since there’s unli­mi­ted com­pe­ti­tion online.

    Way to go !

    • Hey Mars,

      Heh. Yeah, well, non-abstract stuff has its place, too… Glad you like the mes­sa­ges, anyway.

      I think the pro­blem with “New Mar­ke­ting” i.e. Social-Object mar­ke­ting, is not that peo­ple don’t get it– they do– it’s also that somehow they have to sell the idea to their bosses.

      And selling ANYTHING new to one’s boss is always a slow, pain­ful process.

      So when peo­ple see a new idea, their first reac­tion has nothing to do with the objec­ti­vity of the idea, but with THE PAIN their bos­ses will soon be inflic­ting on them :D

      EVERYONE has dealt with this before– it fine, it’s to be expec­ted, it’s part of the game, it’s part of the challenge…

      Onwards!

Speak Your Mind

*

Comment through Twitter

Are you ready to work with us?

Get More Info

Testimonials

His work acknowledges the absurdity of workaday life, while also encouraging employees to respond with passion, creativity, and non-conformity...   MacLeod’s work is undeniably an improvement over the office schlock of yore. At its best, it’s more honest, and more cognizant of the entrepreneurial psyche, while still retaining some idealism.

The New Republic
Lydia Depillis

Last year my State of the College address was 76 slides loaded with data. This year it was 14 cartoons that were substantially more memorable.

Len Schlesinger
Former President, Babson College

"There are only two daily newsletters that I look forward to opening and reading every time they show up to my inbox: Seth Godin's and gapingvoid."

Tony Hsieh
CEO, Zappos

Hugh MacLeod is a genius.  Genius.

Seth Godin
Best Selling Author

In moments of indecision I glance at the wall [to Hugh's work] for guidance.

Brian Clark
@copyblogger
 
  • The New Republic
  • Len Schlesinger
  • Tony Hsieh
  • Seth Godin
  • Brian Clark
prevnext