August 14, 2011

“The Market For A Scotch To Believe In Is Infinite”

Send to Kindle

[One of the Dewars dra­wings I did while atten­ding TED Glo­bal etc.]

[Today’s guest post is by Jason Kor­man, my busi­ness part­ner since 2005, and CEO of gapingvoid]

“The Mar­ket For a Scotch to believe in is Infinite”

There are millions of cases at stake for the guys who get the mes­sa­ging right.

 

We’ve had Scotch on the brain lately. We’ve done wine, we’ve done suits and we’ve done tech, but Scotch has its own par­ti­cu­lar set of challenges.

What makes any bottle of scotch dif­fe­rent? And, does anyone care, any­way? There are, what Hugh’s dad used to call, the “whis­key bores” who drone on and on about all things whisky, but I’m told there aren’t that many of them left. So, what mat­ters to ever­yone else?

There is the realm of the sin­gle malts and high end scotches. But they seem to need to be mar­ke­ted more like Con­gac or Cham­pagne, a bit of bling, sexy pac­ka­ging, and hyped up associations.

For more broad mar­ket Scotch, the oppor­tu­ni­ties are much grea­ter and the cha­llenge much more com­plex. Scotch is a dis­tinctly mas­cu­line pro­duct. It is strong, it is inte­res­ting, is implies thought and inte­lli­gence. It s a pro­duct that wants to have meaning.

Given that, what we see mostly in Scotch mar­ke­ting is a reliance on ‘authen­ti­city’, with ever­yone trying to have the most authen­tic con­ver­sa­tion groun­ded in cen­tu­ries of his­tory. The ques­tion is really: is this rele­vant? Once a con­su­mer knows your  Scotch is ‘for real’, do they care enough to want to know the details? I’d guess, pro­bably not.

With alcoho­lic beve­ra­ges, what you do have is a desire from the mar­ket to want to know: Why? What do you stand for? Why do you exist? And does your brand repre­sent something that I believe in — does it share my world view.

J&B says, “Let’s Start a Party”. I know that they are trying to make an old brand youn­ger and rele­vant. But, OMG, does it seem disin­ge­nuous. It comes across as a little incon­sis­tent with what the pro­duct is about. It’s not tequila, its not vodka, it’s really NOT a party drink.  It feels like granny dan­cing on the table at your cousin’s wed­ding – kinda crin­ge­worthy and creepy. Oh, and in an ack­now­led­ge­ment that even they don’t buy into the party thing, they also tell the story about Mr. Jus­te­rini tra­ve­ling from Bologna to Lon­don in 1749. Not sure what they’re thin­king, but stream of cons­cious­ness brings me to paraph­rase the Artist For­merly Known as Prince… “Let’s party like its 1749″.

Chi­vas goes with “Live with Chi­valry”, and tells “The Story Behind the Legend”. It’s place cen­tric, it’s a nice story about a Scots­man tra­ve­ling to NY a hun­dred years ago. But, it sounds a lot like things we’ve heard before. More impor­tantly, they seem  uncon­cer­ned with rele­vance in 2011. Their ultra-produced videos are like Public Ser­vice Announ­ce­ments, urging peo­ple to be nice. Yawn.

 

As with both of the above, Dewars goes with the place cen­tric, authen­tic Scot­tish thing, so they cover that base. But it feels like a brand that wants more. Their mes­sa­ging is really very ‘of the moment’ and invol­ves peo­ple who are actually alive today — It focu­ses on the top bit of Maslow’s hie­rarchy. They want to find peo­ple and faci­li­tate peo­ple being self– actua­li­zed. The mes­sage is, as beings we are hap­pier doing things that we believe in.

A bright spark at Dewars had the idea of alig­ning with the TED con­fe­ren­ces. After all, Ted’s spea­kers do, by defi­ni­tion, embody the qua­li­ties that Dewars represents.

Enter Hugh. They also hired Hugh to draw at TED Edin­burgh and dis­till the spea­kers ideas into his style of illus­tra­tion.  Hugh likes to say that his goal is to draw a car­toon that rips your face off the first time you see it, and is still doing it and the tenth time.

One of those is pos­ted above.

We ask our­sel­ves: Is Hugh’s style too edgy, too dis­rup­tive, not art direc­ted enough, to be used in main stream media? How can a brand like Dewars bet­ter com­mu­ni­cate what it stands for than through one of Hugh’s cartoons?

In today’s world, where ever­yone is saying adver­ti­sing is dead, what they are really saying that adver­ti­sing the way it used to be done is dead. Giving peo­ple something they believe in, in a way that they can’t help but notice, is where the action really is. Get­ting noti­ced. Doing stuff that gets noti­ced, doing it smart,  and in a way that your audience will think is cool, is where its at. Have beliefs that are strong enough to build a move­ment, not just a brand.

We’ve got Scotch on the brain, and we’re liking it. A cate­gory ripe for disruption.

Jason Kor­man
CEO, gapingvoid.com


 

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , ,

15 Responses to ““The Market For A Scotch To Believe In Is Infinite””

  1. Sarah Carruthers says:

    Hugh, please give me a HUGE BILLBOARD outside my office win­dow.… PLEASE!

  2. Maria says:

    This is inte­res­ting Jason. Just spent an after­noon with mas­ter blen­der Richard Pater­son tas­ting Dal­more sin­gle malt. My blog post is going to be about how whisky is sexy and why women should like it.

    • jason Korman says:

      Hi Maria, Thanks, and I agree. Scotch is seduc­tive. Dal­more is one of those brands that I think takes the Cog­nac route. High end, ele­gantly pac­ka­ged, they take time to create uni­que items that go for lots of money.

      What’s sexier than a sophis­ti­ca­ted woman, a snif­ter of good scotch and a Cohiba ? ;-)

  3. Ashley Collie says:

    One of life’s coo­lest rituals for me is having a scotch with my dad when we see each other. For me, a sim­ple slo­gan for scotch would be: “Wha­te­ver your need, Scotch always does the trick…”

  4. you want to share a bottle of wine with your love. wine is roman­tic. wine is remi­nis­cent, wine is wist­ful. wine is chi­llin on the patio swing with your sweetie.

    scotch is pen­sive. scotch is crea­tive. scotch is gol­fing. hun­ting. scotch is around the kitchen table with the friends that just finished hel­ping you chop the wood for your cabin. …in all of those acti­vi­ties you’re not roman­cing, or part­ying. you’re drea­ming big. you’re con­que­ring the world (or your little tiny part of it, anyway).

    • John Dodds says:

      While I’m far from con­vin­ced by your jus­ti­fi­ca­tion (who says scotch is not an accom­pa­ni­ment to romance /partying or that wine is not aspi­ra­tio­nal?), I do think “thin­king big” is an inte­res­ting thought.

      It’s one we all like to have, it’s defi­ni­tely con­ver­sa­tio­nal and it’s one that can be tied in with ideas such as craft and long-termism that are inhe­rent in scotch’s creation.

      • Jason wri­tes (about scotch): “It’s a pro­duct that wants to have mea­ning.” …so I was kinda trying ot riff off of that. reflec­ting on what scotch means to me. When do I choose to drink it over a good craft mic­ro­brew, or over a fancy bottle of wine, or any other beve­rage? cer­tainly ever­yone has their own pre­fe­ren­ces. for me, scotch is usually the drink of choice around a mea­nin­ful con­ver­sa­tion. …before this article i wasn’t aware of dewars’ mar­ke­ting mes­sage, but now that i’ve loo­ked it, i really like it. am i going to go out and buy a bottle of white label because i believe it’s going to make be a bet­ter thin­ker? pro­bably not, but now that they’ve spon­so­red TED i’d be inte­res­ted in seeing what the align them­sel­ves with next.

  5. Leon says:

    Hugh, I’ve been follo­wing you for years. I’ve been wai­ting for main stream brands to dis­co­ver your knack for com­mu­ni­ca­ting. Gaping­void and Scotch. If that isn’t a win­ning combo, I don’t know what is. I know you can help them to rede­fine what Scotch means to people.

  6. WhiskyNotWhiskey says:

    Smoke and mirrors. Why does an his­to­ric brand of scotch have to select a lifestyle they want to be iden­ti­fied with? This is not authen­tic at all. It’s for­ced. It’s mar­ke­ters sit­ting around a table deci­ding which lifestyle niche would be most pro­fi­ta­ble at this time, and smashing their brand into that niche until another niche looks more enticing.

    Their scotch isn’t chan­ging. Only their brand posi­tio­ning. It’s hard to jump niches with an esta­blished brand.

    Word of Mouth should be the top prio­rity for most scotch mar­ke­ters. If your brand has a his­tory and a story (or seve­ral), tell that story, and own it. The right peo­ple will gra­vi­tate to that brand. If your brand has been around for hun­dreds of years, don’t try to become the brand for the X-Games crowd or the Inter­net crowd. Ins­tead, launch a new brand whose his­tory can be for­med around that audience.

    The fas­test gro­wing vod­kas are the newer vod­kas that have alig­ned their brand to a spe­ci­fic position/niche without having to wrestle with any of the bag­gage from a long pro­duct history.

  7. Ed Byrne says:

    Jason,

    Please stop calling Whis­key ‘Scotch’ — Scottish Whis­key has already done a tre­men­dous job of bran­ding and mar­ke­ting itself — so much so that many peo­ple interchange the word Scotch with Whis­key. Scotch is like Cham­pagne — a type of alcohol from a par­ti­cu­lar region.

    The real oppor­tu­nity with whis­key is to edu­cate the mar­ket on the options — tri­ple pot dis­ti­lled Irish whis­key, peat-fired scotch malt, sin­gle malt ame­ri­can. Whoe­ver can do that can make whis­key like wine — a pro­duct with many regions, fla­vours and levels of qua­lity, where ever­yone can have their own tas­tes and pre­fe­ren­ces. Where we are now is ‘get a bottle of ‘scotch’.

  8. Blair says:

    What an inte­res­ting post Jason.

    I love your take on the Whisky Industry.

    I have recently crea­ted World Whisky Day and it´s star­ting to take off. Over 1500 glo­bal atten­dees want to get involved.

    World Whisky Day is going to appeal to whisky geeks and new whisky drin­kers alike. Its for ever­yone and anyone!

    A day to cele­brate a drink we all love!

    Let´s Get The World Involved!

  9. Kate says:

    When I saw the dra­wing, what I inter­pre­ted was the the world is so f*#@ed that you need to get blotto on Dewars, cer­tainly not cou­rage. And what’s the dif­fe­rence of Dewars going to Ted and other whiskey’s having “hyped up asso­cia­tions.” Seems pretty much the same. Sorry, this just smacks of a bit of hypocricy.

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      Kate,

      “What’s the dif­fe­rence,” indeed… That’s the whole point of this exercise.

      The point of this exer­cise (which is orga­nic and ongoing, by the way) is to move Dewar’s away from “Here’s some sexy-but-contrived rea­son to buy our stuff” to “Hey, we’re kinda into the same things you are.”

      Which, in terms of TED, is actually true… ergo, NOT hypoc­ri­ti­cal, IMHO.

  10. Laurie Ann says:

    Given the type of pro­duct they are mar­ke­ting they should pro­bably con­si­der an exc­lu­si­vity cam­paign, not an ever­yone come to the dance type campaign.

    Scotch wis­key is for the dis­cer­ning pallet and peo­pel who tend to like the finer things in life. I would try a cam­paign that askes ‘subli­mi­nally’ are you good enough for our Scotch?

    That will attrack the atten­tion of the tren­doids. LOL

  11. Maria says:

    Jason, I can show you what’s sexier. :-) What hap­pens when a blog­ger genui­nely likes a product?

    http://sexandthebeach.blogspot.com/2011/08/sexy-scottish-affair-part-1.html

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter