January 30, 2011

the science of love. the science of eHarmony.com.

Send to Kindle

Like Loic and I dis­cus­sed many years ago, the best thing about being a blog­ger is the peo­ple you get to meet. It’s also true of being a car­too­nist, as well. Car­too­ning opens doors.

Three weeks ago, the whole car­too­nist thing somehow led me to Santa Monica, CA, sit­ting in the office of Dr. Gian Gon­zaga, PhD.

Dr. Gian is the head research guy at eHarmony.com, the big dating site. You’ve pro­bably seen the com­mer­cials.

We sat there and tal­ked for about 3 hours. It was one of the most fas­ci­na­ting con­ver­sa­tions I’ve had in… like, forever.

Gian’s research, both in aca­de­mia and for eHar­mony, asks very sim­ple ques­tions: What makes for suc­cess­ful cou­ples? What makes for good long-term relationships?

And yeah, as someone who spends a lot of time every year desig­ning fine art Valen­ti­nes, I find the whole thing abso­lu­tely fascinating.

The one big takea­way from the conversation?

It’s called “eHar­mony” for a rea­son.  It’s not called “ePas­sion” or “eSex” or eHoo­kUp or “eRo­mance” or “eOneNightStand”.

True love, las­ting love, can­not exist without some sort of inhe­rent “Har­mony” in the rela­tionship. And no amount of sex or pas­sion or romance or money can make up for that. Hence the car­toon above [I actually drew that car­toon well over a year ago, long before I met up with eHar­mony. Great minds think alike etc.].

And so eHar­mony tries to match sin­gle peo­ple in a “har­mo­nious” way, to give them a bet­ter chance at being in a happy rela­tionship. Visit their site and dig around a little, you’ll see what I mean.

Another big takea­way from Gian?

Peo­ple are desig­ned for harmony.

We’ve evol­ved over millions of years to be a cer­tain way. And if we act in such  way that is not “in har­mony” with this long-term evol­ved self, we will make our­sel­ves unhappy.

We are made to be good peo­ple. We are made to love. We are espe­cially made to love our chil­dren. We are made to care about one another (at least in close pro­xi­mity).  We are made to live good lives. We are basi­cally pro­gram­med for good­ness, and not evil.

The things that make us happy are the same things that made our prehis­to­ric ances­tors happy. Our true nature is hard-wired; our true nature has been evol­ved over millions of years. No amount of “Drugs & Hoo­kers” is going to make you happy, no mat­ter how much money you spend on them. Nature simply didn’t make you that way.

Funny: The day after our mee­ting, I then found myself in Las Vegas, atten­ding CES on behalf of one of my clients, Intel.

It was REALLY inte­res­ting to be in Vegas the day after Dr. Gian. Wal­king around the bars and casi­nos, I wit­nes­sed a COMPLETELY dif­fe­rent world­view from eHarmony’s, to say the least.

I really, really, really enjo­yed my mee­ting with Dr. Gian. I left his office fee­ling totally ener­gi­zed with my brain on fire. Wha­te­ver your take on eHar­mony may be, I’m always ele­va­ted by peo­ple who, in their own way, tried to build their lives and their work around something that isn’t tri­vial, something that actually mat­ters both to our indi­vi­dual sel­ves and huma­nity in gene­ral. Something not enough of us do. Good luck to him, I say.

[PS: I’m doing a wee Valen­tine car­toon promo with eHar­mony. Watch this space…]

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , , ,

9 Responses to “the science of love. the science of eHarmony.com.”

  1. Gian really is inc­re­dibly inte­res­ting. Nature rewards us for being with someone we love. I genui­nely enjoy lis­te­ning to him and Jen­nie Chen (@misohungry) talk about it.

    Loo­king for­ward to what you guys come up with. :)

  2. It also isn’t called eWeGotSuedForDiscriminatingAgainstGays.

    Too long, I guess?

  3. Nicky Rogers says:

    Why do peo­ple con­fuse infa­tua­tion with love?

    Life is about get­ting along. In love, in work, in family.

    The dopa­mine of “new love’ seems to make peo­ple for­get that they actually need to live with someone after the bloom is off the rose.

    As much as anything it is about, caring, con­si­de­ra­tion and just ‘get­ting on’

    Thanks Hugh!

  4. I emai­led them once and asked them why they exc­lude gay peo­ple. They replied that the were “based on scien­ti­fic research” and that they didn’t have any data on gay peo­ple. What, like when we love each other it’s some fun­da­men­tally dif­fe­rent mecha­nism? WTF?

  5. Paul Breton says:

    Michael, Emma, eHar­mony has had a same-sex matching ser­vice for a few years now (www.compatiblepartners.net) and more than 400,000 peo­ple have sig­ned up to use it. You can find sto­ries from some of the happy cou­ples we’ve intro­du­ced here: http://www.compatiblepartners.net/success

    Miche­lle, thanks! :)

    Nicky, we couldn’t agree with you more.

    Paul Bre­ton
    Direc­tor, Cor­po­rate Com­mu­ni­ca­tions
    eHarmony

  6. Adrian says:

    Don’t know much about the science, but it wor­ked for us.

  7. Michael Martine says:

    Paul, that’s great to hear. I’m very glad about that. It shows you guys are lis­te­ning and inte­res­ted in making things bet­ter. It also shows you have a way to go to com­bat the per­cep­tion you’re still anti-gay.

    I chec­ked on the main eHar­mony site and was glad to see a link to the part­ners site (albeit a very small one at the bot­tom – still, it’s something).

    Thanks for filling us in on these chan­ges. I didn’t know and I’m sure many others don’t either.

  8. Richard Stooker says:

    Inte­res­ting observations.

    Could it be that we’re pro­gram­med for both “har­mony” and Vegas-style exci­te­ment? Too often it’s pre­su­med that one lifestyle prec­lu­des the other, but most peo­ple have lived com­bi­na­tions of both.

    Deve­lo­ped socie­ties and many peo­ple in deve­lo­ping coun­tries have aban­do­ned the strict mora­lis­tic gui­de­li­nes of the past. We’re still strug­gling to find a model of rela­tionships that works for every­body in the long run. Many of us carry scars of the mis­ta­kes of being pioneers.

    It’ll be inte­res­ting to see how eharmony’s research holds up in the long term. After all, peo­ple change. Just because peo­ple are con­gruent right now doesn’t mean they’ll remain that way for the next forty years.

    medi­cal alert

  9. […] Hugh Mac­leod is a car­too­nist and the author of his blog Gaping Void. He employs an inte­res­ting “doodle” style (my term) to create fas­ci­na­ting art joined […]

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter