December 20, 2010

“the high-end microaudience”: the most likely way to make money on the internet

Send to Kindle

[A dif­fe­rent angle on the Angel Gabriel etc. You can get the print here etc.]

This is why I love the internet…

In the old, pre-internet days, if you were a car­too­nist like me and wan­ted to be suc­cess­ful, you pretty much had to be famous.

Not hugely famous neces­sa­rily, but some­body with a pretty major publishing gig. Like Pea­nuts, Doo­nes­bury, Dil­bert, Gar­field or Bloom County, or some of The New Yor­ker heavy­weights like Stein­berg or Ronald Searle.

And those gigs were hard to come by. You nee­ded a big time publi­ca­tion syn­di­cate or media com­pany to back you. And then the news­pa­pers, the adver­ti­sers and the media lands­cape in gene­ral had to be on board as well.

And of course, all this requi­red a VERY large audience. Millions of peo­ple, lite­rally. Just so you could make an OK living.

As we all know, the more peo­ple you need to keep happy, the less likely that’s going to hap­pen, or at least, the less you can con­trol. Mass audien­ces are a fic­kle, unpre­dic­ta­ble bunch. And they have a nasty habit of igno­ring peo­ple like you com­ple­tely, and going for peo­ple like Jus­tin Bie­ber or Paris Hil­ton instead.

Which is why I never took this route. Too many varia­bles I couldn’t con­trol. And my work was never mains­tream enough, anyway.

Thank God the inter­net came along and chan­ged everything. Sud­denly I found myself making a damn good living, without having all those mains­tream hoops to jump through first. Just by dood­ling wee, non-mainstream car­toons all day, to what by old mains­tream stan­dards would be a TINY audience that I reach via this blog, Twit­ter and my news­let­ter.

This is made pos­si­ble because the web, as we all know, is  a SUPERB way to sell rela­ti­vely high-end pro­ducts. In my case, pri­vate, client-based com­mis­sions are worth THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of times more than the adver­ti­sing eye­balls that ulti­ma­tely pay for the news­pa­per cartoonist’s mort­gage. Of course they are. Not to men­tion, the com­mis­sions are fun and inte­llec­tually inte­res­ting to work on.

Which is why my advice for anyone trying to suc­ceed on the web is, make the highest-end pro­duct you can, and then tar­get the tiny hand­ful of peo­ple– the mic­roau­dience- who are likely to buy it. For­get the mas­ses. Tar­ge­ting the lat­ter is too much like trying to win the lot­tery– though great when it hap­pens (howe­ver unli­kely), there are just too many damn varia­bles outside your control.

Any ques­tions?

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , ,

25 Responses to ““the high-end microaudience”: the most likely way to make money on the internet”

  1. […] the mic­roau­dience: the mot likely way to make money on the inter­net (gapingvoid.com) […]

  2. gemorris says:

    This advice is doubly true if you pro­duce a phy­si­cal pro­duct as your busi­ness. There isn’t even sur­vi­val to be had in the mass mar­ket, someone will simply figure out how to have the pro­duct made in southeast asia and run you out of busi­ness. The only refuge for any “manu­fac­tu­ring” of any sort (and in our case we are tal­king about very light manu­fac­tu­ring; sta­tio­nery) is in the niche high end markets.

    It’s easier to expand down­mar­ket than upmar­ket, so regard­less you might as well start near the top.

  3. Joaquín says:

    Hey Hugh,
    Very true. I’ve always been inte­res­ted in kno­wing
    1) which tablet you use and how you keep reso­lu­tion at an ok level to make the phy­si­cal prints and
    2) how it is that you pro­duce your phy­si­cal pro­ducts. I assume there are peo­ple on “the series of tubes” whom one can con­tact and they’ll make it for half what they want to charge me here in Puerto Rico and I can get my own art pro­du­ced and to my door, so I can hang them on my walls next to yours and com­pare ;-)

    That is, your sec­ret sauce minus the sec­ret.
    Care to elaborate?

  4. The lar­ger audience you are trying to tar­get and cater to, the less you will pro­bably be able to focus only on what you love to do. Even if you try it, it won’t take long before you give in here and there and then com­ple­tely change the ini­tial idea. Because that is what a big audience dic­ta­tes; diver­sity, being spread out or making an ave­rage to cover all.

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      gemo­rris, Ste­lla, yeah, which is why I stick to car­too­ning. There are very few car­too­nists in my space… whe­reas there ar tons of wri­ters, social media gurus etc etc.

      Thanks ;-)

      Hugh

  5. […] “the high-end mic­roau­dience”: the most likely way to make money on the inter­net | gapingvoid […]

  6. Jlyles says:

    Yea…it’s something to look into, but I’ve heard inter­net “gurus” make this claim before, and it see­med so much like over-rated hype.

    I love Stella’s point, and it seems like I’ve had that expe­rience recently, but…

    Isn’t is easier to over-saturate a micro-audience than a tra­di­tio­nal niche?

  7. Dino Dogan says:

    This might be the first (and perhaps the only) exam­ple of an article on making money on the “series of tubes” (perhaps that should be it double-double quo­tes? :-) I’ve seen that actually makes sense and is not all-hype.

    Very inte­res­ting. A sound biz advice from a car­too­nist. Lets see Stein­berg or Ronald Searle do that lol

  8. Casey Craig says:

    Hi Hugh,

    This is good advice for artists who aren’t cran­king out cot­tage sce­nes a la Tho­mas Kin­kade or trying to catch up with the latest trend. To stay true to your­self is always easier when you have some collec­tors in your cor­ner to help.

    P.S. I loved wine week!

  9. Yvon Bayonne says:

    What I understand:

    #1 Tar­get the tiniest rele­vant niche you can
    #2 Narrow that niche again (highly cri­ti­cal)
    #3 Make a pro­duct worth being bought
    #4 Sell

    We humans are way too opti­mist. This had to be taken into account (i.e #2)

    Correct?

  10. Sherm Cohen says:

    I’ve been moving in this direc­tion recently, and I can con­firm that this works. I’m pha­sing out my $40 pro­duct and star­ted selling a spe­cia­li­zed $295.00 course (10-DVD set and/or online mem­bership). I’ve been able to make more in a month than I made all last year. Pro­vi­ding solid con­tent on my Blog (with Twit­ter and Face­book lea­ding there) has hel­ped me build a good base of focu­sed customers.

    Thanks for all the great ins­pi­ra­tion, Hugh!

  11. […] Hugh Mac­Leod. Hugh’s usually in good form, often in fine form. Here’s his latest, on the high-end microaudience: […]

  12. Kimberly says:

    Hi Hugh,

    I’ve used exactly this model to sell heri­tage hogs and arti­san pork to high end clients. You’ve been ins­pi­ring me for years. Thanks so much!

    Pax. Kim­berly

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      Thanks, Kim­berly, glad to hear it’s wor­king for you…

      I’m not saying this is the only worthwhile busi­ness model, I’m just tal­king about the best like­lihood of an ave­rage per­son having a good out­come etc.

  13. Moise Levi says:

    I have to agree with Hugh ; A mic­roau­dience is all you need to sell high end pro­ducts.
    I star­ted a finan­cial blog a few years ago, got cre­di­ble and sold a “one on one” tra­ding les­sons (in seve­ral coun­tries).
    Being a car­too­nist (as well), wan­ted to publish finan­cial car­toons daily at first, but quickly found out that I would have a hard time selling them (:

  14. […] Popescu Nu stiu daca stiti gapingvoid.com, dar in orice caz va pot spune ca pe mine ma amuza Hugh Mac­Leod, pen­tru modul aproape Chaplin-ian in care se impie­dica in pro­priile bulen­dre prin­tre averi […]

  15. […] the mic­roau­dience: the mot likely way to make money on the inter­net (gapingvoid.com) […]

  16. D says:

    How do you know that you make more money than the news­pa­per car­too­nists? I bet some of them make a lot of money.

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      Oops… I just saw this one… sur­pri­sed I didn’t com­ment on it, the first time around. OK, here goes.…

      The short ans­wers, I actually know hopw mcuh they make i.e. except for one or two supers­tars, less than you think.

      Basi­cally, I make more money than most of them… most of them don’t make that much. I mean, they do OK, but nothing worth get­ting exci­ted about.

      Secondly, the vast majo­rity of them are hacks, doing unin­te­res­ting work. Every day. And their con­tracts lock them into that for­mula. For ten years, mini­mum. That’s a long time to give up your free­dom, even if the money is good.

      There’s a rea­son why the last inte­llec­tually inte­res­ting car­toon to come along was Dil­bert, and that was twenty years ago.

      There’s a rea­son why so many great car­too­nists gave up as soon as they could: Lar­son, Wat­ter­son etc.

  17. […] for a while. Hugh McLeod tal­ked about this approach in a recent article. He desc­ri­bes tar­ge­ting the High-End Mic­roau­dience in order to make a pro­fit from his […]

  18. […] create it your­self. Even if it’s a small one. Car­too­nist and wri­ter Hugh McLeod calls this your micro-audience. This is the tiny hand­ful of peo­ple who are likely to buy your high-end […]

  19. Kelly Allen says:

    This is such good advice. It can really be hard to break that “mass audience” men­ta­lity, but when you do, it frees you up to do anything, any­time and anywhere. Your ideas are in line with Seth Godin’s recent book “Poke the Box” about not WAITING or ASKING PERMISSION to create, just go ahead and create.

    The actor Jim Par­sons (from the “Big Bang Theory) said if he couldn’t act on TV or Broad­way, he would go back to his sister’s house and put on shows in her back yard. I love to hear pas­sion like that from crea­tive people.

    I know you have cho­sen a high-end mar­ket, but you are also doing exactly what you want and that pas­sion is reflec­ted in the qua­lity of your work.

    Thank you for this great blog post.

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      Hey Kelly,

      Yeah, I’ve always been a mem­ber of the “small is beau­ti­ful” crowd.

      The “It doesn’t scale” crowd never cap­tu­red my imagination.

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter