Archive for December, 2010

December 28, 2010

not everybody’s cut out for “normal”

Another new car­toon for the Racks­pace series.…

Basi­cally, I took the old “George” idea and re-jigged it, adding the tra­de­mark Racks­pace red & black.

And hey, it worked.

I see this car­toon going in the slide deck of Rackspace’s recruiters.

We’re not a ‘nor­mal’ com­pany  etc. It’s OK not to be ‘nor­mal’ etc. ‘Nor­mal’ is boring etc.

It’s easy for a small com­pany to have a dis­tinct per­so­na­lity. Much har­der when the com­pany has grown a lot, like Racks­pace has done in the last few years.

Much har­der to NOT be normal…

[Com­mis­sion your own car­toon from gaping­void etc.]

December 27, 2010

rackspace: why not try to rip the face off the dragon?

[Down­load prin­ta­ble ver­sion here etc.]

This is my latest car­toon from the series I’m doing for Racks­pace.

One thing that Racks­pace is very proud of is their cus­to­mer base. Both in terms of qua­lity and quan­tity. Not only do they have some really wic­ked cus­to­mers, they have lots of them.

And no, I’m not just being nice because they’re my client. Some of them ARE awe­some. A lot of ama­zing com­pa­nies that you’ve heard of and admire.

So… what’s wrong with wan­ting more where that came from?

What is wrong with wan­ting THE BEST cus­to­mer base in the world, and adjus­ting your busi­ness plan accordingly?

And what is wrong with dec­la­ring that to the fric­kin’ world?

To be honest, I don’t just see this car­toon as an inter­nal moti­va­tio­nal pos­ter wha­tsit. I also see it as a full blown adver­ti­se­ment– one that could easily go into maga­zi­nes like Wired or Inc.

What’s wrong with dec­la­ring to the world, “Here’s what we’re going after with a ven­geance”, rather than the usual “Here’s why should buy our won­der­ful pro­duct” drivel?

And the car­toon cha­rac­ter: why not make him stres­sed out and antsy– like real entre­pre­neurs are– rather than the usual happy-happy-joy-joy that most adver­ti­se­ments run with?

Why not talk to peo­ple about the ACTUAL world we live in, rather than the irri­ta­ting fan­tasy world that Madi­son Ave created?

Why the hell not?

We’re all going to be dead in 100 years. In the mean­time, why not try to rip the face off the dragon?

Exactly.

December 20, 2010

“the high-end microaudience”: the most likely way to make money on the internet

[A dif­fe­rent angle on the Angel Gabriel etc. You can get the print here etc.]

This is why I love the internet…

In the old, pre-internet days, if you were a car­too­nist like me and wan­ted to be suc­cess­ful, you pretty much had to be famous.

Not hugely famous neces­sa­rily, but some­body with a pretty major publishing gig. Like Pea­nuts, Doo­nes­bury, Dil­bert, Gar­field or Bloom County, or some of The New Yor­ker heavy­weights like Stein­berg or Ronald Searle.

And those gigs were hard to come by. You nee­ded a big time publi­ca­tion syn­di­cate or media com­pany to back you. And then the news­pa­pers, the adver­ti­sers and the media lands­cape in gene­ral had to be on board as well.

And of course, all this requi­red a VERY large audience. Millions of peo­ple, lite­rally. Just so you could make an OK living.

As we all know, the more peo­ple you need to keep happy, the less likely that’s going to hap­pen, or at least, the less you can con­trol. Mass audien­ces are a fic­kle, unpre­dic­ta­ble bunch. And they have a nasty habit of igno­ring peo­ple like you com­ple­tely, and going for peo­ple like Jus­tin Bie­ber or Paris Hil­ton instead.

Which is why I never took this route. Too many varia­bles I couldn’t con­trol. And my work was never mains­tream enough, anyway.

Thank God the inter­net came along and chan­ged everything. Sud­denly I found myself making a damn good living, without having all those mains­tream hoops to jump through first. Just by dood­ling wee, non-mainstream car­toons all day, to what by old mains­tream stan­dards would be a TINY audience that I reach via this blog, Twit­ter and my news­let­ter.

This is made pos­si­ble because the web, as we all know, is  a SUPERB way to sell rela­ti­vely high-end pro­ducts. In my case, pri­vate, client-based com­mis­sions are worth THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS of times more than the adver­ti­sing eye­balls that ulti­ma­tely pay for the news­pa­per cartoonist’s mort­gage. Of course they are. Not to men­tion, the com­mis­sions are fun and inte­llec­tually inte­res­ting to work on.

Which is why my advice for anyone trying to suc­ceed on the web is, make the highest-end pro­duct you can, and then tar­get the tiny hand­ful of peo­ple– the mic­roau­dience- who are likely to buy it. For­get the mas­ses. Tar­ge­ting the lat­ter is too much like trying to win the lot­tery– though great when it hap­pens (howe­ver unli­kely), there are just too many damn varia­bles outside your control.

Any ques­tions?

December 19, 2010

“sure, we all need money. but I think we need chemistry more.”

[“Hug­ged”, which went out ear­lier this year in the news­let­ter. You can buy the print here etc.]

I love the backs­tory to the “Hug” car­toon above:

My mother, in her day, was a very suc­cess­ful edu­ca­tion soft­ware con­sul­tant. “Have you hug­ged your client today?” was her line, not mine.

She always had about 6 – 10 Blue Chip clients on board at one time. Com­pa­nies like Shell, Exxon, Coco-Cola etc.

And no mat­ter what kind of day she was having, EVERY DAY she would make some kind of effort to demons­trate to each and every client that… she cared, that this stuff mat­te­red, that she was willing to go the extra mile.

And it wor­ked. It cer­tainly paid for me and my sister’s education.

“Hug­ging clients” is really a no-brainer.

Unless you don’t really like your clients. Unless you’re just in it it for the money.

Then it just feels sleazy and wrong.

There’s nothing wrong with insis­ting on good che­mistry, before you com­mit fully to wor­king with someone.

Sure, we all need money. But I think we need che­mistry more.

[P.S. Spea­king of che­mistry, I’m really grok­king the work I’m doing with Racks­pace at the moment. Thank CHRIST for peo­ple like Rob La Gesse etc.]


December 15, 2010

interview with @soniasimone

[“I tra­ded bore­dom for stress. And it was so worth it.” Great inter­view of @soniasimone, on beco­ming an entre­pre­neur etc.]

December 10, 2010

internet famous

December 8, 2010

#thingsiwishmyphonedid: ideas requested

Over at Things I Wish My Phone Did, I’ve star­ted accep­ting other people’s idea sub­mis­sions for new cartoons.

The first one I used was from David Herrold, pic­tu­red above. Thanks, David!

Sure, Things I Wish My Phone Did star­ted life out as a small side pro­ject on behalf of my client, Line2, bit something tells me that it could be something much big­ger, something much more inte­rac­tive. There are a lot of peo­ple out there with strong ideas and opi­nions about “What a phone could be”.

All new ideas– both for new car­toons and ideas for where take the web­site– gra­te­fully recei­ved. Just ping me on Twit­ter, pre­fe­rably using the #Thing­sI­WishMyPho­ne­Did hash­tag. This could be huge. Thanks!

December 1, 2010

cube grenade: thoughtworks

A “cube gre­nade” com­mis­sion I just com­ple­ted for Thought­works, the glo­bal IT con­sul­ting company.

Thought­works has this term, “Water­me­lon”, to desc­ribe a pro­ject that goes terribly wrong, that looks all well and good on the outside (green), but as the pro­ject comes to an end, turns out to be a huge ol’ expen­sive mess on the inside (red). I just took the idea and ran with it.

We’re going to turn this design into a 100 large fra­med prints, as Christ­mas pre­sents for their clients. A fun little “con­ver­sa­tion star­ter” to hang on their walls… which of course, is what the the whole cube gre­nade idea is all about. “Art With Pur­pose” etc.

Fun!

[Com­mis­sion your own cube gre­nade here etc.]