September 2, 2010

“social gestures beget social objects”

Send to Kindle

0711thankyouthankyou.jpg

[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted November,2007]

Chris Sch­roe­der riffs on my whole “Social Object” mar­ke­ting sch­tick with this very salient thought:

If your com­pany wants to suc­ceed, it needs to have a social object mar­ke­ting plan.

Amen to that. But note what Chris also says:

I don’t know about you, but when some­body walks by with an iPhone, I notice. If I see a kid stroll by me in some limi­ted edi­tion Nikes, that regis­ters with me too.

The­rein lies the rub. The Social Object idea is easy to get if your pro­duct is highly remar­ka­ble, highly socia­ble. An iPhone or the latest pair of Nike’s are both fine exam­ples of this.
But I can already hear your inner MBA saying, “Yeah, but what if you don’t work for Nike or Apple? What if your pro­duct is boring home loans, auto insu­rance or… [the list of boring pro­ducts is pretty long].
My stan­dard ans­wer to that is, “Social Ges­tu­res beget Social Objects.“
Which is another way of saying, maybe the way you relate to some­body as a human being plays a part in all this. Maybe desc­ri­bing the pro­duct as “boring” is just one more bullshit lie we tell our­sel­ves in order to make the world seem less com­pli­ca­ted and scary. Hey, my pro­duct is inhe­rently dull and boring, the­re­fore I get to be inhe­rently dull and boring, too. Hoo­ray!
Nowa­days, thanks to folk like Nike, we think of snea­kers as “non-boring” brands. This wasn’t true when I was a kid. Back then snea­kers were those bloody awful $3 plim­solls we wore in Phys Ed. But it took com­pa­nies like Nike and Adi­das to come along and by shear force of will, raise the level of con­ver­sa­tion in the snea­ker depart­ment, before snea­kers became bona fide glo­bal social objects, bona fide glo­bal powerhouse brands.
The deci­sion to raise the level of con­ver­sa­tion isn’t eco­no­mic. Nor is it an inte­llec­tual deci­sion. It’s a moral deci­sion. But whether you have the sto­mach for it is up to you.
Like I told Tho­mas almost 3 years ago re. English bes­poke tai­lo­ring, “Own the con­ver­sa­tion by impro­ving the con­ver­sa­tion.” And hey, it wor­ked. His sales went up 300% in 6 months.
It wasn’t the change in pro­duct that made Tho­mas’ suits Social Objects. It was chan­ging the way he tal­ked to peo­ple. The same applies to Stormhoek, which 3 years ago was an $8 bottle of South Afri­can wine nobody had ever heard of. Con­ver­sa­tion. Mat­ters.
So all you cor­po­rate MBAs out there, here’s a little tip. When you plan­ning on how to embrace the brave new world of Web 2.0, the first ques­tion you ask your­self should not be “What tools do I use?“
Blogs, RSS, You­Tube, Twit­ter, Face­book– it doesn’t mat­ter.
The first ques­tion you should REALLY ask your­self is:
“How do I want to change the way I talk to peo­ple?“
And hope­fully the rest should follow.
Think about it.
[Bonus Link: For a more aca­de­mic take on social objects, check out this post from Anth­ro­po­lo­gist, Jyri Enges­trom.]

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , ,

7 Responses to ““social gestures beget social objects””

  1. Berry says:

    So how did Tho­mas “own the con­ver­sa­tion by impro­ving the conversation”?

    What did you and he SAY that made the con­ver­sa­tion different?

    What did you say about Stormhoek that impro­ved the conversation?

    I don’t want to pre­tend I get this when in fact I don’t quite get what you are saying. So I guess I am loo­king for “case stu­dies”- the tool of the trade for MBA stu­dents! (one of which I am not, just saying)

  2. Hugh,

    What role does ten­sion play in pro­pe­lling social objects?

    By “ten­sion” I don’t mean bad/negative ten­sion (i.e. sti­rring up con­tro­versy for attention’s sake). I’m thin­king more like the ten­sion inhe­rent in great story­te­lling. Ten­sion that begs reso­lu­tion. For exam­ple, a sports team is a power­ful social object because it crea­tes ten­sion through an insider/outsider tribe. Gaping­void crea­tes tension/excitement by saying the unsaid, and fin­ding the words.

    It seems like social ges­tu­res that genui­nely and sin­ce­rely tap into sha­red values, hopes and strug­gles have the best shot at sprea­ding. Because within our values/hopes/struggles lie the tension/energy to live them out and somehow resolve them in the world.

    I hope you will con­si­der expan­ding on this at some point. I’m very inte­res­ted in social objects and pur­pose ideas, and am currently rea­ding Mark Earls’ book “Herd” to catch up on this thinking.

    Appre­ciate what you do, Hugh.

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      Keith, I think you nai­led it in one. Ten­sion is key, as it is in all great storytelling.…

    • Berry says:

      I have this theory that I share often– few agree– basi­cally it’s that “mean” peo­ple get ahead because ever­yone wants to be liked by ever­yone else. So if someone is “mean” to me then I will go out of my way to please them. Many peo­ple doing this pro­pels the mean per­son upwards.

      You do create ten­sion Hugh. Something makes me follow your work. Your mix of business/art is uni­que. But mainly it’s because you don’t jump over your­self to please ever­yone. It’s called buil­ding res­pect. (This reply of mine is an exam­ple of the opposite…)

      But like Keith said, “hope you will con­si­der expan­ding on this at some point.”

  3. Chris Leonard says:

    I’ve been trying to find Stormhoek in Aus­tin for years. Did it ever make it here? What ever hap­pe­ned to Evil Plans?

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter