September 1, 2010

“content marketing” or, it’s much easier to get paid work out of people if they’re already your fanboy

Send to Kindle

I don’t know if it was Brian Clark over at Copy­blog­ger who first popu­la­ri­zed the term, “Con­tent Mar­ke­ting”, but it’s he I most asso­ciate it with.

Con­tent Mar­ke­ting is exactly what is sounds like– crea­ting con­tent in order to more effec­ti­vely mar­ket wha­te­ver it is you’re selling.

Copy­blog­ger itself is a really good exam­ple of con­tent mar­ke­ting. It’s basi­cally a daily advice column for anyone trying to do con­tent mar­ke­ting pro­fes­sio­nally. You get to read it for free, but hey, Brian and his team have other pro­ducts they sell which are all desig­ned to be inte­res­ting, use­ful and valua­ble to their core audience.

And Copy­blog­ger rakes it in as a result; it’s now a seven-figure business.

Back in 2003, eons ago in Inter­net time, I remem­ber tal­king to Henry Cope­land, the foun­der of Blogads.com. This was well before the huge adver­ti­sing mar­ket emer­ged for large sites like Techc­runch, Gaw­ker, Masha­ble and Boing­Boing, back when even the lar­gest blogs were far sma­ller and far more per­so­nal than they are today.

We were chat­ting about poten­tial busi­ness models for blogs, short and long-term. This was still very early days, remember…

“As far as I can tell,” said Henry, “the most via­ble busi­ness model for blog­ging these days is for under-employed con­sul­tants to show off how smart they are.”

Con­sul­tants sho­wing off how smart they are? Under-employed or over-employed, that is con­tent mar­ke­ting. Exactly.

You write a blog. You build a dedi­ca­ted follo­wing. You leave a disc­reet, non-pushy trail of breadc­rumbs to what your busi­ness actually does for money. If X per­cent of your rea­ders take the bait and become paying cus­to­mers, hey, you win.

Like the head­line of this post says, it’s much easier to get paid work out of peo­ple if they’re already your fanboy.

What I like about this model is that it’s sim­ple. It isn’t roc­ket science. And perhaps more impor­tantly, it’s free from the tyranny of wan­ting or nee­ding huge traffic.

[War­ning– VERY rough math to follow:] English Cut can only make and sell about 100 hand-tailored Savile Row suits a year. I can only handle a small hand­ful of Cube Gre­nade clients at one time. Same with James Gover­nor at Red­monk or Piers Faw­kes at PSFK. And if say, our blogs can con­vert one or two per­cent of our hard­core rea­ders into cus­to­mers, in theory, the total rea­dership per blog only needs to be fifty or a hun­dred times that in order to make the busi­ness via­ble. A few hun­dred peo­ple, maybe a cou­ple of thou­sand– very attai­na­ble (and sus­tai­na­ble) numbers.

So if you get it right, you can just do your thing, deligh­ting, thri­lling (and selling to) the audience that you already have, without obses­sing over which “A-Lister” is lin­king to you (or not),  or how many new Twitt­ter follo­wers you’ve got­ten (or haven’t) since last month. Nor do you have slee­pless nights fret­ting over the fact that your blog doesn’t have the same num­ber of rea­ders as The Atlan­tic, The New Yor­ker, The Eco­no­mist, Wired etc. Or wha­te­ver silly, energy-draining neu­ro­ses that so many other social media mavens seem to fall prey to.

That’s the good news. The bad news is, effec­tive con­tent mar­ke­ting requi­res two things: world-class con­tent and a world-class pro­duct. Har­der than it looks. Life is unfair.

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to ““content marketing” or, it’s much easier to get paid work out of people if they’re already your fanboy”

  1. “The bad news is, effec­tive con­tent mar­ke­ting requi­res two things: world-class con­tent and a world-class product”

    But as you say, it means there’s plenty of room at the top. More good news.

  2. That last line just lit me up “Life is unfair” the game is rig­ged, yea. Our self writ­ten life scripts have all the ingre­dients, over coming adver­sity being the one that draws in the most fans, I can­not lose.

  3. Tim Grahl says:

    LOVE this post. Dead on.

  4. Leisa LaDell says:

    Hugh — You. Nai­led. It. And…it’s not the first time, of course. Love this one — thanks for pro­vi­ding this pers­pec­tive. I am buil­ding my busi­ness, and friends keep asking “how will you make money at that?” You have saved me so much time — now I can just send them a link to this post.

  5. disenyosos says:

    Hey Hugh!
    I nee­ded to read this post, just launched a blog on design and sus­tai­na­bi­lity and was worried bout not reaching the num­bers to be influen­tial. But yeah, I´ve gotta spend more effort on con­tent… thats what its about in the end.

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter