May 28, 2010

daily bizcard 028– megan mcardle

Send to Kindle


[Down­load the high-res image here etc.]

Today’s “Daily Biz­card” design, “Socia­lism Is Evil”, goes to the utterly bri­lliant poli­ti­cal jour­na­list, Megan McArdle.

Legend has it that some­body was once so impres­sed with her old ama­teur blog, Asym­me­tri­cal Infor­ma­tion, they offe­red her a job at The Eco­no­mist, one of the most res­pec­ted news organs on the pla­net. She now works at The Atlan­tic, where she has a mas­sive fan base of super-smart people.

I met her in Lon­don in 2005 at a geek din­ner I had orga­ni­zed, back when she was doing The Eco­no­mist gig. She was a most fun and wel­come addi­tion. I remem­ber intro­du­cing her that eve­ning to Gia Mili­no­vich, another very bright Ame­ri­can expat in town. I thought they might get along.…

Gro­wing up in Edin­burgh in the 1970s and 80s, I even­tually left for Uni­ver­sity in Aus­tin, Texas with a very grim view of Socia­lism. Though I hadn’t seen it at its worst (we’re tal­king Scot­land here, not East Ger­many) I’d seen enough of it not to like or trust it. To me it see­med not so much a poli­ti­cal sys­tem, more like a sad, bit­ter, venal cul­tu­ral sui­cide note.

Even nowa­days, if I tried han­ging a pos­ter of this car­toon around Edin­burgh or Glas­gow, I’d still pro­bably get lynched. Which is EXACTLY why I like this cartoon.

Besi­des that, there’s something rather amu­sing to me about a beau­ti­ful, cul­tu­red, sophis­ti­ca­ted Washing­ton jour­na­list han­ding out “Socia­lism Is Evil” cards at swank, East Coast soi­rees. Exactly.

[The Daily Biz­card archive is here etc.]

[Com­mis­sion Hugh]

[Megan, please send me an e-mail at gapingvoid@gmail.com with your ship­ping address and the details you want on the back of the biz­card, and I’ll send a free box of 100 to you. Thanks!]

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , , ,

20 Responses to “daily bizcard 028– megan mcardle”

  1. Fernando says:

    Care­ful, you may get lynched here in Ame­rica as well. Sad isn’t it?

  2. David Spira says:

    I often ponder…

    “How many times does socia­lism have to fail before huma­nity stops belie­ving it will work?”

    Then I see friends get back together with mean or abu­sive ex boy or girl­friends, and rea­lize that I have my answer.

  3. T_Haus says:

    Hugh, you’re a sly one. While I wasn’t alie­na­ted by this car­toon – and I still have the wid­get on my site – which is making me feel a little red at the moment (no pun intended) – I was a little sur­pri­sed. It’s cute to be incen­diary these days, I sup­pose. When it comes to ques­tions of free­dom – and free­dom in terms of crea­ti­vity – how do you define your­self? I think it would be more inte­res­ting and more pro­duc­tive and more honest if peo­ple on both sides of the equa­tion would sit down and talk about how we all feel about our per­so­nal free­doms, and which ones we are com­for­ta­ble with losing, and which ones we aren’t. If only things were as sim­ple as this par­ti­cu­lar car­toon, we’d have all the pro­blems of the world wor­ked out, eh? Maybe you’ll do one about per­so­nal free­doms. Enjoy the wee­kend. ;)

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      “I think it would be more inte­res­ting and more pro­duc­tive and more honest if peo­ple on both sides of the equa­tion would sit down and talk about how we all feel about our per­so­nal free­doms, and which ones we are com­for­ta­ble with losing, and which ones we aren’t.”

      What are you saying? That Socia­lism is about rea­so­na­ble peo­ple get­ting together and wor­king things out in a post-ideological, “freedom-from vs freedom-to” man­ner? Good luck with that angle ;-)

      Though yeah, your idea pro­bably would be more inte­res­ting and productive…

      • T_Haus says:

        …Rea­so­na­ble peo­ple get­ting together and wor­king things out in a post-ideologic, “freedom-from vs. freedom-to” man­ner (nicely put, by the way)… Hmm. What are YOU saying? Is con­ser­va­tism? Frankly, I’m sick to death of the heights of absur­dity to which we have been taken by party line pola­ri­za­tion. The holier-than-thou b.s. gets us nowhere, and in the end, poli­ti­cians are still ans­we­ring to the same peo­ple. What is so scary about the idea of peo­ple get­ting together – truly – to deter­mine how we can work on ways to design bet­ter sys­tems that will be more bene­fi­cial to society ove­rall? As oppo­sed to crappy sys­tems that bene­fit the very few? I really don’t get why low income con­ser­va­ti­ves think they are get­ting such a great deal on health care and insu­rance, for exam­ple, and I find it odd and iro­nic that being able to “stand on one’s own two feet,” seems to be such a strongly held con­ser­va­tive notion until there hap­pens to be a giant, catas­trophic boo-boo… then sud­denly, it’s o.k. for other folks to pay for it.

        My guess is that when it comes down to brass tacks, the things we both want are pro­bably not all that dif­fe­rent. Again; bet­ter sys­tems that will be more bene­fi­cial to society ove­rall. I think the big­gest argu­ment from con­ser­va­ti­ves herein, is “Accor­ding to whom?” To which I res­pond: “of the peo­ple, by the peo­ple, for the people.”

  4. T_Haus says:

    Oh, and also, socia­lism isn’t evil, but I think peo­ple can be. Kinda like, “Guns don’t kill peo­ple. Peo­ple kill people.”

  5. cinderkeys says:

    Hmm. So what do you think about all the peo­ple who accuse Obama of being a socialist?

  6. George says:

    Hi,

    While alie­na­tion with gapin’ void would be, imho, one step too far at the moment, I find the very par­ti­cu­lar moment extre­mely interesting.

    It is the first time that a post on gapin’ void bugs me and actually the second since the last one wasn’t to my liking as well.
    The actual pro­blem is that it is not the car­toons bug­ging me but the prose on the side, the gar­nish if you like.

    It is not a big, nor a new thing, art­work has a life of its own. Thus one could find the bp flo­wer (con­tra­dic­tion in terms?) apo­lo­ge­tic, while the evil plan­ning socia­lists of today’s dish could indeed be evil, in a short of Sran­ge­lo­vish way making us crack a smile obfus­ca­ting at the same time Hugh’s evil agenda to make us remem­ber and finally love the bomb.

    So it’s the actual prose “explai­ning”, poin­ting to the “hid­den agenda” voi­ced by Hugh that spoils the goods.

    In my opi­nion the rea­son is that while the “Car­toons drawn on the back of busi­ness cards” have a voice of their own, poin­ting out stuff around us in a, most of the times, well ver­sed and thought­ful man­ner Hugh’s “expla­na­tions” are wanting.

    Hugh can­not pin down his drawn work with words. It could be a mat­ter of quan­tity, brute force, i.e. the car­toons being ima­ges thus having the power of at least 1000 words while Hugh’s com­ments are cer­tainly shor­ter than 1K. So ruff neck apo­lo­ge­tics and over sim­pli­fi­ca­tion of socialism/communism and its impact seem a little frail to me.

    Still, its “Car­toons drawn on the back of busi­ness cards” not “Philosophy/History of Science/Political Science, etc, etc, drawn on the back of busi­ness cards” so live and let live.

    Kind regards.

  7. Jan says:

    Now I won­der how peo­ple in Texas would react if you’d publish the same thing with:

    “Texas is evil”

    ;-)

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      Jan,

      I won­der how girl scouts would react to “Girl scouts are evil”.

      I won­der how Lat­vians would react to “Lat­via is evil”.

      I won­der how pet shop owners would react to “Pet shop owners are evil”.

      I won­der how North Caro­li­nians would react to “North Caro­lina is evil”.

      Sorry… what was your point again? Oh yeah, you don’t have one.…

  8. T_Haus says:

    To George:

    I com­ple­tely agree; alie­na­tion would be way too far. Whether he knows it or not, Hugh has chan­ged my life for the bet­ter with his words and ideas (I might’ve men­tio­ned it a time or two, actually). We haven’t met, but I love the guy. ;)

    Yes, art has a life of its own. I never liked the BP Flo­wer in the past, but I have an alto­gether dif­fe­rent fee­ling when I see it now, and just as another exam­ple, the Nazi flag will always make the hairs on my neck stand up. On the other hand, I find that the sto­ries behind the art can be fas­ci­na­ting. For exam­ple, I didn’t know what things were like for him gro­wing up in Scot­land. Art on a page or in the form of a song can be very much the same as someone screa­ming. Some­ti­mes it helps to learn why. Yes, car­toons on the back of busi­ness cards, are just that. And a swas­tika is just a cross with hooks. Words and expres­sion mat­ter. It’s where the phrase, “speak truth to power” comes from, and I believe there’s a bibli­cal refe­rence, there.

    Cheers.

  9. Robert says:

    You peo­ple get way too wound up about a sim­ple little car­toon.
    I love it how the stron­gest defen­ders of socia­lism have never lived under a real socia­list regime. I live in Spain. It sucks. And its not even East Ger­many bad.

    Take care. Be free. Love your stuff Hugh. Keep it up.

  10. surreality watch says:

    I’m sure that girl scouts would react to “Girl scouts are evil” –but at least they are girl scouts.

    Given that both the UK’s Labour Party and the Spa­nish Socia­list Wor­kers’ Party are just slightly centre-left par­ties with a long tra­di­tion of ope­ra­ting within the democ­ra­tic sta­tus quo (not unlike the US Democ­rats), I find the men­tio­ning of com­mu­nist regi­mes quite hard to understand.

    So, it’s not the “Socia­lism is evil” design that per­ple­xes me. It’s the ina­bi­lity to dis­tin­guish bet­ween a democ­racy and com­mu­nism. I unders­tand that the term “socia­lism” may have dif­fe­rent mea­nings in USA and in Europe, but still…

    UK –inc­lu­ding Scot­land– and Spain (just like the USA) have never expe­rien­ced a regime that resem­bled the Eas­tern Block. They may have had bad or good govern­ments, but the social democ­racy they know of has nothing to do with what the design refers to. Most of the time, peo­ple cri­ti­cize those par­ties for being just as right-wing as their right-wing opponents!

    I like the art­work but there are parts on the text that seem to desc­ribe an alter­na­tive rea­lity. This comes as a sur­prise, since I’m used to Hugh having a much kee­ner look on things.

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      From what you have writ­ten, I would say you know very little about Scot­tish poli­tic, Surreality.

      My opi­nion stands…

      • surreality watch says:

        I claim to be no expert on the count­less splits of the SNP or the Scot­tish Labour Party (or any other Scot­tish party for that mat­ter…), nor I am par­ti­cu­larly inte­res­ted in both left-wing and right-wing Scot­tish natio­na­lis­tic agenda.

        All the same, I believe I’m not mis­ta­ken in saying that there was no com­mu­nist regime in action right under the very nose of Mar­ga­ret Thatcher. If there was one, the his­to­rians, the poli­ti­cal analysts and the news media seem to have mis­sed it.

        • Hugh MacLeod says:

          Surrea­lity, it’s OK, if you don’t think Socia­lism is evil, just say so. I will still like you ;-)

          • surreality watch says:

            Your tole­rance of my per­cei­ved fee­lings is heart-warming Hugh!
            Who am I to oppose an argu­ment appea­ling to fee­lings rather than inte­llect?
            After three years of follo­wing your art and your ideas, I just have to keep on liking you, too.

            Best wishes!
            :-)

  11. Hugh, I think the card it great and I was won­de­ring if I could use it on the back of my busi­ness cards for BULGARIA — I am sure they will laugh and if they dont as is com­mon I lose my knee caps.

    I know (at least I think I remem­ber so) you used to allow this but noti­ced this image doesnt have your web address on and I would like to over­lay that on the image.

    If you need more of a back­ground please drop me a line.

    And even if it is nega­tive — keep up the ins­pi­ra­tio­nal work always makes me chuckle.

Leave a Reply

Comment through Twitter