personalized porn

 

Have a story. And make sure it’s a good one. A DAMN good one.

 

I have a very old, dear friend in New York, call him Andrew.

Andrew is about forty, and a pretty suc­cess­ful film direc­tor. One of his films aired on HBO recently. He also has a thri­ving cor­po­rate video busi­ness, which he works on when busi­ness in Holly­wood is going slow that month. He’s not famous, but he’s done very well.

When I first met him he was in his late twen­ties, wor­king as a bar­ten­der. Back then he had a vague idea of get­ting into the film busi­ness some day, but I didn’t know how serious he was, to be honest. A lot of twenty-somethings in New York blether on about get­ting into film, one tends to mostly ignore it.

But how he even­tually broke into the film busi­ness is one of my favo­rite tales.

In the very late 1990s he finally deci­des that he’s serious about brea­king into the industry. So he goes out and buys him­self a small video camera, a sound recor­der, a new Macin­tosh com­pu­ter to do his edi­ting, a few lights, some mic­ropho­nes, that kind of thing.

So the good news is, he now has all the gear he needs to get started.

The bad news is, having spent all his savings to acquire the gear, sud­denly he needs money in a hurry. New York is expen­sive, and he’s broke.

But because he had pretty much zero expe­rience in the film busi­ness at that point, he soon rea­li­zes that it’ll be a while before anyone in the tra­di­tio­nal New York film industry will hire him for the kind of money he’s loo­king for.

He can’t afford to wait that long. So how does he pay the rent?

He deci­des to go into porn.

But not just any kind of porn. He does PERSONALIZED porn.

Let’s say you and your Sig­ni­fi­cant Other want to create, shall we say, a spe­cial memento [*cough*] of your love [*cough*], and want something a bit more upmar­ket [*cough*] than just the nor­mal, ama­teur, single-angle, une­di­ted video from a camera [*cough*] that’s stan­ding on a tri­pod near to the bed.

That’s right. You’d give Andrew a call. And Andrew and his sound man would come over to your apart­ment and shoot you and your sig­ni­fi­cant other [*cough*] going at it. With pro­per edits, ligh­ting, sound and camera angles. You and your loved one in the full throes of pas­sion [*cough], with Andrew and his sound man hove­ring around you in silence, get­ting the per­fect shot.

After he had shot the video, he would then take out his com­pu­ter and edit the job right then and there, on the kitchen table. So before he left your home, he’d have already given you the SINGLE and ONLY copy that exis­ted of the video. He and his sound man would then exit with nothing i.e. with no bac­kup copy on his com­pu­ter, so there was no chance of the foo­tage ending up on the inter­net. At least, not from Andrew’s side.

He char­ged a few hun­dred bucks for his ser­vi­ces. The ave­rage shoot only took an hour or two. He’s often do two or three shoots a day. Damn good money for an ex-bartender. A lot more money than I ever made in New York.

Busi­ness was brisk from Day One, to say the least. When he first told me what he’d been up to, back around 2000, I liked the story so much I pitched the idea to a jour­na­list friend of mine. Andrew ended up being fea­tu­red in a pretty high-end maga­zine soon after, which rai­sed his pro­file even more. Within no time the phone was rin­ging off the hook, with all sorts of inte­res­ting peo­ple, both inside and outside the film industry, wan­ting to do busi­ness with him.

Great story. There’s only one catch:

I was tal­king to Andrew on the phone yes­ter­day, wishing my buddy a Happy New Year’s. I asked him if he min­ded me using his “Per­so­na­li­zed Porn” story for a chap­ter in EVIL PLANS, as a pos­si­ble case study for inte­res­ting and ori­gi­nal busi­ness models.

“Sure, Hugh, go right ahead,” he says. “Just one thing. None of it is true.”

“Huh?”

“I made the whole thing up.”

“What?” I say. “My favo­rite story about you ever, the one I’ve been telling folks with glee for the last ten years, was a total lie???”

“Yes.”

“Man, you’re a good bullshit­ter,” I say.

“You knew that about me already,” he says.

“Wow.”

“Look,” he says, “Back then I was just one of thou­sands of young wan­nabe film knuc­kleheads in New York, trying to get my foot in the door. I nee­ded to have a story to tell peo­ple. One that was inte­res­ting. One that was dif­fe­rent. One that got people’s atten­tion. One that made me stand out from all the other knuc­kleheads. One that didn’t require me having a mas­sive show­reel. Hey, it wor­ked. That story got me my first few edi­ting jobs in the busi­ness. And since then I’ve been nothing but successful.”

He pau­ses for a second.

“A little present-tense suc­cess, for­gi­ves a lot of past-tense fai­lure,” he says, chuc­kling with delight.

[About Hugh. Car­toon Archive. Com­mis­sion Hugh. Sign up for Hugh’s “Daily Car­toon” News­let­ter.]

Comments

  1. Oh man… what an awe­some story! The end floo­red me.

  2. Abso­lu­tely bri­lliant. I have a friend who clim­bed up the chain in admi­nis­tra­tive assis­tance by way of just such “edi­to­rial vague­ness” as it were. Care­ful choi­ces of adjec­tive and pro­noun. Sadly not as dra­ma­tic as the per­so­na­li­sed porn.

    Won­der how many of these spe­cial memento busi­nes­ses will pop up in the next twelve months, given this post? Niche mar­ket galore.

  3. While it may have work for him — hasn’t it inju­red his rela­tionship with you?

  4. That’s a great tale.

    And shows an alter­na­tive approach to get­ting someone to lis­ten to a new­bie early in their career.

    It does seem to be such a shame that it wasn’t true. Hell, per­pe­tuate the myth. Maybe he is just trying to hide his somewhat dodgy back­ground nowadays.

    btw, Just won­der how much more crap you will get on Twit­ter through pos­ting something with the word ‘porn’ in it :-o

  5. What a great story and while telling lies might not be THE right way to do things, his rea­son for doing it surely is a good thing.

    What a great story and you know what else? It is actually a good *cough* busi­ness idea.

  6. Holy… wow.… omg.…

    can i, uh.… borrow… this idea?

    *looks around shyly*

  7. That is a thing of sin­gu­lar beauty.

  8. Wow.

    I just don’t have it in me.

    But I can see the brilliance.

  9. Hila­rious!!!;-)
    Mind­blo­wing, indeed;-)
    I have just trans­la­ted the story to my parents and we had a good laugh;-)
    Thanks for that, Hugh and your super cool-y crea­tive buddy with guts;-)

  10. funny — great story :)

  11. I got mis­doubt­ted in the middle of rea­ding, but I almost believe the story before you unfold it at the end, to be honest, you two are both exce­llent story­te­ller. Wait a minute, doesn’t com­mon sense work in our mind? Or, it’s got beaten?

  12. Love this story. It’s called a sin­gu­lar desire for suc­cess and doing wha­te­ver it takes to get it.

    I found myself thin­king as I read — I want to know more inte­res­ting peo­ple like that… I think my entire move­ment out of cor­po­rate con­sul­ting and into online busi­ness is the desire to be surroun­ded by inte­res­ting, thought-provoking, doing wha­te­ver it takes people.

    Thanks Hugh for your work and for being someone I can at least tan­gen­tially inte­ract with and observe via your books and Twitter.

    All the Best, and More!
    Suzie

  13. Your pal wasn’t fib­bing to you back in the day … he’s fib­bing to you now.

    Ten years on, with industry plau­dits and a res­pec­ta­ble film sec­tor rep to live up to, I can unders­tand why that story of seedy hi-jinks behind his suc­cess could become a bit wearing.

    So what bet­ter time to “air­brush” his­tory and come up with a more res­pec­ta­ble ver­sion. Who is going to gain­say him a decade on when he is now set up for life?

    What nobody seems to be asking is this: if wasn’t per­so­na­li­sed porn, then how exactly was your pal raking in the cash back in the day?

    Cyni­cal? Moi?

    Great story though.

    • I agree Scott, it is a great story– because it is full of ambiguities.

      Was he lying? Or was he lying about lying? I guess we’ll never know ;-)

      But the story was inte­res­ting enough to get you and many others to com­ment on it, at least.

  14. Shelley Noble says:

    Set­ting aside the mora­lity of porn, there is no suc­cess, as I can define it, that could ever come out of dishonesty.

    Money? Fuck that.

  15. Myles Delvin says:

    Fuc­king Great Story!

  16. Nor­mally I swa­llow everything you write or draw hook, line and sin­ker. But I was saying “No way… ” on this one waaay before you deli­ve­red the punch­line. :)

  17. Deb­bie, I belie­ved the story from Day One. Why? Because if you know Andrew as well as I do, you’d go, “Yeah, that kinda sounds like something he would do…”

    • I believe you about Andrew… what I don’t believe is that he’d have lots of willing “clients” for his per­so­na­li­zed video ser­vice. Pretty damn kinky, dontcha think?? At least for cou­ples in “tra­di­tio­nal” rela­tionships. But heck what do I know?!

      • I dunno, Deb­bie, there are a lot of weird peo­ple in NY. It’s a city that seems to attract peo­ple who are very moti­va­ted by their “appe­ti­tes”- be it sex, money, power, drugs, whatever.

        Andrew liked explo­ring the city’s “dark under­belly”, a lot more than I ever did…

        Also remem­ber, Andrew’s moti­va­tion back then was not to become suc­cess­ful at por­no­graphy, his moti­va­tion was to create a story– real or ima­gi­ned– that would be inte­res­ting to other people.

        So let’s say the story was true, he’d then only need one or two, maybe a hand­ful of clients to have enough source mate­rial to tell the story effec­ti­vely and memo­rably to others.

  18. “After he had shot the video, he would then take out his com­pu­ter and edit the job right then and there, on the kitchen table, so before he left your home, he’d give you the SINGLE and ONLY copy that exis­ted of the video.”

    No way. Edi­ting video takes serious work and a serious rig. Not a chance someone would be able to do more than one of these a day.

    Wouldn’t have foo­led me with that story. I doubt he would have foo­led anyone in the film busi­ness with that. He might have got­ten peo­ple who weren’t in the busi­ness to buy it.

    This is the kind of crap you come up with when you spend too much time sch­moo­zing, and not enough time in the office, put­ting in the hours.

    Not impres­sed. Bet­ter bullshit than the ave­rage, but still bullshit.

    • Thank you, Cecil ;-)

      I’m fully aware how time-consuming film edi­ting CAN be, if somebody’s paying for it.

      A friend of mine just finished shoo­ting a film with Ewan McGre­gor. He tells me all about it…

      I guess it all depends on how tight the edi­ting the cus­to­mers would want the final edit to be, and how much they’d be willing to pay for it.

      Re. Sch­moo­zing: Yeah, I have no doubt the story star­ted spon­ta­neously at some down­town sch­moo­ze­fest, while he was hit­ting on some gal… and then he ran with it from there.

      That would be totally his style…

  19. And porn acting, while not nearly as tough as dra­ma­tic acting, is still tough. It’s highly unli­kely that you could find more than a few cou­ples capa­ble of doing it with two peo­ple hove­ring over you.

  20. Greg Marquez says:

    I think what makes the ori­gi­nal story hard to believe and the­re­fore inte­res­ting is the idea that there would be a sig­ni­fi­cant num­ber of peo­ple who would actually desire to have their naked gym­nas­tics pre­ser­ved on video.

  21. And yet the other day my dad (who’s now hea­ding up a hotels divi­sion) was telling me about this one guy who built up a strong career in hos­pi­ta­lity, to the point of Head Honcho…then was fired when it was dis­co­ve­red he’d faked his qua­li­fi­ca­tions. And then there’s that MIT lady who had the same fate.

    Perhaps it’s something dif­fe­rent fields have dif­fe­rent tole­ran­ces to?

    (and here I am having a hard time get­ting peo­ple to believe that I’ve done the things I’ve done :P )

  22. It sounds inte­res­ting but can­didly, the idea of auda­ciously lying about your core com­pe­tency just lea­ves me cold. If Gold­man Sachs and AIG are cas­ti­ga­ted for telling their story about these awe­some new invest­ments called sub­prime mort­ga­ges, why does Andrew get to get away with his awe­some ‘per­so­na­li­zed porn’ story? It means that the amount of film he’s direc­ted, shot and edi­ted was wildly overs­ta­ted. Hap­pily, he evi­dently was able to cover his lack of expe­rience with crea­tive talent [and kudos for that] but he could have just as easily set him­self up for a Dose of Rea­lity. I hate sto­ries like this because for every one of them, there are 999 screw­balls who think “me too” and use it as their excuse to jump into wildly ambi­tious and ulti­ma­tely poorly-planned pro­jects. Maybe I’m just pla­ying Devil’s Advocate…I have no emo­tio­nal attach­ment to Andrew, his suc­cess or what I just said.

    • Tim, yeah, I think your point of view is pretty rea­so­na­ble. But it’s easy to be rea­so­na­ble and detached when you have no skin in the game, as you inferred.

      Har­der to do when you’re down to your last five bucks in New York and des­pe­rate for your first break. But that’s what makes the story inte­res­ting. No con­flict = No story.

      But I don’t think Andrew was lying about his core com­pe­tency. He was a pretty good edi­tor back then, as events proved.

      Had he just tur­ned out to be incom­pe­tent and took the money, any­way, that would of course be a dif­fe­rent matter.

  23. Everything you’ve ever writ­ten has tou­ted AUTHENTICITY as the goal of every crea­tive per­son. Ever­yone, from Seth Godin down, says that authen­tic, content-rich rela­tionships are the way forward.

    So faking your way through life is now the way to go. Thanks, Hugh. I look for­ward to more les­sons on scam­ming from you.

  24. Andrew will be very suc­cess­ful in Holly­wood. My only ques­tion is, what was he doing for money if he wasn’t making porn?

  25. OK. Spa­red.

    There have always been plenty of peo­ple who are willing to piss in the pool for per­so­nal gain. Penis pill spam, fake degrees, embe­llished résumés and socks down the pants — all’s fair in love and busi­ness, right? Espe­cially if your com­pe­ti­tion finds doing this stuff distasteful.

    Maybe I’m just mis­rea­ding your post. Maybe it’s just a funny story, meant to be read away from the con­text of your “Ignore Every­body — carve your own niche to suc­ceed” theme. When I read “per­so­na­li­zed porn”, I thought you were lin­king your friend’s busi­ness stra­tegy to your “all good mar­ke­ting is porn” meme of which I am ena­mo­red. Busi­ness porn means open­ness. Your busi­ness pink bits laid bare. Authen­tic Authen­ti­city, not the manu­fac­tu­red kind.

    If my bullshit is sanc­ti­mo­nious, it’s because your post cele­bra­ting a liar who won because of the lie feels like a betrayal.

    Thanks for your site, and good luck with your new book.

    • Well, Mark, I did say “There’s only one catch”.

      I don’t believe Andrew “pis­sed in the pool”. He tur­ned out to be a pretty good edi­tor and film guy, once he got his foot in the door. He was just des­pe­rate for a break, like every young arty kid in New York. So he made up a story that would let him gatec­rash the party. And once he got that break, he deli­ve­red. To com­pare that with selling fake Via­gra is not quite it, I believe…

      Sure, I could’ve ended the story with a “Kids, Don’t Try This At Home” caveat, but I don’t think there was any need to. My rea­ders are smart enough to see the through the obvious con­flict of inte­rest of the story, and draw their own conclusions.

  26. I loved the story. Bought it hook line and sin­ker. But then I tend to be gullible.

  27. I guess you can’t argue with suc­cess. Sure we can crap on the idea — I sure feel like it’s chea­ting somehow — but if it works it works.

    I guess I can’t get beyond this part: This story seems to fly in the face of your ‘You have to put the hours in’ con­cept — one could argue that he hadn’t got­ten a break because he hadn’t put the hours in. Or that he hadn’t found a way to mone­tize his crea­ti­vity pro­perly. It smells of disin­ge­nuous­ness (if that is, in fact, a word).

    I’m a huge admi­rer of your thought pro­cess and it’s a pri­vi­lege to have an open dis­cus­sion with you, no mat­ter what happens.

    Cheers.

    • Tim, kno­wing Andrew as well as I do, I doubt anyone could doubt his work ethic or his talent.

      Also, kno­wing Andrew, I don’t think he sat down one day and said, “OK, today I’m going to invent a big lie to help me sha­me­lessly mar­ket myself”.

      Remem­ber, we’re tal­king about a guy with a supre­mely well-developed sense of mischief. That’s what makes his work inte­res­ting to begin with.

      I’m willing to bet he was just bullshit­ting some boring per­son at some equally boring party, as a pri­vate joke to him­self to keep him­self amu­sed. And then star­ted making a habit of it, and then it grew from there…

  28. Damn, I LOVE this story. And like Scott, I have some doubts about what’s real and what’s not… hey, who even knows if ANY of this is true, or if YOU just made the whole thing up, Hugh? ;)
    Be it as it may, this story is great, and that’s what matters!

  29. super story, so is a real one is it?

  30. Noted — you’ve defi­ni­tely given me something to think about. Thanks for spen­ding the time.

  31. Best ever! Hee hee.…always great to out­wit the system!

  32. Great story… It doesn’t mat­ter if it is true or not, it is crea­tive and hel­ped open a door which Andrew has clearly step­ped through.

    Reminds me of Mel­bourne cri­mi­nal Mark ‘Chop­per’ Read who took some liber­ties with the truth and spun it into a best selling series of books and fea­ture film.

  33. For the ones that keep misun­ders­tan­ding Seth Godin (and this blog­ger and who know how many others), read Seth’s
    post “Magi­cians, sau­sage makers and transparency.”

    A quote: “Pla­ying poker with your cards face up on the table might get you some atten­tion at first, but in the long run it’s unli­kely to help you win a lot of hands.”

  34. 4:13:24 PM] Mr. Robert Dutu says: that is the point
    [4:13:34 PM] Mr. Robert Dutu says: nobody wants to give anything out for free
    [4:14:21 PM] Mr. Robert Dutu says: but if i pro­mise you $16million usd i will end up get­ting more than your pay from you
    (…)
    [4:38:06 PM] Mr. Robert Dutu says: and i know my God will for­give because i pray to him to reple­nish the poc­kets of my clients with dou­ble of wha­te­ver they loss

    and some other fine moments there

    http://onlinearmorpersonalfirewall.blogspot.com/2009/03/yes-16million-usd-but-we-will-have-to.html

  35. Maybe he is lying because he is now suc­cess­ful and he wants to bury his past?

    Never mind. Just another angle to look at it :)

    BTW Great story :)

  36. Haha. This is funny at many levels.

    Let me guess: Not only did your “friend” not do per­so­na­li­zed porn, but this “friend” never really exis­ted at all did he?

    You made him up, didn’t you, to get an inte­res­ting story to write about, and now you’re fee­ling a little guilty and want us to for­give you since you were just get­ting star­ted in the “wri­ting” industry?

    It’s OK, we for­give you. It was a fun story about your “friend” (wink wink).

  37. Great post.

    I was remin­ded of it when rea­ding a write up about items on ebay selling for a lot more when they were given a story.

    Scien­ti­fic evi­dence that sto­ries mat­ter: http://www.predictablyirrational.com/?p=708

  38. Ok is this all about coughing cough coughed stuff. any­way its a good story :)

  39. Pierce Presley says:

    Sur­fer beware: appa­rently hoochymail.com is a font of spam. Thank­fully, guerrillamail.com let me put in dis­po­sa­ble e-mail addres­ses so I wasn’t exposed.

  40. I’ve used hoochymail.com and haven’t had too many spam issues.

Trackbacks

  1. […] Upows­zech­nie­nie por­no­gra­fii miało, według wieszczy nieszczęś­cia, spo­wo­do­wać społeczne spro­wad­ze­nie kobiety do roli obiektu sek­sual­nego, takźe przez modę na pry­watną, ama­torską pornografię. […]

  2. […] Per­so­na­li­zed porn – Title draws you in doesn’t it? It’s OK the link is totally SFW and perhaps the grea­test lie ever told. The story comes from the Gaping Void and quite humo­rous. Who would have ever thought that a sim­ple white lie *cough* could turn out get­ting someone where they are today – so much for telling the truth on your resume. […]

  3. […] narra­tive, while intri­guing and cle­ver, was fic­tion.  Read it here, war­ning: lan­guage [ http://gapingvoid.com/2010/01/04/10572/ […]

  4. […] per­so­na­li­zed porn | Gaping­void. 0 […]

  5. […] full post on Hac­ker News If you enjo­yed this article, please con­si­der sha­ring it! Tag­ged with: Personalized […]

  6. […] I read the per­fect exam­ple of this: Per­so­na­li­zed Porn by Hugh Mac Leod, car­too­nist and author, about a friend of his who, when no one would give him a […]

Speak Your Mind

*

Comment through Twitter

Are you ready to work with us?

Get More Info

Testimonials

His work acknowledges the absurdity of workaday life, while also encouraging employees to respond with passion, creativity, and non-conformity...   MacLeod’s work is undeniably an improvement over the office schlock of yore. At its best, it’s more honest, and more cognizant of the entrepreneurial psyche, while still retaining some idealism.

The New Republic
Lydia Depillis

Last year my State of the College address was 76 slides loaded with data. This year it was 14 cartoons that were substantially more memorable.

Len Schlesinger
Former President, Babson College

Hugh MacLeod is a genius.  Genius.

Seth Godin
Best Selling Author

In moments of indecision I glance at the wall for guidance.

Brian Clark
@copyblogger
 
  • The New Republic
  • Len Schlesinger
  • Seth Godin
  • Brian Clark
prevnext