November 6, 2009

lifestyle refugee

0911liefestylerefugee

[Backs­tory: About Hugh. E-mail Hugh. Twit­ter. Limi­ted Edi­tion Prints. Car­toon Archive. News­let­ter. Book. Inter­viewEssen­tial Rea­ding:Everything You Always Wan­ted To Know About ‘Cube Gre­na­des’ But Were Afraid To Ask.”]

23 Responses to “lifestyle refugee”

  1. MM says:

    Something’s been bothe­ring me about these lately. It seems to me that you wouldn’t dream of dra­wing a car­toon depic­ting a broad racial/ethnic/gender other un-PC ste­reotype, but you’re more than happy to traf­fic in ste­reoty­pes of “hips­ters” and other groups that haven’t his­to­ri­cally been disc­ri­mi­na­ted against. (Top-of-mind exam­ples: This one, and the Apple store car­toon a few days ago.)

    You seem like a smart guy, but this inces­sant rei­te­ra­tion of ste­reoty­pes just stri­kes me as boring and cheap.

    (It’s enti­rely pos­si­ble that there’s something going on here that I’m mis­sing. If that’s the case, please clue me in.)

    • Hugh MacLeod says:

      Why do I get the fee­ling that a hips­ter was fee­ling defen­sive, and left a com­ment on my blog?

      Who said he was a “hips­ter”? Just because he likes comic books and goa­tees– sud­denly you’re ste­reoty­ping, your­self ;-)

      Sorry for boring you, MM. I must try har­der next time.

  2. Ari says:

    Part of Mr. MacLeod’s appeal as an artist and wri­ter is that he goes after the ‘groups that haven’t been his­to­ri­cally disc­ri­mi­na­ted against’. I sort of think that going after the weak and sha­llow popu­lace makes him un-PC given the huge num­ber in that body politic.

  3. Jake Edwards says:

    whats the big deal? 

    Isn’t Hugh a refu­gee? Aren’t we all?

    bring on the media stereotypes…the adwank, the design wank, some modern wank and even bet­ter the old shit!!!

    Hell Yeah!!…there’s nothing like a good ole cheap, boring whinge either. 

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TQXJIi4oCGs

  4. Z says:

    Apple users not being ste­reo typed and disc­ri­mi­na­ted against? *blink blink* im pretty sure PC users have been making fun of them for deca­des now.

  5. George says:

    MM: If your idea of being “disc­ri­mi­na­ted against” con­sists of someone impl­ying that adop­ting cer­tain hips­ter lifestyle ele­ments make one look silly, then it’s obvious that you have never expe­rien­ced (or even seen) actual discrimination. 

    What are you missing? 

    1. A few deca­des of matu­rity and real-life expe­rience, it seems. 

    2. The part where YOU pro­duce something crea­tive that is bet­ter and more popu­lar than what you see here, if you know so much about it. 

    3. The whole rest of the inter­net, if this part of it dis­tres­ses you so much.

  6. Lifestyle says:

    I did find it inte­res­ting and not a stereotype.

    –Shreya
    http://www.life-styl.com

  7. Randy says:

    Hugh lives near a small West Texas town — sounds like a life-style refuge to me!

  8. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Randy: Alpine, Texas, where hips­ter refu­gees flock to in dro­ves ;-)

    And a big con­grats to MM for star­ting the silliest com­ment thread in the his­tory of the planet…

    • Randy says:

      Yep, even I spent a month there one night…
      So, is the area of Alpine south of the tracks (south of Holland Ave) the new SoHo??

  9. MM says:

    George:

    “1. A few deca­des of matu­rity and real-life expe­rience, it seems.”

    I’m almost 40. I’m a law­yer in a large Southern city. In the past I’ve been an Inter­net jour­na­list, English pro­fes­sor, short-order cook, and cons­truc­tion worker.

    “2. The part where YOU pro­duce something crea­tive that is bet­ter and more popu­lar than what you see here, if you know so much about it.” 

    I’m also an award-winning inde­pen­dent film­ma­ker. I didn’t claim that I could make bet­ter car­toons than these.

    “3. The whole rest of the inter­net, if this part of it dis­tres­ses you so much.”

    Dis­tres­ses me enough to take two minu­tes to post a comment?

    I’ve been subsc­ri­bed to this site’s RSS feed for a while, because I stum­bled across it somehow and liked the car­toons. When I noti­ced a pat­tern I thought I’d offer some cons­truc­tive cri­ti­cism. Most of the res­pon­ses, inc­lu­ding Hugh’s, com­ple­tely ignore the points I tried to make and go straight for ad homi­nem attacks.

    Nice con­ver­sa­tio­nal skills, y’all. Adios.

  10. Jake Edwards says:

    got to dig george’s vitu­pe­ra­tion above…now, that’s a gas!

  11. Hugh MacLeod says:

    Hey MM,

    Yes, this is where a blog (or online iden­tity) comes in handy…

    If peo­ple know your work and know you, then you can can con­tex­tua­lize your thoughts against what you have done… with skin in the game.

    Pos­ting an opi­nion as an anony­mous per­son, howe­ver valid the inte­llec­tual rea­sons, makes your case wea­ker at best, makes you seem a troll at worst.

    Like Jeff Jar­vis says, “Iden­tity Matters”.

  12. Jake Edwards says:

    Peo­ple and their fra­gile egocentricism…

  13. George says:

    As an avid stu­dent of social psycho­logy, I find the phe­no­me­non of tro­lling interesting. 

    Ever­yone knows, on some level, that one gene­rally gets the kind of res­ponse one invi­tes. This is an obvious rule of life that even chil­dren ins­tinc­ti­vely grasp. Civi­lity invi­tes civi­lity, and hos­ti­lity invi­tes hos­ti­lity, and the same is true for everything in between. 

    But the troll, like MM here, expects others to treat him bet­ter than he treats them. He expects a com­ple­tely dif­fe­rent set of rules to be applied to others ver­sus him­self, an ethi­cal scheme that is, in may ways, exactly inverted. 

    MM intro­du­ces him­self with com­ments con­sis­ting of dis­mis­sive sar­casm (the Apple store post) and hos­ti­lity (“boring,” “cheap” and cha­rac­te­ri­zing social satire as an inci­pient form of racial bigotry, of all things). Then, when he gets the obvious res­ponse that such com­ments call for, he makes a fuss about how unfairly he is being trea­ted, how he only offe­red “cons­truc­tive cri­ti­cism” and resents the per­so­nal nature of the anta­go­nis­tic res­ponse. Sud­denly, he only wants to talk about the sub­ject mat­ter, in an aca­de­mic and cons­truc­tive way, you see, and lec­tu­res us by telling us that get­ting per­so­nal is out of bounds. 

    And then, after having invi­ted hos­ti­lity and recei­ved hos­ti­lity, and after acting sur­pri­sed and offen­ded that hos­ti­lity should invite hos­ti­lity (a social rea­lity that even chil­dren unders­tand), he offers the final par­ting shot that we (mea­ning me, in par­ti­cu­lar, I sup­pose), lack “con­ver­sa­tion skills.” See? A neat inver­sion of the usual social rules. 

    In light of all of this, which is repea­ted a million times a day all over the inter­net, there is only one rea­so­na­ble conc­lu­sion — peo­ple like MM are loo­king for a fight. They want it. They create it, if they have to. The get the res­ponse they invite, because they like to be yelled at. They have some psycho­lo­gi­cal need for it. They pre­fer it to other modes of con­ver­sa­tion. One can only assume that peo­ple like this feel anxious and lost when they find them­sel­ves being enga­ged with peo­ple in a less anta­go­nis­tic way. 

    I think this phe­no­me­non has something use­ful to teach us about mar­ke­ting — how a well-=crafted mar­ke­ting stra­tegy can invite the desi­red con­su­mer res­ponse, depen­ding on the mind­set and social expec­ta­tions of the con­su­mer group in question.

  14. Jill Elswick says:

    I thought the Apple store car­toon was funny, even though I’m an Apple user. George, I love your desc­rip­tion of the “troll” as someone who “expects others to treat him bet­ter than he treats them.” That’s good. I’m going to try to remem­ber that for future refe­rence. I think MM’s ori­gi­nal post was ins­pi­red by inse­cu­rity, howe­ver, not out of a desire to try to start a troll fight.

  15. Can you say… “Marfa”?

  16. jayvee f. says:

    a slice of cake would be nice at about this time.

  17. Jill Elswick says:

    P.S. Hugh’s moc­kery of “hips­ters” is a major rea­son I like his comics. When I laugh at these jokes, I’m not laughing at “hips­ters.” I’m laughing at myself.

  18. Jeremy Newton says:

    I can see you (Hugh) ope­ning a sug­ges­tion box and pulling out one lonely sug­ges­tion that reads “Please round out your ste­reoty­pes. Tnx.”

    For the record I don’t see these as ste­reoty­pes. I just figu­red these are car­toon mani­fes­ta­tions of peo­ple Hugh has dealt with, overheard, or even been at times. Am I wrong?

  19. MM says:

    George: You’re rea­ding a lot into a little. Honest cri­ti­cism is not the same as tro­lling. I’ve pos­ted posi­tive com­ments on Hugh’s dra­wings in the past. I believe that an artist – of any kind – who takes his work seriously should wel­come criticism.

    Hugh: Fair enough. Here’s a blog I kept from May 2003 until Octo­ber 2008, when I got tired of it: http://informationbureau.wordpress.com/

    Note: A lot of the ima­ges and such are bro­ken links; I had my own domain for a lot of that time, then migra­ted the posts over to free-parking Word­press when I shut it down. Nonethe­less, all 964 posts are there.

  20. constance says:

    Geeezzzz–
    These are CARTOONS for cryin out loud–
    And I LIKE them.
    I never even GOT the apple/mac thing–
    these are car­toons about the human con­di­tion as it exists in cer­tain crea­tive males.
    Opi­nions on nap­kins nearly– but it works for me. 

    Geo above is right on in his com­ments BTW. Dit­tos on all.

    I am an emer­ging artist (from a sales back­bround), mother of two sons (so I get the get the guy stuff howe­ver gross at times). 

    Just wan­ted to say, as a fan, Hugh, please do not Ignore Every­body but it may make sense to Ignore Some!
    Con­si­der to not even publish com­ments meant to bully as they not NOT with the pro­gram here!

    They are the boring ones– Forgitabouttit–

  21. I like the idea of “lifestyle refu­gee” though I’m not sure I really get it. I’d like to see more on this.

Leave a Reply