shit creek consulting

scc001

The groovy cats over at Shit Creek Con­sul­ting com­mis­sio­ned me to design them their own “Cube Gre­na­de”. After loo­king at the half-dozen or so ideas I pre­sen­ted to them, they chose the one above. I believe they’re loo­king to use it for their busi­ness cards, for example.

Shit Creek are a Mic­ro­soft Gold Part­ner. It seems a big part of their busi­ness is coming in and clea­ning up the mess left behind by the large tech con­sul­tan­cies [I’m not naming any names]. So that’s the idea I ran with.

The name of their com­pany implies they have a lot of atti­tude. They wan­ted a car­toon that con­ve­yed this. Easy. It was a fan­tas­tic com­mis­sion and I’m very happy with the car­toon they chose.

I’m loo­king to take on more of these kinds of com­mis­sion. Feel free to e-mail me if you think you could use my work, Thanks.

[Backs­tory: About Hugh. E-mail Hugh. Twit­ter. News­let­ter. Book. Inter­view One. Inter­view Two. EVIL PLANS. Limi­ted Edi­tion Prints. Pri­vate Com­mis­sions. Cube Gre­na­des.]

Comments

  1. love it, Hugh. I defi­ni­tely think we could use your work. After spen­ding a cou­ple of hours with the team here, I’m con­fi­dent that you would believe we don’t take “no” for an ans­wer and we have superhu­man powers to be more impact­ful than the “big boys.” Love it.

  2. Nice to see that someone really knows who they are, and the­re­fore, who their cus­to­mers are.

  3. The atti­tude is a beau­ti­ful com­ment on people’s reac­tion to the chain of bub­bles and the con­sul­tants who dili­gently infla­ted them.

    I wor­ked at Fred­die Mac. All of the foreign con­sul­tants that wor­ked there brought all of their second world atti­tu­des to work with them. The worst of first world bureauc­racy mixed with the worst of second world bureaucracy.

    Every one of them a consultant.

    What a shit storm.

  4. Remark-able

  5. Hugh, this is the best busi­ness card yet! I wish I had thought of this one because its theme is exactly what I do as a Sha­re­Point con­sul­tant: bail out the FUBAR situations.

    Great design!

  6. That is awe­some, I can’t believe there is actually a com­pany called Shit Creek Con­sul­ting. Bri­lliant! I am kinda supri­sed Micro$oft would allow a part­ner to have that name. But hey, wha­te­ver works.

    pretty cool!

    –Brandy

  7. Just found your blog and I can’t wait to read posts daily. I abso­lu­tely loved “Ignore Every­body” and your dra­wings. Your book was a great moti­va­tor in my deci­sion to kick start my blog and a refreshing read for a copyw­ri­ter who many times won­ders why she’s wri­ting about den­tal health everyday.

    • Jenny, I know how you feel. I have been trying to get a Women’s Edu­ca­tio­nal Health Blog star­ted and plan to do so soon. Am doing lots of wri­ting. It can become overwhel­ming espe­cially when one looks around at the competition.

      Don’t give up. Peo­ple need to be infor­med about health, which inc­lu­des den­tal health, from the regu­lar per­son; not the powers that be. Keep at it!!!

  8. Bri­lliant!

  9. All those names of com­pa­nies men­tio­ned speaks a lot!

  10. caffeine head says:

    I’ve clic­ked every link on the per­ver­sely com­pe­lling S__t Creek web­site without fin­ding out exactly what sort of work they do, except in the most gene­ral sense.

    Every page of the SCC web­site reeks of snarky atti­tude and mas­sive self-love. SCC appa­rently is so good that it can afford to turn down the busi­ness of those who don’t like the word “s__t”.

    I like to see a little humi­lity in the spe­cia­lists I pay to work for me. This may mean that I “have my head up my ass”, or that I am a “douchebag”.

    But let me tell ya, today’s douche­bag may be tomorrow’s client. It doesn’t pay to alie­nate any­body, if you can pos­sibly avoid it. SCC will learn this les­son, pain­fully, in the months ahead.

    (Gaping Void is great!)

    • “it can afford to turn down the busi­ness of those who don’t like the word ‘s__t’”

      That’s actually not a bad posi­tion to be in, don’t you think?

      Sure, their shtick isn’t going to work for every­body. But they don’t need “Every­body”; that’s the whole point.

      • A friend of mine is a poli­ti­cal con­sul­tant. He has an unlis­ted busi­ness num­ber. That might be frus­tra­ting to someone who finds him via a Goo­gle search and wants to con­tact him, but he has enough busi­ness he can do that.

        I agree, being able to choose your clients is a pretty good sign of success.

  11. Have they sett­led on a pre­fe­rred sup­plier of padd­les yet? I might be inte­res­ted in tendering.

    Tim

  12. @caffeine_head, while my con­sul­ting firm isn’t quite as con­fron­ta­tio­nal in name, my approach isn’t far off from theirs (I’ve made a fair bit of money clea­ning up after big­ger con­sul­ting firms messes).

    We get asked to sub­mit res­pon­ses to RFP’s and we refuse, asking for a mee­ting to talk about the pro­blem ins­tead. That pis­ses off a lot of clients who just want someone to bid on the RFP and do the job as spe­ci­fied. Howe­ver, a sma­ller group is intri­gued by the fact we don’t do RFP res­pon­ses and we get a few hours of their time to genui­nely engage them about their pro­blem. And, it turns out, that enga­ge­ment usually leads to much bet­ter pro­jects than pla­ying the RFP game.

    I unders­tand your desire to see a little humi­lity. Howe­ver, unders­tand that many con­sul­ting firms don’t like to work with clients who view the busi­ness rela­tionship as “wor­king for me” rather than “wor­king with me”.

    I know in my own prac­tice, if you want someone who will work “for you”, I’m not the right consultant.

    I’ve got more than enough work and actually had my big­gest boom years right in the middle of this eco­no­mic downturn.

    Their approach (and one that Hugh’s stuff takes as well) is to work in such a way that 20% of the gene­ral audience LOVES what you’re doing and 80% HATES it rather than every­body loo­king at it as bland and com­mon. Gene­rally, trying to avoid offen­ding any­body results in nobody loving what you do.

    I’d rather work with the 20% that loves what I’m doing. They’re *happy* to be paying me. They res­pect me *more* when I say “no”. They value the fact I call them on their bullshit and ques­tion their assump­tions. It’s not for ever­yone, but I can only work on a limi­ted num­ber of pro­jects in a year and, since I star­ted doing tech con­sul­ting (1999), the num­ber of peo­ple who want me to work on pro­jects has always excee­ded the num­ber I can actually do (through 2 bub­bles bursting).

  13. caffeine head says:

    Mr. Mac­Leod, you may be right. Perhaps the SCC name will cons­ti­tute an asset, rather than a self-imposed han­di­cap, as it might be for many busi­ness peo­ple. Exc­lu­si­vity is a fine thing, but one must take care not to draw the circle TOO close…

    I sin­ce­rely hope that SCC’s approach to nomenc­la­ture does not spread much further, as I do not wish to drive a “F__k” auto­mo­bile, or use a “C__ks__ker” lap­top. Alas, all things seem pos­si­ble in the 21st century…

    Good luck to SCC, and may the words “Shit Creek” become synony­mous with qua­lity, value, and pride in workmanship.

  14. Nice shit brown color scheme to match the name. This is a parody web site I assume. There are no peo­ple behind it as far as I can tell. No client refe­ren­ces , no portfolio.

    But it is mildly amusing.

  15. Twit­ter says your blog is down!! Get the boys from ShitC­reek on the job!!! That is, if any­body knows what they actually do…I get the impres­sion this is a parody, just like the other comments..funny, but I hope nobody thinks this is real..

  16. Lovely atti­tude, great enga­ge­ment, and I wish them well. Don’t see a client list on that web­site though, or any tes­ti­mo­nials.… maybe I’m mis­sing something.… and maybe they’ll get a bite?

  17. Love it! It’s full of atti­tude without being obno­xious — hys­te­ri­cal! I would love one for ArtofTalk.tv.

  18. We don’t really feel the need to jus­tify our­sel­ves or our way of doing busi­ness. But given some of the com­ments here, we do feel the need to assure the doub­ters that Shitc­reek Con­sul­ting is legit. We do real work for real busi­nes­ses each and every day.

    Yep, we have loads of parody and satire on our site but we are dead serious about our work, our clients, and peo­ple we work with.

    Just keep your eyes pee­led as we tell our story.

Trackbacks

  1. […] As well as this there is a big trust issue in terms of secu­rity and relia­bi­lity. This stems from the big boys making mis­ta­kes (see Mic­ro­soft, Goo­gle etc) and inex­pert blog­gers repor­ting on these and making the clas­sic mis­take of thin­king there is only one cloud. Just because Mic­ro­soft scre­wed up their Cloud doesn’t mean we can’t do a good job of with ours, which reminds me of one of Hugh’s recent posts. […]

  2. […] came across this on Twit­ter, shit creek con­sul­ting. Hugh Mac­Leod wri­tes that ‘The name of their com­pany implies they have a lot of attitude. […]

Speak Your Mind

*

Comment through Twitter

Are you ready to work with us?

Get More Info

Testimonials

His work acknowledges the absurdity of workaday life, while also encouraging employees to respond with passion, creativity, and non-conformity...   MacLeod’s work is undeniably an improvement over the office schlock of yore. At its best, it’s more honest, and more cognizant of the entrepreneurial psyche, while still retaining some idealism.

The New Republic
Lydia Depillis

Last year my State of the College address was 76 slides loaded with data. This year it was 14 cartoons that were substantially more memorable.

Len Schlesinger
Former President, Babson College

"There are only two daily newsletters that I look forward to opening and reading every time they show up to my inbox: Seth Godin's and gapingvoid."

Tony Hsieh
CEO, Zappos

Hugh MacLeod is a genius.  Genius.

Seth Godin
Best Selling Author

In moments of indecision I glance at the wall [to Hugh's work] for guidance.

Brian Clark
@copyblogger
 
  • The New Republic
  • Len Schlesinger
  • Tony Hsieh
  • Seth Godin
  • Brian Clark
prevnext