August 7, 2009

welcome to the overextended class

zzzzsteak28A.jpg
In my last blog post, an inter­view with Chris Ander­son, Editor-in-Chief of Wired Maga­zine, Chris had a bri­lliant thought:

“If ever these was a time to be ove­rex­ten­ded, this is it.”

I agree with him com­ple­tely. I know what it means to be over-extended all too well. Recently I made a list of all the pro­jects I’m currently wor­king on. The next book. The road trip. The prints. Blog­ging. Con­sul­ting. Dra­wing car­toons. The list goes on…
All in all, it came down to ten items. Ten. Each one inte­res­ting and poten­tially luc­ra­tive enough to be taken on as a full-time job. Ten.
Ouch. Even for me, that see­med like WAY too much.
The other day, a friend of mine was kvetching about having to hold down three jobs. “Three?” I quip­ped. “Try hol­ding down ten…“
My friend loo­ked at me funny. He was pro­bably right to do so.
Since about 1991, it’s been like that for me. From the moment I woke up till the moment I went to bed, I was wor­king on something. The day job or the car­toons or something else. Sure, I’d have girl­friends come and go, but the girl­friends never las­ted too long, and I also ended up inven­ting, in 1997, an art form that would allow me to carry on wor­king WHEN I was going out to the bars i.e. the “car­toons drawn on the back of busi­ness cards”.
I’ve not had a pro­per vaca­tion in ten years, either. Nor am I plan­ning one.
Call Chris and myself, and pro­bably over 50% of the peo­ple who read this blog, mem­bers of “The Ove­rex­ten­ded Class”.
You know who you are. And you know what? In terms of per­cen­tage of the popu­la­tion, there were less of us twenty years ago. And there’ll be more of us in two deca­des.
Our parents and grand­pa­rents spent their Cog­ni­tive Sur­plus watching tele­vi­sion. That’s a thing of the past… a his­to­ri­cal acci­dent of the old factory-worker age mee­ting the modern mass-media age. Of course it wouldn’t last fore­ver. We humans as a spe­cies were desig­ned to com­pete, not to sit around on our asses.
Wel­come to the Ove­rex­ten­ded Class, Peo­ple. You may opt out of it if you want, but over time it’s going to get har­der and har­der to make ends meet, let alone be suc­cess­ful, if you do.
Choi­ces.
[UPDATE: Just added this to “EVIL PLANS”.]

[Backs­tory: About Hugh. Twit­ter. News­let­ter. Book. Inter­view One. Inter­view Two. EVIL PLANS. Limi­ted Edi­tion Prints. Pri­vate Com­mis­sions. Cube Gre­na­des.]

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

54 Responses to “welcome to the overextended class”

  1. David M. says:

    A very pres­cient post Hugh.
    Late nights, early mor­nings and still so much to do, but before I star­ted ove­rex­ten­ding myself I wasn’t doing what I love.
    With all the con­nec­tions and resour­ces avai­la­ble, and the pos­si­bi­li­ties for crea­ti­vity and lear­ning, there’s no time for slacking.

  2. phil says:

    It’s not the norm, of course, but I think you’re right — the ‘ove­rex­ten­ded class’ is gro­wing. I only have two jobs/family/other inte­rests etc but they’re lea­ding off into new direc­tions all the time. Tech­no­logy means that the ‘wor­king’ world doesn’t end at 5pm either (is it ‘work’ any­way?), but it cer­tainly beats sit­ting around watching tele­vi­sion which for me doesn’t hap­pen until very, very late these days if at all. And it’s all good.

  3. Soxialize says:

    Enjo­yed this post and read it as I sat in front of three moni­tors cove­red in post it notes. I dont have ten pro­jects but seven, each out­li­ned and piled in groups with specs, notes and requi­re­ments.
    Ove­rex­ten­ded? Only if I can’t solve for the having to eat and sleep issue that keeps coming up. :)

  4. Rebecca says:

    Hmmmm…you had me right up until “it’s going to get har­der and har­der to make ends meet,” which for­ced me to take pause; then my ove­rex­ten­ded, ove­rin­fla­ted balloon star­ted to deflate. Must have been great for our grand­pa­rents’ gene­ra­tion when one job got you a nice house, a decent car, and a pen­sion. My grand­father is 90 years old and still living in the same house he bought after WWII and off the pen­sion he star­ted recei­ving 30 years ago when he reti­red. Then again, I wouldn’t change my ove­rex­ten­ded life for anything in the world…keeps things fun, inte­res­ting and cha­llen­ging. And one day, maybe I’ll even own a house! Now if you’ll excuse me, I have to get back to work…

  5. Xander says:

    Little con­fu­sed. Is your argu­ment that the ruling (upper) class having mana­ged to find ways to con­vince us (wor­king class) to keep wor­king more than 40 hrs a week, sla­vishly pro­du­cing for their con­sump­tion as close to 24/7 as pos­si­ble, until we feel com­ple­tely bur­ned out (and it’ll only be get­ting worse)…and that this is a GOOD thing and we should be proud of it?
    I dunno, man, but it just makes me feel that little bit more ‘taken advan­tage of’ when I feel (as you note) that just wor­king a small hand­ful of jobs is beco­ming less and less able to ‘make ends meet’.

  6. nahbois says:

    Inte­res­ting. I’m all for filling my day with projects/hobbies, and I do NOT see that as a
    com­pe­ti­tive edge; more per­so­nal ful­fill­ment.
    But when I read your post I couldn’t help ques­tio­ning if this “class” is the same who miss dead­li­nes, cut cor­ners, or back out of deals. Been bur­ned a few times.

  7. Jeff Harbert says:

    Your “ten items” list reminds me of a simi­lar idea/goal I’ve had, which is having mul­ti­ple irons in the fire. Entre­pre­neurs tend to work long hours doing one thing and only one thing, or least wor­king toward one sin­gle goal. I’d rather take a mul­ti­ple irons approach. It might, and pro­bably will, take lon­ger to achieve suc­cess, but you can work each iron as you please. If you’re not in the mood to work on one, work on a dif­fe­rent one. Some might deve­lop into income, others might remain hob­bies. You’ll drop some and pick up others. It’s a pretty fluid thing.
    Com­bi­ning this with the focus neces­sary to achieve suc­cess is the trick, and one I think you’ve figu­red out.

  8. Holy cats, does this ever reso­nate.
    Thank you for wri­ting this: partly, b/c I don’t feel as crazy now, and partly b/c I can now just send the uncom­prehen­ding a link to it and GET BACK TO WORK.

  9. smistephen says:

    Very true. I stop­ped wor­king for a second to make my own list, it only had 8, but it remin­ded me of just how “too hard” I’m wor­king.
    Wouldn’t have it any other way, though. I do watch TV, but it’s on my time, using a DVR, and I’m usually on my lap­top at the same time, haha.

  10. Pradeep says:

    Saying ‘ove­rex­ten­ded’ makes it sound like stre­nous effort. More like wor­kaho­lics. But, I think you’re refe­ring to the joy and fun we have doing so many things at a time.

  11. Daniel Sroka says:

    True, so many of us are wor­king very hard at a variety of jobs. But this isn’t uni­que to our digi­tal gene­ra­tion. My parents and grand­pa­rents defi­ni­tely weren’t sit­ting in bar­ca­loun­gers watching Match­game. My father quit a com­for­ta­ble cor­po­rate job to start his own busi­ness, while trying to also be a wri­ter and artist. My mother rai­sed us kids while hol­ding down a job and volun­tee­ring at the Co-op, the church, the school. My grand­mother rai­sed 7 kids, all while wor­king, pro­vi­ding, and being a force in her com­mu­nity.
    I trace my “ove­rex­ten­ded” per­so­na­lity directly to my parents and grand­pa­rents, who did wha­te­ver it took to grow their family and com­mu­nity. If I can work half as hard as them, I’ll be a success.

  12. Sue says:

    Don’t take this the wrong way, but I think I love you. Thought I was the only cra­zed happy luna­tic, but it’s good to know there are actually a lot more such peo­ple out there.
    I gotta get out more, or at least read more blogs.

  13. Joaquin says:

    Bri­lliant, thanks for put­ting a name to my fee­lings right now. Trying to get out of the cor­po­rate wheel, I find myself ove­rex­ten­ded at nights and wee­kends, doing the “un-work” that I love.
    I agree A LOT with the last part (“You may opt out of it if you want, but over time it’s going to get har­der and har­der to make ends meet, let alone be suc­cess­ful, if you do”), but I can’t help to see ever­yone around me obli­vious to this fact. Ques­tion for ever­yone: how to explain it to friends and rela­ti­ves in sim­ple terms?

  14. CT Moore says:

    The defi­ni­tion of suc­cess you seem to be impl­ying, Hugh, sounds pretty f**ked up to me. It’s like Lily Tom­lin said: “The pro­blem with the rat race is that even if you win, you’re still a rat.”

  15. Jan says:

    I’m get­ting exhaus­ted. I want my 4 hour work week!

  16. Kathy says:

    Huh. Mothers have been doing this for so long I guess we always thought that being ove­rex­ten­ded was nor­mal. Then as a group, we added wor­king at something gene­ra­ting actual income (usually outside of our homes). Not sure of the word for that, but ove­rex­ten­ded isn’t even good enough for it.

  17. hugh macleod says:

    @ CT Moore, if your defi­ni­tion of doing what you love and being paid for it is “Rat Race”, then I feel sorry for you ;-)
    @ Xan­der, peo­ple who see their role in life as nothing more than sla­ving away to make their pay­mas­ters rich, don’t have a lot of use in the world I live in.
    I guess the ques­tion is, if “Doing what you love and get­ting paid for it” is such an ideal situa­tion, why don’t more peo­ple do it? I’ll tell you why– because it’s really, really, really hard. A lot of peo­ple pre­fer the easy life.

  18. Whether I feel “ove­rex­ten­ded,” rather than “fully men­tally occu­pied,” depends on *which* job I’m doing– the 40-hour job makes me feel the for­mer; art­work makes me feel the lat­ter.
    When making art, I could go all night and not even need a break. In fact, the only breaks I must take…are to go to my paying job.

  19. Kate says:

    Ove­rex­ten­ding your­self is a choice. You don’t need to do 10 pro­jects to pay the bills. If you do, then maybe you need to recon­si­der your lifestyle.
    I think focu­sing on fewer pro­jects will bring bet­ter results.

  20. Colleen Wheeler says:

    Not sure if you made the wee­kend (wor­king on a book so I don’t have to fire myself on Mon­day) easier or har­der to face.
    Taking on the same kind of passion-driven work I expect of authors during my day job actually makes me bet­ter at both my day and night (early mor­ning, wee­kend) life.

  21. Lois Kelly says:

    I pre­fer being over-extended and free to be wor­king on three, ten, 15 pro­jects I choose than to be suf­fo­ca­ting in a big cor­po­ra­tion and over-burdened with poli­tics, pro­jects and dead­li­nes over which I’d have no con­trol. There’s hard work and tor­tu­rous work.

  22. Donavan Freberg says:

    Is it pos­si­ble to do what you love and have a sim­ple life? No ones life is “easy”. But is it pos­si­ble to just shoot for a sim­ple and happy life, doing what you love and surroun­ded by peo­ple you love?
    And maybe I am naive, but Rebecca’s com­ment really made me think…“Must have been great for our grand­pa­rents’ gene­ra­tion when one job got you a nice house, a decent car, and a pen­sion. My grand­father is 90 years old and still living in the same house he bought after WWII and off the pen­sion he star­ted recei­ving 30 years ago when he reti­red. Then again, I wouldn’t change my ove­rex­ten­ded life for anything in the world…keeps things fun, inte­res­ting and cha­llen­ging.“
    Is “fun” and “inte­res­ting” more impor­tant than secure and safe? Me thinks not. What has hap­pe­ned to this world? What did we trade and did we get shaf­ted in the deal?

  23. Hugh — I’m very glad that you’ve crea­ted a life for your­self that you find ful­fi­lling and luc­ra­tive (though the com­ment about the girl­friends made me feel a little bad for you).
    Still, I’m not sure that wor­king seve­ral jobs to make ends meet is really “the easy life” nor do I believe that the way peo­ple live is simply a mat­ter of “per­so­nal pre­fe­rence.” A lot of where folks end up depends on where they star­ted geo­graphi­cally, eco­no­mi­cally, gene­ti­cally, etc.
    I admire and applaud the accom­plish­ments of heroic indi­vi­dua­lism as much as the next guy, but these accom­plish­ments always take place and appear sig­ni­fi­cant within a social con­text. To dis­miss or over­look that fact may be “neces­sary false cons­cious­ness” or it may just be ego mania (I tend to suf­fer from both).

  24. It’s 5:46AM in Syd­ney on Satur­day mor­ning — fee­ling hap­pily over exten­ded :)

  25. Jason says:

    I think this is a good thing if you are doing all this work for your­self or something you believe in. If it’s for someone else…then I guess you get to figure out if its worth it.
    Just a thought, I doubt this is as uni­que as you are making it seem. My guess is that small busi­ness owners and sin­gle parents would have something to say about being overextended.

  26. Dude, Hugh, please go on a vaca­tion soon!
    That is ridi­cu­lous.
    Your art rocks!
    Cheers.

  27. Dono­van Fre­burg said: “Is “fun” and “inte­res­ting” more impor­tant than secure and safe? Me thinks not. What has hap­pe­ned to this world? What did we trade and did we get shaf­ted in the deal?“
    [My opi­nion only] I don’t believe the con­cept of “secure and safe” truly exists. There is no amount of money or secu­rity I could achieve in my life­time, that one catas­trophe, medi­cal or other­wise, couldn’t wipe out.
    Why should I not spend the best, healthiest years of my life stri­ving towards a pas­sio­nate life, ins­tead of tor­tu­ring myself, wor­king for a nebu­lous future reti­re­ment sce­na­rio; in which my health is too poor to enjoy it?

  28. vinny warren says:

    great post.
    think you’re over-extended now? wait till you have kids! ;-)

  29. Mike Rohde says:

    Hugh, I think espe­cially for crea­tive peo­ple, having many irons in the fire is pretty nor­mal. There are just too many things to be done and not enough time to do them.
    Howe­ver, I won­der if an ove­rex­ten­ded state is a sig­nal to focus and refine what we are aiming to get done. I know for me it’s very easy to keep adding things to my list, so I’m star­ting to feel that the solu­tion for me may be to prune and refine those pro­jects down.
    Having many things is not neces­sa­rily a bad thing, but if you were to reduce those 10 pro­jects to 7, with more focus on each pro­ject in the same amount of time, the results may be much bet­ter.
    Each per­son has their own limits, so it’s not a hard or fast rule. Howe­ver, I think at some point being overly-overextended can work more to dimi­nish the work qua­lity you’re pro­du­cing than being very inten­tio­nal about choo­sing fewer, more impact­ful pro­jects to focus on.

  30. katie ledger says:

    Hugh,
    You have a port­fo­lio career! and have had for some time. A port­fo­lio career being wor­king two or more jobs for dif­fe­rent emplo­yers. The car­toons you con­tri­bu­ted to AND WHAT DO YOU DO? 10 STEPS TO CREATING A PORTFOLIO CAREER — are great. esp the ” I want to feel alive more than 3 weeks a year”. Love that one. If peo­ple are inte­res­ted in the book they can preor­der at Ama­zon– publi­ca­tion date is 15th Oct. Ove­rex­ten­ded? — could be seen as nega­tive. A ful­fi­lling port­fo­lio career which blends all you pas­sions and skills and makes you feel alive? like this more. Its my life any­way :) and I think it’s yours too. speak soon. love Katie

  31. Sarah says:

    So many peo­ple wor­king so hard, whether they love it or not, to get ahead in life. And saying that we all have to be doing that. I just don’t agree. I do not feel in the least bit ove­rex­ten­ded. I’m a mother of preschoo­lers, I have a day job as an engi­neer and a side job as por­trait pho­to­grapher, both because I like them and want to do them not because I need the money. But I highly value non-working time…time slee­ping, enjo­ying good meals, pla­ying with my kids or even *gasp* watching TV. Keeps me refreshed, focu­sed when I am wor­king, balan­ced and full of posi­tive energy rather than ner­vous energy which is what I have when I do work too much and rely on too much caf­feine :)
    Just offe­ring an alter­na­tive perspective.

  32. Todd Schnick says:

    Over-extended? Wouldn’t have it any other way…

  33. Hugh, thanks for ‘calling it’.
    As a fellow overx10, every­day I strug­gle up Mt Debtna, pushing my tro­lley of ideas (the one with the wonky wheel), only to see Mt Neve­rrest in the far dis­tance.
    The com­pany of fellow tra­ve­llers is reas­su­ring.
    Best, Robin

  34. Rob says:

    I only have eight myself but I call them retai­ner con­tracts. I guess I’m a bit of a light weight then.
    One of my con­tracts is for 37 hours a week and when I tell peo­ple about it they say “Well that’s full-time” and I say it might be for some but it’s only part-time for me.… I work those hours plus teach pho­to­graphy one day a week at college, work two shifts as photo edi­tor at the local daily, shoot pro sports for Getty Ima­ges, sell Fine Art Pho­to­graphs, run a photo mail order busi­ness, shoot wed­dings and shoot kids sports.
    I think I might need a holi­day too.
    –rob

  35. Maddison says:

    Yes I’m one of those 50% of folks. I always say to my friends that sleep is over-rated and my brain is on fire. I’m a crea­tive. That is my life and I love every darn minute of it. Won’t stop until they put me in the box!
    maddison

  36. Ove­rex­ten­ding and priotizing/pruning the tasks. Sorta like the “Sex and Cash” theory?

  37. Rebecca says:

    I wan­ted to briefly res­pond to Dona­van Freberg’s com­ment about my post. I don’t think that Dona­van is being naive, as much as perhaps idea­lis­tic. I think most peo­ple want safety and secu­rity, but do they even exist any­more? Did they ever exist? Our world has chan­ged so much and con­ti­nues to change at a rapid pace. It’s up to each indi­vi­dual to keep up in the way he/she feels is most in line with his/her per­so­nal con­vic­tions. But just because one choo­ses to live a life that is fun, inte­res­ting and cha­llen­ging doesn’t make safety and secu­rity any less impor­tant. Frankly, I’m hap­pier living my life on my terms. In the end, it’s really up to the indi­vi­dual per­son. Whether you choose a life that is “safe and secure” or “ove­rex­ten­ded,” the impor­tant thing is that you are happy with the path you have cho­sen for yourself.

  38. proud mem­ber of the ove­rex­ten­ded class. about a month ago i star­ted wri­ting down a list of all the pro­jects i have going on. …before i was finished i got sca­red and stop­ped wri­ting.
    viva wor­kaho­lism!
    (*rai­ses a huge can of redbull*)

  39. Donavan Freberg says:

    Rebecca, that was beau­ti­fully said.

  40. Tom Obrien says:

    I think the com­ment about our parents & grand­pa­rents spen­ding their cog­ni­tive sur­plus watching TV is a con­des­cen­ding BS and a swee­ping gene­ra­li­za­tion. (Do u think TV + web + gaming + tex­ting + FB + Twit­ter hours now are any less than TV was then? It’s not.)
    You are simply desc­ri­bing a life & career choice. Many wear it as a badge of honor (oh the tra­vel, when will I ever get to inbox zero, etc.). That’s all it is. Not bet­ter, not worse than other ways ppl orga­nize their lives to get what they want. Just dif­fe­rent.
    TO’B

  41. smeade says:

    I don’t get it. One bes­tse­lling author’s telling us to work our buts off 24x7 while another’s tou­ting the “4 Hour Work Week”? It will be inte­res­ting to see over time which lifestyle most of us end up following.

  42. hugh macleod says:

    @smeade Just to con­fuse you a little more: The week before Tim Ferris’ “4 Hour Work Week” came out, he emai­led out the blue (I had never heard of him up until that point), telling me that my work had ins­pi­red him a great deal in the crea­tion of the book ;-)
    It’s a great read, for sure…

  43. Cog­ni­tive Sur­plus is such a great phrase its too bad I have none of it. I very much relate. As a stay at home dad of 4 that also has a con­sul­ting busi­ness and an addi­tio­nal full time job I can com­ple­tely relate to this. When i explain what I do to peo­ple they usually look at me in com­plete shock and awe or they look at me like I am stu­pid. Actually that may be the same look I am not sure.

  44. Anna says:

    As a sin­gle career track mother — I appre­ciate much of what has been said above.
    As for you, Hugh, as a long time rea­der of this blog I am fore­ver admi­ring of your indi­vi­dua­lism, lifestyle/career choi­ces and the inc­re­di­ble energy & focus with which you accom­plish all that you do. But I have often been left won­de­ring “at what cost?” I know it’s pre­sump­tuous to cri­ti­cize anyone’s choi­ces in life so I hope I am not doing so. But that is honestly the ques­tion that has often lin­ge­red in my mind when rea­ding your blog.
    But then — we are dif­fe­rent people.

  45. hugh macleod says:

    @ Anna, I find anything worth doing bears tre­men­dous cost. Any parent would know this, as well, of course…
    I’m more rela­xed about it now, though. I guess I feel I’ve paid my dues, or at least, the vast majo­rity of them.

  46. I feel the same way BUT a lot of my over exten­sion is spent on the non work hobby side of things which leads to me crea­ting a lot of freev­con­tent (pic­tu­res & video), but I really love doing it and I always feel like I’m on a mini vacation

  47. Ten jobs? Ten?!
    I thought two was hard enough!
    I’m fee­ling exhaus­ted enough from trying to plan the launch events for my novel around a fairly deman­ding job while still lea­ving time for my other inte­rests.
    If I tried adding another pro­ject to the mix, I’d pro­bably collapse from sleep depri­va­tion in a month.
    Adding to the dis­cus­sion about safety & secu­rity ver­ses fun & inte­res­ting: isn’t it more secure to have options? If one pro­ject beco­mes an abso­lute flop, your plan B is already in ope­ra­tion so you’re never at the point where you’re so des­pe­rate for money that you’ll agree to any job.

  48. Gordon says:

    But why are we ove­rex­ten­ded? I’ve been trying my har­dest for years to fight wha­te­ver it is that has me wor­king lon­ger just to stay in the same place. So, why is this so?

  49. Nick Smith says:

    One man’s cog­ni­tive sur­plus is another man’s meal tic­ket, and so kee­ping peo­ple in bon­dage is too good a busi­ness model for it change any time soon.
    But at what cost? Sell your soul to the Devil or risk poverty, is how most peo­ple still view choice.
    It takes a brave heart to walk off into the other direc­tion, but IMHO that’s where the real juice lies :)

  50. Anna says:

    Yes, Hugh, you have paid your dues — which is what makes your drive & deter­mi­na­tion all the more fas­ci­na­ting. It clearly has a dif­fe­rent source than to merely prove your­self & suc­ceed. You have already done both. I have not. That is my drive & deter­mi­na­tion. But, for someone such as your­self, who does not have these sti­muli any­more — why “pay the cost” of no life apart from work still?
    But then — as you say — anything worth doing has its cost — a cost gladly paid by the per­son who finds the pur­suit of something worth the cost.
    Perhaps what has kept me rea­ding your blog all this time is that you remind me, in part, of the idea­lis­tic thea­tre artists of my world. Folks who have bought into the “star­ving for one’s art” notion. But — only in part do you remind me of them because the other part of you is the prag­ma­tic artist who has got­ten past the “star­ving for art” martyr­dom & found a way to be suc­cess­ful without sac­ri­fi­cing your sense of self, what makes you uni­que as an artist.
    In other words, you are not a martyr to your cause. We thea­tre folk tend to thrive on martyr­dom like its our badge of honor. I con­fess to falling into this cate­gory at times!! Valuing the worth of our cause at great cost.
    Thanks for res­pon­ding to my com­ment and get­ting me to think about all of this.

  51. JTH says:

    I pre­fer the term “enga­ged“
    As long as I’m enjo­ying, and/or get­ting some men­tal gra­ti­fi­ca­tion the pro­ject … It ain’t “work” if it’s fun.
    The modern world of communication/connectivity allows enga­ge­ment in a mul­ti­tude of pro­jects, part­ne­ring with those with dif­fe­rent skill sets.
    This also allows enhan­ced cross fer­ti­li­za­tion of pro­jects with appli­ca­tion of ideas gene­ra­ted from one to another.
    It also allows busi­ness as a non-zero-sum game.
    You can end up with mul­ti­ple win­ners.
    Even a decade ago, this might be con­si­de­red “ove­rex­ten­ded”, today, it’s only the abi­lity to apply more men­tal energy, fire more synap­ses, keep more neu­rons busy.
    But just wait till we can “jack in“
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neuromancer

  52. Great post I can attest to this, I am wor­king all the time and always loo­king to take on more. With time things get more expen­sive and we all look for the next leap up the lad­der. I love what I do and thats what makes it worth all the hard work and dedi­ca­tion, wor­king for your­self has so much free­dom in a dif­fe­rent way from a 9 to 5.

  53. […] (or third or…) job or the demands of a pro­fes­sion.  Some con­tend that there is a deve­lo­ping class of ove­rex­ten­ded peo­ple, wor­king long hours in pur­suit of goals, dreams, and big […]

  54. […] In his latest book, Hugh McLeod reempha­si­zed his fee­ling that ove­rex­ten­ding your­self is a good […]