May 23, 2009

dreck intolerance

Send to Kindle


[“Gin And The Cog­ni­tive Sur­plus”. The REAL rea­son why Madi­son Ave­nue is in cri­sis, the rea­son nobody in the industry ever talks about. Watch Clay Shirky’s video above, or read his blog post on the same sub­ject.]
Some years ago, me and some fellow adver­ti­sing crea­ti­ves gathe­red at Dave Carlson’s apart­ment in Chi­cago, to watch a TV show, drink some alcohol and gene­rally socia­lize. I can’t remem­ber what TV show we were watching; I do remem­ber that the show was two hours long and had LOTS of com­mer­cials.
So like the “industry-insiders” that we were, while the com­mer­cials were broad­cas­ting we’d do run­ning com­men­tary on them. “Oh, that’s shit.” “Nice boobs.” “Wow, I like that car!” “Man, who wrote THAT godaw­ful tagline…?“
Two hours later, the show ended. Every­body came to the same conc­lu­sion. Two hours of com­mer­cial bom­bard­ment later, only TWO of the com­mer­cials we thought were even remo­tely good, from a crea­tive and/or pro­fes­sio­nal stand­point. The rest– dozens of them– were com­plete, use­less, noisy dreck.
This 95%-5% Dreck/Quality ratio is about right. An adver­ti­sing crea­tive wins the occa­sio­nal award now and then, but 95% of the time, she’s pro­du­cing dreck. Work three years in an ad agency if you don’t believe me.
The inter­net, which now dic­ta­tes the terms of media to TV, a lot more than vice versa, doesn’t handle dreck very well. On the inter­net, dreck is really easy to ignore, dreck is really easy to kill. So peo­ple do ignore it. Sadly, Madi­son Ave­nue is not cul­tu­rally equip­ped to handle this kind of Dreck Into­le­rance. Their busi­ness model won’t allow it. And like the news­pa­pers, their Pen­sion Fund sha­rehol­ders won’t allow them to change their busi­ness model, no mat­ter what’s hap­pe­ning out there in Reality-ville.
Yes, it’s a bit of a problem…

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , ,

12 Responses to “dreck intolerance”

  1. Susan says:

    So what does it say about TV’s Dreck/Quality ratio that you can’t remem­ber the TV show at all?
    Having wor­ked for 15 years in tele­vi­sion pro­mo­tions, I’d say its about the same… and I’d give the same ratio to the pro­mo­tions as well (at least, I would to mine — that’s one of the rea­sons I left).
    So only 5% qua­lity shows, and only 5% of those get­ting qua­lity pro­mos… no won­der peo­ple aren’t watching.…

  2. J. Smith says:

    Peo­ple are still watching though aren’t they? It’s when they stop watching alto­gether to par­ti­ci­pate in this next “thing” that mat­ters. It’s when we’re all loo­king for the mouse, ins­tead of loo­king for the next show, right? One good show is enough to suck up a lot of time from a lot of people.

  3. thebestbrew says:

    That vid is so utterly, totaly fuc­king on-the-nail.
    That is why I record stuff and FF through the ads and why I am sit­ting now with GV, twit­ter and my blog dash open with the TV off ins­tead of sit­ting slack-jawed in front of another repeat of MI2. That’s why I’m re-discovering crea­ti­vity I’d for­got­ten I had.
    Once you learn that you can break the brainwashing-tube shac­kles, you come to really, REALLY resent it’s influence.

  4. Nick Taylor says:

    Maybe drek sells. Maybe something so crap that it sticks in people’s heads works bet­ter than a finely craf­ted mas­ter­piece.
    I mean thin­king back to the 60s, the only advert I can remem­ber is some incon­ti­nently exci­ta­ble voice exc­lai­ming “It’s Sabco Time!!!”… and the film in the back­ground was the Sabco logo, and a clock, telling the time. That’s all.
    Good ad? Bad ad?
    I’ve no idea what Sabco is. Some sort of clea­ner I think. I can remem­ber the advert though.

  5. Sunday says:

    Thanks for the video/link and your blog. This is a really inte­res­ting way to look at it. I did without TV for 28 years, now I’m catching up a little with DVDs and online. Basi­cally, can’t say as I mis­sed much, except the occa­sio­nal cul­tu­ral ref bet­ween friends, and a few really great shows.

  6. Eric Hegwer says:

    And that’s why Bounce Rate is the most impor­tant Goo­gle Web Stat you can track

  7. Anonymous says:

    Hugh, the back­ground from this card on Pos­tSec­ret from last week is yours, isn’t it? http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_a7jkcMVp5Vg/Sg9xhqt4OCI/AAAAAAAAI3I/Eoh7b4drzkc/s1600-h/orgasm.jpg

  8. Lira says:

    I’m not sure if its a pro­blem, or simply a new pro­cess that society has developed/discovered. 95% is dreck now, but as crea­tive peo­ple con­ti­nue to trans­form what they pro­duce into bet­ter and bet­ter ideas, we may find our­sel­ves with less and less dreck, simply because dreck doesn’t sell.
    And if that means TV dis­sa­pears because it’s all dreck, then I’m fine with that. Besi­des Hulu & You­tube do come with a mouse. :)

  9. Elijah Few says:

    dreck , its a pro­blem on tv, its a pro­blem on madi­son
    but hey so what?

  10. gregorylent says:

    make 10 pie­ces of art (NOT the same old shit you always crank out) …
    one will be great, one should be bur­ned imme­dia­tely, and the rest are in bet­ween …
    crea­tive life is like that …
    and shit does sell stuff … after all, look at the audience ..

  11. This is a really inte­res­ting way to look at it. I did without TV for 30 years, now I’m catching up a little with DVDs and online.

  12. Hey, I believe that show was a Natio­nal Geo­graphic show about the then unno­ti­ced gathe­ring geother­mal infla­tion and it’s cog­ni­tive effect of the underl­ying socioe­co­no­mic strata of a bur­geo­ning world popu­la­tion in reli­gious cri­sis over fos­sil fuels, but we were too fuc­king stu­pid to unders­tand any of that so we just rag­ged on about the com­mer­cials!
    Boyz we wuz.