Archive for April, 2009

April 30, 2009

a marketing 2.0 icon

PCsmall123.jpeg
[The Pur­ple Cow print. 39“x28”]

A few days ago, with the bles­sing of Seth Godin, I announ­ced the Pur­ple Cow Print. Here are some more of my thoughts, in no par­ti­cu­lar order:

1. I wan­ted to create an icon for the world I currently live in. The internet-enabled, Mar­ke­ting 2.0 world. Seth’s 2003 book, “Pur­ple Cow” see­med to sum up that world for me best. Tur­ning into a print i.e. an ico­nic ver­sion of the world he spoke about, was a no-brainer. You walk into somebody’s office and see that print on their wall, you have no doubt wha­tsoe­ver which world­view he’s alig­ned to.
2. I lear­ned this while mar­ke­ting wine: What’s inte­res­ting is not the liquid in the bottle, or what vine­yard it came from, but the con­ver­sa­tions that hap­pen around it. Same with art. I wan­ted to make a print that HAD NO CHOICE but to start a con­ver­sa­tion. A con­ver­sa­tion about what? Not the work of art per se, but what the thing that the icon repre­sents– the ideas in the book.
3. It’s the big­gest print I have made so far: 39x28”. That’s BIG for a print. That’s a lot of pur­ple.
4. Though I used “Web 2.0″ tech to mar­ket it, in many ways the print was a sta­te­ment AGAINST what Web 2.0 seems to have been evol­ving into these last cou­ple of years… a place where the shiny new tools seem to mat­ter A LOT MORE to peo­ple than the objects peo­ple were buil­ding WITH the shiny new tools.
5. Though I’m really, really unbe­lie­vably happy with the num­ber of pre-orders we have got­ten so far, I believe the print will be A LOT MORE inte­res­ting to A LOT MORE peo­ple once they see it han­ging on other people’s walls. Once they see the mole­cu­les with their own eyes. Once THE REAL con­ver­sa­tions begin. The cen­tral the­sis to Seth’s book is “Be Remar­ka­ble”. I went all meta and used his book design as a star­ting point to create something remar­ka­ble myself.
6. Some­body asked me recently if the way I mar­ke­ted my prints [i.e. via Web 2.0] was part of the art­work itself? Well, I believe that all art is infor­med by its social dimen­sion, inc­lu­ding the com­mer­cial bit. The fact that you bought the print off a blog, rather than from a tra­di­tio­nal art gallery, does indeed inform the story behind it. But you can just as easily take that theory so far. In the end, it’s made of paper and hangs on a wall. Theory can be a dis­trac­tion. some­ti­mes.
7. One of my great car­too­nist heroes, Char­les Schultz, once said, “If I were bet­ter at dra­wing, I’d make pain­tings. If I were bet­ter at wri­ting, I’d write books. So ins­tead I draw car­toons”. That’s exactly how I feel about my own work. I don’t see my work han­ging in the Louvre any time soon. What I do see, howe­ver, and what gets far more inte­res­ting to me with time, is how peo­ple use my work fro their own ends, for hel­ping them find their own sense of pur­pose. Seth’s book, or this print, won’t change your life. ONLY YOU will change your life. It’s only the job of the artist or wri­ter to maybe give you a nudge in the right direc­tion.
8. I am insa­nely gra­te­ful to Seth Godin for allo­wing me to run with this idea. He rules. Thank you, Seth!
[Check out The Pur­ple Cow print over at gapingvoidgallery.com.]

putting the “global” into “global microbrand”

murs2a.jpg
For years now, I’ve been rif­fing on “The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand”, something I’ve always wan­ted to create for myself:

A small, tiny brand, that “sells” all over the world…The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand is sus­tai­na­ble. With it you are not behol­den to one boss, one com­pany, one cus­to­mer, one local eco­nomy or even one industry. Your brand deve­lops rela­tionships in enough dif­fe­rent pla­ces to where your per­ma­nent address beco­mes almost irrelevant.

And from what became gla­ringly obvious early on, a lot of my fellow blog­gers had the same idea. To which I’ve always said, “Hurrah!”:
So then the next ques­tion is, when does your mic­ro­brand become TRULY glo­bal? Where is the tip­ping point?
Your guess is as good as mine, it really all depends on your defi­ni­tion of “glo­bal”. Although this blog has had rea­ders from all over the pla­net for many years, most of my actual, paid busi­ness over time has come from the UK and Ame­rica. So it never felt THAT glo­bal to me.
Then last week I ship­ped an order of sig­ned prints to a client in Bra­zil…
And then today, some­body from Main­land China purcha­sed a Pur­ple Cow print. We’re tal­king “Main­land”. Not Hong Kong. Not Tai­wan. Main­land.
Something inte­res­ting is hap­pe­ning, I can feel it…

art, myth and marketing

blot1676.jpg
My recent inter­view with Late­ral Action got me thin­king about “Myth”:

The way artists mar­ket them­sel­ves is by having a great story, by having a “Myth”. Telling anec­do­tal sto­ries about Warhol, Pollack, Bas­quiat, Van Gogh is both (A) fun and (B) has a mythi­cal dimen­sion… if they didn’t, they wouldn’t have had movies made about them. The art feeds the myth. The myth feeds the art.

We all know how mytho­lo­gies build up around art and artists, that over time informs the artist’s work itself.
Warhol’s weirdly des­truc­tive social scene at The Fac­tory in the 1960s. Pollack’s exces­sive drin­king. Van Gough’s des­cent into mad­ness. Keith Haring’s wild party times in the New York gay scene…
Let’s say you spent a siza­ble chunk of money on a work by an artist you love. Let’s just say you couldn’t really jus­tify it finan­cially, you pro­bably couldn’t afford it, but dam­mit, you just HAD to have it.
Let’s say you’re sho­wing off the work to a friend, which is now proudly han­ging in your office. Let’s say your friend never heard of the artist before.
“What???” your friend says, “You spent HOW MUCH on that? But it’s only some green and blue blotches!“
So you give your friend some back­ground infor­ma­tion. You tell him how famous the guy was back in New York in the 1970s, how “Breakth­rough” his work was at the time, how he was influen­ced by Famous Artists A, B and C, and how he went on to influence Later Famous Artists X, Y and Z. You tell anec­do­tal sto­ries about his tumul­tuous marriage to a famous, Japa­nese nove­list [who’s work is also now making a come­back], and his up-and-down, booze-soaked rela­tionship with Famous Artist K, his brief, heart­brea­king love affair with Famously Tra­gic Socia­lite P, his battle with alcohol and drugs, and the old farm he reti­red to up in Woods­tock, New York.
Hope­fully by the time you are done with your story, though he may not end up being a collec­tor of the artist him­self, he at least will unders­tand more clearly the work’s reso­nance, and why you made the purchase.
And of course, so will you. Because it wasn’t just your friend who nee­ded to hear the story. You nee­ded to hear the story, as well. You nee­ded to be able to tell your­self that story, that story NEEDED TO EXIST, or else you simply would have not bought the pain­ting in the first place. Without the story, without the “Myth”, you could not have jus­ti­fied purcha­sing the work to your­self [let alone your wife].
We don’t just do this for $40K works of art, we use the some mytho­lo­gi­cal tech­ni­ques when we buy com­pu­ters, break­fast cereal, or bars of soap. Our lives are only as mea­ning­ful as the myths we can create for our­sel­ves. And we like to create myths around the objects that fill up our lives. That’s what “Bran­ding” is all about.
The more I think about mar­ke­ting art, the more I think how what I’m lear­ning applies to mar­ke­ting everything else. Because art is not par­ti­cu­larly uti­li­ta­rian, the myth is key.
And unless you can unders­tand the myth that informs wha­te­ver pro­duct you’re trying to sell, the har­der your job will be. The more you can TRULY unders­tand the myth, the big­ger an edge you will have over your com­pe­ti­tion. I am right on this one.

new work for sale

murmur111.jpg
[“Mur­mer”. Ink & Pen­cil on Moles­kine. April, 2009.]
I have some new ori­gi­nal pie­ces for sale on my gaping­void gallery page, inc­lu­ding three new “Moles­kine” pie­ces.
I’m asking myself a lot these days, “How did I get into the art busi­ness?” It cer­tainly wasn’t inten­tio­nal. That could be a good thing, of course…
I hope you’ll check them out. Thanks, Everybody!

probably my best interview ever…

suffer333.jpg
Mark McGuin­ness inter­vie­wed me recently over at the Late­ral Action blog. Pro­bably my best inter­view ever. A huge amount of what I’ve been thin­king about lately somehow mana­ged to make it onto the page. For example:

2. A lot of artists and crea­tive types see mar­ke­ting as an evil neces­sity — or just plain evil. What would you say to them?
“Artists can­not mar­ket” is com­plete crap. Warhol was GREAT at mar­ke­ting. As was Picasso and count­less other “Blue Chips”. Of course, they’d often take the “anti-marketing” stance as a form of mar­ke­ting them­sel­ves. And their patrons lap­ped it up.
The way artists mar­ket them­sel­ves is by having a great story, by having a “Myth”. Telling anec­do­tal sto­ries about Warhol, Pollack, Bas­quiat, Van Gogh is both (A) fun and (B) has a mythi­cal dimen­sion… if they didn’t, they wouldn’t have had movies made about them. The art feeds the myth. The myth feeds the art.
The worst thing an artist can do is see mar­ke­ting as “The Other”, i.e. something outside of them­sel­ves. It’s not.

Thanks Mark! I enjo­yed that.

April 28, 2009

the new gapingvoid print: the purple cow “totem”: pre-order $495

pc777A.jpg
[UPDATE: A pic­ture of me hol­ding up one of the Pur­ple Cow prints. They look UTTERLY AMAZING in real life…]

PC133.jpg
[“Pur­ple Cow” Printer’s Proof, pho­to­graphed straight on. Dimen­sion: 39“x28”, Click on image to enlarge etc.]

[Update: Seth Godin blogs about the prints here.]

sethPSDmainJPEG.jpg
[The ori­gi­nal design. Click on Image to Enlarge etc]
A cou­ple of weeks ago I pos­ted a new car­toon, basi­cally a re-working of the front cover of my friend and men­tor, Seth Godin’s semi­nal 2003 mar­ke­ting book, “Pur­ple Cow”. Like I told Seth in an e-mail:

It has occu­rred me many times recently, that one rea­son MANY, MANY peo­ple in the world are currently suf­fe­ring during this current recession/crisis/whatever, is simply because they didn’t follow the advice in Pur­ple Cow.
That’s a bit sim­plis­tic, I know, but it still has a ring of truth too it.
ALL your books are great, but Jeeze, Pur­ple Cow is the one that really got under my skin, which is really what ins­pi­red the big dra­wing I did. To me the book, as a totem, as an icon, repre­sents a huge shift in thin­king that came along, almost unin­vi­ted, back in the early 2000’s. The dra­wing repre­sents [to me] my own abi­lity to inter­na­lize it.
You and I both somehow mana­ged to find a way to currently live in this Pur­ple Cow/Hughtrain world now, that we wrote about 5+ years ago. But now I see that same world sud­denly arri­ving for millions of peo­ple… and it’s cold & scary for a great many of them.
Which is why I now think peo­ple now need to read Pur­ple Cow more than ever…

I read Seth’s book right about the same time I really star­ted to “get” this whole blog­ging and Web 2.0 thing. Pur­ple Cow was almost ico­nic to me.
Which is why it was easy for me to envi­sage it as an icon.
So with Seth’s bles­sing, I tur­ned this icon into lite­rally ANOTHER icon– a very large, pur­ple, ico­nic, fine art print. A “Totem”, as it were. Like Seth said on his blog, when he first announ­ced the print ear­lier today:

Totem poles have been around for a long time, because they work. We need a place to tell our sto­ries, and a remin­der of what to talk about.

On a pro­fes­sio­nal level, the stuff Seth talks about in Pur­ple Cow is still very rele­vant. Be remar­ka­ble, Ever­yone is a mar­ke­ter etc.- is what to me, Web 2.0 was all about. It WASN’T about yak­king on end­lessly about the latest shiny object or the latest crazy web-celeb stunt. It was about get­ting inte­res­ting ideas, pro­ducts and ser­vi­ces out to mar­ket a lot more cheaply, quickly and easily than it ever was before before. THAT’S WHAT EXCITED ME.
And that’s what this “Totem” is ALSO all about.
The print will be co-signed by both me and Seth. A limi­ted edi­tion of 380.
You can a pre-order one below for $495.00 below by making $150 Pay­Pal depo­sit. This offer is open only to the first 100 peo­ple who res­pond. Once they’re in pro­duc­tion, you can purchase one at the retail price of $1,100.00 over at The gaping­void Gallery, my new e-commerce web­site that launched offi­cially today.
Seth and I are plan­ning on having some sort of “Sig­ning Party” in mid-June up in New York City, to sign the prints live. If you’re in town, I hope you can make it.
Thanks, Seth, this is going to be insa­nely great!
[The Small Print:]
1. The pre-order price is $495.00 for the first one hun­dred peo­ple who order. Once the prints have been co-signed by both me and Seth, the price reverts back to retail i.e. $1,100.00
2. It will be a limi­ted edi­tion of 380 seri­graphs, plus artist’s proofs.
All prints will be co-signed and dated by both me and Seth.
3. The prints will be ship­ped out circa July 1st, 2009, soon after the NY print party.

[Click on Pay­Pal $150 Depo­sit]
4. To secure your pre-order, please use the Pay­Pal but­ton above to make a $150 depo­sit. The Pay­Pal form will ask you for all your details [inc­lu­ding your pre­fe­rred ship­ping address], which of course we’ll have for our records. Why are we asking for a depo­sit? To weed out the spam­mers, fla­kes and trolls out there [This is the Inter­net, after all], lea­ving only com­mit­ted buyers in the mix. No other rea­son.
5. When asked for your details, please inc­lude your real name, not just your busi­ness name. The ship­per won’t deli­ver it other­wise.
6. We’ll email you a Pay­Pal form for the outs­tan­ding invoice once the art­work is prin­ted, pac­ked and ready for ship­ping.
7. We’ll be prin­ting these to the same high stan­dards as always i.e. top-of-the-line inks and paper, approx 39″ x 28″ in dimen­sion. Please note this print is quite lar­ger than the ear­lier edi­tions, so make sure you free up plenty of wall space!
8. Ship­ping & hand­ling [approx $45 USA, $65 abroad] is not inc­lu­ded in the price. The buyer is also res­pon­si­ble for any Cus­toms & Excise outside the USA. We ship them rolled, pro­tec­ted in tis­sue paper, in extra sturdy, 5-inch mai­ling tubes. If you insist on having it ship­ped flat, we can cer­tainly do that for you, but it costs extra and the risk of ship­ping damage is far higher.
9. If you have any ques­tions, please feel free to drop me an email at gapingvoidprints@gmail.com, and either Laura or me will hap­pily ans­wer them.
10. Thanks, as always, for your love and support!

April 25, 2009

art as ‘social marker’

wntt432.jpg
[Brian Man­ley kindly just sent me a pic­ture from his Flickr stream of his new “We Need To Talk” print, fra­med and han­ging in his office. Thanks, Brian!]
A while ago, I tal­ked about “Social Mar­kers”, a form of “Social Object” that pla­ces you in con­text within a group.

Social Mar­kers are a prime form of social shorthand, that peo­ple use to STAKE OUT the ecosys­tem they’re occup­ying. So why do I find this such a use­ful term for mar­ke­ters? Because obviously, if your pro­duct is a Social Mar­ker in your industry ecosys­tem [the way the iPhone is in the mobile world, or Star­bucks is in the cof­fee world, or Ama­zon is the book world, or Goo­gle is in the search world, or Whole Foods is in the super­mar­ket world, or Vir­gin is in the air­line world, or English Cut in the bes­poke world etc etc] you will have an AMAZING com­pe­ti­tive advan­tage to call your own.
And if the pro­duct your com­pany makes is not a Social Mar­ker, I guess the first ques­tion would be, “Why the hell not?” Quit your job and start over.

A few weeks ago I read an article in The Eco­no­mist about how very rich Rus­sians have sud­denly star­ted buying the art of Damien Hirst and other Wes­tern Con­tem­po­ra­ries in large num­bers.
Hirst is very, very famous. His work sells for millions. We could argue his work’s artis­tic merits till the cows come home… his work is cle­verly desig­ned to pro­voke that kind of con­tro­versy, any­way. But I’m not here to play art cri­tic. I’m here to talk about something else.
When peo­ple buy expen­sive, famous art, it’s not just about the art in ques­tion. It’s also about the social dyna­mic that surrounds it.
When you spend a king’s ran­som on a work of art, you are basi­cally sen­ding a mes­sage to the world, “I HAVE ARRIVED”.
“I, too, am now a mem­ber of a cer­tain elite group. Like my peers, I too can appre­ciate and afford the likes of Hirst, or Warhol, or Johns, Rauschen­berg, Matisse, Picasso etc etc. “
“Art as Social Mar­ker”. Exactly.
Peo­ple buy large yachts for the same rea­son. Or large apart­ments in May­fair or Cen­tral Park South. Or deers­tal­king esta­tes in Scot­land. Or golf mem­berships to Augusta. Or islands in the Carib­bean. “Social” dri­ves the purchase just as much as the object’s inhe­rent uti­lity, pro­bably more.
As far as I can tell, peo­ple don’t buy my work to adver­tise the fact that they’ve arri­ved somewhere BIG, like these wealthy Rus­sians buying Damien’s work.
It seems more like to me, peo­ple buy my work because they ASPIRE to arrive somewhere, one day. Somewhere inte­res­ting and mea­ning­ful, with any luck.
Whe­re­ver that place may be, I can relate. I hope to arrive there one day, too…

April 24, 2009

more stormhoek in far west texas


Loren Feld­man has the skinny

signing prints in miami

4321a.JPG
[The “Agen­ciaC­lick” prints being sig­ned and num­be­red…]
4321b.JPG
[The “Wolf vs Sheep” prints, freshly sig­ned and num­be­red…]
I’m in Miami for the wee­kend, mainly here to sign some more prints and do some more dra­wing…
Drawn in Alpine, Texas. Prin­ted in NYNY. Sig­ned in Miami. Sold all over the world, via the Inter­net. A glo­bal mic­ro­brand, if ever there was one…

April 23, 2009

prints, people and pics

Puppy%20002LB.jpg
TechPRGuy%20and%20Hugh%20print2.JPG
In my last CDF News­let­ter I asked peo­ple to please send me any pic­tu­res they might have of my prints in their pos­ses­sion.
Larry kindly sent me two, with the follo­wing note:

Attached is my “Pur­ple Puppy” on my far kitchen wall, along­side a Haring print I bought 20 years ago at his Pop Shop in NYC.
Also attached is “Techc­runch Party 2006″ in my old office space. What’s inte­res­ting is that it sur­vi­ved an major elec­tri­cal explo­sion and fire in that buil­ding two years ago, and was the first thing I chec­ked when allo­wed a brief visit while the buil­ding was clo­sed for weeks after­ward.
And, yes, I am a Crazy, Deran­ged Fool. Star­ted my own small PR firm on Nov. 1, 2008, while Wall Street was implo­ding, repla­ced my prior income, and just recently excee­ded it, with more growth immi­nent. Won’t kid you — the first two months were scary. But I stuck with it, and am merrily pres­sing on.
 – Larry Bouchie

Thanks, Larry! If you have any print pho­tos your­self– espe­cially ones with PEOPLE in them, please feel free to send them to me at gapingvoid@gmail.com. Thanks!

“fred 44″, revisited

Fred44%200904.jpeg
[“Fred 44″. Click on image to enlarge etc.]
Last year I wor­ked on a large, 18“x24” pen­cil & ink dra­wing called, “Fred 44″.
It was a study for what went on to become my lar­gest pain­ting to date, “Desert­Manhat­tan”.
My friend, Laura owns a really nice camera, so we deci­ded to take another pic­ture of it.
Voila! Hope you like…

April 22, 2009

does art have “users”?

studioexpJPEG.jpg
[Photo of The Expe­rience Stu­dio. Those six­teen small panels on the right are actually my car­toons.]
In my latest “Crazy Deran­ged Fools” news­let­ter that I sent out ear­lier today, I wrote about “The Kine­tic Qua­lity”:

We’ve always seen the Kine­tic Qua­lity wor­king in mar­ke­ting, wor­king with brands. “By buying Brand X, I feel hip­per, coo­ler, sexier, more secure, more in con­trol” etc etc. But what I’m fin­ding out is, this also works with art. To me, the inte­res­ting thing about art is not the usual “Heroic, absinthe-soaked, vision quest lone indi­vi­dual archety­pal artist crap”, but how the art is USED by the per­son who has it han­ging on the wall. What’s it actually there for? Deco­ra­tion? Sho­wing off? A con­ver­sa­tion star­ter? An ice brea­ker? A way of telling a story? Something to brigh­ten up the room? A sym­bol of social sta­tus? An expres­sion of indi­vi­dual world­view? An expres­sion of emo­tion? A totem to remind one­self of something ins­pi­ra­tio­nal and/or impor­tant? Perhaps a bit of all these?
So I’m seeing two worlds collide here: The inter­nal, soli­tary part of making the art, and the exter­nal social part of how the piece of art is actually used.
Art? Used? Is art actually allo­wed to be “used”? Would the Art Police allow that? Ins­tead of calling them “Patrons”, can we call art buyers “Users” ins­tead? Would you be offen­ded if I called you that? There’s no wrong ans­wer…
Poten­tial Energy tur­ning into Kine­tic Energy. I guess one of the rea­sons I’ve always had such libe­ral licen­sing terms [“Want to use my stuff on your Power­Point Sli­des for free? Sure, go right ahead!!!.…”] is that I like seeing my work being USED. If peo­ple like my work, that’s great. But if they can actually find it tan­gibly use­ful, even better.

Soon after, Tony Kir­ton of The Expe­rience Stuido sent me the pho­to­graph above, with the follo­wing note:

We posi­tio­ned the your car­toons at the entrance of the stu­dio, to kick-start a rele­vant con­ver­sa­tion. Never failed!

It’s little men­tal trick that Kathy Sie­rra taught me– Don’t think of them as “Cus­to­mers” or “Patrons”, think of them as “Users”. Wha­te­ver thing you’re selling, it’s not what it does that’s inte­res­ting; it’s how peo­ple use it that’s inte­res­ting. “Peo­ple Mat­ter. Objects Don’t.” Exactly.

April 21, 2009

marfa

P8300048.JPG

moleskines

moleskineframed123.JPG
[“Moles­kine 42″ in a nice woo­den frame. Click on image to enlarge etc.]

moleskine42vvv.JPG
[“Moles­kine 42″ before the fra­ming, approx 5“x7”: Click on image to enlarge etc.]
moleskine42%20closupA.jpg
[Close-up view]
In May 4th, 2008 I blog­ged about a new dra­wing, “Moles­kine 42″.
I’m plan­ning on doing more of these. I like their sim­ple, plain, black & white aus­te­rity.
Yes, I’ll be selling them. I’ll also be taking com­mis­sions, just like I did with The “Wiki­pe­dia” Moles­kine. If you’re in the mar­ket, feel free to let me know via email, Thanks.
[Moles­kine Archive is here.]

April 16, 2009

DeepZoomPix


My buddy over at Mic­ro­soft, Steve Clay­ton, demons­tra­tes Deep­Zoom­Pix, using my car­toons. Details here. Thanks, Steve!

“create or die”

redknight002.jpg
Chris over on Twit­ter left me the follo­wing mes­sage:

@gapingvoid “create or die” is a timely slo­gan for the country and eco­nomy. we have shif­ted too far over to the con­su­mer side

Yep, I would agree…
[The gaping­void “Create or Die” print.]

April 15, 2009

“Dream Big”

P4140006.JPG
[Alpine, Texas. Some of my Stormhoek “Dream Big” pos­ters in the men’s room at Harry’s, com­plete with 1980’s beer porn. Hurrah!]
desert4444.jpg
It’s been a while since we first put up the Stormhoek sign up in the Far West Texas desert.
“Made in South Africa. Drunk in West Texas”.
I liked that tagline, but I much pre­fer “Dream Big, Alpine, Texas”. It speaks more to peo­ple. It’s not about “Here’s why you should buy our wine”. Whether we’re selling wine, or wor­king in a local garage, it’s more about something lar­ger that we can all relate to, all of us who are lucky enough to live out here.
In small town like Alpine, where I live, word spreads. Real peo­ple tal­king about y’all etc.
When it works, Word-Of-Mouth Mar­ke­ting works REALLY well. A story about a crazy car­too­nist dude with this South Afri­can wine gives peo­ple something to talk about.
The one thing they do say about the actual pro­duct, though, that makes all the dif­fe­rence: “The wine tas­tes good”.
Gran­ted, that’s not the most sophis­ti­ca­ted sound byte there is, but it works well.
Peo­ple like it. It’s a qua­lity pro­duct. My sec­ret, evil plan would die over­night if it wasn’t.
The good news is, in the Uni­ted Sta­tes, Stormhoek sold more bott­les before April 1st this year, than it sold in the entire 2008. So something out here in Far West Texas is wor­king. Exci­ting times, Indeed.

the studio

P4050001.JPG
That’s “Desert­Manhat­tan” there in the back­ground, with a new, much sma­ller pain­ting I’ve just star­ted…
Far West Texas is well-suited to a stu­dio made of can­vas walls. The light is mag­ni­fi­cent…
I don’t spend a lot of time in the stu­dio– too busy with other pro­jects– but when I am there, I feel both crea­tive and serene. A hard combo to achieve, for most of us…

extremely hard

extremely%20hard%20002.jpg
“I work extre­mely hard doing what I love, mainly to ensure that I don’t have to work extre­mely hard doing what I hate.“
[From a recent Twit­ter post.]

April 13, 2009

the thing is…

change%20the%20world%20558.jpg
[From a recent post on Twit­ter.]
Now ain’t that the truth…?
I guess the argu­ment still remains, what does “Chan­ging The World” actually mean?
Does it have to be something huge, like Bill Gates star­ting Mic­ro­soft, The Beat­les relea­sing Sgt. Pep­per, or Nixon bom­bing Cam­bo­dia?
Or can it be something more modest, like ope­ning up a really cool inde­pen­dent books­tore in a small town in Far West Texas that really could use one?
There’s no right ans­wer.
It all depends on what you truly, truly love. “Mea­ning Sca­les”.

the next gapingvoid print: “create or die”: $265 pre-order

create%20or%20die%20jpeg.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
Though this car­toon, “Create or Die” is less than a week old, it see­med to really reso­nate with peo­ple, and by the time the end of last week rolled around, the num­ber of peo­ple emai­ling me about this image almost equa­led those who voted for Wolf v. Sheep. So, being the kind of per­son that hates to disap­point, I deci­ded to damn the tor­pe­does and go ahead and publish it, as it seems to make lots of peo­ple happy.
The car­toon was ins­pi­red by a dia­log I had going with one of my clients, Dell Com­pu­ters, just before Christ­mas. The more I thought about it, the more I rea­li­zed that this “crea­ti­vity” thing isn’t just a Dell issue, it applies to all of us.
Like I said in my pre­vious blog post:

In this glo­ba­li­zed, hyper-linked, internet-enabled world, “Boring” has sud­denly become a very expen­sive luxury.
[…]
I want to make limited-edition prints that somehow, even in a small, indi­rect way, helps make com­pa­nies and indi­vi­duals less afraid, and more willing to be CREATIVE, more willing to embrace the CREATIVITY that they already have. Because eco­no­mi­cally and spi­ri­tually, that is ulti­ma­tely where our future lies, even if that idea some­ti­mes terri­fies us.

I can’t tell you what to make. I can’t tell you what your cus­to­mers will find inte­res­ting or use­ful. I can’t tell you what’s going to knock their socks off. I can’t tell you what “Create” means to you or some­body else.
But I will tell you, I AM RIGHT about this one. Create or Die. That’s why I wan­ted to make this into a print. Something on the wall to serve as a steady remin­der.
[The Small Print:]

1. It’ll be prin­ted around the end of April, and will retail at $450.00. Not yet sure on the edi­tion size, we’ll decide when it is going to print, all hand-signed and num­be­red by me. Using the Pay­pal but­ton below to make a $100 depo­sit, you can own at the pre-publication price of $265.00. The pre-pub price will expire by Thurs­day. Any orders after that, but before the publi­ca­tion date can buy it for $350.00. The minute the image is prin­ted, the price reverts back to $450.00.

[UPDATE: The Pay­Pal Depo­sit has been removed.]


2. To secure your pre-order, please use the Pay­Pal but­ton above to make a $100 depo­sit. The Pay­Pal form will ask you for all your details [inc­lu­ding your pre­fe­rred ship­ping address], which of course we’ll have for our records. Why are we asking for a depo­sit? To weed out the spam­mers, fla­kes and trolls out there [This is the Inter­net, after all], lea­ving only com­mit­ted buyers in the mix. No other rea­son.
3. When asked for your details, please inc­lude your real name, not just your busi­ness name. The ship­per won’t deli­ver it other­wise.
4. The print will be ready to ship in 4 – 6 weeks from today. We’ll email you another Pay­Pal for the outs­tan­ding invoice once the art­work is prin­ted and pac­ked.
5. We’ll be prin­ting these to the same high stan­dards as last time i.e. top-of-the-line inks and paper, approx 24″ x 35″ in dimen­sion. If for some rea­son, I don’t like the way the colors lay down when I am proo­fing it, I reserve the right to change the colors and if you don’t like the final image, you can have your depo­sit back, no ques­tions asked.
6. Ship­ping & hand­ling [approx $45 USA, $65 abroad] is not inc­lu­ded in the price. The buyer is also res­pon­si­ble for any Cus­toms & Excise outside the USA. We ship them flat, not rolled.
7. If you have any ques­tions, please feel free to drop me an email at gapingvoidprints@gmail.com, and either Laura or me will ans­wer them.

Thanks, as always, for your love and support!

“ignore everybody” launches June 11th, 2009

bookjacket777.jpg
[The book jac­ket– click on image to enlarge etc.]

It’s less than 2 months till my book, “Ignore Every­body” comes out. June 11th it hits the bookstores.

[You can down­load two PDF sam­ple chap­ters here etc.]

[Pre-order Here:]

Ama­zon. Bar­nes & Noble. Bor­ders. 800-CEO-READ. Indie­Bound.

To keep up-to-date with it all, please subsc­ribe to my “Crazy, Deran­ged Fools” news­let­ter. I send something out about once a month. Thanks.

[UPDATE: The Offi­cial Publisher’s Blurb for the book:]

When Hugh Mac­Leod was a strug­gling young copyw­ri­ter, living in a YMCA, he star­ted to doodle on the backs of busi­ness cards while sit­ting at a bar. Those car­toons even­tually led to a popu­lar blog – gapingvoid.com – and a repu­ta­tion for pithy insight and humor, in both words and pic­tu­res.
Mac­Leod has opi­nions on everything from mar­ke­ting to the mea­ning of life, but one of his main sub­jects is crea­ti­vity. How do new ideas emerge in a cyni­cal, risk-averse world? Where does ins­pi­ra­tion come from? What does it take to make a living as a crea­tive per­son?
Now his first book, Ignore Ever­yone, expands on his shar­pest insights, wit­tiest car­toons, and most use­ful advice. A sam­ple:

* Selling out is har­der than it looks.
Dilu­ting your pro­duct to make it more com­mer­cial will just make peo­ple like it less.
* If your plan depends on you sud­denly being “dis­co­ve­red” by some big shot, your plan will pro­bably fail. Nobody sud­denly dis­co­vers anything. Things are made slowly and in pain.
* Don’t try to stand out from the crowd; avoid crowds alto­gether. There’s no point trying to do the same thing as 250,000 other young hope­fuls, wai­ting for a miracle. All exis­ting busi­ness models are wrong. Find a new one.
* The idea doesn’t have to be big. It just has to be yours. The sove­reignty you have over your work will ins­pire far more peo­ple than the actual con­tent ever will.
After lear­ning MacLeod’s 40 keys to crea­ti­vity, you will be ready to unlock your own bri­lliance and unleash it on the world.
About the Author
Hugh Mac­Leod wor­ked as an adver­ti­sing copyw­ri­ter for more than a decade, while deve­lo­ping his skills as a car­too­nist and pun­dit. His blog is Gaping Void, and more than a million peo­ple have down­loa­ded the ori­gi­nal post that ins­pi­red this book, “How To Be Crea­tive.” He also lec­tu­res and con­sults on Web 2.0 and its impact on business.

April 10, 2009

gapingvoid’s secret, evil plan finally goes public…

hampster444.jpg
[“Hams­ter Wheel”. Click on image to enlarge etc.]
I’ve sold or given away a lot of car­toons to my peer group over the years.
And given the choice bet­ween the two, I have gene­rally pre­fe­rred it when they hung it in their office, as oppo­sed to in their homes.
Not that I have the sligh­test objec­tion to peo­ple han­ging it in their homes, of course. But ever since I was a kid, I’ve wan­ted my place of work to be a crea­tive envi­ron­ment, not an envi­ron­ment of slow, lin­ge­ring, death-by-endless-drudgery. And when I think of my peer group, they always FELT STRONGLY the same way as well, regard­less of what they actually did for a living.
Idea­lis­tic? Sure. Unrea­lis­tic? Often. But we never had a pro­blem with that. We knew it was the price we paid for trying to be true to our guts.
And yes, I always liked making car­toons that reflec­ted this “crea­tive” streak we all aspi­red to pro­fes­sio­nally. And my peer group liked it, too. And this is basi­cally where my office-centric car­toon shtick came from.
One of the buzz­words you hear a lot in the busi­ness world these days, is “Inno­va­tion”. Yes, it’s a genui­nely worthy thing to aspire to. Genuine inno­va­tion crea­tes lots of genuine value, every young intern knows this. Which is why peo­ple like to throw it around like con­fetti. It’s one of those words that sound good in mee­tings, regard­less of how serious one is about ACTUALLY inno­va­ting ANYTHING.
Here’s some friendly advice for all you Innovation-buzzword fan­boys: You don’t get to be more inno­va­tive, until you make your­self more crea­tive FIRST.
“Inno­va­tive” is an “exter­nal” word. It can be mea­su­red. It gene­rally talks about things that have been tes­ted pro­perly and found to have wor­ked in the real world.
“Crea­tive”, howe­ver, is more of an “inter­nal” word. It’s sub­jec­tive, it’s mur­kier. It’s far har­der to mea­sure, it’s far har­der to define. It’s an inward jour­ney, not out­ward. Which is why a lot of peo­ple in busi­ness try to keep the word out of their offi­cial lexi­con, pre­fe­rring ins­tead more neu­tral, more externally-focused lan­guage like “Value”, “Exce­llence”, “Qua­lity” and yes, “Inno­va­tion”.
The trou­ble is, of course, that approach doesn’t work as well any more. In this glo­ba­li­zed, hyper-linked, internet-enabled world, “Boring” has sud­denly become a very expen­sive luxury.
Do you REALLY think Apple is afraid to use the word, “Crea­tive”? Do you REALLY think Steve Jobs goes around his office yak­king on end­lessly about “Value, Exce­llence, Qua­lity and Inno­va­tion”? No, of course he doesn’t. Apple’s UTTERLY AMAZING design, busi­ness and mar­ke­ting pro­wess comes from the UTTERLY AMAZING crea­tive fire in their collec­tive belly, not the other way around.
I want to make limited-edition prints that somehow, even in a small, indi­rect way, helps make com­pa­nies and indi­vi­duals less afraid, and more willing to be CREATIVE, more willing to embrace the CREATIVITY that they already have. Because eco­no­mi­cally and spi­ri­tually, that is ulti­ma­tely where our future lies, even if that idea some­ti­mes terri­fies us.
There. So now you know my sec­ret, evil plan. You have been warned.

print update: wolf vs sheep $265 offer extended throughout easter holiday

ws0904%20jpeg.jpg
[“Wolf vs. Sheep”. Click on image to enlarge]

[UPDATE: Wolf vs Sheep $265 is now clo­sed. The price is now $350 pre-order until the print ships, early May. Thanks for the support!!!!!]

Re. “Wolf vs. Sheep”. We weren’t expec­ting the $265 pre-order offer [avai­la­ble only the the first 30 peo­ple etc.] to sell out as quickly as it did [All 30 were gone before the end of the day!]. Besi­des that, there were peo­ple who e-mailed us, saying that where having pro­blems with Pay­pal, or they were not in an acces­si­ble place, etc.
So, being that it is Eas­ter, and that I’m fee­ling in a “Holi­day” mood, that sort of thing… We’ll keep the pre-publication price open until 5pm Eas­ter Sun­day, New York time.
PLEASE, THIS OFFER IS LIMITED TO ONE PER PERSON. IF YOU WANT MORE THAN ONE, TO GIVE TO A FRIEND, ETC., PLEASE EMAIL ME FIRST, THANKS.
If you want to make the usual $100 depo­sit, please feel free to click the Pay­Pal but­ton below, and we’ll honor the $265 price. Thanks.
[UPDATE: PAYPAL BUTTON REMOVED, EASTER SUNDAY.]
[PS: To read the fine print, please click on the link above, or here. Thanks Again.]

April 9, 2009

the white pebble

whitepebbleJPEG2.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
There’s a won­der­ful metaphor in the Bible [Reve­la­tion 2:17] about “a white peb­ble”.

17 Let the one who has an ear hear what the spi­rit says to the con­gre­ga­tions: To him that con­quers I will give some of the hid­den manna, and I will give him a white peb­ble, and upon the peb­ble a new name writ­ten which no one knows except the one recei­ving it.

The metaphor was once explai­ned to me by a Catho­lic monk. To paraph­rase:
“You have three sel­ves: The per­son that you think you are, the per­son that other peo­ple think you are, and the per­son that God thinks you are. The white peb­ble repre­sents the lat­ter. And of the three, it is by far the most impor­tant.“
He then gave me some good advice, something I’ve always kept with me:
“When life gets really tough, just remem­ber the white peb­ble. Just remem­ber who you really are. Just remem­ber the per­son that only God can see.“
Wha­te­ver your thoughts on God or Reli­gion may be, posi­tive or nega­tive, the white peb­ble is a very sim­ple metaphor that auda­ciously asks the ques­tion: “Who are you, really?“
Yes, why are you here, exactly? Who are you here for? Your­self? Other peo­ple? God? Or maybe some other cause? You tell me…
It’s one of those ques­tions that never gets old. Unlike the poor body that hou­ses us.

the survival dance and the sacred dance

sexandcash111.jpg
A friend just emai­led me this excerpt from “Soul Dance”, by Bill Plot­kin. I liked it so much, I thought I’d share it with y’all. It cer­tainly reso­na­tes with my current day job. Bri­lliant.

The Sur­vi­val Dance and The Sac­red Dance
Har­ley Swift Deer, a Native Ame­ri­can teacher, says that each of us has a sur­vi­val dance and a sac­red dance, but the sur­vi­val dance must come first. Our sur­vi­val dance, a foun­da­tio­nal com­po­nent of self-reliance, is what we do for a living — our way of sup­por­ting our­sel­ves phy­si­cally and eco­no­mi­cally. For most peo­ple, this means a paid job. For mem­bers of a reli­gious com­mu­nity like a monas­tery, it means social or spi­ri­tual labors that con­tri­bute to the community’s well-being. For others, it means crea­ting a home and rai­sing chil­dren, fin­ding a patron for one’s art, or living as a hun­ter or gathe­rer. Every­body has to have a sur­vi­val dance. Fin­ding and crea­ting one is our first task upon lea­ving our parents’ or guar­dians’ home.
Once you have your sur­vi­val dance esta­blished, you can wan­der, inwardly and out­wardly, searching for clues to your sac­red dance, the work you were born to do. This work may have no rela­tion to your job. Your sac­red dance sparks your grea­test ful­fill­ment and extends your truest ser­vice to others. You know you’ve found it when there’s little else you’d rather be doing. Get­ting paid for it is super­fluous. You would gladly pay others, if neces­sary, for the oppor­tu­nity.
Hence, the impor­tance of self-reliance, not merely the eco­no­mic kind implied by a sur­vi­val dance but also of the social, psycho­lo­gi­cal, and spi­ri­tual kind. To find your sac­red dance, after all, you will need to take sig­ni­fi­cant risks. You might need to move against the grain of your family and friends. By honing psycho­lo­gi­cal self-reliance, you will find it easier to keep focu­sed on your goals in the face of resis­tance or incom­prehen­sion, ini­tial fai­lure or set­backs, or eco­no­mic or orga­ni­za­tio­nal obs­tac­les. And spi­ri­tual self-reliance will main­tain your con­nec­tion with the dee­pest truths and what you’ve lear­ned about how the world works.
Swift Deer says that once you dis­co­ver your sac­red dance and learn effec­tive ways of embod­ying it, the world will sup­port you in doing just that.
What your soul wants is what the world also wants (and needs). Your human com­mu­nity will say yes to your soul work and will, in effect, pay you to do it. Gra­dually, your sac­red dance beco­mes what you do and your for­mer sur­vi­val dance is no lon­ger need. Now you have only one dance as the world sup­ports you to do what is most ful­fi­lling for you. How do you get there? The first step is crea­ting a foun­da­tion of self-reliance: a sur­vi­val dance of inte­grity that allows you to be in the world in a good way — a way that is psycho­lo­gi­cally sus­tai­ning, eco­no­mi­cally ade­quate, socially res­pon­si­ble, and envi­ron­men­tally sound. Cul­ti­va­ting right live­lihood, as the Buddhist call it, is essen­tial trai­ning and foun­da­tion for your soul work; it’s not a step that can be skipped.

[Bonus Link:] “The Sex & Cash Theory”, gaping­void, 2004.

April 8, 2009

the next gapingvoid print: “wolf vs sheep”, pre-order at $265

ws0904%20jpeg.jpg
[“Wolf vs. Sheep”. Click on image to enlarge]

[UPDATE: Wolf vs Sheep $265 is now clo­sed. The price is now $350 pre-order until the print ships, early May. Thanks for the support!!!!!]

“Wolf vs. Sheep” will be the next gaping­void print.
The votes are in, and it is always inte­res­ting to see which image wins, and what peo­ple have to say about why. We were bet­ting that the win­ner was going to be “Love Begets Love”, but bet­ween the emails and com­ments, it was at least three-to-one for “Wolf vs Sheep”. [Which just pro­ves that I still do not know why peo­ple like one car­toon over another]. Even though, fewer peo­ple voted for the other ima­ges, they were no less pas­sio­nate about the ones they selec­ted, and that star­ted us thin­king… as I will explain below.
I am always remin­ded that I need to spell out the ‘fine print’, as follows:

1. It’ll be prin­ted around the end of April, and will retail at $450.00. It’ll be an edi­tion of roughly 100, hand sig­ned and num­be­red by me. The first 30 peo­ple who pre-order it by making a $100 depo­sit using the Pay­Pal but­ton below can have it at the pre-publication price of $265.00. Any orders after, but before the publi­ca­tion date can buy it for $350.00. The minute the print goes into pro­duc­tion, the price reverts back to $450.00.

[UPDATE: PAYPAL BUTTON REMOVED, EASTER SUNDAY.]
2. To secure your pre-order, please use the Pay­Pal but­ton above to make a $100 depo­sit. The Pay­Pal form will ask you for all your details [inc­lu­ding your pre­fe­rred ship­ping address], which of course we’ll have for our records. Why are we asking for a depo­sit? To weed out the spam­mers, fla­kes and trolls out there [This is the Inter­net, after all], lea­ving only com­mit­ted buyers in the mix. No other rea­son.
3. The print will be ready to ship in 4 – 6 weeks. We’ll send you another Pay­Pal for the outs­tan­ding invoice once the art­work is prin­ted.
4. We’ll be prin­ting these to the same high stan­dards as last time i.e. top-of-the-line inks and paper, approx 24″ x 35″ in dimen­sion. If for some rea­son, I don’t like the way the colors lay down when I am proo­fing it, I reserve the right to change the colors and if you don’t like the final image, you can have your depo­sit back, no ques­tions asked.
5. Ship­ping & hand­ling [approx $45 USA, $65 abroad] is not inc­lu­ded in the price. The buyer is also res­pon­si­ble for any Cus­toms & Excise outside the USA. We ship them flat, not rolled. When you give us your details, please remem­ber to inc­lude your name, not just your com­pany name. Other­wise the Post Office won’t accept it.
6. If you have any ques­tions, please feel free to drop me an email at gapingvoidprints@gmail.com, and either Laura or me will ans­wer them.

Though “Wolf vs Sheep” was the clear win­ner, there was still a lot of PASSIONATE sup­port for the two other con­ten­ders, “Create Or Die” and “Love Begets Love” [see the com­ments]. We’re loo­king at ways to make those avai­la­ble to you as well. I draf­ted a post ear­lier today that I’ll publish in a few days. In part, it says:

EVERY DAY now, I’m get­ting emails from peo­ple, reques­ting that I turn their favo­rite gaping­void car­toon into a limi­ted edi­tion print. The good news is, in an ideal world, I would do it in a nano­se­cond. The bad news is, it is just not eco­no­mi­cally fea­si­ble. These sorts of print edi­tions are really expen­sive to make, and without a cri­ti­cal mass of cus­to­mers per edi­tion, it simply doesn’t work
The funny thing about my work is, that because there is so much of it, so many dif­fe­rent ima­ges mean so many dif­fe­rent things to so many dif­fe­rent peo­ple. On one level, I’ve been really bles­sed at being very pro­li­fic, but on another level, I strug­gle with deci­ding what to ima­ges to choose for pro­duc­tion. Yes, there are obvious ones, like “The Blue­train”, but many, like “Corinthians”, which pro­ved to be really popu­lar in the end, I could have just as easily not have cho­sen.
There HAS to be a bet­ter way. Somehow, I need to make the selec­tion pro­cess more open to Ever­yone.…
So I’m thin­king to myself, wouldn’t it be cool if peo­ple could SPONSOR their own limi­ted edi­tion? Seriously.

We’re loo­king into this idea where indi­vi­duals can fea­sibly “spon­sor” the pro­duc­tion of their favo­rite car­toon into print form, and har­nes­sing the power of the Inter­net to get other peo­ple to join their cause. We’ll either build or own web­site for that, or we’ll use something like Fundable.org.
lovebegets25CCCC.jpg
create%20or%20die%20jpeg.jpg
[“Love Begets Love” and “Create or Die”.]
“Love Begets Love” and “Create or Die” will be the gui­nea pigs. It’ll be really inte­res­ting to see what hap­pens. Please watch this space.
Thanks, as always, for your love and support!

i am intoxicated

intoxicated%20jpeg%20002.jpg

April 7, 2009

art, the kinetic quality and social objects

vinnyWAAA.jpg

Vinny Warren, a highly res­pec­ted Crea­tive Direc­tor in Chi­cago [He wrote the Bud­wei­ser “Whas­sup” ad cam­paign] has kindly hung his new “Blue­train” print in a key focal point of his agency, the con­fe­rence room. He blogs about it here.

Fresh from the fra­ming store, it’s one of just 85 sig­ned Hugh Mac­Leod prints from the first in a series of limi­ted edi­tion prints he’s doing. This was always my favo­rite car­toon of his. I used to have a b/w prin­tout of it on my office wall. It pretty much sums up how I feel gene­rally. And I love the wildly opti­mis­tic yet utterly truth­ful tone. The text reads: THE MARKET FOR SOMETHING TO BELIEVE IN IS INFINITE.

This adver­ti­sing con­nec­tion got me thin­king about something I pos­ted back in February, 2004, during the tail end of my own adver­ti­sing career, called “The Kine­tic Quality”:

“The Kine­tic Qua­lity”: All pro­ducts are infor­ma­tion. The mole­cu­les are secondary.

The future of brands is inte­rac­tion, not com­mo­dity. It’s not something you buy, but something you pati­ci­pate in.

i.e. a brand is not a thing, but a place.
[…]
In the old days, the three most impor­tant words in adver­ti­sing were “Uni­que Selling Pro­po­si­tion”. To me, the three most impor­tant words are “By Inte­rac­ting With…”

–By inte­rac­ting with Ger­ber, she beco­mes a better-informed mom.
–By inte­rac­ting with The Wall Street Jour­nal, she beco­mes more tuned into the world of capi­ta­lism.
–By inte­rac­ting with Apple, she brings her entre­pre­neu­rial dreams clo­ser to rea­lity.
–By inte­rac­ting with McDonald’s, her busy sche­dule is made slightly easier by avoi­ding a lot of fuss over lunch.
–By inte­rac­ting with Rals­ton Purina, she beco­mes more attached to her canine friend.
–By inte­rac­ting with your brand, she becomes…?

A good brand is a two-way con­ver­sa­tion.
What we blog­gers know about the nature of infor­ma­tion (a great deal) can be applied far beyond our usual diet of media, poli­tics and jour­na­lism. Because all pro­ducts are infor­ma­tion. All pro­ducts are ideas. The mole­cu­les are secondary.

Back when I wrote that, I was an adver­ti­sing crea­tive i.e. selling other people’s stuff. Now I’m selling my own stuff i.e. my prints. And the same rules still apply:

–By inte­rac­ting with gaping­void, Vinny Warren [or whoe­ver] becomes…?

The short ans­wer is, roughly: “Bet­ter able to arti­cu­late his own world­view to him­self and to peo­ple around him.“
That’s the idea, at least. Which of course, is THE WHOLE PURPOSE of art in the first place: Self-expression through third-party “Social Objects”.
Anyone who’s ever owned an iPhone or a Har­ley David­son will know exactly what I’m tal­king about…
[Sign up to the gaping­void “Crazy, Deran­ged Fools” News­let­ter here.]

the next gapingvoid print: “wolf vs sheep”, “love begets love”, or “create or die”

ws0904%20jpeg.jpg
lovebegets25CCCC.jpg
create%20or%20die%20jpeg.jpg

[UPDATE: “Wolf vs Sheep” will be the next gaping­void print. Details here.]

In case you haven’t been follo­wing, I have been upda­ting a few ima­ges from my back cata­lo­gue [which num­bers over 5,000 dra­wings, the last time I coun­ted] and tur­ning them into limited-edition silksc­reens.
It has been a great expe­rience. It’s allo­wed me to reac­quaint myself with the ima­ges, that in some cases, I haven’t really thought about for years. It brings back some old memo­ries, and puts my mind to work in a new medium: How to trans­late 2″ x 3 1/2″ busi­ness card-sized doodle into large, 2-or –3-foot ima­ges.
As I spend time with this, I can’t help thin­king about that age-old, never-quite-answered ques­tion, “What is Art?” How is it dif­fe­rent, how has our rela­tionship chan­ged with it from even say, a cou­ple of deca­des ago? Espe­cially with the Inter­net evol­ving our sense of “Media” at such a light­ning pace?
I don’t have a defi­ni­tive ans­wer to this, but I do have a few thoughts on the sub­ject:
The artist whose work best sum­med up for me the Modern, post-World War Two, 20th-Century world that most of us were born into, is the late, great Andy Warhol. A fan­tas­tic maga­zine illus­tra­tor in the 1950s, who got into the ima­gery of tele­vi­sed, mass media in the 1960s. VERY mass-media. Who appro­pria­ted the visual lan­guage of a mass-produced, top-down, broad­cast, CORPORATE world. The visual lan­guage of Madi­son Ave­nue, the visual lan­guage of Kellog’s Corn Fla­kes, Heinz Ketchup and of course, Campbell’s Soup. And we look at his work with the same sort of detach­ment as a TV com­mer­cial, or a can of beans in the super­mar­ket. And we NEED to remain detached, or else this rather loud, gla­mo­rous, oppres­sive, con­su­me­rist world­view would bury us, would turn our brains to corn syrup.
Then along comes the Inter­net. A place that doesn’t do shotgun-media,“Broadcast” well. A place where if what you’re saying isn’t enga­ging, isn’t hit­ting peo­ple on a inti­mate, human level, it doesn’t get seen, it doesn’t get sha­red, it doesn’t exist.
Which explains why, as a rela­ti­vely dedi­ca­ted citi­zen of the Inter­net, I am far more inte­res­ted in what a piece of “Art” can do for you, once it is on your wall, than what I got out of crea­ting it. What it can do as piece of com­mu­ni­ca­tion bet­ween you and the peo­ple close to you, not as a piece of aca­de­mic Art Theory. I like the “Social-bility” of the work. I like crea­ting “Social Objects”. And this to me, of course, is what the Inter­net also runs on. This, to me, is also what the new internet-enabled, post-TV world is all about. Ins­tant, Human Con­nec­tion.
And where does this “Human Con­nec­tion” come from? Easy– from tal­king about the world you and I actually live in, not the world the “Theory Police” live in. Yes, that one. The messy one. You know EXACTLY what I’m tal­king about…
And yes, that’s what car­toons have ALWAYS been about to me, long before the Inter­net was inven­ted, long before I even knew what Art Theory was. As I’m fond of saying, “It isn’t roc­ket science”. Real, Human Con­nec­tion never was.
So, with this brave new world in mind, we’re thin­king of publishing one of the three follo­wing car­toons:
1. “Wolf vs Sheep”. This is a re-working is one of my his­to­ri­cal favo­ri­tes. I first drew it when I had just to moved to New York, in 1998. It was about what I saw as the choi­ces that peo­ple are con­fron­ted with in the rat race. They were fas­ci­na­ting times and eli­ci­ted other favo­ri­tes of mine, like “Com­pany Hie­rarchy”.
2. “Love Begets Love”. Virgil’s famous quote. I drew the car­toon as a con­ten­der for the Stormhoek Valentine’s wine in 2007. It never made it onto the bottle as a label in the end, but a lot of peo­ple loved the dra­wing.
3. “Create Or Die”. Though I only pos­ted this car­toon for the first time a few hours ago, I’ve so far recei­ved about 20 emails from peo­ple expres­sing serious inte­rest in it as a print. I never saw that coming, but what the heck, up it goes…
We’ll publish one of the three, depen­ding on the feed­back we get. If you have an opi­nion either way, please feel free to leave a com­ment below, ping me on Twit­ter, or if you think you’re in the actual mar­ket for buying one, send me an email. Thanks.
The silksc­reen print will be roughly the same size [approx 24″ x 35″] and of the same high qua­lity as “Corinthians” and “We Need To Talk”. The price and num­ber of the edi­tion will also be in the same ball­park.
Please let me know your thoughts. All very exci­ting. Thanks Again.

the “ignore everybody” cartoon

ignore%20everybody%200905jpeg.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
Last week, Patrick Bren­nan was stuck in an air­port lounge for seve­ral hours, wai­ting for his con­nec­ting flight. To kill time, he star­ted mes­sing around visually on his com­pu­ter with the forty chap­ter tit­les of my upco­ming book, “Ignore Every­body”. He came up with this, then emai­led it to me.
I liked it so much, I went ahead and re-worked it, in my own handw­ri­ting. Very cool. If I ever publish it as a limited-edition print, Patrick, I’ll make damn sure you get a copy. Thanks so much!

mediocrity sucks

mediocrity%20sucks1%20jpeg.jpg
I’m gues­sing this would make a pretty fun print to put on someone’s office wall… just a thought.

mediocrity now howls in protest

mediocrity%200905.gif
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
[Car­toon ins­pi­red by a recent Twit­ter post.]

create or die

create%20or%20die%20jpeg.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
You either get it or you don’t. You either feel it in your bones, or you don’t. There’s nothing to explain.
[UPDATE:] Though only a few hours old, this car­toon is already in the run­ning to become the next gaping­void limited-edition print! Details here.]

April 6, 2009

tyger! tyger!

tyger0905.gif
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
[William Blake]

April 4, 2009

same cross (green)

samecross%20giff.gif

god isn’t dead

gdead001giff.gif

psalm 23

p23gif.gif
[Psalm 23]

blue monster israel

22072007054-1_thumb.jpg
Just stum­bled across this photo from July, 2007. The Blue Mons­ter made it to the SAP offi­ces in Ra’anana, Israel. Rock on.
I’ve not been pushing The Blue Mons­ter much in the last year. I’ve been busy with other things, and besi­des, like Microsoft’s Steve Clay­ton told me a while back, “It already has a life of its own, so there’s no need to…“
That being said, every now and then I’ll come across someone in the Mic­ro­soft ecosys­tem, either via email, Twit­ter or in per­son, who’ll tell me a funny story about it e.g. like how they were in somebody’s office on the other side of the pla­net, and there they saw it, han­ging on the wall. Stuff like that makes my day. And it’s been hap­pe­ning quite a lot recently, for rea­sons unbek­nownst to me. Which I sup­pose is why I’m wri­ting about it now…
In retros­pect, over two years since it made its debut, I’m quite relie­ved it never got offi­cially sanc­tio­ned by the Mic­ro­soft mar­ke­ting machine. “We’re Mic­ro­soft! We GET The Blue Mons­ter! We’re cool!!!!” That would’ve gone down like a lead balloon.
My spies tell me that inside Mic­ro­soft, The Blue Mons­ter is pretty divi­sive. Some peo­ple really reso­nate with it, a lot of peo­ple go, “Who the hell autho­ri­zed this?!! This isn’t part of the bran­ding!!!!” I con­si­der them friends of mine, but I don’t work for Mic­ro­soft, nor are they currently clients of mine. So I’ll let them sort that one out for them­sel­ves. Heh.
I never envi­sio­ned it as part of “The Brand”. To me it was just a car­toon that arti­cu­la­ted that demo­nic, crea­tive pas­sion, that sense of PURPOSE that ALL com­pa­nies need to arti­cu­late, Mic­ro­soft or other­wise, soft­ware or other­wise, if they wish to remain inte­res­ting, if they wish to thrive long-term.
It’s not roc­ket science. Which is why it works.
[Link: The ori­gi­nal Blue Mons­ter blog post.]

April 1, 2009

print update: signing

P4010008AA.JPG
P4010012BB.JPG
Today was “Print Sig­ning” Day. Spent most of the mor­ning sig­ning “Corinthians” and “We Need To Talk”. Rock on.
As you can see, “WNTT” is red & white. It was con­cei­ved as a pur­ple & blue print, but as I e-mailed to peo­ple who had pre-ordered one:

As you will remem­ber, it was envi­sio­ned as a mostly pur­ple print, with some blue and black.
It loo­ked good on the com­pu­ter screen [i.e. lit from behind]. The trou­ble is, it didn’t look so good as a prin­ted proof. It simply didn’t work. Somehow the pur­ple didn’t gel with the other colors. It all loo­ked kinda muddy.
So we mes­sed around, as you can see in the second photo above. We took out the pur­ple, just to see if that hel­ped.
Then we chan­ged the ori­gi­nal blue to fire-engine red, we also tried orange-yellow.
And the red.… simply put.… loo­ked SMOKING HOT! I’m wri­ting this down in Miami. The WNTT edi­tion [red] just arri­ved here in a woo­den crate, and it looks utterly fabu­lous. Trust me; the photo doesn’t do it jus­tice.
P3310001CC.JPG
[The prints, 30 seconds after ope­ning the cra­tes…]
I know that the pur­ple image above was what you plan­ned on buying, and you may in fact have had your heart set on something pur­ple. I totally unders­tand that. Then again, Art is a work-in-progress. I didn’t know exactly HOW things were going to turn out until I was actually in the prin­ting stu­dio. C’est Le Gue­rre.
I’m sig­ning the prints tomo­rrow and ship­ping them out this week. If you’re not happy about the new red color, I unders­tand com­ple­tely, and I will gladly refund your money in full, or cre­dit you with a later print edi­tion. It’s totally your call.

The vast majo­rity of peo­ple were cool with this, a lot of them actually said they pre­fe­rred the new red ver­sion. One per­son did have her heart set on pur­ple, so we gave her a refund, fair enough. One other per­son agreed to take a “Corinthian” in its place. So it all tur­ned out rather well, all things con­si­de­red.
The prints are being ship­ped out tomo­rrow, so expect to see yours in the mail in the next few days. To be honest, I’m over the moon with how well these two edi­tions tur­ned out. These are very exci­ting times. Thanks, as always, for your love and sup­port. Rock on.

the purple cow cartoon

sethPSDmainJPEG.jpg
[Click on Image to Enlarge etc]
This dra­wing was ins­pi­red, of course, by my friend, Seth Godin’s semi­nal book, “Pur­ple Cow”..
I always loved both the words and the design of the book. This is my tri­bute to it.
The book came out in 2003. Since then it’s chan­ged a lot of lives for the bet­ter, inc­lu­ding mine. Since then its DNA has buried itself deep inside Mar­ke­ting Theory everywhere. Long may it con­ti­nue to do so…