February 4, 2009

about the blue monster tattoo guy losing his job at microsoft…

Send to Kindle

BMtattoo2A.jpg
A few peo­ple have pin­ged me about this story over the last cou­ple of days, so I guess a blog post was in order.
A cou­ple of years ago, I drew the Mic­ro­soft Blue Mons­ter car­toon. It star­ted taking on a life of its own inside Mic­ro­soft.
Then back in July I blog­ged about how one Mic­ro­soft emplo­yee, Dan Wood­man, liked the idea so much, he went and got him­self a Blue Mons­ter Tat­too. As Dan said himself,

While I can never for­get how much I love this com­pany and all of the great things we do, I wan­ted a daily remin­der of the fact that I, as a Mic­ro­sof­tie, need to change the world every sin­gle day. That is why, as part of MGX this year, I deci­ded to fully embrace the Blue Mons­ter and all it stands for. That is my very own Blue Mons­ter tat­too (and yes, he is real!). He’s there to make sure I don’t for­get why I am here and what it is that I am doing — chan­ging the world.

The a cou­ple of days ago the story breaks that Dan has just been laid off from Mic­ro­soft. The job is gone, the tat­too remains etc. As the song goes, “Isn’t it iro­nic”.
Dan talks about here:

One of the ques­tions I have been hea­ring often invol­ves my very first blog post on this site– “What about the Blue Mons­ter?” The truth is, I haven’t regret­ted that tat­too since I got it and now is no excep­tion. The Blue Mons­ter is sta­ying. :)
Wor­king at Mic­ro­soft has been the grea­test expe­rience of my life and I have no desire to for­get about it. And even if I don’t get back into Mic­ro­soft right away (which is, by the way, my plan!), then I have a remin­der that even outside of Mic­ro­soft, I need to do my best to change the world every sin­gle day.

So being the car­too­nist who spaw­ned the Blue Mons­ter, how do I feel about it?
Well, I don’t know Dan per­so­nally, but at the time I con­si­de­red it a great honor that he would regard my work highly enough to tat­too him­self with it, even if I would never be totally com­for­ta­ble with that kind of res­pon­si­bi­lity. But I guess that’s the price you pay for put­ting your work out there. It’s like being a songw­ri­ter, and then rea­ding in the natio­nal media that some tee­na­ger in Iowa killed him­self while lis­te­ning to your album. That doesn’t make you an acces­sory to mur­der. Art has a life of its own.
And yeah, get­ting laid off is always a risk, with or without a com­pany tat­too to call your own. Wel­come to rea­lity.
Secondly, just because Dan doesn’t work for Mic­ro­soft Corp any more, doesn’t mean he’s no lon­ger part of the gran­der cause he sig­ned up for, for the kind of change he wants to help make. Mic­ro­soft is a huge com­pany, but it’s dwar­fed in com­pa­ri­son by the size of their Part­ner Group ecosys­tem. I ima­gine Dan could easily end up somewhere in there, wor­king away quite hap­pily and pro­duc­ti­vely for the same cause.
And why not? I have a friend who was laid off from Mic­ro­soft last year, and guess what? She still dri­ves to the Red­mond cam­pus every day. Only this time she’s the emplo­yee of an outside con­trac­tor, not Mic­ro­soft, but the type of work that she’s doing, and the peo­ple she’s wor­king with inside Mic­ro­soft, really hasn’t chan­ged too much. The lines that sepa­rate “inter­nal” and “exter­nal” are very blurry, com­pa­red to even half a gene­ra­tion ago.
Thirdly, the Blue Mons­ter was never about Dan’s paycheck. It was about an idea. I’ve been saying this for years: All a pro­duct is, all a com­pany is, is an an “Idea Ampli­fier”. Pro­ducts don’t excite us. Human poten­tial exci­tes us.
i.e. “Peo­ple mat­ter. Objects don’t.“
Good luck to you, Dan. Good luck with your next adven­ture, and good luck with your new blog. Rock. On. And Thanks!

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , ,

11 Responses to “about the blue monster tattoo guy losing his job at microsoft…”

  1. Daniel Edlen says:

    The thing is, it’s our own human poten­tial that exci­tes us. Poten­tial in others only exci­tes us when we can inter­nally trans­fer that to us. Often times that’s through a pro­duct. We see a pro­duct making someone else kic­kass and we want to kic­kass too.
    So, yes peo­ple mat­ter, but perhaps really only when they mat­ter to us. Other­wise they get flat­te­ned due to lack of subs­tan­tive atten­tion into the Mic­ro­soft tat­too guy.
    Peace.

  2. Candi says:

    I’ve been thin­king about get­ting a tat­too based on a design of yours. I just can’t decide which one I like best. I’ll keep you pos­ted :)

  3. There is something faintly ridi­cu­lous about someone get­ting a tat that reflect their pro­fes­sed love of the com­pany that pays their salary. i2 offe­red a bounty for peeps to get their logo tat­ted up — then chan­ged the logo. I mean — c’mon, it’s fskin’ retarded.

  4. tex1sam says:

    It’s pretty small min­ded of some to think that the Blue Mons­ter tat­too is bogus now that he has a world of fresh oppor­tu­nity to focus on.
    A desire to have an impact on the world does not have to exist within the con­text of a cor­po­ra­tion. Hope­fully Dan can take that pas­sion and focus it in new ways that don’t involve get­ting a MS pays­tub on the 1st and 15th.

  5. Dan Woodman says:

    Thanks, Hugh. It’s ama­zing to me how many peo­ple are dis­cus­sing this story. It’s even more ama­zing to me how peo­ple I have never met have such a strong opi­nion of me (one way or another), as I have lear­ned through some other blog com­ments. You and Tex1Sam have pretty much hit it on the head — it isn’t about Mic­ro­soft. If it had been about Mic­ro­soft, I’d have the MS logo tat­tooed on my body. Honestly, I con­si­de­red it, but clearly didn’t do it. It wasn’t what I wan­ted. When I saw the Blue Mons­ter and the story that went with it, I rea­li­zed that it was exactly what I had been loo­king for. It was about Mic­ro­soft, but wasn’t Mic­ro­soft. It had (and con­ti­nues to have) a dee­per mea­ning than simply “I love Microsoft.”

  6. @Daniel Edlen — Totally disa­gree with you there re human poten­tial. Some of us are dri­ven by hel­ping others reach or approach their poten­tial. It’s cer­tainly my passion.

  7. Daniel Edlen says:

    Back @Allison Rey­nolds — You’ve made people’s rea­li­zed poten­tial your pro­duct, so yes, they mat­ter to you. I’m not saying this cyni­cally, or to put down hel­ping others, it’s just that you get to kic­kass by doing so. It’s your pas­sion, your focus, how you’re taking over the world. You.
    Peace.

  8. No thanks says:

    Thank god for the few Den­nis Howlett’s out there; tat­tooing your­self with an icon of the com­pany you work for is the height of inte­llec­tual lame­ness. These are the same peo­ple who will tear-up at com­pany retreats while making refe­ren­ces to giving “110%.“
    As much as that kind of soul-murdering bs sic­kens me from per­so­nal expe­rience, it’s not half as lame as the attempt by others to kite this epi­sode into a haiku about MAN’S ULTIMATE PLACE IN THE UNIVERSE.
    Lis­ten up: the guy sells his labor for a wage. Sen­ti­men­ta­li­zes the rela­tionship in a way that suits the com­pany. When the com­pany deci­des it can’t carry him, it cuts the umbi­li­cal without a second thought. ABCs of capi­ta­lism.
    It’s the height of disho­nesty to then say, “Well, it wasn’t ever about Mic­ro­soft. It really is about the abi­lity of the indi­vi­dual to forge ahead, to dream the impos­si­ble dream, to run where the brave dare not go, to right the unrigh­ta­ble wrong.“
    The idea that peo­ple work at Mic­ro­soft to change the world — a com­pany that’s renown for the medioc­rity of its pro­ducts, the rapa­cious­ness of its mono­po­lis­tic prac­ti­ces, its eager­ness to work with the mili­tary, with dic­ta­torships, with anyone that will cough up the cash — is just men­da­cious crap.
    That fact that those kinds of claims cons­tantly get floa­ted on this site to cho­ru­ses of “Here! Here!” is why soo­ner or later this blog always ends up in the same ideo­lo­gi­cal space as log cabin Repu­bli­cans.
    So, yeah, the epi­sode does have a dee­per mea­ning: wake up, and don’t be a stooge.

  9. hugh macleod says:

    @ no thanks. Nice rant, but your self-imposed limi­ta­tions are not mine, Dan’s or Microsoft’s problem.

  10. At least it’s not just the blue mea­nie. This guy got a Word­Press tat­too.
    It may have chan­ged his life, but now it’s chan­ged his body.

  11. […] Today found this great post, here is a quick excerpt : A few peo­ple have pin­ged me about this story over the last cou­ple of days, so I guess a blog post was in order. A cou­ple of years ago, I drew the Mic­ro­soft. Read the rest of this great post Here […]