December 22, 2008

the global microbrand riff continues

Send to Kindle

angel319A-thumb.jpg
For the grea­ter part of the last decade, I have been using the inter­net to build what I’m fond of calling, “The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand”.

A small, tiny brand, that “sells” all over the world.
The Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand is nothing new; they’ve exis­ted for a while, long before the inter­net was inven­ted. Ima­gine a well-known author or pain­ter, selling his work all over the world. Or a small whisky dis­ti­llery in Scot­land. Or a small cheese maker in rural France, whose pro­duce is expor­ted to Paris, Lon­don, Tokyo etc. Ditto with a vio­lin maker in Italy. A clas­si­cal gui­tar maker in Spain. Or a small English firm making $50,000 shotguns.

Here are some more thoughts, in no par­ti­cu­lar order of impor­tance:

1. I think in many ways, the artist is the ulti­mate glo­bal mic­ro­brand.
She just does her thing from whe­re­ver; if she’s any good and for­tune favors her work, her stuff is sud­denly being seen, read or heard all around the world, without her having to leave her stu­dio too much. Nice work if you can get it.

2. The good news is, so far it’s gone extre­mely well for me.
The bad news is, it has taken me fore­ver to this point. Bet­ter late than never, I sup­pose.
3. I’ve had the most suc­cess hel­ping to build Glo­bal Mic­ro­brands for other peo­ple, most notably, English Cut and Stormhoek. The idea that I should start appl­ying what I know about this world to my own, com­mer­cial pro­ducts, didn’t really kick in till ear­lier this year. Though busi­ness has been busy enough so far [and get­ting busier by the day], it’s still a strange fee­ling for me. Seems like it’s easier to pro­mote other people’s stuff than one’s own stuff. You don’t take it so per­so­nally, somehow.
4. Being an artist has three main com­po­nents– 1. Making the actual work 2. Run­ning the busi­ness and 3. Pro­mo­ting the busi­ness. It’s REALLY hard to do all three at the same time. It’s EQUALLY hard to find peo­ple who can take over some of the duties and res­pon­si­bi­li­ties of 2 and 3. Good peo­ple who actually know what they’re doing are rare and expen­sive.
5. I made my best work when I was rela­ti­vely cold, hungry and des­pe­rate. This kind of expe­rience tends to make one very una­po­lo­ge­tic, years later, when the “suc­cess” even­tually arri­ves.
6. Having a glo­bal mic­ro­brand is not about being “famous”. It’s about having a serious, almost tribe-like con­nec­tion with a num­ber of peo­ple who want to buy into what you’re doing. If you’re selling $5000, hand-made suits like Tho­mas Mahon, that num­ber only needs to be a hun­dred or so. If you’re selling $20 books or music CDs, that num­ber needs to be much lar­ger. I’m somewhere in the middle, because my work has a lot of price points– from the $16.29 price tag of my upco­ming book, to the x-hundred-dollar prints I’m wor­king on, to the five-figures I plan to sell my large pain­tings for [Yes, I’ve already been offe­red that for “Desert­Manhat­tan”, even though it’s still far from com­ple­tion]. Somewhere early on I deci­ded 10,000 peo­ple for me was the magic num­ber. I may be wrong on that, though…
7. I don’t believe in over­night suc­cess [mainly because it has yet to hap­pen to me, or anyone I know]. I believe on buil­ding my “tribe”, one per­son at a time. I also think that having a defi­nite num­ber in mind re. how large you want your tribe to be, is extre­mely help­ful.
8. Results may vary depen­ding on who you are and what you’re selling, but I have always found it easier to find one tribe mem­ber willing you give you $1000, than it is to find 1000 tribe mem­bers willing to give you one dollar. The down­side to that is, the more expen­sive and exc­lu­sive your pro­duct, the har­der it is to scale further. Somewhere in there lies the sweet spot. If you find it, let me know.
9. You see this a lot, in the blo­gosphere par­ti­cu­larly: Peo­ple with great pro­ducts but no tribe to speak of [Daniel Edlen of Viny­lArt fame springs imme­dia­tely to mind], and peo­ple with large tri­bes, but no real com­pe­lling pro­duct to speak of. Again, it’s all about fin­ding the sweet spot.
10. I didn’t really start buil­ding my tribe till I was well into my thir­ties, when blogs and Web 2.0 came along. It was a medium “I just got” right away. Man, how I wish the inter­net came along twenty years soo­ner; it would’ve made my life a lot easier in those early days.
11. Though I didn’t have the term for it back then, back in college I always knew a “Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand” was what I wan­ted even­tually. I always knew I was never cut out to be the cor­po­rate, office-worker kinda guy. I gave the lat­ter an honest try, and it was a com­plete disas­ter. Like I said, bet­ter late than never.
12. If your Glo­bal Mic­ro­brand suc­ceeds, it’s not because of the brand’s func­tio­na­lity per se, it’s because what you’re doing gives the end user something to believe in. To me, that’s always been pretty obvious, some folk still find it a dif­fi­cult idea to pro­cess.
[UPDATE: Just added this blog post to “Evil Plans”.

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , ,

15 Responses to “the global microbrand riff continues”

  1. vicious_kind says:

    I have been buil­ding something of this like. It was not even really visual art rela­ted, at its start. Only in recent times have I really begun the work to tran­si­tion it to my pain­ting and drawings.

  2. Eolai says:

    As an artist (pain­ter pri­ma­rily, but I have a car­toon site that com­ple­ments the “brand”) all of these points ring true for me — though in my case I’d drop the word “extre­mely” in point #2. For now.

  3. Hugh, thanks for this post. Maybe I’m in that “cold, hungry & des­pe­rate” phase right now, but it’s encou­ra­ging to see that even through it all you really are buil­ding a story. Isn’t that all a brand or mic­ro­brand really is anyway?

  4. CT Moore says:

    Three words come to mind, Hugh: Res Ipsa Loquitur

  5. Mad Greg says:

    If one con­si­ders ‘glo­bal’ to be english spea­king males that wear big, brightly colo­red shirts — I’m there.
    (BTW, when I jum­ped the cor­po­rate gig and follo­wed my bliss it was in large part encou­ra­ged by your early posts on glo­bal micro brands — I read them and thought ‘yep, I want to do that’ — so, thanks!)
    MG

  6. Marie says:

    When oh when are you going to be nearby?

  7. jer979 says:

    I am going to reblog. I quote you ALL THE TIME on this idea and you’ve brought it together quite well. This is your next book…want a co-author?

  8. Basil White says:

    Stan­dup Come­dians are glo­bal microbrands.

  9. Thomas says:

    I see a real con­nec­tion with what you are saying and how alot of Authors are approaching get­ting their works out on pod­casts. Mur Laf­ferty, Scott Sigler, J C Hutchins are all going about buil­ding their own glo­bal microbrand.

  10. Lot’s of good stuff here, howe­ver, allow me to attempt to prove you wrong on a few points, and to make it less dif­fi­cult for me, you won’t know which ones, until I do it.

  11. BonnieL says:

    @Hugh — don’t know how much you’re plan­ning to charge for your litho­graphs, but your glo­bal mic­ro­brand is worth heaps, so don’t sell your litho­graphs for less than $2,500 a pop.
    @CT — had to know what Res Ipsa Loqui­tur meant so I loo­ked it up. The thing speaks for itself, or the thing itself speaks. Thanks for impro­ving my vocab. CT.
    bon­nieL
    triiibe on!

  12. Hey Hugh, nice of you to put that infor­ma­tion about what makes an artist. I’m not all that artsy, but it’s nice to get a looking/take a peak at those who are and how they have to go through.

  13. Welp, now you only need 9,999. Treat me well.

  14. Emma Kirsopp says:

    What a great post! Thank you, I just heard something go “click” in my brain with your point about buil­ding a tribe. Is/will your book be dis­tri­bu­ted in Aus­tra­lia as I think it will pro­bably do me a lot of good. Thanks again
    Cheers.
    Emma

  15. Helmut says:

    I think most of the long time rea­ders here know your Hugh­train entries, but the link in 12. doesn’t show any of those posts. On purpose?