November 6, 2008

the cocktail party rule

Send to Kindle

excellence224-thumb.jpg
True Story: A friend of mine, call her “Jane”, is a really good cor­po­rate blog­ger. Really good. She’s won awards. Her work has been fea­tu­red in the mains­tream media. She’s a pio­neer. She’s a rocks­tar.
Any­way, last week one of her company’s major com­pe­ti­tors star­ted their own blog, basi­cally trying to emu­late Jane‘s work, or perhaps more impor­tantly, Jane‘s suc­cess.
What did Jane do? She was cool about it. On her blog she wrote them a “Wel­come to the neigh­borhood” post. “Good luck with your new blog­ging adven­ture” etc. Oh, and she also prai­sed one of her competitor’s pro­ducts, which truth be told, is a really good pro­duct for that industry.
Well, no soo­ner had she pos­ted it, than one of the senior suits wrote a group email to every­body, bera­ting her for “Adver­ti­sing one of our competitor’s pro­ducts, ins­tead of tal­king about our own exce­llent pro­ducts”.
Sigh. What the poor suit doesn’t rea­lize, of course, is that on a basic, pri­mal level, how you talk about your com­pe­ti­tion actually says a lot more about you, than tal­king about your­self ever will.
I call this The Cock­tail Party Rule– what’s true at cock­tail par­ties is also true in mar­ke­ting: “If you want to be boring, talk about your­self. If you want to be inte­res­ting, talk about something other than your­self.“
If you have the cojo­nes to actually say “Nice job!” in public to some­body in the same busi­ness as you, it means you’re pro­bably secure enough about your own sch­tick. It means you’re not exactly worried about your own pro­duct. And peo­ple can tell. Ani­mals can smell fear, or the lack the­reof.
I’ve seen this hap­pen in the art world, many times. It’s the great artists who are the big­gest fans of other great artists. It’s the hacks and no-hopers who go around calling the great artists “ove­rra­ted”.
Jane explai­ned her actions to the suit, and the logic behind them, the suit grum­bled a bit, then con­ce­ded. Cri­sis aver­ted.
Nothing I haven’t seen before. It’s human nature to want the bene­fits of this brave new world of ours, without wan­ting it to have to actually exist, without having to do anything dif­fe­rently them­sel­ves. At least at first. Edu­ca­tion is expensive.

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , ,

22 Responses to “the cocktail party rule”

  1. So true — and one rea­son why cor­po­rate blog­ging chan­ges copo­rate cul­ture after some while. If copro­rate cul­ture does not kill the blog before. But, psst, don’t tell anyone.

  2. RIck Julian says:

    Agree, Hugh.
    Busi­nes­ses too often behave as though they exist in a para­llel uni­verse to life and human con­duct – that the mecha­nics of how we should behave in cor­po­rate life are somehow decou­pled from the basic rules of per­son to per­son inte­rac­tions. Often it takes the form of this quasi-militaristic, scorched earth approach in which our com­pe­ti­tors are vie­wed as ene­mies that must be eli­mi­na­ted …while we desc­ribe peo­ple as “resour­ces” and “tar­gets” etc.
    In fact the more cor­po­ra­tions huma­nize them­sel­ves, the more suc­cess­ful they’ll in buil­ding and actually sus­tai­ning rela­tionships inter­nally and exter­nally. Here’s to hoping they do.

  3. Joshua Smith says:

    I’m really glad you said this Hugh. It all comes back to the con­ver­sa­tion and there isn’t much of a con­ver­sa­tion if you’re blab­be­ring about your damn self (or what your pedd­ling) all the time. I want to know what’s on your mind damn it. Right on my man.

  4. Jessica Meats says:

    If you say that someone else’s pro­duct is good when it is good, peo­ple are more likely to believe you when you say yours is good.
    If the suits honestly believe they have a great pro­duct, they should be out there encou­ra­ging peo­ple to try out all the alter­na­ti­ves and con­si­der them care­fully. Peo­ple will always pre­fer to choose a pro­duct because they think it’s a great pro­duct, than because no one told them there was an alter­na­tive until it was too late.
    Good for Jane.

  5. Elad Sherf says:

    Hey Hugh, this is so true. peo­ple auto­ma­ti­cally try to eat out com­pe­ti­tors. Not only that this beha­vior is not really polite and doesn’t show a real care for the cus­to­mer, it is actually a wrong busi­ness move. As men­tio­ned in the book “Yes!” research shows that when sto­res pro­vi­ded infor­ma­tion regar­ding their com­pe­ti­tors, they were per­cei­ved as more trust­worthy, lea­ding the cus­to­mers to buy in their store, even though they char­ged higher pri­ces. Peo­ple don’t think before they act.
    Elad

  6. abso­lu­tely LOVE the line … “If you want to be boring, talk about your­self. If you want to be inte­res­ting, talk about something other than yourself.”

  7. Tim Walker says:

    Well said, Hugh — and I espe­cially like Jessica’s sum­ma­tion in her com­ment above: “If you say that someone else’s pro­duct is good when it is good, peo­ple are more likely to believe you when you say yours is good.“
    Your com­pa­ri­son to artists is apt, and it reminds me of the same phe­no­me­non in sports: the really good pla­yers have no trou­ble saying “We’ve got our work cut out for us, because that’s a really good team they’ve got.” It’s the bush-leaguers who feel the need to belittle the opposition.

  8. Drake says:

    Ins­tead of don’t be boring, how about “How to get a date,” i.e. how to look appea­ling to others. RULE 1: take a sho­wer. Ok, this doesn’t apply here, but RULE 2: be con­fi­dent! Inse­cu­rity ain’t sexy! If you have the poise and con­fi­dence to regard other pro­ducts with res­pect, it says “Things are ok here, in fact we are the best. So much so that we don’t have to berate com­pe­ti­tion or disa­vow their exis­tence.” Cus­to­mers see this as brand trans­pa­rency and inte­grity! Cheers, Hugh! Blog on!

  9. Bob Collins says:

    Always a smart remin­der —  And in today’s enga­ge­ment con­nec­tions through sha­red pas­sions — peo­ple want talk about what exci­tes them.
    And if they don’t know you — yet — unless your ama­zingly sexy or cha­ris­ma­tic — star­ting off with infor­ma­tion about your­self — well you most likely won’t excite or inte­rest them.
    As the old saying goes — Talk to peo­ple about them­sel­ves and they will lis­ten for hours.

  10. KAPITEL says:

    Low down, dirty, spi­ne­less
    RATS in SUITS?
    NEVER!!

  11. karyn romeis says:

    She was for­tu­nate that disas­ter was aver­ted. The whole issue of what may and may not be said on a blog is such a mine­field — espe­cially if the blog is pro­fes­sio­nal but pri­va­tely held. I effec­ti­vely got can­ned for one of my posts and for the com­ments others made on it!

  12. joe alon says:

    You made my day! I’m sup­po­sed to sit by the com­pu­ter and read artic­les about busi­ness cards and other pro­mo­ting prin­ted mate­rials. At last — a real pro­found mes­sage deli­ve­red by few words and a funny pic­ture. Thank you! My job title is: Online Busi­ness Deve­lop­ment Mana­ger of an Online Print Web­site named: DCP-PRINT (Digi­tal Color Pro­duc­tion) our web­site is: http://www.dcp-print.com and you are invited.

  13. KAPITEL says:

    Know want you to that smo­king pre­vai­led ces­sa­tion
    make sad ash­trays and lonely ciga­ret­tes divor­ced from use­ful­ness. Lied to myself apocryphal incohe­rence and blog fast non­sense ins­tead of love at blog site rek­now­ned.
    Make sense it does you know.

  14. peter says:

    If ins­tead of tal­king about myself I hire a PR firm to talk about me — do I get in under the rule?

  15. How can there be any honesty in the world of cor­po­rate blogs? It sounds like it’s always just a mat­ter of time before your client or emplo­yer gets offended.

  16. Brett Duncan says:

    Remem­ber, and repeat, someone’s name.
    Ask ques­tions. Then ask more ques­tions when you get ans­wers to the first ques­tions.
    Say something good about someone, or don’t say something at all.
    Age-old prin­ci­ples that are spor­ting new duds now in the digi­tal age. Sur­pri­sed it hasn’t com­ple­tely infil­tra­ted our poli­ti­cal sys­tem yet, but we’ve now got four years to see if that will change for the better.

  17. Harry Joiner says:

    “…how you talk about your com­pe­ti­tion actually says a lot more about you, than tal­king about your­self ever will.” Man! Spot on. Are you on a roll, or what!

  18. To Joe Alon of dcp-print.com: you’re being too for­ward, IMHO…
    [If I were you I would have held off the invi­ta­tion to your web­site after I’ve made at least a few dozen com­ments at Gaping­void and made myself an inte­res­ting cha­rac­ter yet be so mys­te­rious that curio­sity would lead others to natu­rally click on my link.]
    [And no, I’m not inte­res­ted in visi­ting your web­site. Yet.]
    [I’m not sure about Hugh, though…]

    [note to self: if you wanna be inte­res­ting bla-bla-bla.…]