October 31, 2008

mass marketing and the heroic, lone individual

ifyoutalkedtopeople.jpg
From my recent ‘Ten Ques­tions’ with Mark Earls:

7. In “Crea­tive Age”, you des­tro­yed a very sac­red cow of the agency world, The Brand. With your second book, “Herd”, you suc­cess­fully went after an equally mas­sive agency sac­red cow: The Idea of Con­su­mer as “Heroic Indi­vi­dual” [Embo­died by cul­tu­ral icons like The Marl­boro Man, or the exis­ten­tial ath­lete wea­ring Nike’s]. Your mes­sage see­med to be, actually guys, we’re social ani­mals. We’re social pri­ma­tes; we behave more like chimps and gori­llas, more than we behave like lone, cigarette-smoking cow­boys. Care to explain the idea further?
[Mark’s Ans­wer:] Again to sim­plify: Human beings are to inde­pen­dent action, what cats are to swim­ming. We can do it if we really have to, but mostly we don’t… Ins­tead, we do what we do because of what those around us are doing (Wha­te­ver our minds and our cul­tu­res tell us).
So if you want to change what I’m doing, don’t try to per­suade me– don’t try to make me– do anything. Ins­tead, enlist the help of my friends…
But not cru­dely (as in “Recom­men­da­tion”). That’s just per­sua­sion by another name: another “Push” tac­tic. I’m con­vin­ced the ans­wer lies in crea­ting “Pull” (i.e. Social) forces.

When I wrote that ques­tion for Mark, I’d been thin­king a lot about the “Heroic, Lone Indi­vi­dual” sch­tick in mass media, par­ti­cu­larly with mass mar­ke­ting.
Most mass-market mes­sa­ges are con­su­med alone. Most of the ones we see are so unre­mar­ka­ble– think of a late-night TV com­mer­cial for a local car dea­ler, for exam­ple– they’re not Social Objects, they don’t warrant us doing the social, they don’t warrant us sha­ring them with peo­ple. Sure, we can gather in groups around the TV and be watching the same com­mer­cial, but the com­mer­cial is not genui­nely addres­sing us as a group. It’s trying trying to pick us off, one by one.
Ergo, the world of mass mar­ke­ting is basi­cally a lonely place. Which makes the Marl­boro Man- think riding the range with no other peo­ple for miles around– or the exis­ten­tial ath­lete– think Tiger Woods, about to make the ama­zing putt– the per­fect citi­zen for it.
Then along comes the inter­net. Along comes inte­rac­tive. Along comes “sha­ring”. Along comes media that actually crea­tes real social beha­vior, as oppo­sed to just trying to create idea­li­zed, thea­tri­cal ver­sions of it..
Sud­denly Mr. Lone­some Heroic seems a bit out of place.

12 Responses to “mass marketing and the heroic, lone individual”

  1. Engago Team says:

    The power used to be adver­ti­sing, thus orde­ring and com­man­ding and paying invoi­ces.
    Now the power is chan­ging into social media, which requi­res effort and inte­lli­gence. Things money can’t really buy.
    After 200 years of adver­ti­sing in mass media (news­pa­pers — first in 1702 in UK), the change is immi­nent and very dis­rup­tive.
    How will the Proc­tor & Gam­bles’ going to handle this? As small com­pa­nies can cha­llen­ges the Goliaths with con­tent that gene­ra­tes inte­rest and addi­tio­nal com­mu­ni­ca­tions almost for free.

  2. Keith Handy says:

    That car­toon (“If you tal­ked to peo­ple the way adver­ti­sing tal­ked to peo­ple, they’d punch you in the face”) has reso­na­ted with me so much that I’ve been thin­king and saying it since the first time I saw it, and pro­bably half-forgot the source.
    Mul­tiply that by ten when it’s an auto­ma­ted pre-recorded tele­mar­ke­ting call, and I’ve just was­ted my breath on a sin­cere “hello”.

  3. So deep. So power­ful an idea, Hugh.
    I remem­ber the day, when I emer­ged from deca­des of watching info­mer­cials on TV alone late at night, and rea­li­zing that ever­yone else had been doing the same. How did I find that out? The inter­net.
    I was shoc­ked, shoc­ked I tell you, to dis­co­ver that millions of other peo­ple could quote “going to see” Cal Worthing­ton or the cadence of the Chia Pet tv ad copy, not to men­tion, falling and not being able to “get up”! I thought that only I was loon enough to watch that crap! Who else would? Ever­yone, as it was all that was avai­la­ble to con­nect with at that time. Alone together.
    So, now that we know we are all together here, what can we do with it?

  4. miz lonely says:

    yeah you could sell me anything right now

  5. KAPITEL says:

    Now that we are all together we can “burn” the bill­boards, repea­tedly ignore/sabotage these mes­sa­ges, make ads­pend an irre­le­vance and claim back the envi­ron­ment, our men­tal real estate and maybe, just maybe, create a bet­ter future in which the Orwe­llian lea­nings & fis­cal idiocy inhe­rent in mass mar­ke­ting, the tv indus­trial com­plex, imba­lance of power and con­trol doesn‘t so rea­dily fea­ture…
    Exxon Mobil, Clear Chan­nel et al.…..it‘s up to us to make these ideas a reality.

  6. Daniel Edlen says:

    So, maybe Face­book ads should show how many of your friends also clic­ked through? Cross the inte­rrup­tion model with social pull?

  7. Jason korman says:

    hugh, Bri­lliantly lucid

  8. And to think that I read “Herd” cover to cover. Of course! On a rela­ted note, I am wor­king on some thin­king around APE and car­toons, etc. Also sur­pri­sed I had not loo­ked at that as a via­ble media story before.

  9. Andreas Krey says:

    I still won­der whether prac­ti­cally every active form of mar­ke­ting isn’t simply mani­pu­la­ting peo­ple (or trying to).

  10. Frank P says:

    I think that there may be an added dimen­sion which goes some­way to explai­ning the Mr Lone­some heroic tac­tic, in that often we do what we do because of what those around us are doing it while ratio­na­li­sing to our­sel­ves that we are Mr Lone­some Heroic and doing it for far bet­ter rea­sons than ever­yone else.

  11. Rasul Sha'ir says:

    Very pro­found idea. I think what is also valua­ble to recog­nize is that a huge part of the rea­son why mar­ke­ting is what it is today is because our eco­no­mic and poli­ti­cal DNA (two enor­mous fac­tors that dic­tate our per­cep­tions and realities) — which on many occa­sions — trumps the cul­tu­ral con­text is wired to sup­port the suc­cess of the “indi­vi­dual”. Not the (cul­tu­ral) group. It is a strong argu­ment that this country was built on “I” not “we”. This is the very idea that dri­ves this country. Hence why mar­ke­ting is as it is — as Mark Earls sta­tes. Daily we don’t ope­rate cons­ciously and/or deli­be­ra­tely thin­king about we (even though that’s truly how we are engi­nee­red — i.e. the cat swim­ming ana­logy). We have sepa­ra­ted busi­ness and how we as peo­ple actually live (depen­ding one one another) for a long time now. Once we look seriously at alig­ning the two then I think even more sig­ni­fi­cant crum­bling of the Marl­boro Man schema will con­ti­nue to take place.

  12. Young Edward says:

    Umbre­lla
    Uncons­truc­ted Cap
    Uni­sex Wrist­watch http://www.szpromos.com
    Urgent Char­ger
    USB Cup War­mer
    USB Flash Drive
    USB Hub Clock http://www.szpromos.com
    USB Lap­top Light
    USB Lights http://www.szpromos.com
    USB Memory Sticks
    USB Pen http://www.szpromos.com
    USB Port