October 30, 2008

the blue monster celebrates two years without being killed

bluemonsterazure_sm_thumb.jpg
[Blue Mons­ter PDC Edi­tion– it’s colo­red azure for a rea­son.]
It was two years ago today that I first pos­ted the Blue Mons­ter on this blog. Thanks mainly to Microsoft’s Steve Clay­ton run­ning with the idea [At great risk to his own career, I might add], it’s been quite an adven­ture for us both, to say the least.
Microsoft’s James Senior pos­ted this two days ago:

About a year ago, my pal Steve Clay­ton (happy birth­day buddy) unleashed a genius viral mar­ke­ting ploy aimed at star­ting a con­ver­sa­tion about Mic­ro­soft. It was really a call to arms cha­llen­ging the com­pany to rein­vent itself. To inno­vate. To change the world.
Today we really did announce some stuff that will change the world, and it’s an ama­zingly exci­ting time to be at the com­pany. Here’s the stuff that we announ­ced today at PDC 2008.
* Win­dows 7 fea­tu­res
* Office Web Appli­ca­tions
* Office 14 fea­tu­res
* Live Fra­me­work
* Live Mesh Beta
* Live Mesh Dev Plat­form
* Live Mesh on the Mac
* Live Mesh on Win Mobile
* Visual Stu­dio 2010 WPF
* Visual Stu­dio Edi­tor exten­si­bi­lity
* Win­dows Live ID and Open ID
* And more…
I think we’ve finally ans­we­red the call of the Blue Mons­ter. We’re not going home, we’re going to change the world! Rock and Roll.

Here are some ran­dom notes on our little blue friend, in no par­ti­cu­lar order of impor­tance:
1. I always liked what Dave Armano had to say about it:

Because ever­yone at Mix 08 who wor­ked for Mic­ro­soft and han­ded me either a “Blue Mons­ter” busi­ness card or had the stic­ker, see­med dif­fe­rent. It was hard to put a fin­ger on, but although they were belie­vers in Mic­ro­soft, they also see­med to believe in an exter­nal vision that cha­llen­ged Mic­ro­soft to make a mea­ning­ful impact in the world. It’s a non cor­po­rate honest opi­nion, and some at Mic­ro­soft embrace it publicly.
What’s to be lear­ned? Blue Mons­ter shows us that no mat­ter how big or small the com­pany that the world is a big­ger place. And exter­nal influen­ces can become inter­nal influen­ces. And it teaches us that if we are inte­res­ted in the evo­lu­tion of cor­po­rate cul­ture, that sym­bols are impor­tant. If we don’t find our own — someone will find them for us.

2. There was a time, maybe a year ago, when I could have fea­sibly tur­ned the Blue Mons­ter sch­piel into a full-time gig. A com­bi­na­tion of ran­dom events and my equally ran­dom self somehow deci­ded against it in the end. Pro­bably just as well. It’s more inte­res­ting without it being tied to a pri­vate, com­mer­cial agenda.
3. So Mic­ro­soft wants to change the world. But as JP once remin­ded me, with the Blue Mons­ter the con­verse is also true: the world wants Mic­ro­soft to change as well. Which is exactly how it should be.
4. When the Blue Mons­ter first star­ted get­ting trac­tion, Sarah Blow and others war­ned me that there was a lot of talk amongst the geeks, about how alig­ning with Mic­ro­soft might damage my own per­so­nal brand… “Hugh embra­ces The Dark Side” etc. I was per­fectly aware of the risk; and frankly I didn’t care. I liked the peo­ple from Mic­ro­soft I had met up until that point, I also had a point to prove about large com­pa­nies and their inter­nal cul­tu­res, about how the inter­net made it pos­si­ble for large com­pa­nies to talk to the world in new ways. The “Porous Mem­brane” etc. To hell with “Per­so­nal Brand” crap. Wha­te­ver.
5. There are a lot of gaping­void rea­ders who don’t much care for Mic­ro­soft, and don’t mind telling me so. Do I worry about it? Not really, hell, some of it I actually agree with. They’re entit­led to their opi­nion. They may not care for the car, that’s fine by me, that doesn’t mean I’m not allo­wed to amuse myself, chec­king under the hood.
6. I am not a techie, I am not a coder. I’m use­less at that stuff. What inte­rests me about Mic­ro­soft is the “Cul­ture” bit i.e. kee­ping 70,000 peo­ple happy and pro­duc­tive, while making a pro­fit by selling nothing more than ones and zeroes. The “Purpose-Idea” of the place etc. When you have a com­pany that large, that inte­res­ting, that pas­sio­nate and that power­ful, it’s a gold­mine of new mate­rial to write about.
7. I’ve not done much work with Mic­ro­soft this year, mainly because I moved to West Texas. In Decem­ber that might be chan­ging. Watch this space.
8. Props to Steve Clay­ton for everything. He’s a rare breed.
[UPDATE:] Steve Clay­ton talks about the two-year anni­ver­sary:

What a ride that has been. An inte­res­ting ride and at times a dan­ge­rous one for me per­so­nally. As James Senior said in a post ear­lier this week the PDC has been a Blue Mons­ter week – for the second birth­day we couldn’t have pic­ked a bet­ter week. PDC has been full of world chan­ging announ­ce­ments. Maybe they’re just world chan­ging from where I sit so please don’t think I’m sug­ges­ting we just cured can­cer or something….but I con­ti­nue to believe this com­pany does world chan­ging stuff. Stuff we should be proud of and that’s the kind of stuff we announ­ced this week. For me, the coin­ci­dence of timing is amazing.

[Digg This Story Here.]

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

12 Responses to “the blue monster celebrates two years without being killed”

  1. Ken says:

    It’s so funny, who the hell cares whether they care for Mic­ro­soft!
    What I love about your work is the com­men­tary through your sketches. It’s not like you dec­la­red your und­ying love for Mic­ro­soft and said ever­yone else sucks.
    You just poin­ted out the “elephant” in the room in regards to what is per­cei­ved to be the pro­blem at Mic­ro­soft.
    Love or hate em’, we can all learn from them and what your glea­ning from them too.

  2. bonnieL says:

    Happy Birth­day Blue Mons­ter — these days, two years is like a life­time. And thanks for David’s post Hugh -
    *Blue Mons­ter shows us that no mat­ter how big or small the com­pany that the world is a big­ger place.*
    best,
    bonnieL

  3. I just love this. The void gets bet­ter and bet­ter.
    Point 3. Yeah yeah!
    As far as I‘m con­cer­ned Mic­ro­soft have got the MONSTER and little else! I have to com­ment on Jame Senior‘s insert though; thus…
    The mons­ter in a way makes more sense to me than seman­tics like mesh, office, 2010, fra­me­work and WPF. Why dont they really use it, really throw it around a little? Bill isn‘t a great advert for anything but bad foot­wear.
    I always won­de­red, W.T.F. does exten­si­bi­lity really mean? I know what its sup­po­sed to mean but it‘s genuine b*ll*cks, like sug­ges­ting dino­saurs are future proof.
    In a way this tech­ni­cal puf­fery and jar­gon is not much dif­fe­rent from adwank brand speak really — it‘s just an attempt to sound hip; veri­si­mi­lar to car names but more obs­cure a & har­der to decipher.
    How about some sim­pli­city amidst all this com­ple­xity, some com­mu­ni­ca­tion, some real talk, some real lan­guage?
    Yes, the geek shall in inhe­rit the earth but the fact is we are all geeks now in a sense but just not that geeky.
    To muso‘s, desig­ners, and crea­ti­ves this lan­guage means nothing, we need to know that it does what we want not what it says on the box because the box is cove­red in B.S.. I have to use a Mac because I dont trust the lan­guage of mic­ro­soft — it sounds great for accoun­ting and that is all.
    But the mons­ter, what a guy!
    He must be a drum­mer.
    Dont kill the badass out­law inside you who needs to paint in the TX moun­tains. The west wasn‘t won on salad, nor the war through compromise…

  4. Although I’m a nobody, I had this up in my cubicle for a long time at my pre­vious job. I remo­ved the Mic­ro­soft por­tion, as you can ima­gine. It hel­ped to keep me dri­ven and focu­sed on my goals.
    Thanks, Hugh!

  5. Laura says:

    Thanks for this post Hugh. I like that you aren’t follo­wing esta­blished “rules” for per­so­nal bran­ding. I think that doing so waters down a per­so­nal brand. It’s coun­ter pro­duc­tive, since a per­so­nal brand is an expres­sion of your per­so­na­lity — whether peo­ple like it or not. That’s the whole point.

  6. Jessica says:

    Happy Birth­day Blue Mons­ter and how appro­priate that its anni­ver­sary is pretty much right on Hallo­ween!!! Blue Mons­ter has ins­pi­red me throughout my work on Mic­ro­soft and I hope that i too will con­ti­nue to try to “change the world ( for bet­ter! ) or go home”. hope to have more mic­ro­softy dis­cus­sions soon Hugh!

  7. Engago Team says:

    Blue Mons­ter or not.
    The Empire (Mic­ro­soft) will strike again even if they have to change their busi­ness model from retail or pre­pac­ka­ged with com­pu­ters to in the cloud.
    Mic­ro­soft is capa­ble of chan­ging their busi­ness model and to re-invent them­sel­ves, just like Apple, IBM, Phi­lips, Sam­sung, Sony.

  8. bonnieL says:

    Vic­tor P, just chec­ked out your blog.
    I furiously disa­gree with your reply to Hugh above.
    Vic­tor wrote: “Although I’m a nobody.…“
    You’re wrong, wrong, wrong! So there!
    bonnieL

  9. Liz says:

    Didn’t know anything about this phe­no­me­non until I saw this blog post. How great to be able to influence a cor­po­ra­tion in such a posi­tive way, I don’t care who they are. Any impe­tus for self-reflection gets bonus points from me. Kudos!

  10. Umm, this is going to make me seem like a jerk. This whole thing is a vaguery about an ad scheme to pro­mote a giant com­pany. Rather than trying to come up with some sort of inter-company phi­lo­sophy, why didn’t any­body just ask where the nega­tive press on Mic­ro­soft comes from?
    Perhaps it’s the fact that Win­dows, every sin­gle ver­sion of Win­dows that I have ever owned, has had some biza­rre error and crashed.
    …or got­ten a virus…
    It’s weird that Apple doesn’t seem to get major out­breaks of viru­ses on their sys­tems, isn’t it? That’s not something that per­cep­tion can con­trol. Mic­ro­soft laid off record num­bers of it’s employ­ment force during the 90’s. I’ve seen stu­dies sug­ges­ting that over 50% of hac­kers in the world have at one time or another wor­ked on a large Win­dows plat­form or directly for Mic­ro­soft.
    So, why come up with this mons­ter thing; which really, to peo­ple not washed in your cul­ture, makes us roll our eyes. You know that scene in Fight Club, where the guy is tal­king about effi­ciency and his corn flour blue icon? THAT’S how this looks to other peo­ple. Just so you know.
    This is defi­ni­tely why I went into busi­ness for myself. Because, at what point can you look your boss in the eye, and tell him: “this isn’t okay. You’re scre­wing up.” –you can’t, and that’s not an acci­dent. Large cor­po­ra­tions pick and choose what rallies emplo­yees around one ban­ner to inc­rease pro­duc­tion. Of course, it’s only the full brain-washed that ever fall for it.
    What’s this cam­paign cost? Ima­gine, if that money, time, and effort were spent on desig­ning a ver­sion of Win­dows that doesn’t crash after the first time down­loads a virus.
    It may jus­tify the bud­gets of adver­ti­sers to be self-promoting, but it does nothing for faith in your pro­ducts. I buy Mac; which is iro­nic con­si­de­ring that even THEY aren’t THAT good. They are just so much bet­ter than Win­dows, that I have no rea­son to go back and rely on crappy third party hard­ware manu­fac­tu­rers and an OS that works when it feels like wor­king.
    You don’t seriously take pride in collec­ti­vism, do you?

  11. John Dumbrille says:

    Um Jason, I think Hugh’s trying to influence Mic­ro­soft cul­ture for the bet­ter. Of course MS is fcked, big deal. So is the eco­nomy. The point is — now what?