September 25, 2008

the complexity war a.ka. “success is more complex than failure”

complicated128.jpg
Rud­yard Kipling once desc­ri­bed Triumph and Disas­ter as “Impos­ters, both”. The lon­ger I stay in the wor­king world, the more I start to get what he means.
It’s funny how you can have two guys sit­ting next to each other in an office, both doing the same job. Both using the same com­pu­ters and pho­nes. Both with the same aca­de­mic qua­li­fi­ca­tions. Both with a simi­lar IQ. Both wor­king the same amount of hours. But why does one guy take home five times more sales com­mis­sion than the other guy? What’s going on? Is it luck? Skill? Jus­tice? Injus­tice?
The ques­tion of what sepa­ra­tes suc­cess from fai­lure, is something I’ve always liked to pon­der on. Sud­denly this week, out of nowhere, the follo­wing line hit me:
“Suc­cess is more com­plex than Fai­lure.“
Think about it. Being a fai­lure is a no-brainer. All you have to do is sleep till noon, get out of bed, scratch your balls, have your mor­ning visit to the bath­room, turn on the Star Trek re-runs, help your­self to some break­fast [Lef­to­ver pizza and a bottle of Jack Daniels, Hurrah!], light up your first joint of they day, down­load some porn, and already you’re well on your way. Sure, a few incon­ve­nient varia­bles may enter the pic­ture here and there, to com­pli­cate an other­wise per­fect day of FAIL, e.g. what you’re going have to say to your brother in order to con­vince him to lend you that $300, so you can pay off the telephone bill, that kinda thing. But for the most part, the day-to-day modus ope­randi of your “Ave­rage Total Fai­lure” is quite straight­for­ward.
Being suc­cess­ful, howe­ver, is a whole dif­fe­rent ball game. Break­fast mee­tings at 7.00am. Con­fe­rence calls at mid­night. Visi­ting twelve cities in five days. Fiel­ding ques­tion from a swarm of hos­tile jour­na­lists. Dea­ling suc­cess­fully with an enra­ged, multi-million dollar cus­to­mer who’s screa­ming bloody mur­der over something rather tri­vial in the grand scheme of things. Dea­ling suc­cess­fully with an enra­ged, multi-million dollar inves­tor who’s screa­ming bloody mur­der over something rather tri­vial in the grand scheme of things. Making sure there’s enough money in the account to meet the pay­roll of all your legions of highly-paid, highly-effective, highly-talented emplo­yees. All these hun­dreds of unre­len­ting issues to deal with, all day, every day. You get the pic­ture.
And as always, what’s inva­riably true of peo­ple is also inva­riably true for busi­nes­ses. So when I see a small but insanely-successful busi­ness sud­denly implode over­night [it seems to hap­pen quite a lot in Sili­con Valley], I’m gues­sing chan­ces are it wasn’t ina­bi­lity to manage growth per se that des­tro­yed the busi­ness [a favo­rite rea­son cited by those wri­ting busi­ness obi­tua­ries], but the ina­bi­lity for the busi­ness to manage com­ple­xity. Com­ple­xity inc­rea­ses expo­nen­tially with growth, most small com­pa­nies can cul­tu­rally only handle inc­re­men­tal inc­rea­ses in com­ple­xity. As I’m fond of saying, “Human beings don’t scale”.
Which is why wal­king around the hall­ways of large, suc­cess­ful com­pa­nies can often seem so oppres­sive to some­body new to it. All that cul­tu­ral regi­men­ta­tion is there for one rea­son only: To fight “The Com­ple­xity War”. Sure, it might feel a bit ghastly to the more idea­list and free-spirited among us, but until some­body can come up with a bet­ter way to win this Com­ple­xity War at a Fortune-500 level, I don’t see it ever going away.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

15 Responses to “the complexity war a.ka. “success is more complex than failure””

  1. Ryan Sholin says:

    A varia­tion I’ve been using for some time now:
    “Suc­cess tends to take lon­ger than failure.”

  2. That still doesn’t explain the fact that one guy takes home 5 times more sales com­mis­sion than the other guy. Is one just wor­king har­der than the other? Wor­king smar­ter? Is one bet­ter at kis­sing ass? Does one just have more cha­risma?
    Get­ting pro­mo­ted in the For­tune 500 world isn’t just about hard work, talent and smarts. If it were, Wall Street would be in much bet­ter shape today, and the Adver­ti­sing world would be every bit as cool a place to work as it ought to be. I’m sure you’ve known your share of sub-par execs who were clearly pro­mo­ted or ele­va­ted to their highest level of incom­pe­tence, and many of them go on to have long “suc­cess­ful” careers. Is there really a con­nec­tion with com­ple­xity in those instances?

  3. sig says:

    Hugh,
    reminds me of the “Kare­nina prin­ci­ple” lif­ted from Tolstoy’s “Anna Kare­nina”:
    “Happy fami­lies are all alike, every unhappy family is unhappy in its own way”.
    Suc­cess is depen­dent on all aspects wor­king — fai­lure needs only one aspect fai­ling, any of the many…

  4. Gerald Guido says:

    There is something to be said for a “per­fect day of FAIL”. If you are going to do something you might as well do it right, inc­lu­ding slacking.

  5. Hugh,
    The solu­tion to busi­ness com­ple­xity is sim­ple. Who said you have to grow beyond the level at which your model is effec­tive? Just don’t.

  6. I’ve been a ‘suc­cess’ and a ‘fai­lure’… It is MUCH more fun being a suc­cess. :-) But some­ti­mes you just CAN’T hang on to it — no mat­ter what you do. The ‘Com­ple­xity War’ might be one of the best phra­ses I’ve ever seen for that pro­blem. It ins­tantly evo­kes the next con­cept “Fog of War” and the 2 ima­ges cer­tainly tell my story very well.
    Once again, another home-run of pithy one-liners. Seriously, you could write your whole next book on cle­ver one-liners that force peo­ple to think. A book of ‘twitter-sized’ thought pro­blems…
    Take care, and keep up the good work. I look for­ward to rea­ding (and BUYING and you get­ting paid for it) your first book.
    Michael Laine
    “Space Ele­va­tor Guy”

  7. gregorylent says:

    no one learns anything from suc­cess. one only learns from fai­lure, when things fall apart. and that is when you’ll see some real com­ple­xity.
    you have it back­wards. suc­cess is doing one thing inten­sely, in all its facets.
    fai­lure is com­ple­xity in action, and not sim­ple at all.

  8. Fluffy the Destroyer says:

    For some a “per­fect day of FAIL” could be con­si­de­red a luxury. If FAIL means eating a slice of last nights pizza… while watching Bugs Bunny car­toons and blo­wing bong hits at the dog. I want FAIL. There were times in my life where I would given my eye tooth to turn off my cell and email and make it stop. Just for a day. If that is FAIL, I want EPIC FAIL at least once a month.
    Even Jeho­vah took a day off. I won­der what he did on his down time. I think that is where the platy­pus came from.… a bottle of Jack, a cou­ple of joints and some qua­lity FAIL time… no pres­sure, no stock hol­ders.… just a box of spare parts, a Sun­day after­noon and sin­gu­lar mis­sion of “WTF is THAT?”.

  9. BonnieL says:

    Hugh, does today’s post hold the ans­wer to the ques­tion you asked in your “Back from the Road Trip” post?
    *How the heck am I going to manage all the stuff I’ve currently got going on, AND find the time to draw car­toons.*
    best,
    bonnieL

  10. Rait Ojasaar says:

    To over­come fai­lure one needs to suc­ceed in reco­ve­ring, which sug­gests that in a way fai­lure breeds com­ple­xity (pro­vi­ded that the one who fai­led will seek to reco­ver from the situa­tion in the first place). Com­ple­xity of reco­ve­ring from fai­lure can be har­derd by seve­ral mag­ni­tu­des as you have to first get back to zero before con­ti­nuing your climb upwards.

  11. Aidan Kehoe says:

    I disa­gree with this, I think the two are ortho­go­nal. The com­ple­xity needs to be there for a rea­son, it shouldn’t be a result of archai­cisms or supers­ti­tions, and often com­plex orga­ni­sa­tions are laden with both.

  12. Paul says:

    Yes, suc­cess is more com­pli­ca­ted for the sim­ple rea­son there are a near infi­nity of ways to do it WRONG. Fin­ding out how to do it right is *one* of the com­ple­xi­ties.
    On another note of right ways; I don’t see a pre-order cou­pon for the book, is that on the publisher’s site?? And who’s publishing??
    Keep it up.

  13. I believe some of the invi­si­ble con­tri­bu­tors to suc­cess are in the les­sons that parents teach their kids. My motto: if we don’t teach our kids how to suc­ceed they can only do so by accident.

  14. That is so true. Many peo­ple are afraid to suc­ceed more than if they fail. While it is true, some peo­ple are such per­fec­tio­nist, that they are afraid to try in fear that they will fail, most peo­ple rather dodge suc­cess. They can­not com­pute how things will change for them and the level of hard work you must put into a ven­ture once you truly suc­ceed! Good post.