August 15, 2008

the three c’s: changers, contributors and coasters

Send to Kindle

business128765.jpg
I’ve wor­ked with a lot of com­pa­nies over the years, big and small.
I have found that even small com­pa­nies are remar­kably com­plex orga­nisms. But of course, anywhere that ambi­tion is allo­wed to focus usually is. Human beings are messy crea­tu­res.
It seems to me that in any com­pany, large or small, you can divide the peo­ple into three broad categories.

1. The “Chan­gers”. These are the peo­ple who use their work as a plat­form to “Change The World”. They go into a mar­ket and try to change it, in order to create something bet­ter, both for them­sel­ves and for the mar­ket at large. They can be the CEO or work in the mail room. Theirs is not a social posi­tion, it’s a psycho­lo­gi­cal con­di­tion.
2. The “Con­tri­bu­tors”. These are peo­ple who want to do their jobs, do it well, and get hand­so­mely rewar­ded for it. They don’t neces­sa­rily see the need for “change” per se, they just want to see what works, and get it done. They want to find out who’s on the win­ning team, and get them­sel­ves a place on it.
3. The “Coas­ters”. They just want to turn up and get paid. Their lives and iden­ti­ties are outside their work– fami­lies, friends, hob­bies etc– their job is just a means to an end; a way to pay for their “real lives” elsewhere.

None of the three is neces­sa­rily bet­ter or worse than the others– we all have dif­fe­rent needs, dif­fe­rent agen­das, dif­fe­rent tem­pe­ra­ments. We’ve all made dif­fe­rent deci­sions about what kind of life we want to lead, what kind of com­pro­mi­ses we’re willing to make, what kind of adven­tu­res we want to have. All roads exact their own uni­que toll. All choi­ces come with a price.
I sup­pose I’ve always ended up in the “Chan­ger” camp, somehow. It was never deli­be­rate. It was just about how I relate to the world. Some­ti­mes it was a defi­nite advan­tage. Other times it was career sui­cide.
So in the last cou­ple of weeks I’ve been having a lot of con­ver­sa­tions with peo­ple at Dell. The sub­ject of the need to “Change Dell” has come up a bit. Actually, no. It has come up A LOT. A WHOLE LOT.
As a “Chan­ger”, the word “Change” really doesn’t frigh­ten me. To talk about “Change”, doesn’t neces­sa­rily imply that there’s anything abnor­mal or wrong going on. As I’m fond of saying, all busi­ness models are wrong. Wha­te­ver sys­tem you’ve got in place, it’s yesterday’s model. Wha­te­ver pro­cess you’ve got ins­ta­lled, the world has since moved on– all you can do is try to play catch-up, to grea­ter or les­ser degrees of suc­cess. Hence the car­toon pos­ted above.
So in a mee­ting in Round Rock, I ask this one Dell per­son, “So why are you guys inte­res­ted in tal­king to me? I’m no Peter Druc­ker, I’m just a car­too­nist.” The per­son ans­wers, “Because we like your very aty­pi­cal point of view. We think it could perhaps be use­ful to us.” Fair enough. If I had been that per­son, I’d pro­bably have said much the same.
So these last few weeks, I’ve been mulling over the word, “Change”, and how it applies to Dell. Or to put it more simply, what ACTUALLY needs to change? Sure, they’ve had their fair share of trials and tri­bu­la­tions over the last few years. But there’s a lot that they’ve got­ten right, as well. Sure, you might pre­fer Apple over Dell for your per­so­nal choice of com­pu­ter, but guess what? The con­su­mer sec­tor repre­sents only 15% of their total busi­ness. In the other 85% of the busi­ness, B2B, they’ve not been doing too shabby. The com­pany still makes a pro­fit. Their big­gest cus­to­mers still return their phone calls. Sure, they have their issues, but hey, who doesn’t? As I’m fond of saying, this stuff is HARD. Get over your­sel­ves.
i.e. “Change”. What does it REALLY mean for Dell? I’m just asking… Yes. I really, really want to know.
I’ve also been mulling over how this expe­rience dif­fers from the work I’ve done with Mic­ro­soft.
One thing I have noti­ced so far inside the com­pany, is how often the word “Dell” is used interchan­geably with “Michael”. Some­ti­mes we’re tal­king about the man, some­ti­mes the com­pany. The lines seem very blurry. I don’t recall “Mic­ro­soft” and “Bill” being so interchan­gea­ble, I really don’t.
Michael Dell seems to cast a huge pre­sence over the com­pany, even more so than Bill Gates casts a pre­sence over Mic­ro­soft. This is no bad thing. It just is what it is.
Actually, I find this quite an endea­ring aspect to the com­pany. Michael is cer­tainly no absen­tee land­lord CEO, from what I can make out. Every day, I’m told he sends a lot of emails to peo­ple to lots of dif­fe­rent levels in the com­pany. He’s very hands-on, he doesn’t just hold court with the peo­ple repor­ting directly to him. Dell might be a For­tune 50 com­pany, but there’s something about it that is STILL just this crazy college kid from Aus­tin, buil­ding made-to-order com­pu­ters in his dorm room for his friends. These hum­ble roots still hold strong. Walk around the offi­ces, and you can still smell them around you.
So one eve­ning last week, after a long but inte­res­ting day over at the Round Rock offi­ces, I’m having din­ner with an old friend in South Aus­tin. A nice little Mexi­can joint I’ve become very fond of. Avo­cado mar­ga­ri­tas. Smo­ked pork tacos that melt in your mouth. It’s all good.
My friend asks me how I’m get­ting on with this new Dell pro­ject. I tell her, “Well, I’m fin­ding it pretty darn inte­res­ting so far. But at the end of the day, if Michael Dell doesn’t grok it, there’s not much I can do. From what my gut tells me, it seems like it’s very much ‘his’ com­pany, even more so than Bill Gates and Mic­ro­soft. I could be wrong, but there it is… Of course, if he does end up grok­king it, then it’ll get pretty intense, pretty quickly. But in a good way.“
My friend and I are sit­ting there, enjo­ying the eve­ning, tal­king about the good old days, back when we both atten­ded uni­ver­sity in Aus­tin. Sud­denly in the back of mind, I’m thin­king about the “Chan­gers” inside Dell. These, I decide, are the peo­ple I need to speak to. All roads ANYWHERE worthwhile begin with these good folk. The rest can look after them­sel­ves. The rest won’t quite unders­tand me, and there’s simply no point pre­ten­ding that they will.
It is true. I don’t know EXACTLY what I’m loo­king from them quite yet. It’s still early days. Then again, a jazz musi­cian never knows EXACTLY what notes he’s going to play, before the gig actually starts…
We live in inte­res­ting times…

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , , ,

17 Responses to “the three c’s: changers, contributors and coasters”

  1. Max Battcher says:

    It sounds like you really need to meet Michael Dell and have a chat directly with him… But it also sounds like you are hesi­tant or other­wise skir­ting the issue. Due you worry that you don’t have the clout to go directly to him? Or are you trying to esta­blish a collage of him, and thus the com­pany, from the peo­ple around him?
    This post seems to have seve­ral layers of inte­res­ting curiosities…

  2. Darcy Moen says:

    One of my men­tors sha­red inva­lua­ble advice with me early in my career.
    Embrace change, for change is the only cons­tant.
    Change is what makes makes ave­rage com­pa­nies great. Change is what kills off com­pe­ti­tors who become com­pla­cent.
    For a while, Dell was about change. Dell even­tually pla­teaued. Now Dell sits at a fork in the road. The can rest on their lau­rels and coast for a while, but you and I know coas­ting is a downhill affair.
    Change will be the only way for­ward again, its up to ‘Dell’ to decide that, or not. I won’t lose sleep over their deci­sion, neither should you.

  3. Jan says:

    I like Dell. I love my Dell gaming note­book. It does all my daily pro­duc­ti­vity stuff plus also allo­wing me to attend the occa­sio­nal LAN-party.
    It’s the per­fect combo of power­ful por­ta­ble gaming hard­ware + the peace of mind from kno­wing you will get sup­port from a large com­pany and that get­ting spare parts won’t be a pro­blem (unless you want to switch your notebook’s key­board by one with a dif­fe­rent layout, because at least in Europe Dell won’t sell it to you).
    My next note­book may be a Dell again (I was satis­fied about the qua­lity, sta­bi­lity and warranty options), but I hope that, before I fall for a cheap desk­top pc, they’ll bring a gaming note­book to mar­ket that:
    1) weighs much less than the current gene­ra­tion (5kg + a mas­sive power supply! My back hurts when I carry it in a back­pack)
    2) Has a clip-on cover that can make it look like something an adult would use.
    3) Has pri­ce­tag that would keep peo­ple from floc­king back to desk­top pc’s during an eco­no­mic reces­sion.
    4) Has palm­rests in black plas­tic (trans­pi­ra­tion during games wears off the sil­very coa­ting of the plastic.

  4. Huw says:

    I recog­nise the three C peoples;and the chan­gers are the way to go. I rec­kon there is (at least) one other group in most orga­ni­sa­tions — what shall I call them? The Crap­pers? The Chai­ners? Fos­sils? Wha­te­ver. These peo­ple acti­vely resist change because of fear, desire to con­trol etc. Much more des­truc­tive than Coas­ters, and very dif­fe­rent dyna­mic from Chan­gers. Alie­na­ting and disem­po­we­ring them can be satisf­ying in many ways.

  5. Keith Combs says:

    I don’t think you are giving the Coas­ters their just due. They are the majo­rity. They are a force. And who says just doing their job in order to have a real life is bad?
    I envy coasters.

  6. Howard says:

    Great post Hugh!
    I hope it ser­ves as a catalyst to create a face to face with Michael Dell. While there may be peo­ple that push change at Dell there is only 1 per­son that can decide to make an idea into the cor­po­rate mis­sion.
    “He who pays… says” True in any orga­ni­za­tion in var­ying degrees. But still true.

  7. Sara Mooney says:

    I always loo­ked at these three types as Inno­va­tors, Impro­vers, and Main­tai­ners. But the three C’s has a much bet­ter sound to it. In either case, there is always a need for change to stay in front of the com­pe­ti­tion. There are defi­ni­tely many levels to keep a com­pany run­ning, and it takes all three types to keep it moving smoothly.

  8. joelipka says:

    The three C’s are a great model for explai­ning basic beha­viors. I think that one thing you could add to them is that they are situa­tio­nal beha­viors. Some­ti­mes you must be a chan­ger, some­ti­mes you see the change too late and must become a con­tri­bu­tor and other times you might have to be a coas­ter because of overwhel­ming family pro­blems.
    You need to add the “chai­ners” because these peo­ple are the worst. They are the ones that kill com­pa­nies, put­ting their own per­so­nal needs above that of their company.

  9. Gjorgi says:

    great post. i have 2 cate­go­ries howe­ver: live to work, work to live. at the end of the day, if what u do is what makes u happy, then we are all good :)

  10. gregorylent says:

    find the rebels .. then go home

  11. epredator says:

    I shall cer­tainly be using (and giving props accor­dingly) the 3 C’s
    I think that much of the ten­sion in cor­po­rate cul­ture is cau­sed by the fact that many coas­ters end up in con­tro­lling mana­ge­ment posi­tions as many chan­gers cant be bothe­red with the for­ma­li­ties, whilst the con­tri­bu­tors deli­ver the goods.
    The balance in con­trol the­re­fore is in the wrong place due to a natu­ral sett­ling. All 3 clas­ses are nee­ded, but I sus­pect the dis­tri­bu­tion makes life hard for the chan­gers. Mind you.… thats what makes them/us want to change things :-)

  12. As other pos­ters I’d like to add a cate­gory. I’ll call then the “Caba­teu­res” with the “c” pro­noun­ced as “s”. These peo­ple resist change stre­nuously and work hard to under­mine change of all kinds because it will make them look bad or expose them for being the lag­gards they really are. I know a guy here who is one of your “water coo­ler” peo­ple. He makes a point of socia­li­zing with wor­kers just enough to get the infor­ma­tion he wants to use against them. He’s friendly to those when he’s on his research mis­sions and then talks poorly about them behind their backs in his under­mi­ning role. Every com­pany has a few of these peo­ple as well — peo­ple who work very very hard to make sure that nothing chan­ges because that’s where their power lies.

  13. John says:

    Y’know, when I wor­ked tech sup­port for Dell, the Blue Mons­ter was my desk­top wall­pa­per. Every­body won­de­red what the hell it was, and every­body asked me about it. Now I’m inter­vie­wing for another posi­tion at Dell, and maybe, just maybe, I won’t be the only one with the Blue Mons­ter on his desk­top.
    I’m glad to see you taking your energy and your insight to the colossi of the tech world, the Mic­ro­softs and the Dells, because I’ve been on the ground doing grunt work for these com­pa­nies and they are pain­fully una­ware of the emer­ging post-Cluetrain rea­li­ties, the things peo­ple like you and Sco­ble have been shou­ting from the roof­tops for thee past five years. It makes me think that there may be some hope for these old-school desktop-era guys yet.
    Then again, by vir­tue of what they pro­duce, these guys should be the smar­test and the fas­test, shouldn’t they :)

  14. Carolyn says:

    Coas­ters are the majo­rity & I’m not sure how much would get done without them.They’re happy to go along to get along & don’t usually make waves. Sure it seems like they aren’t doing much, but they allow me, a Con­tri­bu­tor, to do what I want to do — which is anything but Coast.At my job Chan­gers are eli­tes who take cre­dit for change that’s set in motion by Con­tri­bu­tors. :)

  15. phil jones says:

    Hmmm … where’s the cyni­cal Hugh I know and love? The one who drew this car­toon? http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/000887.html
    Tell us which of *those* you’re now selling to … :-)

  16. Keith Combs says:

    He seems to have mello­wed since moving to Texas.