June 8, 2008

wine as commodity

Send to Kindle

sand002.jpg
The rela­ti­vely small, southern French pro­vince of Lan­gue­doc pro­du­ces more wine than the entire State of Cali­for­nia. Thou­sands and thou­sands and thou­sands of vine­yards. Italy alone boasts 500,000 vine­yards, and 50,000 indi­vi­dual wine brands. That’s roughly one vine­yard for every one hun­dred peo­ple!
This is one of the great things about wine is, of course. There’s so much choice out there, that once you get the wine bug, you easily can spend the rest of your life sam­pling thou­sands of them, and never get even close to sam­pling them all.
But on the other side of the coin, this makes your job as a wine pro­du­cer VERY TOUGH. If for exam­ple, you have all your money sunk into an Ita­lian wine farm, Con­gra­tu­la­tions, you’ve got half a million other Ita­lians in the same boat as you. That’s a pretty crow­ded boat, to say the least.
The other day I sho­wed the above car­toon to the owner of a large Ame­ri­can wine impor­ter.“What a lovely grain of sand you are. Too bad you’re lying on the beach.“
My the­sis that came out of that con­ver­sa­tion: Wine has become a com­mo­dity. But most peo­ple in the wine trade are too self-absorbed with their own wine sch­tick to ack­now­ledge the fact. OTHER PEOPLE’S WINE may already be a com­mo­dity, but NOT OUR WINE, no no no no… Our wine is SPECIAL, yes yes yes yes…
If you want to remove the “com­mo­dity fac­tor” from your wine, you first have to admit that yes, you too are also selling a com­mo­dity. And then work from there.
To quote a phrase I pro­bably use far too often: “We’re not in the wine busi­ness. We’re in the decom­mo­di­fi­ca­tion busi­ness.“
So how does one “decom­mo­dify” wine? I have no idea. If I knew, I’d be a billio­naire.
But what HAS wor­ked well for me so far, is to stop thin­king so much about the pro­duct– the gra­pes, the vine­yards, the terroir, the hum­ming­birds gathe­ring nec­tar in the early mor­ning sun yak yak yak. Ins­tead, I find it far more use­ful to be inte­res­ted in the actual peo­ple drin­king it. Who are they? What do they need? What’s their sch­tick? What works for them?
What’s true in life is also true in mar­ke­ting: If you want to be boring, talk about your­self. If you want to be inte­res­ting, talk about other people.

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , ,

19 Responses to “wine as commodity”

  1. Catherine says:

    Great Post — very true…
    “Ins­tead, I find it far more use­ful to be inte­res­ted in the actual peo­ple drin­king it. What do they need? What’s their sch­tick? What works for them?“
    SPOT ON!

  2. Dave says:

    It’s that part about how peo­ple don’t remem­ber what you do or what you say so much as they remem­ber how you make them feel. And if you want to catch a mouse, make a noise like a cheese …

  3. Com­mo­dity or Social Object?

  4. Ben Tamblyn says:

    Hugh, inte­res­ting and thought pro­vo­king post as usual. There’s actually a lot of para­llels to be drawn with the soft­ware industry and MS in par­ti­cu­lar. Like the wine industry peo­ple in soft­ware talk about how great their sho­vel is and all the fana­tas­tic com­po­nents that make up this — but all too often we for­get about the inten­ded pur­pose of the cus­to­mer or con­su­mer which is about “dig­ging a hole” — that’s the right size and right fit for them. Wine’s simi­lar — and so I think I agree with Paul F above. The com­mo­dity — is the sho­vel but the social object is the hole. For mar­ke­ters decom­mo­di­fi­ca­tion the­re­fore comes from unders­tan­ding more about the social object.

  5. Paul says:

    If Gary Vay­nerchuk had a vine­yard and a wine label, I’d drink his wine. I know him. I’d want to drink the wine of someone that pas­sio­nate about wine and about people.

  6. John Wesley says:

    The narra­tive that a pro­duct fills in your life…something or other

  7. Paul’s got it! “So how does one “decom­mo­dify” wine?” You know how, Hugh. It hap­pe­ned with the Blue Mons­ter. Sorry to be all high on the “Tip­ping Point” vibe, but you and Mal­colm Glad­well should really have a con­ver­sa­tion.
    With the Blue Mons­ter, a “con­nec­tor” type saw it and sha­red it with MS peeps, and your social object took off. The Blue Mons­ter social object con­nec­ted with the Stormhoek social object, and MSers went gaga for the wine. It was “theirs”. It was asso­cia­ted with a social object they iden­ti­fied with (Blue Mons­ter). And it was asso­cia­ted with you. All by word of mouth and per­so­nal endor­se­ments. Their enthu­siasm begat enthu­siasm, etc.
    With mar­ket satu­ra­tion and com­mo­di­ties, insight as to what’s good and what sucks is dif­fi­cult to fathom. But a friend, or someone you trust, or someone you admire, or someone you think is “cool” — they endorse something, and you’ll take the next step and try it. You’ve expe­rience with their tas­tes, you think it’s simi­lar to yours (or you’d like it to be). So you try the new thing.
    You’re a Con­nec­tor, Hugh. And you’re also a Maven. But you’re not a Sales­per­son. The good news is, you know plenty of such creatures.

  8. Richard says:

    Hugh, have you seen Fishhoek from the glo­bal wine behe­moth Cons­te­lla­tion? Is this their take on cha­llen­ging Stormhoek in cer­tain regions? Your post takes on even more rele­vance when you con­si­der the power the glo­bal wine com­pa­nies can wield
    Love the work, enjoy the sta­tes!
    Richard

  9. Brooks Moses says:

    Gra­pes are a com­mo­dity. Gra­pes grown on the gra­pe­vine on my back patio are not a com­mo­dity.
    Maybe wine made from gra­pes that I know, because I’ve been rea­ding a blog about them for the past many months, so I’ve been buil­ding up anti­ci­pa­tion of what the wine that’s made from them is likely to be like, is not a com­mo­dity?
    (Are peo­ple who will read a wine blog for as long as it takes to get from vine to wine a commodity?)

  10. Matt Wardman says:

    >There’s so much choice out there, that once you get the wine bug, you easily can spend the rest of your life sam­pling thou­sands of them, and never get even close to sam­pling them all.
    Why does this remind me of blogs?
    Aha — the busi­ness of decom­mo­di­fi­ca­tion.
    Thanks for the thought­ful post.
    Matt

  11. It is true that most peo­ple in the wine trade don’t rea­lize they are selling a com­mo­dity. When is the last time you tas­ted a wine that wasn’t stom­ped by a won­der­ful little family? Nearly all wine is mar­ke­ted this way. Most wine busi­nes­ses do not have the option of actually decom­mo­dif­ying, because they are making a com­mo­dity pro­duct. What you call the decom­mo­di­fi­ca­tion busi­ness is really just a dif­fe­rent mar­ke­ting angle. The truth of the mat­ter is that there really are some small far­mers in the world gro­wing and making something beyond a com­mo­dity– an agri­cul­tu­ral pro­duct. Just because a pro­duct is tra­ded on the com­mo­dity mar­ket, e.g., corn, pork, orange juice, doesn’t mean that there aren’t great far­mers pro­du­cing an authen­tic, deli­cious pro­duct that is quite distinctive.

  12. Mathew Ferguson says:

    There are a few decom­mo­di­fied com­pa­nies out there: Star­bucks — Ita­lian cafe expe­rience pulled cof­fee out of com­mo­dity sta­tus.
    Sumo Salad in Aus­tra­lia: sure I can get salad anywhere but they have salads no one else has.
    Cer­tain coo­king ingre­dients — spe­cial flours, sugars, salts.
    We have a bookshop chain here in Mel­bourne called Rea­dings who use ser­vice and book­se­ller know­ledge to pull them­sel­ves out of com­mo­dity. If you say you like X author then they’ll know what other books you may like. Try get­ting that at Borders.

  13. peter says:

    but is wine a com­mo­dity? At one level — “house wine” — maybe it is. But surely if con­su­mers rou­ti­nely reject a $3 bottle of Mer­lot and buy a $25 bottle ins­tead, hasn’t the wine mar­ket already been lar­gely “decommodified”?

  14. Edric Chen says:

    Spea­king of wine, what do you gather from the Yellow Tail story? It seems they are really enjo­ying the bene­fits of their mar­ke­ting angle which for me is, “Peo­ple drink wine, period.” No pre­ten­ses, no cookie-cutter crap. I think it’s bri­lliant com­pa­red to a lot of brands out there.
    Most peo­ple inc­lu­ding myself can­not dis­tin­guish the dif­fe­rence bet­ween wines. Well, at the very least, I know white wine from red wine. So when someone tells me to drink their wine, heck, why not?
    As someone said before, Stormhoek might just be the next Yellow Tail.

  15. MariaD says:

    Is cus­to­mi­za­tion a way to decom­mo­dify?
    I am loo­king for ways to cus­to­mize math lear­ning. There are no rea­sons, any­more, to have it THAT stan­dar­di­zed.
    In par­ti­cu­lar, I am now searching for a way to help small groups pro­duce their own “mini-curricula” based on com­mon, but cus­to­mi­za­ble, fra­me­works. Inte­res­tingly, pretty much all “colla­bo­ra­tive book crea­tion” ways I found so far pro­duce a con­ver­gent, sin­gu­lar, voted-on pro­duct that can later be copied and dis­tri­bu­ted like, well, a book (which is a com­mo­dity of sorts). A wiki, for exam­ple, squee­zes everybody’s dif­fe­rent takes on a sub­ject into one “latest, best so far” ver­sion. This is a pro­blem, really.
    I don’t know if my brains­tor­ming made sense to you, but what you drew and wrote star­ted it, so there!

  16. el jefe says:

    Decom­mo­di­fi­ca­tion. Bingo. This is not a new con­cept (ask the peo­ple making disk dri­ves for exam­ple.) But a very very impor­tant con­cept. We’re trying. Thanks Hugh.

  17. Sean Tierney says:

    You know something is NOT a com­mo­dity when they’re willing to go out of their way to get it when a per­fectly accep­ta­ble subs­ti­tute can be had for chea­per / less fric­tion.
    @Paul ‘pur­pose of the cus­to­mer or con­su­mer which is about “dig­ging a hole“‘
    but it’s not even really about dig­ging a hole if you think about it. It’s about plan­ting a bea­ti­ful tree, or get­ting at a bro­ken sprin­kler head. And then if you extra­po­late further, it’s not even really about those things either– it’s about wan­ting bea­ti­ful sce­nery in your back­yard » peace & com­fort » on and on…
    This is defi­ni­tely an impor­tant insight. It’s why Yellow­tail has done so well — they dis­pen­sed with all the wine snob­bery and did situa­tio­nal assess­ment vs. fea­ture assess­ment. Clay­ton Christensen’s book “Innovator’s Solua­tion” has some more great exam­ples if you’re inte­res­ted in this type of thin­king.
    bot­tom­line: if you strike a nerve with your audience and they’ll go out of their way to buy your stuff, you’re not a com­mo­dity. Figu­ring out how to achieve that is always the cha­llenge.
    sean

  18. Senthil says:

    Wow thats a cle­ver pic­ture… I would love to use it in my face­book appli­ca­tion Happy­Wishes ;-)

  19. rae says:

    I have been in a quest to find the most great tas­ting wines out there. I have tried wines recom­men­da­tion in http://vino.com, but nothing seems to satisfy my palate. Any addi­tio­nal recommendations?