Archive for June, 2008

June 30, 2008

untitled 451

untitled3333.jpg

social object: “sweaty betty”

B_Kensington.jpg
Sweaty Betty. Though I’m not exactly their tar­get mar­ket, I love this brand. They have a store next door to one of my regu­lar Lon­don wate­ring holes, which is how I first came across them. From the moment I read their sign, I just “got it”.
The name is fun, it’s memo­ra­ble, it desc­ri­bes what they’re selling per­fectly, and it’s so… English. It doesn’t take itself that seriously. Though Sweaty Betty is going for the upper end of the mar­ket, this isn’t gym wear for the uptight, self-important crowd.
And yes, it’s a social object. Their story is easy to relay at a cock­tail party, even after a cou­ple of drinks. Some nicely desig­ned gear, a good vibe and a fun name; some­ti­mes that’s all you need.

June 25, 2008

creating “blue monsters”

bluemonster2255.jpg
[BACKSTORY: A year and a half ago, I crea­ted the Blue Mons­ter car­toon, which with the help of Microsoft’s Steve Clay­ton, took on a life of its own inside the Mic­ro­soft Corp. It was fun, inte­res­ting, Steve and I were well plea­sed etc.]
A few weeks ago, I tal­ked about “Blue Mons­ter 2.0″. I allu­ded to a new direc­tion I was taking; I thought I’d ela­bo­rate further:
Crea­ting Blue Mons­ters, I believe, is a fine way for a mar­ke­ting guy to spend his time. Espe­cially as I’m fond of saying that Blue Mons­ters are “The Future of Mar­ke­ting”.
[NB. In its sim­plest form, a Blue Mons­ter is my pet name for a “Social Object” desig­ned to bring about cul­tu­ral change within an orga­ni­za­tion. It cer­tainly wor­ked well enough at Mic­ro­soft etc.]
Can another Blue Mons­ter be crea­ted? Can ligh­ting strike twice? Can ligh­ting strike outside of Mic­ro­soft? I believe it can. Only, there has to be some ground rules. The client in ques­tion has to be ready for it, has to want it see it hap­pen.
Ideas within com­pa­nies are like peo­ple within com­pa­nies. It doesn’t mat­ter how good thy are, there has to be a cul­tu­ral fit or else it’s a com­plete waste of time; you’re just figh­ting a losing battle.
I have an evil plan. Weighing options…

meaning scales, people don’t.

hughtrain0806.jpg
[More thoughts on “How To Be Crea­tive”:]
38. Mea­ning Sca­les, Peo­ple Don’t.
From my blog: “Mea­ning Sca­les”. February, 2005:

As Buddha says, there is no one road to Nir­vana. Enligh­ten­ment is a house with 6 billion doors. While we’re alive, we intend not to find THE DOOR, not A DOOR, but to find OUR OWN, UNIQUE DOOR.
And we’re willing to pay for the pri­vi­lege. We’re willing to give up money and time and power and sex and sta­tus and cer­tainty and com­fort in order to find it.
And guess what? It’ll be a great door. It’ll add to this life. It’ll reso­nate. Not just with us, but with every­body it comes in con­tact with. The door will use­ful and pro­duc­tive. Alive and kic­king. It’ll create wealth and laugh­ter and joy. It’ll pull its own weight, it’ll give back to others. It’ll be cen­te­red on com­pas­sion, but will be into­le­rant of dullards, para­si­tes and cynics.
It may be modest, it may not. It could be a little candle shop; it could be a soft­ware com­pany with the GNP of Swe­den. It could involve poli­tics or wor­king with the elderly. It could be star­ting a design stu­dio or ope­ning a bar with Cou­sin Mike. It could be a screen­play, oil paints, or dis­co­ve­ring the vio­lin. It doesn’t mat­ter. Mea­ning Scales.

Sure, I was pretty drunk on the Kool-Ade when I wrote that, but I think the main point is still valid. The size of the endea­vor doesn’t mat­ter as much as how mea­ning­ful it beco­mes to you.
But given a choice bet­ween two paths, both valid, how do you know which one to take? How do you know which one has the mea­ning­ful payoff?
The ans­wer, of course, is that you don’t. Whether we’re tal­king about moving to New York to become an “Art Star”, or ope­ning up a hum­ble cof­fee shop in Alpine, Texas, that’s why they’re called “adven­tu­res”. Because you don’t how it’s going to end.
All you can do is admit to your­self that yes, this is an adven­ture, and to accept it as such, sur­pri­ses and all. With a little bit of prac­tice you even­tually get into the flow of it.
Yes, anything worth doing takes lots of prac­tice. Adven­tu­res inc­lu­ded.
And when I say “Peo­ple don’t scale”, I’m sta­ting the obvious: that no mat­ter how meteo­ric your rise to the top [or not], you are still behol­den to the day-to-day rea­li­ties as any living crea­ture.
Birth, sick­ness, death, falling in love, watching TV, rai­sing fami­lies, mowing the lawn, going to the movies, taking your nephew to a ball game, drin­king beer, han­ging out with your bud­dies, pla­ying fris­bee on the beach, pain­ting the house, ten­ding the gar­den. No mat­ter where your adven­ture takes you, most of what is truly mea­ning­ful is still to be found revol­ving around the mun­dane stuff you did before you embar­ked on your adven­ture. The stuff that’ll be still be going on long after you and I are both dead, long after our con­tri­bu­tion to the world is for­got­ten.
But often, one needs to have that big adven­ture before truly appre­cia­ting this. Going full circle. Exactly.

June 24, 2008

when your dreams become reality, they are no longer your dreams

crude333.jpg
[More thoughts on “How To Be Crea­tive”:]
37. When your dreams become rea­lity, they are no lon­ger your dreams.

If you are suc­cess­ful, it’ll never come from the direc­tion you pre­dic­ted. Same is true if you fail.

[A Brief His­tory Of The “Car­toons Drawn On The Back Of Busi­ness Cards” For­mat.]
As this book reaches its end, I’m thin­king how it’s been OVER TEN YEARS since I first came up with the “car­toons drawn on the back of busi­ness cards” for­mat. And it seems like I’VE ONLY JUST got them to the com­mer­cially suc­cess­ful level I thought they were capa­ble of reaching.
Bet­ter late than never, I sup­pose.
A friend asked me recently, had I known it would take this long, would I have bothe­red in the first place? I have in my mind this fan­tasy ver­sion of myself that makes rea­so­na­ble and sen­si­ble deci­sions, more often than not. This rea­so­na­ble and sen­si­ble per­son, if he exis­ted, would pro­bably have ans­we­red, “No. Defi­ni­tely not.”
But none of this is sen­si­ble. None of it ever was. So yeah, kno­wing what I know now, I pro­bably wouldn’t have beha­ved any dif­fe­rently. I’m not proud of that; I’m not asha­med, either. It just is.
Was it worth the cost? Not really. It never is. Van Gough once told his brother, “No pain­ting ever sells for as much as it cost the artist to make it.” I’ve yet to meet in the flesh any artist who could prove him wrong.
Though loo­king on the bright side, it IS nice after years of strug­gling away in obs­cu­rity, to have a body of work that you’re actually proud of, one that [A] makes you a good living, [B] exceeds your ear­lier expec­ta­tions of what you thought you were capa­ble of achie­ving as a human being, and perhaps most impor­tantly, [C] has given a lot of other peo­ple a lot of joy and value.
When I was a kid in college, there very few ave­nues a car­too­nist could take, if she wished to be suc­cess­ful. There was no inter­net. There were only news­pa­pers, maga­zi­nes, books, TV, movies, comic books, merchan­di­sing, and little else. A world I find hard to ima­gine now, only a cou­ple of short deca­des later. And besi­des, I never saw my work as par­ti­cu­larly com­mer­cial, so even if I did give it my best shot, I never thought it would ever rea­lis­ti­cally pay off.
So in my last year of college, feig­ning matu­rity, I tur­ned my atten­tion to lan­ding a job that would pay my bills upon gra­dua­tion. From what I could then tell, wri­ting TV com­mer­cials see­med to use the same part of the brain it took to draw car­toons, and I wasn’t a bad car­too­nist, so I deci­ded to give Madi­son Ave­nue a go. It loo­ked like it could be inte­res­ting.
Somehow I mana­ged to get a job as an adver­ti­sing copyw­ri­ter, straight out of school. Some skill was nee­ded, most of it was luck, but when you’re in your early twen­ties and ente­ring the serious job mar­ket for the first time, you’ll take wha­te­ver you can get.
Though I was in the ad industry off-and-on for over a decade, I don’t think about it too much, now. Some part of me has blac­ked it out. Besi­des being VERY hard work, it wasn’t much fun. I was very much in the ranks of what I would call the “In-Betweenies” i.e. those good enough to get and keep a pretty well-paid posi­tion in an ad agency, but not good enough to really get ahead in it; not good enough to enjoy it pro­perly. This was the world I lived in, in 1998 New York, when I star­ted dra­wing the car­toons with a ven­geance. And like every other In-Betweenie my age, it was a tiring, stress­ful time for me.
[And then the inter­net hap­pe­ned…]
Over the next cou­ple of years, yes, I drew a lot of car­toons, but I didn’t do much with them. They were just a hobby. Besi­des, I had a lot going on at the time, with the job and the New York lifestyle to main­tain. Most of my car­toon audience back then con­sis­ted of fellow New York bar­flies that I had fois­ted them upon.
But all good things must come to an end. One day I found myself under-employed, broke and pis­sed off with life in gene­ral. With nothing bet­ter to do besi­des wai­ting for the phone to ring, in May, 2001 I star­ted my blog, gapingvoid.com.
I would like to say that the web­site took off soon after, the car­toons were a smash hit, and things impro­ved dra­ma­ti­cally right away, but sadly that didn’t hap­pen. I just kept at it, day after day, buil­ding it up slowly. That’s still how it hap­pens, for the most part.
The million-dollar con­tract has yet to arrive in the mail. That’s OK, somewhere along the line I figu­red how to make good money off of them, INDIRECTLY.
How? It’s pretty straight­for­ward, in retros­pect. I pos­ted the car­toons online, and because I had a lot of free time on my hands, I then spent a log time trac­king what hap­pe­ned to them, once they went out into the ether. This was 2002, just as blogs were begin­ning to hit the scene. This was the begin­ning of Google’s rise to the top of the search mar­ket. This was the era of Technorati.com, when peo­ple wan­ted to start seeing what was hap­pe­ning on the web RIGHT NOW, not just his­to­ri­cally.
Over the next year or two watching the car­toons tra­ve­ling about, watching what other blog­gers were up to, I star­ted get­ting a pretty good feel for how the inter­net ACTUALLY wor­ked, not just how the jour­na­lists and mar­ke­ting folk told peo­ple how it wor­ked. After a while I star­ted pos­ting my thoughts about this brave new world online. And after a while peo­ple star­ted e-mailing me, offe­ring to pay me good money if I would share more of what I had lear­ned online with them.
Sha­ring this infor­ma­tion for me was A LOT MORE FUN and bet­ter paid than trying to sell ads to clients, so hey, I went for it.
So far I’ve mana­ged to turn it into a pretty nice busi­ness. A lot more money, for a lot let stress and time than Madi­son Ave­nue ever offe­red me. Not a bad out­come.
The thing is, none of it hap­pe­ned on pur­pose. It just kinda sorta hap­pe­ned, one ran­dom event at a time.
I find having two strings to my bow, car­toons and inter­net, helps the busi­ness out a lot. I like to play them off each other. Sorry, I can’t draw you a car­toon; I’m too busy doing inter­net stuff. Sorry, I can’t help you with your inter­net pro­blem; I’m too busy dra­wing something for a client. I totally believe that if I gave one of them up for good, the other one would crash and burn over­night. It’s kee­ping the crea­tive ten­sion bet­ween the two, an exten­sion of the afo­re­men­tio­ned “Sex & Cash Theory”, that keeps things inte­res­ting. For both me and the good folk paying my bills.
I never inten­ded to be a pro­fes­sio­nal car­too­nist. I never inten­ded to become an inter­net joc­key. But somehow the two got mashed up to create this third thing. That’s what I mean by “If you are suc­cess­ful, it’ll never come from the direc­tion you pre­dic­ted.”
It’s good to be young and full of dreams. Dreams of one day doing something “insa­nely great”. Dreams of love, beauty, achie­ve­ment and con­tri­bu­tion. But unders­tand they have a life of their own, and they’re not very good at follo­wing ins­truc­tions. Love them, revere them, nur­ture them, res­pect them, but don’t ever become a slave to them. Other­wise you’ll kill them off pre­ma­tu­rely, before they get the chance to come true.
Good luck.

June 23, 2008

hugh & the rabbi, episode 6

untitled449.jpg
Down­load the Pod­cast
Pod­cast RSS feed

John­nie Moore, Mark Earls, Rabbi Pinny and myself all met the other week and tal­ked for 70 minu­tes. It was fun. It was ram­bling. It was all good. Hope you have a lis­ten etc.

June 19, 2008

new mistake

newmistake001.JPG
When I briefly met Esther Dyson the other day, I gave her the above car­toon, which I had drawn there, right on the spot. It was, of course, ins­pi­red by her clas­sic maxim, “Always make new mis­ta­kes”.
What a total honor to meet her. Peo­ple like Esther always remind me of what Loic and I tal­ked about once: That the best thing about being a blog­ger is the peo­ple you get to meet. Exactly.

June 15, 2008

hello from san francisco

sample333.JPG
[Close-up on Fed 45. Approx 1.5x1.5 inches square. Click on image to enlarge etc.]
[UPDATE: You can follow my goings on at Super­nova over on my Twit­ter page. Also, they have their own Twit­ter page here.]
Blog­ging this from a neat cafe here in San Fran­cisco. Hea­ding over to Super­nova in a little while, where I’ll be spea­king on a panel Wed­nes­day mor­ning.
It’s great being back in town; it’s ama­zing how many friends I have in San Fran­cisco, even if I’ve spent less than a total two weeks in my entire life here.
But I feel the same way here as I did in New York last week– the Big City doesn’t do much for me any more. It did once, then one day the fee­ling vanished. I can’t wait to get back to Alpine and crank out some more big dra­wings.
That being said, this regu­lar tra­ve­ling stuff is impor­tant for me. I think I’d go nuts if all I did was hang out in West Texas. Variety is the spice of life etc.
Besi­des the car­too­ning, I’ve got a cou­ple of inte­res­ting pro­ject ste­wing in the back­ground. Wai­ting for a few more pla­nets to line up before going public with them. It’s all good. I’ll let you know how I get on. Cheers.

June 14, 2008

the puck

thepuck001.JPG
“The Puck”. Pen­cil on paper, approx. 16 x 21 inches.
“Aim for where the puck is hea­ded, not for where it is”, is a line that my friend, Fred Wil­son once quo­ted to me. It’s his per­so­nal man­tra for the Ven­ture Capi­tal busi­ness. Not hard to see why; it’s a superb thought.
[UPDATE:] Some com­men­ters below kindly tell me that this is a paraph­rase of something ori­gi­nally said by the hoc­key great, Wayne Gretzky. Rock on.

June 13, 2008

“fred 45″ update

fred35v001.JPG
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
Well, “Fred 45″ is coming along, slowly. Approx 15 x 21 inches, ink & pen­cil on paper. Last time I blog­ged it, it was just a pen­cil grid.
All this tra­ve­ling I’ve been doing recently has KILLED my pro­duc­ti­vity, at least in this depart­ment… I’m loo­king for­ward to a long, quiet win­ter, to say the least.

now what?

now%20what.jpg
This is a car­toon I desig­ned for Jerry Colonna’s busi­ness card, about 2 years ago. He’s still using it. Rock on.

i was lonely

lonely1244.JPG
[Click on image to enlarge/print etc.]

June 8, 2008

mickey demon

mickeydemon556.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc.]

wine as commodity

sand002.jpg
The rela­ti­vely small, southern French pro­vince of Lan­gue­doc pro­du­ces more wine than the entire State of Cali­for­nia. Thou­sands and thou­sands and thou­sands of vine­yards. Italy alone boasts 500,000 vine­yards, and 50,000 indi­vi­dual wine brands. That’s roughly one vine­yard for every one hun­dred peo­ple!
This is one of the great things about wine is, of course. There’s so much choice out there, that once you get the wine bug, you easily can spend the rest of your life sam­pling thou­sands of them, and never get even close to sam­pling them all.
But on the other side of the coin, this makes your job as a wine pro­du­cer VERY TOUGH. If for exam­ple, you have all your money sunk into an Ita­lian wine farm, Con­gra­tu­la­tions, you’ve got half a million other Ita­lians in the same boat as you. That’s a pretty crow­ded boat, to say the least.
The other day I sho­wed the above car­toon to the owner of a large Ame­ri­can wine impor­ter.“What a lovely grain of sand you are. Too bad you’re lying on the beach.”
My the­sis that came out of that con­ver­sa­tion: Wine has become a com­mo­dity. But most peo­ple in the wine trade are too self-absorbed with their own wine sch­tick to ack­now­ledge the fact. OTHER PEOPLE’S WINE may already be a com­mo­dity, but NOT OUR WINE, no no no no… Our wine is SPECIAL, yes yes yes yes…
If you want to remove the “com­mo­dity fac­tor” from your wine, you first have to admit that yes, you too are also selling a com­mo­dity. And then work from there.
To quote a phrase I pro­bably use far too often: “We’re not in the wine busi­ness. We’re in the decom­mo­di­fi­ca­tion busi­ness.”
So how does one “decom­mo­dify” wine? I have no idea. If I knew, I’d be a billio­naire.
But what HAS wor­ked well for me so far, is to stop thin­king so much about the pro­duct– the gra­pes, the vine­yards, the terroir, the hum­ming­birds gathe­ring nec­tar in the early mor­ning sun yak yak yak. Ins­tead, I find it far more use­ful to be inte­res­ted in the actual peo­ple drin­king it. Who are they? What do they need? What’s their sch­tick? What works for them?
What’s true in life is also true in mar­ke­ting: If you want to be boring, talk about your­self. If you want to be inte­res­ting, talk about other people.

June 6, 2008

10 things I hate about web 2.0

allegedmoralfailings337.jpg
1. Recon­ci­ling the huge gap bet­ween how inte­res­ting and impor­tant you tell your clients it all is, ver­sus how inte­res­ting and impor­tant you actually find it all your­self.
2. The end­less train of online armchair quar­ter­backs end­lessly trying to engage you with end­less rounds of men­tal mas­tur­ba­tion.
3. The same usual sus­pects whi­ning end­lessly on about the same usual sus­pects.
4. The idea that spou­ting end­less hyper­bole about the latest doohic­key wid­get is actually an inte­res­ting, com­pe­lling and worthy way for a grown man to spend his free time.
5. The well-intentioned but mis­gui­ded belief that anony­mous loser douche­bags are actually entit­led to an opi­nion.
6. Peo­ple at con­fe­rence panels, pre­ten­ding that the only rea­son they’re atten­ding is to offer valua­ble insight to their fellow man, as oppo­sed to just pim­ping their wares and/or scou­ting for con­sul­ting gigs.
7. The per­va­sive use of the term, “2.0″ to desc­ribe anything other than inter­net soft­ware e.g. “Love 2.0″, “Women 2.0″, “Brea­kup 2.0″, “Food 2.0″, “Reli­gion 2.0″, “Music 2.0″, “Poetry 2.0″, yak yak yak…
8. Any blog­ger with higher traf­fic than my own.
9. The popu­lar but mis­ta­ken belief that there is a vast, uns­top­pa­ble army of peo­ple in the world who actually care about this shit.
10. The sopho­mo­ric con­ceit that “The Con­ver­sa­tion” is two-way. To quote Fran Lei­bo­witz, “The oppo­site of Tal­king is not Lis­te­ning. The oppo­site of Tal­king is Waiting”.

June 1, 2008

“fred 45″ begun…

fred45v001.JPG
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
Star­ted on “Fred 45″ this after­noon. So far it’s just a pen­cil grid on paper, approx 15 x 21 inches.
I have a pretty neat idea where this is hea­ded. Watch this space.

random shit

randoms555.JPG
[Another one from my Moles­kine… Click on image to enlarge etc.]

“fred 44″ is finished!

fred44final.jpg
[Fred 44. 18 x 24 inches. Ink & pen­cil on paper. Click on image to enlarge etc.]
Got in early this mor­ning and put the final touches onto Fred 44.
OK. So now it’s done. Over. Basta. Finito.
I feel good about it. Rock on.