May 31, 2008

“think geek”

Send to Kindle

thefuturebelongs219.jpg
[Click on image to enlarge/download/print etc. Licen­sing terms here etc.]
[From Octo­ber, 2007:]

My defi­ni­tion of a geek is, “Some­body who socia­li­zes via objects.”
When you think about it, we’re all geeks. We’re all enthu­sias­tic about something outside our­sel­ves. For me, it’s mar­ke­ting and car­too­ning. For others, it could be cellpho­nes or Scotch Whisky or Apple com­pu­ters or NASCAR or the Bos­ton Red Sox or Bhud­dism. All these act as Social Objects within a social net­work of peo­ple who care pas­sio­na­tely about the stuff.
Wha­te­ver industry you are in, there’s some­body who is gee­ked out about your pro­duct cate­gory. They are using your pro­duct [or a competitor’s pro­duct] as a Social Object.
If you don’t unders­tand how the geeks are socia­li­zing– con­nec­ting to other peo­ple– via your pro­duct, then you don’t actually have a mar­ke­ting plan. Heck, you pro­bably don’t have a via­ble busi­ness plan.

It’s hard for me to think of mar­ke­ting, without thin­king in terms of Social Objects. It’s hard for me to think of mar­ke­ting, without thin­king how the geeks fit in the equa­tion.
So many peo­ple start out trying to mar­ket to Mr and Mrs Ave­rage. I think they’d have bet­ter luck if they thought of the geeks first.
“Think Geek.“
[Afterthought:] Someone in the com­ments asks, “Doesn’t the pro­duct also need to make sense to non-geeks?“
It would depend on the pro­duct, it would depend how “spe­cia­list” it is, I sup­pose. Can you show me an inte­res­ting, suc­cess­ful pro­duct that the geeks hate, but the non-geeks love?

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , ,

18 Responses to ““think geek””

  1. Maor says:

    Hugh got a point.

  2. Great post! I’m glad that I caught the link on Twit­ter.
    And taking your thoughts a step further — the brand not only needs a mar­ke­ting plan to embrace the geeks sup­por­ting the brand, but also a plan to orga­nize & sup­port a com­mu­nity around them!
    Connie

  3. crawford says:

    Love the rede­fi­ni­tion of geek. Not since I sent away for my Johnny Quest sec­ret deco­der ring have I felt so much a part of the club. ;-)

  4. Connie Reece says:

    Hugh, I think it’s an age-old prin­ci­ple: “The geeks shall inhe­rit the earth.”

  5. Anonymous says:

    Aren.‘t the geeks the early adop­ters… I guess the pro­duct does need to appeal to geeks but long term, doesn’t the pro­duct also need to make sense to non-geeks?

  6. You’re my new hero.

  7. Ian Hay says:

    I think it’ much easier to mar­ket to geeks as they have a shiny toy aspect to them, I cer­tainly do, but the pro­blem is lon­ge­vity, in actually making a pro­duct that geeks love but that can also trans­late to the mass mar­ket..
    Can’t think off-hand of a mass mar­ket loved but geek hated pro­duct, cheap ugly PC’s come to mind though

  8. hugh macleod says:

    Ian, I don;t think cheap PCs are much loved by anyone– they’re com­mo­di­ties, for the most part. Not the kind of busi­ness I would find that inte­res­ting, not to men­tion, easy to get into.

  9. Jonny Good says:

    What’s wrong with com­mo­di­ties? There are thou­sands of pro­ducts out there that are hated by ‘geeks’ and enthu­siasts — family cars, fro­zen food, cheap beer etc etc etc — that are neverthe­less highly suc­cess­ful due to bet­ter prices,and bet­ter con­ve­nience. They cer­tainly have a via­ble busi­ness plans based on effi­ciency, dis­tri­bu­tion and gene­ral busi­ness ruth­less­ness. I would sug­gest it not ade­qua­tely pre­pa­ring in this area that cau­ses most busi­nes­ses to fail, not having poor mar­ke­ting — look at Stormhoek?!

  10. Shawn Lea says:

    It hit me the other day — while going shop­ping for “entertainment” — the essence of capi­ta­lism is socia­li­zing with objects. So we’re all capi­ta­list geeks, it seems. ;)

  11. In Cringley’s “Triumph of the Nerds”, Dou­glas Adams said something simi­lar; he said something like “A nerd is someone who uses a telephone to talk about telepho­nes. By exten­sion, a com­pu­ter nerd is someone who uses a com­pu­ter… in order to use a com­pu­ter.“
    Not exactly the same as “socia­li­zes via objects” but the spi­rit of the quote seems simi­lar to me.

  12. ericabiz says:

    “Can you show me an inte­res­ting, suc­cess­ful pro­duct that the geeks hate, but the non-geeks love?“
    Sure: Ame­ri­can Idol.

  13. Q: “Can you show me an inte­res­ting, suc­cess­ful pro­duct that the geeks hate, but the non-geeks love?“
    A: Mic­ro­soft
    (Well, okay, they fail on the “inte­res­ting” part.

  14. Adam says:

    “Some­body who socia­li­zes via objects.”
    As oppo­sed to someone that treats objects like women?

  15. futurepast says:

    A geek is someone who has for­got­ten they were once greek. For­get about “mar­ke­ting” to geeks, lis­ten to tompeters.com, you should be desig­ning and mar­ke­ting to .…. the future is in the past.

  16. Will says:

    “Can you show me an inte­res­ting, suc­cess­ful pro­duct that the geeks hate, but the non-geeks love?“
    Inte­res­ting to whom? Us geeks?