<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: hugh &amp; the rabbi, episode 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gapingvoid.com/2008/05/12/hugh-the-rabbi-episode-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2008/05/12/hugh-the-rabbi-episode-4/</link>
	<description>&#34;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 20:55:13 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Madrugada Jones</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2008/05/12/hugh-the-rabbi-episode-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22401</link>
		<dc:creator>Madrugada Jones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 18:57:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=4310#comment-22401</guid>
		<description>I like Euan&#039;s recollection about David Weinberger&#039;s quote.  Conversations are tricky things to start.  I&#039;ve been trying to get one going with my cartooning blog, but the difference between starting a convo on a conventional talky blog and getting one started on a blog that employs mainly pictures is, I&#039;m coming to realize, that it&#039;s hard to get a dialogue started with just pictures.  But to me, cartoons that are drawn with subterfuge in mind should be able to jump-start debate.  Maybe mine just aren&#039;t subtle or biting enough.  Anyone have any thoughts on this?
&lt;a href=&quot;http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Euan’s recollection about David Weinberger’s quote.  Conversations are tricky things to start.  I’ve been trying to get one going with my cartooning blog, but the difference between starting a convo on a conventional talky blog and getting one started on a blog that employs mainly pictures is, I’m coming to realize, that it’s hard to get a dialogue started with just pictures.  But to me, cartoons that are drawn with subterfuge in mind should be able to jump-start debate.  Maybe mine just aren’t subtle or biting enough.  Anyone have any thoughts on this?<br />
<a href="http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://spinachflame.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crawford</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2008/05/12/hugh-the-rabbi-episode-4/comment-page-1/#comment-22400</link>
		<dc:creator>crawford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 17:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=4310#comment-22400</guid>
		<description>Two keys on the same chain:
Intimacy vs love
Attraction vs promotion
Thx
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two keys on the same chain:<br />
Intimacy vs love<br />
Attraction vs promotion<br />
Thx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
