Comments on: “fred 43″: work in progress– day one

By: Rasul Sha'ir

Rasul Sha'ir — Mon, 12 May 2008 16:20:43 +0000

I like vruz's comments. Its interesting though, that in the 'digital' age in which we have created a voice for the masses and have made it 'easier' to connect on numerous levels, we have actually convoluted the communication stratosphere making it that much harder for humane interaction and authentic engagement. We're all on so many levels hiding behind our computers with pseudonymns and aliases. Nonetheless I agree that a great way for creativity to flourish is through building your own brand and engaging people in authentic ways that encourage genuine conversations and sincere interactions. Keep redefining your own playing field, as gapingvoid has and as Hugh says 'rock on'!

By: Stephanie

Stephanie — Mon, 12 May 2008 14:48:52 +0000

It’s interesting, seeing your work in a larger format…I realized that what I like the about your cartoons is not just the uniqueness of the “scribbles” but also the density of the “scribbles” in a smaller format.
I like the “scribbles” crammed together.

By: ponor

ponor — Mon, 12 May 2008 12:46:40 +0000

Interesting to read what everyone is saying here on your blog — Interesting that you say your stats have gone down recently (twitter)
(@vruz… fine…only you should have used the personal pronoun “his”.. it’s “fake” to pretend otherwise.)

By: RKR

RKR — Mon, 12 May 2008 00:04:22 +0000

Sorry Hugh, that comment was from the hip and missed its target, toss out those remarks.
Keep the good work, and accept my apology.

By: rkr

rkr — Sun, 11 May 2008 23:59:55 +0000

hmmmm.…
The Gapingvoid Gallery presents:
f-in_e-art.com
…just a thought.

By: Craig Overend

Craig Overend — Sat, 10 May 2008 21:49:00 +0000

Them cells, they is multiplyin.

By: Paul

Paul — Sat, 10 May 2008 21:31:05 +0000

No offence to 42 but I like 43 better too

By: vruz

vruz — Sat, 10 May 2008 19:09:09 +0000

Fine art is way, way, way overrated anyway
The economics and life standards of our age don’t allow for an elite of patrons and starving artists. (as you have correctly pointed out in some of your articles)
Fine art in the 50s and 60s pop fashion stemming from mass production of the 50s also seem unfeasible in a democratised world of mass customisation.
How valuable becomes art when it can be faked, created semiautomatically or reproduced ad infinitum ?
How about faking and posing academicism ?
http://vruz.tumblr.com/post/31299089
I believe the only possible way to do authentic art nowadays is the way you’re doing it, Hugh.
Creating a personal brand, nurturing it, finding a unique voice –but not only that, as it becomes more important the artist’s ability to communicate with her audience.
There’s no more lone rangers, superheroes, robinhoods nor princesses in distress.
No more Tristans und Isoldes, no more Lohengrins and Elsas, no black swan descending from Parnassus to reach for the unilumminated.
The artist becoming aware of her own humanity, and their public seeing humanity through her eyes, making the experience unique, irreplaceable, unfakeable.
A world becoming more humane and authentic, it’s at least worth attempting.

By: ruurd

ruurd — Sat, 10 May 2008 18:33:21 +0000

cartist?