May 10, 2008

“fred 43″: work in progress– day one

P5100001A.JPG
[Click on image to enlarge etc.]
Like they say, when you fall off your horse, the first thing to do is get right back on it.
After Fred 42 died ear­lier today, I got right back to work. Behold “Fred 43″. Ink & pen­cil on paper. 23 x 30 inches. It’s been a busy mor­ning, to say the least.
I’m already liking this one. We’ll see where it goes…
By the way, to ans­wer a frequently-asked ques­tion. I con­si­der these large pie­ces “car­toons”, I do not con­si­der them “fine art”. I con­si­der myself a car­too­nist, not an “artist”.
So there!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

9 Responses to ““fred 43″: work in progress– day one”

  1. ruurd says:

    car­tist?

  2. vruz says:

    Fine art is way, way, way ove­rra­ted any­way :-)
    The eco­no­mics and life stan­dards of our age don’t allow for an elite of patrons and star­ving artists. (as you have correctly poin­ted out in some of your artic­les)
    Fine art in the 50s and 60s pop fashion stem­ming from mass pro­duc­tion of the 50s also seem unfea­si­ble in a democ­ra­ti­sed world of mass cus­to­mi­sa­tion.
    How valua­ble beco­mes art when it can be faked, crea­ted semiau­to­ma­ti­cally or repro­du­ced ad infi­ni­tum ?
    How about faking and posing aca­de­mi­cism ?
    http://vruz.tumblr.com/post/31299089
    I believe the only pos­si­ble way to do authen­tic art nowa­days is the way you’re doing it, Hugh.
    Crea­ting a per­so­nal brand, nur­tu­ring it, fin­ding a uni­que voice –but not only that, as it beco­mes more impor­tant the artist’s abi­lity to com­mu­ni­cate with her audience.
    There’s no more lone ran­gers, superhe­roes, robinhoods nor prin­ces­ses in dis­tress.
    No more Tris­tans und Isol­des, no more Lohen­grins and Elsas, no black swan des­cen­ding from Par­nas­sus to reach for the uni­lum­mi­na­ted.
    The artist beco­ming aware of her own huma­nity, and their public seeing huma­nity through her eyes, making the expe­rience uni­que, irre­pla­cea­ble, unfa­kea­ble.
    A world beco­ming more humane and authen­tic, it’s at least worth attempting.

  3. Paul says:

    No offence to 42 but I like 43 bet­ter too ;)

  4. Them cells, they is multiplyin.

  5. rkr says:

    hmmmm.…
    The Gaping­void Gallery pre­sents:
    f-in_e-art.com
    …just a thought. :)

  6. RKR says:

    Sorry Hugh, that com­ment was from the hip and mis­sed its tar­get, toss out those remarks.
    Keep the good work, and accept my apology.

  7. ponor says:

    Inte­res­ting to read what ever­yone is saying here on your blog — Inte­res­ting that you say your stats have gone down recently (twit­ter)
    (@vruz… fine…only you should have used the per­so­nal pro­noun “his”.. it’s “fake” to pre­tend otherwise.)

  8. Stephanie says:

    It’s inte­res­ting, seeing your work in a lar­ger format…I rea­li­zed that what I like the about your car­toons is not just the uni­que­ness of the “scrib­bles” but also the den­sity of the “scrib­bles” in a sma­ller for­mat.
    I like the “scrib­bles” cram­med together. :-)

  9. Rasul Sha'ir says:

    I like vruz’s com­ments. Its inte­res­ting though, that in the ‘digi­tal’ age in which we have crea­ted a voice for the mas­ses and have made it ‘easier’ to con­nect on nume­rous levels, we have actually con­vo­lu­ted the com­mu­ni­ca­tion stra­tosphere making it that much har­der for humane inte­rac­tion and authen­tic enga­ge­ment. We’re all on so many levels hiding behind our com­pu­ters with pseu­donymns and alia­ses. Nonethe­less I agree that a great way for crea­ti­vity to flou­rish is through buil­ding your own brand and enga­ging peo­ple in authen­tic ways that encou­rage genuine con­ver­sa­tions and sin­cere inte­rac­tions. Keep rede­fi­ning your own pla­ying field, as gaping­void has and as Hugh says ‘rock on’!