May 8, 2008

“the blue monster is the future of marketing”

BlueMonster350px.jpg
I haven’t tal­ked about The Blue Mons­ter for a while.
The Blue Mons­ter, as you will remem­ber, is a cartoon-based “Social Object” that me and my Mic­ro­soft buddy, Steve Clay­ton, unleashed on the good but unsus­pec­ting folk at Mic­ro­soft. For those unfa­mi­liar with it, you can find the backs­tory here on Goo­gle.
One of the rea­sons I haven’t tal­ked about it much lately, is simply because there is no lon­ger the need. To paraph­rase Steve, “It’s already out there, it’s already wor­king its magic. It has a life of its own and it no lon­ger needs us.“
Exactly. And as my friend, Tara Hunt so rightly poin­ted out, to push it too hard, espe­cially with Mic­ro­soft mana­ge­ment giving it a big thumbs-up, would somehow defeat the pur­pose. If ove­ru­sed, “Sub­ver­sion as a mar­ke­ting tool” can be coun­ter­pro­duc­tive, espe­cially if it comes from above.
In 2007, the con­ver­sa­tion was all about “THE” Blue Mons­ter. But in 2008, a new con­ver­sa­tion seems to be emer­ging: “A” Blue Mons­ter.
Let me explain:
I’ve been tal­king to some com­pa­nies recently, tal­king about doing some new busi­ness with them. Without any doubt, the ques­tion I get asked the most is, “Can you make a Blue Mons­ter for us?“
Obviously, when they’re tal­king about “A” Blue Mons­ter, they’re not tal­king about a wee blue car­toon cha­rac­ter with pointy horns, that hails from Red­mond, Washing­ton.
What they’re tal­king about, of course, is a “Social Object”, not neces­sa­rily a car­toon, desig­ned to create what I loo­sely desc­ribe as “Mar­ke­ting Dis­rup­tion”.
It’s not unlike when you’re tal­king about Seth Godin. When you say, “THE” Pur­ple Cow, you’re tal­king about his won­der­ful and semi­nal mar­ke­ting book from a few years ago. But when you talk about “A” Pur­ple Cow, you’re just tal­king a about a pro­duct, any pro­duct, which from a mar­ke­ting stand­point has been desig­ned so well, it does not need any tra­di­tio­nal mar­ke­ting per se. It’s so “remar­ka­ble” for what it is, peo­ple can’t help but talk about it. And so the word spreads, almost by magic. Seth actually gives a really good exam­ple of exactly that here.
So what’s the dif­fe­rence bet­ween a Pur­ple Cow and a Blue Mons­ter? Well, we could split hairs on that one fore­ver, but for me, the main dif­fe­rence is Pur­ple Cows have their “remar­ka­bi­lity” baked into the pro­duct. Blue Mons­ters are more about the “Social”, the inte­res­ting bit is the inte­rac­tions that hap­pen AROUND the pro­duct. That’s what gave our little wine com­pany the edge when mar­ke­ting Stormhoek. The VAST majo­rity of our con­ver­sa­tion was not about the wine in the bottle. The con­ver­sa­tion WAS ALL ABOUT the peo­ple drin­king it. As we were fond of saying, “Wine is the ulti­mate social object. It’s only inte­res­ting AFTER the cork is pulled.“
So in conc­lu­sion, yes, something has recently evol­ved in my thin­king. Though my rela­tionship with Mic­ro­soft remains as strong as ever, “Blue Mons­ter” now means something far big­ger to me than just car­toons, gaping­void, Mic­ro­soft, Red­mond etc. The Blue Mons­ter is all about the Social Object.
I have often said, I believe Social Objects are the future of mar­ke­ting.
Let me modify that slightly: I believe the Blue Mons­ter is the future of mar­ke­ting.
[UPDATE:] Steve Clay­ton sent me the follo­wing mes­sage on Twit­ter:
steveclatwit125.jpg
I replied back:
stevecla126.jpg
[Afterthought:] Unders­tan­ding the Blue Mons­ter means unders­tan­ding the need to be “big­ger than your­self”. Exactly.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

11 Responses to ““the blue monster is the future of marketing””

  1. Alex says:

    It’s the future of mar­ke­ting … and yet, isn’t this what mar­ke­ting should always have been about? Pro­fes­sio­nals somehow lost sight of the art of mar­ke­ting by focu­sing on the science mar­ke­ting. Great post.

  2. Jas Dhaliwal says:

    Hugh,
    Well said. The Blue Mons­ter has ins­pi­red many of us.
    More impor­tantly, it ser­ves a good entry point for dis­cus­sions. Dis­cus­sions occu­rring within small firms to the board rooms of the lar­gest cor­po­ra­tes.
    Social Objects unlock something power­ful. The power for peo­ple to com­mu­ni­cate again with them­sel­ves and their cus­to­mers. It is honest, pure and no bullshit.
    There’s a the­sis in here… and one day I may research it for a doc­to­rate…
    BTW, how’s the book coming along?
    Jas

  3. Darcy Moen says:

    Hugh, as longs as there has been trade, there has been the need of mar­ke­ting. Loo­king back at just the past 100 years, there have been many an author wri­ting about ‘new mar­ke­ting’ (such as Claude Hop­kins Scien­ti­fic Mar­ke­ting, David Ogilvy on Adver­ti­sing, etc, etc.) You men­tion Seth and Pur­ple Cow, and of course social objects currently per­so­ni­fied by the Blue Mons­ter.
    I totally agree with Alex, isn’t this what mar­ke­ting should have been all about? There are nume­rous pro­ces­ses and tech­ni­ques to close a sale, many of which result in fai­lure. Cus­to­mers have many rea­sons to buy. The time­less magic of com­merce hap­pens in a very narrow over­lap­ping area called ‘mar­ke­ting’.
    Hugh, you ins­pi­red my first ever blog rela­ted dra­wing. http://www.flickr.com/photos/26405521@N03/2477008012/

  4. pol says:

    Deep. Soooooooooooooooooo Deeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeep.

  5. You should colo­rize the Blue Mons­ter and take it to Goo­gle. :-)

  6. Paul says:

    >Robert,
    Goo­gle already has a Blue Mons­ter, it already is ‘colo­ri­zed’, it looks like this.
    Goo­gle™
    OH, you already knew that :-)

  7. Stop, wait, reverse that…(from Willie Wonka)
    What I like about the Blue Mons­ter is that it makes MSFT sma­ller than itself. The pro­blem with MSFT is that it is SO big it beco­mes face­less in many aspects. The Blue Mons­ter puts a face on the com­pany, and one that is cheer­ful and just a little sub­ver­sive. Like Den­nis the Menace. It shows that the com­pany is willing to be self effa­cing and even recog­nize it’s inner “demon”. It has a life of it’s own because MSFT let’s it and because they let it, reflects posi­ti­vely back on the com­pany. BRAVO Blue Monster!

  8. charlie says:

    Eh, so long as the Blue Mons­ter doesn’t turn into the Blue Sock. Crea­ting true social objects is very hard.
    alexdc and I have had nume­rous dis­cus­sion on it spar­ked by that Sin­gles Bra­ce­let thingy.
    And I also think that when you say “I believe the Blue Mons­ter is the future of mar­ke­ting.” you are really rei­te­ra­ting and con­den­sing what you’ve been saying and doing for a very long time. Good to see the con­cept hold.

  9. PCD says:

    You are waaaaaay over thin­king this… MSFT is fuc­ked, period.

  10. hugh macleod says:

    PCD, I doubt you have any serious know­ledge as to EXACTKY WHAT I’m thin­king. As for your ungra­cious thoughts on Mic­ro­soft, time will tell ;-)
    btw, Nor­mally I don’t publish anony­mous com­ments, but what the hell, I’m gues­sing you pro­bably work for a com­pe­ti­tor of theirs, and giving out your name would pro­bably not be a wise carer move. Rock on.

  11. Bobby says:

    I still don’t get blue monster?