April 10, 2008

why i deleted my twitter account

history76156222.jpg
[A car­toon from 2007 etc.]

It’s no big deal. I liked Twit­ter. But I found it too easy.
I think my time would be bet­ter spent dra­wing car­toons and wri­ting books.
That’s just how I feel.
[UPDATE:] This story seems to have made it onto the front page of Tech­meme. Lots of peo­ple tal­king about it. Wow.
[UPDATE:] An archive of my Tweets can be found here.
[UPDATE:] A cou­ple of hun­dred e-mails later, I res­to­red the Twit­ter account. You can read again it here.

152 Responses to “why i deleted my twitter account”

  1. Crawford says:

    Par­ting is such tweet sorrow.
    But loo­king for­ward to the enrich­ment of sim­pli­city!!!
    s

  2. Anonymous says:

    Stop­ping twit­ter bold and cou­ra­geous? Please take some time to leave Sili­con Valley and visit the world.

  3. Paula Hawk says:

    Now you can’t even come back to tell us of your father’s reco­very… They are right, you will be seriously mis­sed…
    Now to go follow @waynesutton to gloat a bit (I’m @hawksdomain) :)

  4. Bo says:

    What’s “Twit­ter”?

  5. Mariela says:

    It is a big deal, we (already) miss you on Twit­ter.
    Twit­ter is the only way for me to stay somehow close to peo­ple I have deep res­pect. Thank you for that oppor­tu­nity.
    Good luck with the book.

  6. Shelley says:

    Good for you, not so hot for us… but come back any­time you like, will you?

  7. Hugh,
    I am sorry to see you leave twit­ter. I think this is a huge mis­take. I think you lost a huge bran­ding oppor­tu­nity and effec­tive sho­wed your fans that you did not care. That might not have been the intent… but that is the per­cep­tion.
    I wish you well and remain a fan. More analy­sis here: http://facereviews.com/2008/04/10/gaping-void-drops-twitter-account-big-mistake/
    Cheers!
    Rod­ney Rumford

  8. Obli­ga­ted to post my own disap­point­ment with your absence. Amidst all the unin­te­res­ting and couldn’t-care-less twit­te­rings, I really loo­ked for­ward to the flashes of insights from one of my favo­rite blog­gers. I look for­ward to your return!

  9. Julian says:

    Wow. Your very own twit­ter right here on your blog. How iro­nic.
    And no 140 char limit!

  10. I agree with man­yof the com­ments here Hugh — I abso­lu­tely unders­tand why you have stop­ped, but at the same time think it is a shame — that said, if we see more car­toons out of you as a result then yay!
    Paul

  11. Good move. Twit­ter is a time and atten­tion sink unless you use it very, very care­fully. More focus, more quality.

  12. GeekMommy says:

    Well, con­grats and good luck Hugh.
    I’m not sure if it will prove a good move or not in the long run.
    I would never have found your bri­lliance if it weren’t for Twit­ter and my friends there who were friends and fans of yours…
    But we all must do what we think best.
    I won’t ever delete my Twit­ter account — even if I stop using it. Because for me it’s a record of my thoughts and expe­rien­ces and inte­rac­tions with those I have met and befrien­ded there.
    But hope­fully it will pro­vide you with less dis­trac­tion so that you may get your book com­ple­ted.
    Sen­ding good thoughts your way for your Dad’s reco­very. Twit­ter will be less without you there.
    But we’ll still be there if you decide to come back.
    LMP

  13. good thing
    free the muse from the clut­ter
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=fG_F20pB4Tk

  14. Johnson says:

    Thank you. Too many thought pro­vo­king peo­ple have disap­pea­red into Twit­ter and no lon­ger have anything mea­ning­ful to share, unless you want to follow, stay con­nec­ted to tweets or check their tweets­tream regu­larly – and even when you do that, their heart (or mind) is not totally there. Twit­ter has become an amu­sing pass time for me, but I have had to turn it off most of the time as it is really more of a dis­trac­tion than anything else.
    Plus, I’m really anno­yed that much of the great dis­course that has flou­rished in the last few years has been con­su­med by Twit­ter and redu­ced to 2-second half-thoughts that 90% of the time have no resoun­ding value (to me at least).
    I hope more follow you. Thanks.

  15. Vincent says:

    Nice move, man.

  16. Good to see that you’ve made a deci­sion that works for your life and not the stam­pede of the crowd. Best of luck.

  17. alan p says:

    Who needs Twit­ter — Pup­pets are the future :) . Go well.…

  18. jswa says:

    Well, I’m glad I never sig­ned up in the first place, I had a gut fee­ling such cons­tant form of ‘life upda­tes’ small chat was going to be dis­trac­ting. I’m more of a let­ter guy myself, gives you time to con­tem­plate before you ‘post’.

  19. Mike Wagner says:

    Hugh stops using “ham­mer”, world won­ders “why?”.
    Your car­toon caught it all so well.
    Why do caught up caring so much about one com­mu­ni­ca­tion tool over another?
    Keep creating…a story worth repea­ting,
    Mike

  20. KB says:

    good move. maybe spend more time tal­king to peo­ple face-to-face

  21. Good luck, dude. You’re still VERY high on my top 10 list of Inter­net peo­ple I want to meet in per­son. I can unders­tand how twit­ter can take away from your other enga­ge­ments, but your tweets were something I follo­wed clo­sely.
    Can’t wait to read your book, and I can only hope one day I’m lucky enough to score a busi­ness card with a dra­wing of yours on it.

  22. Matt says:

    For those of us that don’t use Twit­ter this is like seeing a news story about a long-running tv show get­ting can­ce­led and rea­li­zing that we’ve never seen a sin­gle epi­sode. I’m overwhel­med with not caring.
    But if it means you’ll be wri­ting more in mediums I might actually access then I’m all for it.

  23. Shannon says:

    A disap­poin­ting day for sure, I will miss your tweets. Do what’s right for you!
    But I echo the others… you should really keep the name gaping­void on twit­ter or some doosh will pick it up..

  24. Prokofy says:

    Can I have your stuff?

  25. GeekTieGuy says:

    If you twit­ter about a tree falling down and no one “follows” you, does it shake the ground?
    So much energy spent on making a few bits in a data­base line up in a cer­tain way.
    Good thing you’re coming to your senses.

  26. sam says:

    Have to say, I tried Twit­ter because you see­med so keen on it, but I could never get it. To be honest, it mat­ters less to me the details of what’s going on in Alpine Texas or whe­re­ver you are every ins­tant of the day. Those sorts of details were (to me alone maybe) a fairly boring period for gaping void. The brand, not the blog. Neat expe­ri­ment but I found myself rea­ding “great cof­feshop in alpine has wifi, etc. rock on.” and won­de­ring why I was still rea­ding. And then I stop­ped rea­ding gaping void on twit­ter and felt much bet­ter.
    Glad to hear it, per­so­nally. Rock on. Etc.

  27. Bp says:

    You was bored of doing “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twitter” ?

  28. ickledot says:

    I don’t know you, have never met you, in all like­lihood pro­bably never will. Up until a few weeks ago I’d never even heard of you.
    And yet, I was worried. I’d got­ten used to your regu­lar twit­ters and their var­ying sha­des of tri­via and gra­vity. I began to worry that something awful had hap­pe­ned to your dad whose treat­ment you had been desc­ri­bing.
    I’m plea­sed there were no cri­ses but I can’t unders­tand why you have gone from being such a pro­li­fic twit­te­rer to zero. Are you an all or nothing kind of per­son?
    Please return soon with perhaps a twit­ter in the mor­ning and another before bed.

  29. 10:45 – Cof­fee
    10:57 – Toi­let
    11:02 – Dump finished
    11:05 – Twit­ter my most insig­ni­fi­cant day
    I tried it. Still have an account but have yet to figure out if it gives me anything at all. Do I really need to know that someone is wai­ting for a train…or going to a bar…or whatever?

  30. Dear Hugh — I am not sur­pri­sed –the world hap­pens when we are busy mic­ro­blog­ging.. I feel the same.
    Hope to see you soon =)
    Henry

  31. Jeff says:

    I remem­ber your Dec. 2 post when you took a stand on blog­ging. And now books. Good luck in West Texas. No Country for Old Men — and Tweets.

  32. Tomas says:

    Twit­ter is not the life­line some com­men­ters make it out to be. It can be use­ful sure, but be real, it’s pretty mea­nin­gless as a com­mu­ni­ca­tion medium.
    Some peo­ple just need find mea­ning in their own life ins­tead of clin­ging to others to feel important.

  33. I follo­wed you on twit­ter for a few days, then stop­ped — very high “sig­nal to noise” ratio. In fact, most of the high pro­file blog­gers I read I stop­ped follo­wing on twit­ter for the same rea­son.
    I use twit­ter, but may only check it once or twice a day, and I feel no need to “catch up” on tweets I’ve mis­sed. I still have good things come of my twit­ter con­nec­tions, so I’ll be on the ser­vice for some time to come. Like most things, twit­ter is bet­ter in moderation.

  34. matt says:

    I just sig­ned up to twit­ter last week, I added you and was floo­ded with an overwhel­ming amount of twitter…I was about to unsubsc­ribe from your feed, nothing per­so­nal, just too much tweet.
    for my todo queue: socio­lo­gi­cal study of the rights & res­pon­si­bi­li­ties surroun­ding Twitter.…

  35. hugh macleod says:

    I hear what you’re saying, Matt. Then again, I had close to 5,000 follo­wers by the time I left Twit­ter, so I must have been doing something right ;-)

  36. I switched off for close on 27 months: 2003 – 5. I know what that was about for me. CYA later.

  37. Suebob says:

    You can quit me, but I just can’t quit you!

  38. Clive Birnie says:

    Jeez. com­ment 140!
    I bet you 8 pints of Guin­ness (or alter­na­tive of your choice) in a bar of your choice in either Lon­don or Dublin that you have star­ted a trend and many (lets call it more than 5%) of your Twit­ter follo­wers, ahem, follow you…

  39. Hugh, just don’t stop dra­wing the flip­pin’ car­toons. You gotta do what works for you. I’ll miss the tweets both from you and the ones you for­war­ded as well.
    Best of luck with the book.
    Cheers,
    Tim

  40. red_fox says:

    noooooo… why?

  41. Kyle MacRae says:

    So. Fare­well then @gapingvoid
    Your Twit­ter feed many enjo­yed
    But now you’ve left to write a book
    Typi­cal fuc­king blogger

  42. dc crowley says:

    Your move shoc­ked me. But it gave me the push I nee­ded to step back. I’m not stop­ping, just reap­prai­sing what I do (blog­ging) and how I blog. Twit­ter is ok for me per­so­nally. I switch it on when I can and what I miss is OK.
    Any­way this is about you. Good move. I could see something was coming via Durham and Alpine. Hope it does you lots of good. Cheers and thanks for your con­ver­sa­tion and car­toons. Really enjoy them.

  43. Sassy says:

    I have a Twit­ter account — but rarely sign into it, why? I just never remem­ber to (unless one of my follo­wers asks me where I’ve been) plus, does anyone really care that I’ve just had a glass of water or that I’m cra­ving cho­co­late or if I’m wri­ting? See? Ya I’m totally exci­ting. Good luck with your book. And I love that cartoon.

  44. Thib H. says:

    I also dele­ted my twit­ter account some months ago. I found it really inte­res­ting to see that after a while, Twit­ter is mostly a tool most of us use for dis­trac­tion. Ins­tead of con­cen­tra­ting on what we’re doing, we’re tal­king about tal­king about wha­te­ver it is we’re doing. And often times it’s not neces­sary or even inte­res­ting to tweet so much.
    I had an “ex” who insul­ted me for bur­ying myself in a gui­de­book to a place we were in. I wasn’t really bur­ying myself in it. I was using it to orient myself to the place. The ex twit­te­red a lot. And come to think of it, I won­der why his cri­ti­cism of me “bur­ying” myself in a gui­de­book didn’t apply to him­self bur­ying him­self in the ephe­me­ral inter­net as oppo­sed to wha­te­ver expe­rience he was going through at that moment. Ins­tead the twee­ted about it, thus a step further remo­ved from the expe­rience itself.

  45. Thi says:

    I totally agree with Sassy who wrote: “…plus, does anyone really care that I’ve just had a glass of water or that I’m cra­ving cho­co­late or if I’m wri­ting?”
    My sen­ti­ments pre­ci­sely. Many tweets are about these kinds of unin­te­res­ting ran­dom thought bub­bles. I find it inte­res­ting that how in rea­ding a person’s tweets they may seem very open and com­mu­ni­ca­tive but in per­son they are actually rather hesi­tant and sec­re­tive. Not always true for ever­yone, of course.

  46. rsomers says:

    I’ll miss your tweets but will con­ti­nue to follow via the blog and elsewhere. Twitter’s just a medium for ideas, that’s all. If an artist choo­ses to for­sake water­co­lor and focus on oils, so be it…they haven’t ‘betra­yed’ water­co­lor.
    I’m amu­sed by a cou­ple of long com­ments that ques­tion your deci­sion. If they think your deci­sion was a mis­take, shouldn’t they be requi­red to say so in I’ll miss your tweets but will con­ti­nue to follow via the blog and elsewhere. Twitter’s just a medium for ideas, that’s all. If an artist choo­ses to for­sake water­co­lor and focus on oils, so be it…they haven’t ‘betra­yed’ water­co­lor.
    I’m amu­sed by a cou­ple of long com­ments that ques­tion your deci­sion. If they think your deci­sion was a mis­take, shouldn’t they be requi­red to say so in <140 characters?

  47. Brooks Moses says:

    Hugh, I think there’s should be a “2008” update to that car­toon: “Ah, Texas.…”
    ‘Cause what I see there is not just the “twit­ter! twit­ter! twit­ter!”, but the fact that all three panels are pac­ked enti­rely full of things with exc­la­ma­tion points, in exactly the way that your blog this year isn’t.