April 10, 2008

why i deleted my twitter account

history76156222.jpg
[A car­toon from 2007 etc.]

It’s no big deal. I liked Twit­ter. But I found it too easy.
I think my time would be bet­ter spent dra­wing car­toons and wri­ting books.
That’s just how I feel.
[UPDATE:] This story seems to have made it onto the front page of Tech­meme. Lots of peo­ple tal­king about it. Wow.
[UPDATE:] An archive of my Tweets can be found here.
[UPDATE:] A cou­ple of hun­dred e-mails later, I res­to­red the Twit­ter account. You can read again it here.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

153 Responses to “why i deleted my twitter account”

  1. Pamela Slim says:

    Wow. I don’t know why I am sur­pri­sed, but I am.
    What a deci­sive move. In sup­port of your emer­ging book.
    Good for you.

  2. Ric says:

    Appa­rently get­ting rid of a Face­book account is not all that sim­ple … when they say it’s dele­ted you may find that all your entries, news feed items etc. still exist .…

  3. Shai Coggins says:

    Mis­sed your announ­ce­ment on this on Twit­ter. So, it’s a bit of a sur­prise. I even still remem­ber your Tweet saying Twit­ter has become impor­tant to you because of the # of follo­wers you had, etc. But, I can unders­tand where you’re coming from to some degree.
    In any case, you’ll be mis­sed on Twit­ter. But, I’m sure we’ll con­ti­nue to hear from you.
    Good luck with the new direc­tion of your writing/blogging/social web/drawing life.

  4. mdy says:

    Wouldn’t you want to keep your Twit­ter account if only to keep someone else from clai­ming that name? Even if you don’t update it ever again?

  5. Gregg Scott says:

    Now I can rest assu­red that my Timeline-gobbling rant of 10 days ago isn’t the rea­son you’ve clo­sed shop. It was only rea­son you stop­ped Follo­wing me.
    This is a bold and cou­ra­geous move as Twit­ter is beco­ming a vor­tex — perhaps a vital one — in which I find it hard to manage or even attend to real life.
    An artist’s aura of empathy is a pre­cious field which can so easily be corrup­ted by dis­trac­tion; even good dis­trac­tion.
    I look for­ward the 2008 panel on the His­tory of Your Blog.
    I thank you for your thought­ful dis­course in the Twit­ter Time­line on the legacy of W. and the rami­fi­ca­tions of the 49th Para­llel.
    Say what you will of Twit­ter but it is quite unli­kely that I would have had the oppor­tu­nity to con­verse with the likes of Steve Gill­mor, Laura Fit­ton and your­self.
    Now, I’m going to text @mydishes and tell them to wash them­sel­ves so I can check my current replies.
    Gregg

  6. Seth E says:

    So is everything you ever wrote on there just…gone? Is it all really that worth­less? I ask that not just of your account, but in the grea­ter sense. Would you ever, say, do the same thing to your blog? Just hit ‘delete’ and flush it all away. Is everything we’re doing here com­ple­tely disposable?

  7. Joe Andrieu says:

    Doh!
    A said day, Hugh. I enjo­yed your ran­dom upda­tes from Alpine.
    We’ll miss you.

  8. Geoff says:

    I won­der when gapingvoid.com will become a gaping void?

  9. Mickipedia says:

    I will miss you.

  10. Tantek says:

    Hugh,
    Your twit­ters will be mis­sed, past and pre­sent. Did you con­si­der simply let­ting your Twit­ter account stay fro­zen in time for the inde­ter­mi­nate future? I know I (and seve­ral folks I know) will miss nume­rous gems of yours that we had favo­ri­ted. Perhaps you could con­si­der doing so — I think the Twit­ter folks have the abi­lity to pull old accounts out of cold sto­rage or something.
    Thanks for all the art you create in all forms.
    A fan,
    Tantek

  11. hunee says:

    I will miss your tweets…but whe­re­ver you are happy ..follow your heart… :)

  12. Cindy says:

    I’ve always heard toxi­city is a func­tion of dose. And then there’s something about mode­ra­tion that peo­ple harp about. So I s’pose if one could Twit­ter just enough but not too much, that would be nice. You’re right, though, about it being just too easy.

  13. Good move.
    I con­gra­tu­late your deci­sion. FOCUS is a key skill to create the best of wha­te­ver it is you are into.
    D

  14. Dave O'Flynn says:

    It wasn’t because you couldn’t tweet about anything other than Alpine, Texas then? ;-)
    But yeah, tools like Twit­ter, Face­book, et al encou­rage a fas­ci­na­tion with the minu­tae of life. Makes it much har­der to con­cen­trate on the things that require unin­te­rrup­ted though.
    Good luck with the book!

  15. Jeff Tidwell says:

    dra­wing is good!

  16. Chris Heuer says:

    It’s become a 24/7 con­ver­sa­tion like a sta­dium chat room ins­tead of a mic­ro­blog­ging plat­form now — I enjoy being con­nec­ted to ever­yone, but I unders­tand why you want that hour or two back each day. Very bold move, kick ass on the book and dont look back…

  17. dydimustk says:

    You will be mis­sed.
    Your con­vic­tion and deter­mi­na­tion is inspiring.

  18. Wow, does your car­toon ever reso­nate for me. Although for me, the mid­point bet­ween when I star­ted blog­ging and now — when I was first get­ting seriously derai­led — revol­ved more around poli­tics than tech, a pat­tern which has more or less con­ti­nued. (Case in point: 80% of all my recent blog posts are twit­ter digests; another 15% or so are either expli­citly poli­ti­cal or expli­citly tech-related. Which lea­ves — if one is asses­sing things gene­rously — maybe 5% of con­tent that is in line with my ori­gi­nal blog­ging intent; that is, it favors lite­rary narra­tive over pole­mics.)
    Fin­ding balance is a pre­ca­rious and dif­fi­cult feat. (Or we make it so, through all our collec­tive and indi­vi­dual dis­trac­tions.)
    In any event, I quite res­pect your choice here, and hope it bears fruit for you in terms of impro­ved focus and atten­tion to mat­ters of craft, the stuff you live for, the stuff you love.
    And which, of course, you’re inc­re­dibly good at.

  19. Rachel says:

    Oh. A sur­prise. It was only a few weeks ago you were saying it was the only way you were going to com­mu­ni­cate, you were not using email. So the blog is what it left.
    But I’m with the others — why delete? Why not just moth­ball and leave the infor­ma­tion up there? You’ll be missed.

  20. John T Unger says:

    Wow, Hugh, I guess you *were* serious.
    Didn’t think you’d delete the account though, figu­red you were gonna just stop pos­ting to it. Or that you were kid­ding.
    I feel like you dele­ted part of my email inbox. Part of it that I was saving because I liked it. I don’t go for that inbox zero stuff… I save the things I like.
    I’m bum­med about losing the abi­lity to chat with you on twit­ter, but really kind of even more bum­med about losing one half of tweet replies and DMs bet­ween us. I’d have copied those if I knew this was what you had in mind. Bum­med that all the tweets of your I had in my favo­ri­tes are also gone. I guess I should have bac­ked shit up, eh?
    I can totally see why you’d rather work than tweet, and can even unders­tand having to take a nuc­lear option to avoid “acci­den­tally” get­ting back into it. But I wish you’d left the fric­kin’ pages up and just loc­ked your­self out of the account with a pass­word you couldn’t remem­ber or something.
    And yeah, I know they were your words and you have the right to do wha­te­ver you want with them, etc. Just wish you hadn’t.
    Dras­tic mea­su­res, man. You know what? Fuck. That’s really all I have to say about it. I’m fuc­king pis­sed off. Just wan­ted to get that off my chest.

  21. jflowers says:

    Seems like 2007 should really have read, “SOCIAL OBJECTS! SOCIAL GESTURES! SOCIAL MARKERS! (twit­ter!)” You really didn’t say much about Twit­ter until the very end of the year (and the begin­ning of this one), and for those of us who never read your tweets, it was only a very few men­tions.
    I honestly never unders­tood your fas­ci­na­tion with it in the first place. It dis­plays too little infor­ma­tion in too imper­so­nal a con­text for it to really mat­ter to anyone (even less so than Face­book, in my opi­nion). Sure, you can title them “@whomever”, but it’s very much a public con­ver­sa­tion, and you still can’t say all that much for it to mean much of anything to anyone. Kind of goes against a lot of what you say about social objects and making real con­nec­tions and what­not. Not to say that Twit­ter doesn’t have its uses, but as the main #1 per­so­nal con­tact of a per­son, or for doing any kind of busi­ness with an even slightly arti­cu­late message…it is just not the right tool for the job.
    Glad you finally saw your own light ;)

  22. Baher says:

    After your exci­te­ment and evan­ge­lism of twit­ter, this comes as a total shock to me.
    And this “too easy” rea­son is not a mea­ning­ful expla­na­tion, is it?

  23. Mike says:

    I guess I knew it had to end even­tually. You were follo­wing, and being follo­wed by, too many peo­ple for it to be sus­tai­na­ble for long.
    Limits are a good thing. Twit­ter is wor­king so well (for now) because it pla­ced a limit on what you could do (send upda­tes) and impo­sed a cha­llen­ging limit on length (140 cha­rac­ters). These limits make you boil down your thoughts until only their most valua­ble core remains.
    Unfor­tu­na­tely, like all the other social net­works out there right now, Twit­ter has not pla­ced a limit on con­nec­tions with other users. And because there is no limit, these con­nec­tions have less value than they could, with peo­ple trying to scoop up friends by the thou­sands.
    Maybe in the future someone will deve­lop a mecha­nism that makes peo­ple sit down and spend a cou­ple of minu­tes figu­ring out which con­nec­tions are the really valua­ble ones to have. Until then, we pro­bably need to try and place that limit on our­sel­ves. Con­si­der it an inter­per­so­nal diet.
    Per­so­nally, I’ve found that follo­wing 30 peo­ple has been wor­king well, so maybe I will try and stick with that. I guess after tonight I am left with one spot to fill, and boy it sure does it come with some big shoes.

  24. John Wesley says:

    If it means more car­toons and wri­ting I’m all for it.

  25. Can’t help fee­ling that if you’d follo­wed the ten com­mand­ments (http://www.twitter.com/tencommandments) you might’ve got­ten a more enjo­ya­ble and sus­tai­na­ble expe­rience out of twitter…

  26. Tim Draayer says:

    Hugh,
    Its admit­tedly been to long since I’ve spent some time here but I was follo­wing you on twit­ter.
    I enjo­yed your upda­tes but I admire your deci­sion to com­mit to the tasks at hand which don’t delude your efforts.
    All the best.
    Tim

  27. Peter Cooper says:

    I think I see a good point in this somewhere, but what intri­gues me is how Jaiku is less easy…? :)

  28. Neil Simmons says:

    Sad to hear that, Hugh — but you gotta do what you feel is right for you!
    Good luck with the book.
    Regards
    Neil (dungeekin)

  29. Tom Raftery says:

    Wow Hugh,
    On the one hand I am shoc­ked at such a big move and on the other hand I can unders­tand it per­fectly.
    I have said many times that my blog out­put has dimi­nished dras­ti­cally since I star­ted using Twit­ter. It is an inc­re­di­ble time sink.
    Having said that, I get enor­mous value from Twit­ter so I would find it very dif­fi­cult to drop it.

  30. Fair play to you for kno­wing where to spend time for best effect. I like your dra­wings more than I liked your tweets because your drawn cha­rac­ters on cards stick with me lon­ger than your typed cha­rac­ters on screen.

  31. Cara says:

    Tal­king to a friend the other day about
    “How to be crea­tive“
    He won­de­red why you recom­men­ded to “stay away from crowds ” .
    You overheard that, didn’t you?

  32. Aw, I’m so sad! How is your pre­dic­tion sup­po­sed to come a rea­lity without you there!?
    http://www.gapingvoid.com/Moveable_Type/archives/004000.html

  33. what hap­pe­ned to ‘if you’re not on twit­ter i dont want to talk to you’ ? weird, any­way, loo­king for­ward to more cartoons.

  34. Locutus of Borg says:

    Hugh on February 29th:
    “Note to World: If you’re not on Twit­ter, I don’t want to make friends with you.“
    Funny how things turn out ;)

  35. Christian says:

    I thought I read somewhere that you had a finan­cial twit­ter??
    Oh well, I agree with Dun­can Fischer, Focus is a good thing!

  36. Dileepa says:

    What an apt car­toon. Ins­tead of using tech­no­logy to talk about other things, all peo­ple seem to talk about is tech­no­logy itself. Crazy, crazy world.

  37. Seems kind of harsh…

  38. jill says:

    Thank god for that. Now you just need to con­vince Sco­ble.
    I per­so­nally enjoy your con­si­de­red and sty­lish posts to be uncon­fi­ned by the twit­ter 140 cha­rac­ters. Hope­fully you will return to blog pos­ting a little more fre­quently, even if it is ‘just’ the car­toons.
    I enjo­yed tex­ting my friends but when I stop­ped we had even more to talk about over a glass of wine. I am now online only three days a week, it feels like breathing again.

  39. Mike Doeff says:

    I hope that Twit­ter reser­ves the gaping­void user id — sort of like a sports team reti­ring a player’s num­ber — for you in case you decide to return someday.

  40. Texas ranger says:

    why is this a loss? Spent way to much twit­ter time tal­king about the Texas move. We get it, you moved to a small TX town. zzzZzzzz

  41. Alvin says:

    I will defi­ni­tely miss your tweets. Bum­mer too, because 3 days ago I was exci­ted when I got the Hugh Mac­Leod is now follo­wing you e-mail.
    Happy dra­wing and writing.

  42. Rob Clark says:

    I’ll miss having you as part of my daily twit­ter stream, Hugh, but defi­ni­tely unders­tand the deci­sion.
    It gets far too easy to just enjoy the con­tent of others and not create your own … and the 140 chars is often enough to satiate that need to express one’s self, but not nearly enough to make an impact.
    I look for­ward to seeing the inc­rea­sed out­put of car­toons though.

  43. christoff says:

    I did enjoy rea­ding the tweets about your various misad­ven­tu­res. I think you should come back, but limit your­self to 5 tweets a day.

  44. Beppone says:

    Good choice… i need your car­toons :)

  45. fred wilson says:

    i agree with most of the com­ments on this thread.
    mostly that you will be mis­sed.
    but like many forms of social media, twit­ter can be addic­ting and if it was get­ting in the way of impor­tant work, then you made the right call
    i hope you will still keep blog­ging and i hope all of your friends on twit­ter will keep lin­king to your blog and your dra­wings
    fred

  46. Average Jane says:

    We’ll miss you on Twit­ter, but I agree that it can be a time suck.
    Loo­king for­ward to the book!

  47. liza says:

    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!
    snif
    snif
    WAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAH!

  48. Alex says:

    You will be mis­sed! I enjo­yed get­ting your upda­tes from your tra­vels and from Alpine, but I sup­pose you’re loo­king for more crea­tive and thought­ful media than 140-character tweets (and 2005 was a good year for blogging).

  49. Roland Hesz says:

    Well, your tweets will be mis­sed.
    Any­way, good luck with your book and your other plans.
    And it was a plea­sure to read you there while it las­ted. :)

  50. Jon Shuler says:

    One less Pillar right?

  51. T-Lex says:

    I have been fee­ling the exact same way about this whole twit­ter phe­no­me­non.
    I feel like follo­wing suit, haha.

  52. umbluteleleu says:

    bored already?

  53. George Nimeh says:

    Thank god Hugh!
    Huge waste of time. It is f*ckign navel-gazing at its finest and a totally unc­rea­tive acti­vity. Get on with your lives peo­ple. We are much more than a collec­tion of sound bites.
    And as for Twitter’s busi­ness model, in “Tell me the future” (The Guar­dian, Mon­day Decem­ber 3 2007), Biz Stone clai­med (and pre­dic­ted) that Twit­ter has emer­ged to create a seam­less layer of social con­nec­ti­vity across SMS, IM, and the web. Twit­ter asks one ques­tion: “What are you doing?“
    That same day, I pre­dic­ted that “at some point in the next five years, inves­tors will ask Biz Stone one ques­tion: “What are you doing?“
    If they don’t get bought by Goo­gle, they’re doo­med.
    http://www.i-boy.com/weblog/2007/12/copredictions.html
    ~G~

  54. Kevin Briody says:

    Good for you Hugh. I’ll miss your tweets on everything (inc­lu­ding the #alpi­ne­te­xas posts, which were fas­ci­na­ting), but that will just make me pay more atten­tion to your blog again. Focus is good. :)

  55. BryanA. says:

    It’s too true. The Inter­net at large can make us for­get who we are and what really plea­ses us. Go For It!

  56. BarbaraKB says:

    I have to admit, I have con­si­de­red the same. On cer­tain days, Twit­ter can be quite a dis­trac­tion from the real work I need to do…
    Con­grats on your bold move, Hugh.
    Here’s to more car­toons and a finished book from you.
    Peace.

  57. /pd says:

    Bollocks — you cant leave just like that !! What will we do w/out you in twit­ter­vi­lle ? :) -
    Hmmmm is this twit­ter fati­gue or impact of con­ti­nuous par­tial atten­tion ? Maybe your the early adop­ter — sig­na­ling something that is unde­fi­ned.. somthing like remem­ber blog­gers who have stop­ped blogin!!

  58. Frank Martin says:

    That has not been my expe­rience — I’ve been MORE pro­duc­tive, AND more inte­lli­gent about the pro­duc­tion AND my pro­duc­tion has been more inte­lli­gent.
    You added much to our com­mu­nity. We’ll miss you.

  59. Rex Hammock says:

    As everything you send out via RSS finds me, as long as you’re on the grid and crea­ting, I hope to hear the ping. Can’t wait for you book. All the best.

  60. paul says:

    You’ll be back.….

  61. @mdy
    > Wouldn’t you want to keep your Twit­ter account
    > if only to keep someone else from clai­ming that
    > name? Even if you don’t update it ever again?
    You can’t regis­ter an account with a name that’s been dele­ted. They clearly warn you about that on the delete page — if you want to re-register it later on your stuf­fed.
    (I regis­te­red, twee­ted once, then dele­ted my account a while ago. It’s not for me either.)

  62. alexdesignz says:

    You could have stop­ped Twit­te­ring except for impor­tant mes­sa­ges. I would have never seen you work if it wasen’t for Twitter.

  63. Rob Safuto says:

    Con­gra­tu­la­tions. I think many peo­ple, inc­lu­ding myself, tend to get caught up in all these tools. Where is the focus going? It’s going away and that’s not a good thing. Less con­tent. Higher qua­lity. Sounds a bit like Jerry Maguire. Good stuff.

  64. Joe Latone says:

    I apo­lo­gize for insul­ting you by saying I was going to unfo­llow you. Ah, well, if this means you’re rever­ting back to 2005, all the better. (:

  65. Inte­res­ting move, Hugh.
    It makes a lot of sense for you, business-wise, to inc­rease focus like men­tio­ned above.
    Although, on a lar­ger scale, this is an embo­di­ment of your very telling car­toon. Most mar­kets are built on exe­cu­tion, com­mu­ni­ca­tion and the mar­ke­ting of ideas (in wha­te­ver form they take). There has been a large up-swing in com­mu­ni­ca­ting our ideas to the point of dilu­tion. Peo­ple are star­ting to rea­lize that we’ve got the chan­nels in place and now it’s time to focus back on what we’re actually trying to say.
    Circ­les, hills & valleys, et al.

  66. Man, and I JUST found you like 2 weeks ago.

  67. Jason Adams says:

    Ahhh.. Tone above the hum — good move. Time to get back to 2005 (maybe 2004?), just don’t pull an Into the Wild move on us. Your work con­ti­nues to guide me and those I share it with. Loo­king for­ward to the book.

  68. Lauri says:

    Well, Jaiku is bet­ter than Twit­ter any­way. ;D

  69. Joe says:

    You shouldn’t del the account, tho, Hugh. Someone might pick it up and use the id to do a fake Hugh. Ins­tead, unfo­llow ever­yone then block your account, in effect making it an orphan id.

  70. If Twit­ter was kee­ping you from doing something impor­tant, than more power to you Change the world :) Then you need to call into the Gill­mor Gang from time to time so we can catch up on you. You are still impor­tant to us.

  71. Nathan Clark says:

    It’s a good move if your alter­na­tive is wri­ting and dra­wing. If it was watching tv or sur­fing the web, it’d be a regression.

  72. You’re a bet­ter man than me. I’ve been deba­ting doing the same thing, but I haven’t been able to bring myself to cut that par­ti­cu­lar cord.

  73. Kerri. says:

    Con­grats on remo­ving your­self from the Abyss that is Twitter.

  74. logtar says:

    I just paced myself… but this is truly a war­ning… that is why I don’t push that feed anywhere.

  75. Thomas says:

    I star­ted my time clock on how long this would take as soon as Hugh left face­book after being such a big pro­mo­ter for a while, I can’t say I am sur­pri­sed in the least. I do agree you ought to keep the account as a pla­cehol­der as someone else mentioned.

  76. Aruni says:

    Wow, that is a bold move. I’ve met some great peo­ple on twit­ter. It does take time, but so far it’s been fun.
    Was it something that hap­pe­ned at SXSW that trig­ge­red all of this?
    Sounds like you are an all or nothing kind of guy…

  77. Remiss63 says:

    Con­gra­tu­la­tions on taking some impor­tant steps to focus your energy Hugh. I’ll miss your Tweets for sure, but unders­tand com­ple­tely how something like Twit­ter can begin to con­sume your time, energy, and life giving short shrift to those things that are truly of grea­test impor­tance.
    Perhaps we’ll find a way to balance the mul­ti­pli­city of com­mu­ni­ca­tion methods one of these days. Perhaps a gad­get … or a mashup … or ?

  78. Alias says:

    Twit­ters is for twits. Enough said.

  79. joaquin says:

    Hmmm…feels like the last time I was dum­ped. Twit­ter loses a lot of value for me (“it’s who u follow, not who follows you”, remem­ber?)
    Everything’s been said, so if this ALIGNS your daily actions with long term focus, great. There’s stuff to think about in all you say, this deci­sion isn’t any dif­fe­rent..
    Thanks for all the insight on your tweets.

  80. Susan Beebe says:

    Hugh,
    Sorry to see you go from twit­ter! I loved rea­ding your tweets. Inte­res­ting move towards achie­ving maxi­mum sig­nal to noise ratio… can’t say i blame ya! Best of luck to you as you launch for­ward in your “new chap­ter” in life — pun fully inten­ded!
    So, now i’ve gotta check out your blog more to keep up with you… :-)
    Susan
    @smbeebe on twitter

  81. Thejesh GN says:

    All the very best

  82. Reginald says:

    Why do you con­si­der your can­ce­lla­tion “no big deal”; con­si­de­ring all the hype about twitter?

  83. Peter Gold says:

    I’ve only just joi­ned.
    1. I unders­tand why you’ve left.
    2. Do I see the future before me?
    3. Should I act now before it’s too late!

  84. steve says:

    Wel­come to the Twit­ter free!

  85. Owen Cutajar says:

    You’ll be back .. I know you’ll be back …

  86. Ken Wallich says:

    I found the “Chee­rio”, follo­wed by the imme­diate disap­pea­rance of the account to be a great sta­te­ment, very thea­tri­cal. I miss the archive and favo­ri­tes, but think I liked the sta­te­ment even more!

  87. chaosgone says:

    I’m still in the you­tube! you­tube! you­tube! phase. I should write more.

  88. Jyri says:

    I’m with John Wes­ley. If it means more wri­ting and car­toons, awesome

  89. I’ll miss your com­men­tary on life throughout the day, but at least the blog is here to stay.
    And the car­toons. And we have a book to look for­ward to (where’s the pre-order form!)
    you’re not down­si­zing… but ratio­na­li­sing!
    Enjoy Alpine ;) Have a Shi­ner Bock for me (one of many little things I learnt from your tweets and now my life is better!)

  90. And I was just get­ting to know you. Guess I got twit­te­ri­zed to late.
    Now the ques­tion will be, is there life after twit­ter?
    Good luck on the other side. Look for­ward to the book.

  91. D.J. Coffman says:

    I’ll miss it! But at least we have your thoughts here.
    Every­body buy Hugh’s book when it comes out!

  92. Bold move, but unders­tan­da­ble if your prio­ri­ties are the blog and the book. I wish you the best with both.
    A recu­rring meme I keep hea­ring and rea­ding is when to inter­na­lize and when to twee­tsource for ins­pi­ra­tion. Funny how these memes come in waves.

  93. Wayne Sutton says:

    I truly unders­tand how you feel. I took 2 1/2 days off twit­ter after the UNC lost and I was more pro­duc­tive and focu­sed. Twit­ter does require a lot of time. It’s almost like inter­net phone tal­king, when you’re on the phone you can’t do as much as when you’re off it. I’m going to stay on twit­ter for a while but going to try to focus on pro­jects more.
    I’m @waynesutton on twit­ter and I’m not dele­ting my twit­ter account.

  94. Noel Jackson says:

    Doing what *actually* mat­ters is a smart thing.
    Twit­ter is a vast dis­trac­tion that pro­bably out­weighs it’s benefits.

  95. Hugh:
    I enjo­yed follo­wing you on twit­ter, and wish you all the best in gai­ning back your focus.
    Cheers,
    Connie

  96. Good for you. I only use Twit­ter from my iPhone and mainly to stay in touch with friends and family. I never suc­cum­bed to the huge trap and/or time-sink it can become, if you try to actually read the stuff of all the peo­ple you are follo­wing… :)

  97. Joe says:

    If dele­ting your Twit­ter means more ener­gies towards HTBC: The Book, then I’m all for it.

  98. David Armano says:

    Will miss you on Twit­ter, but com­ple­tely unders­tand. Best of luck with the book. Keep your crea­tive well full.

  99. The first “big” aban­don­ment of Twit­ter. Good for you. The soo­ner it dies, the grea­ter our chan­ces of redee­ming our civi­li­za­tion.
    There’s nothing more anno­ying than a Twit­terhead. Not even an Apple Fan­boy. Not even that.

  100. Michael says:

    The odd thing is that I was lis­te­ning to this week’s Gill­mor Gang just a few minu­tes ago and someone was prai­sing Twit­ter for the abi­lity to recom­mend good asian res­tau­rants in NYC.

  101. Crawford says:

    Par­ting is such tweet sorrow.
    But loo­king for­ward to the enrich­ment of sim­pli­city!!!
    s

  102. Anonymous says:

    Stop­ping twit­ter bold and cou­ra­geous? Please take some time to leave Sili­con Valley and visit the world.

  103. Paula Hawk says:

    Now you can’t even come back to tell us of your father’s reco­very… They are right, you will be seriously mis­sed…
    Now to go follow @waynesutton to gloat a bit (I’m @hawksdomain) :)

  104. Bo says:

    What’s “Twit­ter”?

  105. Mariela says:

    It is a big deal, we (already) miss you on Twit­ter.
    Twit­ter is the only way for me to stay somehow close to peo­ple I have deep res­pect. Thank you for that oppor­tu­nity.
    Good luck with the book.

  106. Shelley says:

    Good for you, not so hot for us… but come back any­time you like, will you?

  107. Hugh,
    I am sorry to see you leave twit­ter. I think this is a huge mis­take. I think you lost a huge bran­ding oppor­tu­nity and effec­tive sho­wed your fans that you did not care. That might not have been the intent… but that is the per­cep­tion.
    I wish you well and remain a fan. More analy­sis here: http://facereviews.com/2008/04/10/gaping-void-drops-twitter-account-big-mistake/
    Cheers!
    Rod­ney Rumford

  108. Obli­ga­ted to post my own disap­point­ment with your absence. Amidst all the unin­te­res­ting and couldn’t-care-less twit­te­rings, I really loo­ked for­ward to the flashes of insights from one of my favo­rite blog­gers. I look for­ward to your return!

  109. Julian says:

    Wow. Your very own twit­ter right here on your blog. How iro­nic.
    And no 140 char limit!

  110. I agree with man­yof the com­ments here Hugh — I abso­lu­tely unders­tand why you have stop­ped, but at the same time think it is a shame — that said, if we see more car­toons out of you as a result then yay!
    Paul

  111. Good move. Twit­ter is a time and atten­tion sink unless you use it very, very care­fully. More focus, more quality.

  112. GeekMommy says:

    Well, con­grats and good luck Hugh.
    I’m not sure if it will prove a good move or not in the long run.
    I would never have found your bri­lliance if it weren’t for Twit­ter and my friends there who were friends and fans of yours…
    But we all must do what we think best.
    I won’t ever delete my Twit­ter account — even if I stop using it. Because for me it’s a record of my thoughts and expe­rien­ces and inte­rac­tions with those I have met and befrien­ded there.
    But hope­fully it will pro­vide you with less dis­trac­tion so that you may get your book com­ple­ted.
    Sen­ding good thoughts your way for your Dad’s reco­very. Twit­ter will be less without you there.
    But we’ll still be there if you decide to come back.
    LMP

  113. good thing
    free the muse from the clut­ter
    http://youtube.com/watch?v=fG_F20pB4Tk

  114. Johnson says:

    Thank you. Too many thought pro­vo­king peo­ple have disap­pea­red into Twit­ter and no lon­ger have anything mea­ning­ful to share, unless you want to follow, stay con­nec­ted to tweets or check their tweets­tream regu­larly – and even when you do that, their heart (or mind) is not totally there. Twit­ter has become an amu­sing pass time for me, but I have had to turn it off most of the time as it is really more of a dis­trac­tion than anything else.
    Plus, I’m really anno­yed that much of the great dis­course that has flou­rished in the last few years has been con­su­med by Twit­ter and redu­ced to 2-second half-thoughts that 90% of the time have no resoun­ding value (to me at least).
    I hope more follow you. Thanks.

  115. Vincent says:

    Nice move, man.

  116. Good to see that you’ve made a deci­sion that works for your life and not the stam­pede of the crowd. Best of luck.

  117. alan p says:

    Who needs Twit­ter — Pup­pets are the future :) . Go well.…

  118. jswa says:

    Well, I’m glad I never sig­ned up in the first place, I had a gut fee­ling such cons­tant form of ‘life upda­tes’ small chat was going to be dis­trac­ting. I’m more of a let­ter guy myself, gives you time to con­tem­plate before you ‘post’.

  119. Mike Wagner says:

    Hugh stops using “ham­mer”, world won­ders “why?”.
    Your car­toon caught it all so well.
    Why do caught up caring so much about one com­mu­ni­ca­tion tool over another?
    Keep creating…a story worth repea­ting,
    Mike

  120. KB says:

    good move. maybe spend more time tal­king to peo­ple face-to-face

  121. Good luck, dude. You’re still VERY high on my top 10 list of Inter­net peo­ple I want to meet in per­son. I can unders­tand how twit­ter can take away from your other enga­ge­ments, but your tweets were something I follo­wed clo­sely.
    Can’t wait to read your book, and I can only hope one day I’m lucky enough to score a busi­ness card with a dra­wing of yours on it.

  122. Matt says:

    For those of us that don’t use Twit­ter this is like seeing a news story about a long-running tv show get­ting can­ce­led and rea­li­zing that we’ve never seen a sin­gle epi­sode. I’m overwhel­med with not caring.
    But if it means you’ll be wri­ting more in mediums I might actually access then I’m all for it.

  123. Shannon says:

    A disap­poin­ting day for sure, I will miss your tweets. Do what’s right for you!
    But I echo the others… you should really keep the name gaping­void on twit­ter or some doosh will pick it up..

  124. Prokofy says:

    Can I have your stuff?

  125. GeekTieGuy says:

    If you twit­ter about a tree falling down and no one “follows” you, does it shake the ground?
    So much energy spent on making a few bits in a data­base line up in a cer­tain way.
    Good thing you’re coming to your senses.

  126. sam says:

    Have to say, I tried Twit­ter because you see­med so keen on it, but I could never get it. To be honest, it mat­ters less to me the details of what’s going on in Alpine Texas or whe­re­ver you are every ins­tant of the day. Those sorts of details were (to me alone maybe) a fairly boring period for gaping void. The brand, not the blog. Neat expe­ri­ment but I found myself rea­ding “great cof­feshop in alpine has wifi, etc. rock on.” and won­de­ring why I was still rea­ding. And then I stop­ped rea­ding gaping void on twit­ter and felt much bet­ter.
    Glad to hear it, per­so­nally. Rock on. Etc.

  127. Bp says:

    You was bored of doing “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twit­ter” “Twitter” ?

  128. ickledot says:

    I don’t know you, have never met you, in all like­lihood pro­bably never will. Up until a few weeks ago I’d never even heard of you.
    And yet, I was worried. I’d got­ten used to your regu­lar twit­ters and their var­ying sha­des of tri­via and gra­vity. I began to worry that something awful had hap­pe­ned to your dad whose treat­ment you had been desc­ri­bing.
    I’m plea­sed there were no cri­ses but I can’t unders­tand why you have gone from being such a pro­li­fic twit­te­rer to zero. Are you an all or nothing kind of per­son?
    Please return soon with perhaps a twit­ter in the mor­ning and another before bed.

  129. 10:45 – Cof­fee
    10:57 – Toi­let
    11:02 – Dump finished
    11:05 – Twit­ter my most insig­ni­fi­cant day
    I tried it. Still have an account but have yet to figure out if it gives me anything at all. Do I really need to know that someone is wai­ting for a train…or going to a bar…or whatever?

  130. Dear Hugh — I am not sur­pri­sed –the world hap­pens when we are busy mic­ro­blog­ging.. I feel the same.
    Hope to see you soon =)
    Henry

  131. Jeff says:

    I remem­ber your Dec. 2 post when you took a stand on blog­ging. And now books. Good luck in West Texas. No Country for Old Men — and Tweets.

  132. Tomas says:

    Twit­ter is not the life­line some com­men­ters make it out to be. It can be use­ful sure, but be real, it’s pretty mea­nin­gless as a com­mu­ni­ca­tion medium.
    Some peo­ple just need find mea­ning in their own life ins­tead of clin­ging to others to feel important.

  133. I follo­wed you on twit­ter for a few days, then stop­ped — very high “sig­nal to noise” ratio. In fact, most of the high pro­file blog­gers I read I stop­ped follo­wing on twit­ter for the same rea­son.
    I use twit­ter, but may only check it once or twice a day, and I feel no need to “catch up” on tweets I’ve mis­sed. I still have good things come of my twit­ter con­nec­tions, so I’ll be on the ser­vice for some time to come. Like most things, twit­ter is bet­ter in moderation.

  134. matt says:

    I just sig­ned up to twit­ter last week, I added you and was floo­ded with an overwhel­ming amount of twitter…I was about to unsubsc­ribe from your feed, nothing per­so­nal, just too much tweet.
    for my todo queue: socio­lo­gi­cal study of the rights & res­pon­si­bi­li­ties surroun­ding Twitter.…

  135. hugh macleod says:

    I hear what you’re saying, Matt. Then again, I had close to 5,000 follo­wers by the time I left Twit­ter, so I must have been doing something right ;-)

  136. I switched off for close on 27 months: 2003 – 5. I know what that was about for me. CYA later.

  137. Suebob says:

    You can quit me, but I just can’t quit you!

  138. Clive Birnie says:

    Jeez. com­ment 140!
    I bet you 8 pints of Guin­ness (or alter­na­tive of your choice) in a bar of your choice in either Lon­don or Dublin that you have star­ted a trend and many (lets call it more than 5%) of your Twit­ter follo­wers, ahem, follow you…

  139. Hugh, just don’t stop dra­wing the flip­pin’ car­toons. You gotta do what works for you. I’ll miss the tweets both from you and the ones you for­war­ded as well.
    Best of luck with the book.
    Cheers,
    Tim

  140. red_fox says:

    noooooo… why?

  141. Kyle MacRae says:

    So. Fare­well then @gapingvoid
    Your Twit­ter feed many enjo­yed
    But now you’ve left to write a book
    Typi­cal fuc­king blogger

  142. dc crowley says:

    Your move shoc­ked me. But it gave me the push I nee­ded to step back. I’m not stop­ping, just reap­prai­sing what I do (blog­ging) and how I blog. Twit­ter is ok for me per­so­nally. I switch it on when I can and what I miss is OK.
    Any­way this is about you. Good move. I could see something was coming via Durham and Alpine. Hope it does you lots of good. Cheers and thanks for your con­ver­sa­tion and car­toons. Really enjoy them.

  143. Sassy says:

    I have a Twit­ter account — but rarely sign into it, why? I just never remem­ber to (unless one of my follo­wers asks me where I’ve been) plus, does anyone really care that I’ve just had a glass of water or that I’m cra­ving cho­co­late or if I’m wri­ting? See? Ya I’m totally exci­ting. Good luck with your book. And I love that cartoon.

  144. Thib H. says:

    I also dele­ted my twit­ter account some months ago. I found it really inte­res­ting to see that after a while, Twit­ter is mostly a tool most of us use for dis­trac­tion. Ins­tead of con­cen­tra­ting on what we’re doing, we’re tal­king about tal­king about wha­te­ver it is we’re doing. And often times it’s not neces­sary or even inte­res­ting to tweet so much.
    I had an “ex” who insul­ted me for bur­ying myself in a gui­de­book to a place we were in. I wasn’t really bur­ying myself in it. I was using it to orient myself to the place. The ex twit­te­red a lot. And come to think of it, I won­der why his cri­ti­cism of me “bur­ying” myself in a gui­de­book didn’t apply to him­self bur­ying him­self in the ephe­me­ral inter­net as oppo­sed to wha­te­ver expe­rience he was going through at that moment. Ins­tead the twee­ted about it, thus a step further remo­ved from the expe­rience itself.

  145. Thi says:

    I totally agree with Sassy who wrote: “…plus, does anyone really care that I’ve just had a glass of water or that I’m cra­ving cho­co­late or if I’m wri­ting?“
    My sen­ti­ments pre­ci­sely. Many tweets are about these kinds of unin­te­res­ting ran­dom thought bub­bles. I find it inte­res­ting that how in rea­ding a person’s tweets they may seem very open and com­mu­ni­ca­tive but in per­son they are actually rather hesi­tant and sec­re­tive. Not always true for ever­yone, of course.

  146. rsomers says:

    I’ll miss your tweets but will con­ti­nue to follow via the blog and elsewhere. Twitter’s just a medium for ideas, that’s all. If an artist choo­ses to for­sake water­co­lor and focus on oils, so be it…they haven’t ‘betra­yed’ water­co­lor.
    I’m amu­sed by a cou­ple of long com­ments that ques­tion your deci­sion. If they think your deci­sion was a mis­take, shouldn’t they be requi­red to say so in I’ll miss your tweets but will con­ti­nue to follow via the blog and elsewhere. Twitter’s just a medium for ideas, that’s all. If an artist choo­ses to for­sake water­co­lor and focus on oils, so be it…they haven’t ‘betra­yed’ water­co­lor.
    I’m amu­sed by a cou­ple of long com­ments that ques­tion your deci­sion. If they think your deci­sion was a mis­take, shouldn’t they be requi­red to say so in <140 characters?

  147. Brooks Moses says:

    Hugh, I think there’s should be a “2008” update to that car­toon: “Ah, Texas.…“
    ’Cause what I see there is not just the “twit­ter! twit­ter! twit­ter!”, but the fact that all three panels are pac­ked enti­rely full of things with exc­la­ma­tion points, in exactly the way that your blog this year isn’t.

  148. Susie says:

    I didn’t rea­lise you’d left twit­ter till I read about in an online subsc­rip­tion this mor­ning…
    I totally unders­tand why… its very dis­trac­ting. But at the same time I really liked get­ting to know you and enjo­yed your dis­trac­tions.
    Susie :-)
    (KahunaGirl)

  149. […] fifty times – if whether I expect to stick to my deci­sion over the long-term or whether, like others who have tried to quit Twit­ter before me, I’ll come craw­ling back in a few […]