January 27, 2008

how to get published in france

Send to Kindle

aaahhhhhh05.jpg
[More thoughts on “How To Be Crea­tive”:]

36. Start blog­ging.
The ease with which a blog can cir­cum­vent the gate­kee­pers is staggering.

I have a friend in Paris. Call her Chan­tal. She’s a lovely woman, tres chic, very smart and sexy, with a cute apart­ment in the 20th Arron­dis­se­ment and a res­pec­ta­ble job in an adver­ti­sing agency. A cou­ple of years ago, she wrote a book. A novel. In French. Lots of sex and intros­pec­tion [Sex & Intros­pec­tion being a very popu­lar French lite­rary combo, of course]. Any­way, Chan­tal wants to get the book published.
The last time I dined with her in Paris, Chan­tal was telling me her tale of woe, after she had spent many long months sch­lep­ping around town, trying to find a publisher, which in Paris means trying to ingra­tiate her­self with the Pari­sian lite­rary scene. This is something that’s actually quite hard to break into, given the huge num­bers of unpu­blished sex-and-introspection novels doing the rounds. One guy, an edi­tor at some small imprint nobody outside of Paris has ever heard of, offe­red to help her, but even­tually gave up once he figu­red out that she wasn’t going to sleep with him. You get the pic­ture.
Being an avid blog­ger, of course, I was not very help­ful.
“Your book has thir­teen chap­ters,” I say. “Voila! That’s thir­teen blog posts. One chap­ter per blog post. Put it online, and you’ll have a book offer within six months. Trust me.“
Of course, this is not how you do it in Paris, sup­po­sedly. You do it by going to all the right par­ties and hob­nob­bing with all the right peo­ple, sup­po­sedly. If you’re good at it, you get a book deal, sup­po­sedly. If you’re really good at it, they’ll also let you go on the high­brow TV talk show cir­cuit and pon­ti­fi­cate about “Cou­ture” with all the other eru­dite cul­ture vul­tu­res, sup­po­sedly. Maybe give you an occa­sio­nal column in Le Figaro, sup­po­sedly. An into­xi­ca­ting combo of both inte­llec­tual cele­brity and bour­geoise res­pec­ta­bi­lity, sup­po­sedly. Very elite, sup­po­sedly. Very French, sup­po­sedly.
Sadly, she never went with the blog option. Sure, it could’ve wor­ked quite easily [Hey, it wor­ked easily enough for Tom Rey­nolds, the Lon­don ambu­lance dri­ver who got a book deal based on his blog wri­tings], but doing that would pro­bably have been seen as a bit gauche by the other groovy cats in the Pari­sian lite­rary scene. And I sus­pect she wan­ted mem­bership into that club, every bit as much as she wan­ted to see her name in print.
Of course, as any­body who lis­tens to NPR or the BBC will know, we have simi­lar cul­tu­rally elite hie­rarchies here in the English-speaking world, just maybe not so hard­core. There’s something stran­gely curious about how the idea of “The Novel”, “Le Roman” has such a strong hold on the French ima­gi­na­tion; there’s something so heroic to them about the idea of the “Auteur”, that it’s hard to explain to peo­ple from more phi­lis­tine parts of the world. On one level, you can easily admire such strong reve­rence to a clas­sic archetype. On another level, such attach­ment can need­lessly hold you back.
Wha­te­ver. If I were Chan­tal, I would still con­si­der blog­ging the book in full. And I would post up an English ver­sion as well, to give the book the grea­test chance of being read by peo­ple outside her French, urban mic­ro­cosm. Sure, the Pari­sian lite­rary purists will bitch and moan, but hey, they’re Pari­sian lite­rary purists– they’re going to bitch and moan anyway.

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , ,

23 Responses to “how to get published in france”

  1. Clive Birnie says:

    I am with you on this. There are some good fic­tion wri­ters out here in the ether. Its a good way to test drive, get some feed­back and fine tune as you write. see:
    http://garethlynpowell.blogspot.com/
    http://www.daisybennett.com/
    There is also http://www.fictionpress.com/ but I am a little overwhel­med by the volume myself.
    Also Autho­nomy a an expe­ri­ment from Har­per­Co­llins I dis­co­ve­red via Neil Per­kin http://www.neilperkin.typepad.com/only_dead_fish/
    There is always an audience if you look for it. Pro­mi­sing French wri­ter shun­ned by lite­rati publishes in English on web…
    If she builds it: they will come.

  2. Hi Hugh,
    I love every sin­gle words of this won­der­ful post, but this:“outside her French, urban mic­ro­cosm” is… sim­ple­ment superbe ;-)

  3. Hila­rious, insight­ful, and so true, Hugh.
    I design books for a living. EVERYONE over 40 has one to publish in the USA. Busi­ness is end­less. Although here, the value’s not the social caché as much as in the act of per­so­nal expres­sion. We all feel we have something inte­res­ting to say, n’est pas il ainsi?
    Things have expo­nen­tially chan­ged in just the last two years to the point where I now only recom­mend that my clients use POD (print on demand) digi­tal pres­ses to pro­duce their tit­les, prin­ting them as they are orde­red. No capi­tal out­lay, no inven­tory to manage, etc.
    I encou­rage peo­ple to try various books in various ite­ra­tions and see which con­nects best to an audience as it costs nothing to have 10 ver­sions of the same book made.
    Things have chan­ged indeed.

  4. KG says:

    Such great insights here! If your friend only took the leap in blog­ging, her net would appear (I’m paraph­ra­sing a quote from “The Artist’s Way” here…). I think this will encou­rage more peo­ple to take crea­tive risks with their work.
    Your post brings two other exam­ples to mind:
    1. An author who basi­cally did it her­self is M.J. Rose. Her blog is called “Buzz, Balls and Hype”:
    http://mjroseblog.typepad.com/buzz_balls_hype/ She got her stuff out there, deve­lo­ped a follo­wing, and then publishers came knoc­king on her door.
    2. Cory Doc­to­row is another great exam­ple. He gives his work away for free all the time. He’s built a huge follo­wing and works on exci­ting, crea­tive stuff almost non-stop.
    Thanks for this!

  5. Robert Bruce says:

    Great. GREAT.
    So, I never went to Bread Loaf, most rea­ders could care less.

  6. Marina says:

    I‘m a big fan of your dra­wings and not so with you in many of your opi­nions BUT TODAY!!!!!!!!
    I believe that if you really find plea­sure in wri­ting, you will write whe­re­ver –like you do with dra­wings– but if “Chan­te­lle” wants to join the “Pari­sian lite­rary purists face­book group”, she should sleep with the first half-known-in-this-circle guy…nothing to do with wri­ting :D

  7. >Chan­te­lle
    doesn’t that mean “mush­room?“
    (oh wait. that’s “chan­te­re­lle.” nevermind.)

  8. hugh macleod says:

    Mea culpa; I spe­lled her name wrong. It’s “Chan­tal”, not “Chan­te­lle”. Oops. Fixed. Sorry.

  9. AH says:

    “The enemy of authors isn’t piracy, it’s obs­cu­rity.” –Tim O’Reilly

  10. Bertil says:

    Half a dozen of my close friends published books in France, two on ave­rage; none had any pre­vious con­ne­xions with anyone inside the lite­ra­ture scene before. Those who got ‘in’ were intro­du­ced because they wrote, and after they pro­ved their skills, not prior to — which sounds logi­cal to me. The num­ber of peo­ple publishing their first novel has almost been dou­bling every two year for the past decade: it’s not like it’s an elite club that’s so clo­sed you have to be born published to get a shot.
    I also know seve­ral very hot models who wrote “novels” (three hun­dred pages worth of sex & intros­pec­tion, strictly impos­si­ble to read; my first com­ment on those actually was: “There are a few words I‘m going to throw at you: just tell me if they ring a bell: ‘gram­mar? sen­ten­ces? plot?’”); they slept all they could to get published (inc­lu­ding with more then one per­son at once, and I am spa­ring you the details) — in the end, one slept with a guy high-up enough that she got… let’s say prin­ted. That was her worst idea because now, she’s out for a rea­son — and back to mode­lling (which she doesn’t like so much) for good .
    I’ve asked many publisher friends of mine, both in fic­tion and non-fiction: write a decent draft is all you need to get an ans­wer. Every draft send gets one shot, and the rea­der goes as far as (s)he pos­sibly can; if it’s good, it’s tal­ked about — and if you need a bet­ter name for the author, be it famous or just a classy-sounding pen-name, that’s the easiest thing to arrange; famous peo­ple are always deligh­ted to sign and pro­mote a good book, espe­cially if someone else took the pain to write it — sha­dow wri­ter is not an insult here: peo­ple are open and proud about it, see “Men­son­ges et trahi­sons et plus si affi­nités…”.
    Star­ting with “a ray of light was going through the quiet room” of long intros­pec­tion about how not-so-uncommon is your cha­rac­ters first name, well, that’s… shoo­ting your self in the foot.
    Marina, let me ask: if someone is going to offer you sex, but no social capi­tal, would you hang around with him, or her? Even after a sea­son of Cali­for­ni­ca­tion, that ‘date’ thing is still a little bit obs­cure to me, so I’m not sure where you are tal­king from — but a one night stand with the right per­son to know, or a friend, rela­tive, etc. sounds like the best way to trash all your chan­ces. Think about it: you gene­rally just don’t want to see her the mor­ning after, right? Unless she’s the one, of course — a com­ple­tely dif­fe­rent case, mind you. You though orgies are some kind of rite of pas­sage in the Lit scene? Really? OK: anyone older then 14 can tell you it’s a gross way old & bored cou­ple try to spice up their ine­xis­tent sex life. Publishers usually have inte­res­ting cou­ples: com­pli­ca­ted, edu­ca­ted, con­tras­ted… But I can’t remem­ber orgies being anything else then a joke — except for those dam­ned Red Neck pro­vin­cials from outside the Walls.
    If her book is actually good, let her give it to all her friends: mind you, not those “in the know” —who would hate her for for­cing them to read something half-baked— but those who might have fun rea­ding it. She might even hand-out copies in the street or in a café (thank you Lulu.com) with an e-mails for com­ments. Read the com­ments. A blog would be use­ful in the same way, but one post per chap­ter… that sounds a lot to me. A few good books were made this way, with some great suc­cess — mostly graphic novels, I’d say.
    It might feel like only peo­ple in the know get a chance: sta­tis­ti­cally, that’s how it looks. Actually, if you com­pare it with who pas­ses the com­pe­ti­tive exams to enter the most pres­ti­gious uni­ver­si­ties, those also tend to be those whose parents are in the know. The only thing is: all exams are anony­mous. Really. Know­led­gea­ble parents taught you what you need to know to get a great job; howe­ver unfair, that’s how life is here in France.
    Oh, and: if she is living in the XXth dis­trict, anyone can tell from the way she sounds on the phone, or dress, or combs her hair, or walks, or what shoes she wears, that she is a lef­tist. It’s not even something you think about.
    Shelly: “caché” means “hid­den”; you meant “cachet”, which means “seal”, and is still the proof of something being genuine, of good qua­lity. Howe­ver, “n’est pas il ainsi?” is very un-French.
    Marina, the group you are loo­king for is called “J’adore déjeu­ner au Café de Flore“:
    http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=6176724589

  11. hugh macleod says:

    Ber­til, I dare­say there’s enough mate­rial in that com­ment of yours to form the basis of a novel ;-)

  12. But wait, did she even work with an “edi­tor” edi­tor? I mean did she just write the book and expect to be read and published without the pro­cess or revi­sion? I would never send a ms. to an agent without having had my stuff read a million times by dif­fe­rent eyes, which is of course the great point of put­ting it out there on a blog, you get free input from poten­tial rea­ders.
    If the ans­wer is “no,” boy that really says something about the idea of ‘auteur’ …
    A writer’s wri­ter will keep wri­ting. Put the first book down and keep wri­ting. First book may suck, any­way, the pub­llishing of which you may regret. You always have to prac­tice your craft, regard­less.
    Here in the sta­tes it’s just as much about ass-kissing and who you know, in any case.

  13. Kimber Chin says:

    A cau­tion though that put­ting a novel online DOES have an effect on rights avai­la­ble for sale. (At least that is my unders­tan­ding, could be wrong on that)
    Still bet­ter some rights sold than none.

  14. Alda says:

    Yes, but if ever­yone has already read it online, why would anyone want to buy it??
    Just pla­ying the devil’s advo­cate. I’m actually a firm belie­ver in blog magic.

  15. You don’t have to put your entire book online. Excerpts, short sto­ries, other wri­ting. The point is to get the energy cir­cu­la­ting and deve­lop a rea­dership. If you’re acti­vely wri­ting, this isn’t hard to do. In fact, you can even start blog­ging as part of your writer’s craft. One hit won­ders writ­ten in obs­cu­rity don’t go too far.
    A novel or non-fiction work can also start out as a blog. But it doesn’t neces­sa­rilly trans­late into a book so trans­pa­rently and seam­lessly. You still need an edi­tor and a pro­cess of revi­sion.
    A book is a fetishi­zed object that’s nice to hold in your hands. Rea­ding a book simply doesn’t com­pare to losing your eye­balls to a com­pu­ter screen. I’d still buy something in book form if I really loved it.

  16. Brooks Moses says:

    Kim­ber Chen: You are correct. Some publishers will not purchase books which have been pre­viously published online, period full stop. Others don’t mind. It’s a gam­ble.
    Alda: Talk to Cory Doc­to­row — who’s been pos­ting free ver­sions of most of his books on his web­site, as a mar­ke­ting tool. He’s been fin­ding that it helps sales of the phy­si­cal books, by acting as adver­ti­sing, rather than hur­ting them.

  17. Simon says:

    If your friend Chan­tal would be OK to sleep with me I’d be deligh­ted to publish her book on my blog.

  18. Unless I mis­sed it, I’m sur­pri­sed noone else men­tio­ned pro­bably the most obvious Sex and Intros­pec­tion blog, which was then tur­ned into a book, and a major TV series?
    http://belledejour-uk.blogspot.com/
    Which became the Inti­mate Adven­tu­res of a Lon­don Call Girl in print, and The Sec­ret Diary of a Call Girl on ITV2, with major publi­city etc.
    And even­tually, no mat­ter how high­brow, the suc­cess of those using the most effec­tive mediums to reach their audience will even­tually have an effect, and high­brow dis­cus­sions won’t be able to ignore blogs, or web­si­tes. Just as high­brow dis­cus­sions even­tually came round to almost every facet of popu­lar culture.

  19. Eamon says:

    Blog­ging your way to get­ting published is an inte­res­ting idea. Was won­de­ring how a wri­ter blog­ging their work online is pro­tec­ted by copy­right law?

  20. “Copy­right is an auto­ma­tic right and ari­ses whe­ne­ver an indi­vi­dual or com­pany crea­tes a work. To qua­lify, a work should be regar­ded as ori­gi­nal, and exhi­bits a degree of labour, skill or jud­ge­ment“
    As far as I’m aware, anything, inc­lu­ding blog­ging, is auto­ma­ti­cally pro­tec­ted by copy­right…
    The big issue online is enfor­cing it…

  21. Jennifer says:

    The real ques­tion here is, sure you can put your stuff online. (Assu­ming publishers don’t have an issue with publishing stuff that’s already been online for free, which is still an issue with some peo­ple.) But how do you somehow get the audience and eye­balls enough to get that much publi­city? That’s where I’m stum­ped, as to how one stands out from the kaji­llion other blogs.
    Feel like pos­ting about that, Hugh? I’d be inte­res­ted, at least.

  22. cecil says:

    Great as usual, Hugh !
    In France the rea­son for so many peo­ple to publish a book is not to have a book published, oddly enough. It is to be seen as an “Auteur” as Hugh bri­lliantly spot­ted, i.e an Artist. Blog­ging is vul­gar, anyone can do. In such an eli­tist society as ours this is just a no go.
    You have to unders­tand the french psyché for that. We behea­ded our king and killed God with our “répu­bli­que laï­que”. There is no guide left and I’m not the only one to say that our pan­de­mic and chro­ni­cal des­pair is somehow rela­ted.
    Any­way : after the revo­lu­tion we diddn’t have any guide left to turn to but the great phi­lo­sophers from back then (“les Lumie­res”). And in our cul­ture they repla­ced both god and the King. Hence this very strange and sac­ra­li­zed rela­tionship to the writ­ten object.
    Last but not least, this type of lit­te­ra­ture (sex & intros­pec­tion — french offi­cial name is “Autof®iction” — the ® is mine) could turn out to be quite emba­ras­sing for a regu­lar blog­ger. It won’t for someone pro­tec­ted by the divine halo of the “Auteur” posi­tion.
    For any french rea­der in the assis­tance I would strongly reco­mend “la lit­te­rra­ture sans esto­mac” by Pie­rre Jourde which is an hila­rious (yet very tho­roughly argued from a lite­rary per­pec­tive) book on the pari­sian lite­rary purists : the “Ger­ma­no­pran­tins” aka peo­ple from St Ger­main des Près.