October 27, 2007

“social objects”: blue monster wine update

Send to Kindle

BM214.jpg
For rea­sons unk­nown to me, sud­denly in the last week the orders for Stormhoek Blue Mons­ter Reserve have star­ted floo­ding in, espe­cially from Mic­ro­sof­tees in the USA. Rock on.
I’m get­ting on the case this week… if you’ve already con­tac­ted me about this, expect to be hea­ring from either me or my collea­gue, Tessa Soole in the next week or two. Thanks.
Some ran­dom thoughts:
1. I came up with the Blue Mons­ter wine idea, as a exer­cise in crea­ting a “Social Object”. What the heck, Theory is all very well, but actual real-life com­mer­cial exe­cu­tion is a lot more fun and inte­res­ting. I’m just lucky to have the groovy cats at Stormhoek who let me try out these crazy ideas.
ali_bluemonster_03.jpg
[My friend, Ali­son with a Blue Mons­ter litho­graph in her office.]
2. Ear­lier this year I crea­ted another Blue Mons­ter social object, namely, the limi­ted edi­tion litho­graphs. I only made a thou­sand of them, and they went fast. As I didn’t want to print more of them [that would’ve chea­pe­ned the first edi­tion], I had to come up with something else, something that could scale beyond one thou­sand peo­ple. Since I’m in the wine busi­ness, and since I had already been making car­toon labels for Stormhoek wine, it wasn’t too much of a stretch.
3. The Blue Mons­ter wine is also part of the “Smar­ter Wine” con­ver­sa­tion. The main the­sis is that it’s not the wine per se that is inte­res­ting, it’s the con­ver­sa­tions that hap­pen around the wine that is inte­res­ting. And that is true for all social objects. Peo­ple mat­ter. Objects don’t.
4. If the Blue Mons­ter wine idea is inte­res­ting, it’s because of a most unli­kely mash-up bet­ween a small, obs­cure winery in South Africa, and the world’s lar­gest soft­ware com­pany. But it’s this very unli­ke­lihood, this very unli­kely swap­ping of Cul­tu­ral DNA bet­ween two very dif­fe­rent com­pa­nies, that gives it its mojo.
5. Impor­ting dif­fe­rent Cul­tu­ral DNA into an orga­ni­za­tion is a real balan­cing act. Too much of it makes it impos­si­ble for the com­pany to focus. Too little and the com­pany withers on the vine.
6. BL Och­man has a really good sum­ma­tion of the BM wine story here.

What’s impor­tant is that a lone blog­ger with a good idea was able to get a huge com­pany to lis­ten to him and to adopt one of his fairly radi­cal ideas. It shows that social media is a via­ble force for change, for mar­ke­ting, and for the new media than a lot of big com­pa­nies may now finally begin to take seriously.

7. When thin­king about appl­ying social media to com­pa­nies, “What social media tools should we use” should not be the first ques­tion. “How do we wish to talk to peo­ple dif­fe­rently” should be the first ques­tion. If you don’t have an ans­wer to this, quit your job and go find something else.
8. None of this stuff is roc­ket science. Most of it is gla­ringly obvious. And sadly for folks wor­king in the social soft­ware industry, “The peo­ple who get it, don’t need us. And the peo­ple who need us, don’t get it.” Which is why being a “blog con­sul­tant” or wha­te­ver is a lot less luc­ra­tive and rewar­ding than peo­ple often think.
9. I recently recei­ved the follo­wing e-mail:

Hugh,
As much as I like the Blue Mons­ter, does it really mat­ter in the grand scheme of things? I mean, we both know that no mat­ter how big the Blue Mons­ter gets, Mic­ro­soft is still going to con­ti­nue being “evil”, and its soft­ware is still going to con­ti­nue to suck. And no blog­ging car­too­nist is ever going to change that.
Any thoughts?
Dave

Well, Dave, your low opi­nion of Mic­ro­soft not­withs­tan­ding, I’m not loo­king at this from the exe­cu­tive level. I’m coming at this from the pers­pec­tive of a small-time car­too­nist with a blog and an inter­net con­nec­tion. And from where I’m stan­ding, it seems to me that in a big com­pany like Mic­ro­soft, even a small thing like the Blue Mons­ter can create a lot of value for a lot of peo­ple. Not get­ting too carried away in the Expec­ta­tion Depart­ment is what will keep things inte­res­ting.
10. No, I have no idea of where all this is going. All I care about these days is dra­wing car­toons, doing inte­res­ting things with inte­res­ting peo­ple, paying my bills, and kee­ping my sorry ass out of the hos­pi­tal, the men­tal asy­lum, the mor­gue etc.

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , ,

11 Responses to ““social objects”: blue monster wine update”

  1. Really get­ting your social objects thing now Hugh since spea­king to you at The Face­book Debate.
    Demons­tra­ting the object “con­cept” in a bottle of wine is a great way for others to unders­tand it.
    Paul

  2. B.L Ochman says:

    thanks for lin­king to my post Hugh.
    What I found really inte­res­ting about that post is that it got not one com­ment on my blog, and not one com­ment when I cross-posted it on Mar­ke­ting­Profs Daily Fix blog. I con­ti­nue to think the story is frea­king ama­zing.
    The idea, like so many, is still what good old Al Gore calls “pre-dawn.“
    But then, you and I have been there before and we’ll be there again.
    rock on my friend.

  3. Tom Tac says:

    On num­ber 9 … (“does it really mat­ter in the grand scheme of things? .… Mic­ro­soft is still … And no blog­ging car­too­nist is ever going to change that. .. Any thoughts?”)
    Wow. What a sur­pri­sing turd. The sur­prise is not in what Dave had to say, but in his assump­tion that no one would recog­nize the “cant match your suc­cess so Ill try to tear it down” men­ta­lity.
    Yes, yes, Dave really could be sin­cere and Dave may not know the story of the little boy and the star­fish, one is never 100% sure from a blog com­ment.
    But it really really looks like the usual attempt to rees­ta­blish the usual pec­king order, and I deplore those kinds of things.
    (Star­fish story (http://www.starlearners.com.sg/story.html) Of course! None of our efforts change ‘the grand scheme of things’, usually, but what good we do, what chan­ges we do, we do! Someone who has chan­ged a little bit of the world has ‘chan­ged the world’.)
    To my favo­rite blog­ging car­too­nist that is chan­ging the world … Keep it up, Hugh! God bless…

  4. Hugh — rea­son for the upsurge in orders from the US is the Blue Mons­ter story hit the front page of Microsoft’s glo­bal Intra­net home (MSW) last week. I got a lot of email from folks asking where to buy :) I swear if I had a few cases by my desk I could open an Odd­bins inter­nally!
    I like the way the story keep reap­pea­ring as the mes­sage spreads to dif­fe­rent parts of the globe and as Mic­ro­soft folks and others take it to dif­fe­rent places.

  5. John says:

    Tom Tac,
    “What a sur­pri­sing turd.” Huh? What are you tal­king about? Is that rela­ted in some way to Dave’s com­ment, or are you just making notes about your bodily func­tions?
    ”…‘cant match your suc­cess so Ill try to tear it down’ men­ta­lity.“
    Whose suc­cess are you refe­rring to, Microsoft’s or Hugh’s?
    One of the entries here on Hugh’s blog says, “My other main inte­rest at the moment has been wor­king with Mic­ro­soft on The Blue Mons­ter Pro­ject, which has all to do with fin­ding new ways to get the com­pany to tell its story bet­ter.“
    And as I recall, the topic at the time when Dave made his com­ment was whether the Blue Monster’s pro­blems rela­ting to cus­to­mers are pro­blems of style or subs­tance. In par­ti­cu­lar, Hugh had quo­ted com­ments from various Blue Minions that Microsoft’s pro­ducts are okay and the only pro­blem is one of public rela­tions.
    Don’t you think Dave was making a mea­ning­ful con­tri­bu­tion to that dis­cus­sion? Of course, Hugh’s com­ments to the effect that he doesn’t run Mic­ro­soft were also “per­ti­nent”.
    Hugh,
    I don’t think the Blue Mons­ter is the per­so­ni­fi­ca­tion of evil (even though he has a face only a mother could love).
    Any­way, one of my company’s com­pu­ters recently met an unti­mely demise. After much gnashing of teeth and pulling of hair, we repla­ced it with a Vista powe­red machine. So far, it is func­tio­ning nor­mally and has not made any attempts to seize con­trol of the com­pany. I’ll let you know how it works out so you can pass the news on to your close per­so­nal friends, Bill G and Steve B.

  6. AndyT13 says:

    Com­ple­tely off topic but I’m now totally in love with Alli­son. Send her to me. Please?

  7. Dick says:

    Hey,
    ’Really NOT get­ting your social objects thing.‘
    I do unders­tand that you help out folks. So. Thats cool.
    Dick

  8. Tom Tac says:

    John, I am not in a posi­tion to say you’re wrong.
    While I might *think* I have a good sus­pi­cion of Dave’s inten­tions, it was unne­ces­sary for me to throw in a vul­gar name. If this was a wiki, I’d have edi­ted it out by now. Maybe Hugh will do that.
    And, if “Dave” ever sees that post, I apo­lo­gize to him for the word. It doesn’t mea­sure up to my own stan­dards.
    Re his com­ment: Hugh had already addres­sed the issue by poin­ting out that “not get­ting too carried away in the Expec­ta­tion Depart­ment” was what was nee­ded.
    No, there was no way I could know that the email from Dave had sur­fa­ced during a “style and subs­tance” dis­cus­sion of MS PR. I have been thin­king that the Blue Mons­ter Pro­ject is an attempt to help MS tell its story, and the bit about trying to “make the world a bet­ter place” is part of the legend, so I think the “change the world or go home” line is a posi­tive thing. It doesn’t relate to the actual soft­ware that is in place out there.
    But while I think his point of view on the sub­ject dif­fers from mine, the sen­tence you zeroed in on was not warran­ted. Thanks, John, for hel­ping me revi­sit it.

  9. Robinson says:

    Back to turds… I’m not sure it’s a good idea to shor­ten ‘Blue Mons­ter’ to ‘BM’ when refe­rring to something you want peo­ple to consume.

  10. John says:

    Tom Tac,
    Your com­ments of con­tri­tion appear to be heart felt and sin­cere. No further action will be taken at this time. But remem­ber, we of the blog police are always watching. Always.

  11. David Brain says:

    have you tal­ked through the Kula exam­ple on the blog Hugh?