October 9, 2007

the “smarter wine” idea

Send to Kindle

0710smarterwine.jpg
[Offi­cial “Smar­ter Wine” logo etc.]
At Stormhoek, the wine com­pany I work for, our basic sch­tick is this phi­lo­sophy we call “Smar­ter Wine”. This is what Mark Earls would call the “Purpose-Idea” of the com­pany; i.e. the rea­son we get out of bed in the mor­ning and go to work every day. Here are some thoughts on what Smar­ter Wine means, in no par­ti­cu­lar order:
1. Smar­ter Wine does not imply that we’re “smar­ter” than anywhere else. It’s an ideal that we aspire to, not that we embody. The idea is not something Stormhoek will ever “own”, like a tagline in an ad cam­paign. It’s an idea I think EVERYBODY in the trade should get their head around, be they makers, sellers or buyers, large or small. But hey, I would say that.
2. Everyone’s defi­ni­tion of “smar­ter” will be dif­fe­rent. I’m OK with that. To me, it means con­ti­nually enga­ging the cus­to­mer at a higher level, con­ti­nually rai­sing the bar.

0710blurry.jpg

3. The bri­lliant thin­ker, Rus­sell Davies iden­ti­fied four key­words that will govern the future of the adver­ti­sing busi­ness. About as suc­cinct a list as I’ve ever seen:

Blurry.
Use­ful.
Inte­res­ting.
Always In Beta.

“Always In Beta” is a popu­lar term in Sili­con Valley. In an ideal world, it would be equally popu­lar in the wine trade as well. It’s unfor­tu­nate that this is not the case.
4. A word peo­ple like using in the wine trade is “inno­va­tion”. Some com­pa­nies pay it only lip ser­vice, some com­pa­nies actually try to embrace it full-on. But it’s har­der than it looks. Wine is one of the oldest pro­ducts in the world; change hap­pens slowly and with great reluc­tance. Sure, put­ting wine in funky-dunky plas­tic or alu­mi­num bott­les might be tech­ni­cally “inno­va­tive”, but does the ave­rage wine cus­to­mer actually want that? A more inte­res­ting ques­tion for me is how the wine con­nects with peo­ple on an emo­tio­nal and inte­llec­tual level. That to me is where the real action is.
5. Big ideas start out as little ideas, and lots of them. What do com­pa­nies like Apple, Nike, Inno­cent Drinks and Star­bucks have in com­mon? Super­fi­cially, very little. But one thing you’ll notice about them is that they’re cons­tantly coming up with new stuff. Cons­tantly trying out new ideas, seeing what hap­pens, and if it doesn’t work out, they move on quickly. Their sch­tick is all about taking fre­quent small steps in the right direc­tion, as oppo­sed to bet­ting the farm on the annual Super­bowl ad. Crea­ting a cons­tant stream of “Social Objects”. We take a simi­lar approach at Stormhoek [We’re a small wine com­pany, frankly, so we have no other choice]. Dif­fe­rent bran­ding ideas, dif­fe­rent car­toon label ideas, dif­fe­rent spon­sorship and PR ideas. On one level it’s a highly unpre­dic­ta­ble way to go about it. On another level, it’s ama­zing how cer­tain we are that SOMETHING good comes out of it even­tually.
6. Eighty per cent of vine­yards in the world do not make a pro­fit. Eighty. Per. Cent. Other fun stats: There are 50 coun­tries in the world that have wine indus­tries. Italy alone has 500,000 vine­yards. Sicily has ten times the vine­yards as Napa Valley. Conc­lu­sion: The com­pe­ti­tion is off the scale. Besi­des making good wine [obviously], the only way for­ward is to somehow figure out, by any means neces­sary, how to rise above the clut­ter. The only way to do this is to speak to peo­ple in a way our industry has never spo­ken to them before.
7. I am not a wine expert. I am not a wine snob. I am not a wine bore. I am not even a wine geek. When I think of the busi­ness I’m in, I do not think of the vine­yards, the lifestyle porn that’s famously attached to the industry, the “hum­ming­birds gathe­ring nec­tar in the mor­ning dew” pala­ver. My thoughts are more pro­saic. I think about a per­son pushing a shop­ping cart through a super­mar­ket, a teacher or a nurse, perhaps, who’s there buying food because she’s coo­king spaghetti for her boy­friend that eve­ning, who just wants a good bottle of wine for under ten dollars to go with it. Her needs, as sim­ple and basic as they are, inte­rest me FAR MORE than satisf­ying the vast sea of social pre­ten­tions that lives inside the wine trade.
8. Not every­body inside the trade will “get” the Smar­ter Wine idea. In mar­ke­ting terms, it not that big a deal. As Oscar Wilde once quip­ped, “A man can­not be too care­ful in the choice of his enemies.”

Be Socia­ble, Share!

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

Tags: , , , , , ,

9 Responses to “the “smarter wine” idea”

  1. Seth E says:

    Des­pite all the vine­yards, I still think there’s a major gap in the wine industry/trade. Of course, I speak solely as a con­su­mer, but in my expie­rence no one has a “my wine” whe­reas most peo­ple have a Vodka , a Whis­key, and a beer that they con­sis­tently drink (btw, Stoli, Jack, and Harp). The rea­son for this, I think, is because of the “clut­ter”. I doubt non-affcianados could name one of the world’s million vine­yards, nor should they have to, nor should they need to. If a wine com­pany is really “smar­ter”, they’ll save the con­su­mer from having to be.

  2. Susanna says:

    Inte­res­ting post. #6 makes me think of Gary, a friend of my Dad’s. He has a vine­yard, and he is pas­sio­nate about gro­wing the best gra­pes. We got to tour his vine­yard a cou­ple years ago, and it was fas­ci­na­ting to learn all the little details about what he does to get the best har­vest pos­si­ble.
    What Gary does not do, though, that many neigh­bo­ring vine­yards do, is run a winery. He has had some of the wine­ries he does busi­ness with make small batches of wine just for him that he can sell or give to clients and friends. But he doesn’t do the whole pro­mo­tion, public tas­ting, etc. deal. He just focu­ses on gro­wing great gra­pes, which he sells to wine­ries both big and small. And even in a tough busi­ness cli­mate, he is doing very well.

  3. hugh macleod says:

    Sounds like Gary has found him­self a nice wee niche, Susanna. Good for him :)
    Yes, nice wee niches in the wine biz do actually exist, but ove­rall it’s a tough-ass busi­ness, that’s for sure.

  4. Lloyd Davis says:

    I do find it fas­ci­na­ting that des­pite the fact that you con­ti­nue to make it very clear you’re in the wine busi­ness, peo­ple think the Blue Mons­ter is about you get­ting into tech.
    btw, you’re quo­ting Rus­sell Davies, not Rus­sell Beat­tie — our Russell’s name is much easier to pro­nounce :)

  5. hugh macleod says:

    Typo fixed, Lloyd. Thanks for the poin­ter.
    Yeah, it’s fun watching peo­ple guess what I’m up to with Mic­ro­soft. Espe­cially the anti-MSFT Open Source guys. I won­der if they rea­lize, the more they rant here, the more they’re hel­ping me out, and indi­rectly, MSFT as well…

  6. scott radtke says:

    I am a wine drin­ker and I also own a bar so I have some idea about what folks want and some of the obs­tac­les they face.
    I can’t agree more about your approach, while some may buy into the whole “wine porn” or some blather about a wine lifestyle, most wine buying is a more hum­ble expe­rience. Robert Par­ker, the big­gest wine geek of all, has a shut up and drink men­ta­lity. Do you like the wine? Then it’s good and you don’t need an expert to tell you one way or another.
    WHAT’S LEFT IS TO CONNECT. Walk into any wine shop or super­mar­ket and you know that in there is a bottle — or ten — for you, but have no idea where to start. If you don’t have that spe­cial someone in-store who knows you, it’s up to the wine­ma­kers to help. This goes way beyond making a fancy label. Many awe­some wines are plain to ugly on that score. You need to bring more to the game.
    It’s an inte­res­ting dilemma. You’re a brave man Macleod.

  7. Paul says:

    No need to guess what you’re doing with ‘Blue Mons­ter’.
    “2. The idea doesn’t have to be big. It just has to change the world.” — MacLeod
    Most defi­ni­tely the FLOSS rants help. And though the M$ Busi­ness Model is the ‘evil empire’ it is NOT the sof­ties who are. Let us not for­get that without M$ and IBM, regard­less of what we feel about their ethics, or lack of, com­pu­ting would hardly be the ubi­quity it is today.

  8. Sue says:

    Half of the time I have no idea what you are about in some of your posts Hugh, but the fact that you con­sis­tently say these things like in num­ber 7, and actually appear to effort change, effec­ti­ve­ness and cut thru some of the crap for us in the non-marketing/non-tech work world is one of the rea­sons I con­ti­nue to read everyday-gives me hope! That and you’re a cutie car­too­nist who makes me laugh and think too ;)

  9. Jason says:

    Hugh,
    Another insight­ful look at the world from an outsi­der. Although I don’t feel that wine (and bes­poke suits for that mat­ter) are a com­mo­dity as oppo­sed to tech­no­logy and Star­bucks cof­fee, there is a need to rise above the clut­ter in any size mar­ket. Note that real wine is always in beta, that’s what makes it inte­res­ting.
    Jason