September 28, 2007

unleashing the blue monster [drum roll, please.…]

0709brimming.jpg
From John­nie Moore [one of my favo­rite blog­gers, by the way]:

And (doh) that’s what Hugh’s Blue Mons­ter sch­tick is about, right? As I get it, the Blue Mons­ter as repre­sents all the energy that keeps peo­ple at Mic­ro­soft des­pite its frus­tra­tions — and the idea that it needs to be unleashed.

Yep. That pretty much sums it up. Thanks for that, John­nie.
Taking a Blue Monster-type tack may be the wrong move, of course [I’m a car­too­nist, not a sooth­sa­yer]. But besi­des rear­guard actions defen­ding their core cash cows, what other option do they have? What other option does any large com­pany have, with a mature brand and a vast army of sha­rehol­ders? Serious question.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

6 Responses to “unleashing the blue monster [drum roll, please.…]”

  1. John Dodds says:

    I hear social net­wor­king is popu­lar these days.

  2. John Dodds says:

    More seriously, the theory dic­ta­tes that like any such com­pany should take the cash from the cash cows and seek to build new busi­nes­ses in areas which have great growth poten­tial and become the cash cows of the future. The other part of the theory that is all too often igno­red is that the exis­ting mar­kets have pea­ked and have only one way to go so it is sui­ci­dal to focus on rei­ne­ven­ting or repli­ca­ting them.
    Just as current suc­ces­ses deri­ved from doing something dif­fe­rent in the past, so future suc­ces­ses will derive from doing something dif­fe­rent now.

  3. The mar­ke­ting cha­llenge for a big com­pany is to appear small. That’s why the Blue Mons­ter works. By hiring you it’s like Mic­ro­soft is beha­ving like a star­tup. Totally not expec­ted beha­vior of a big evil mul­ti­na­tio­nal cor­po­ra­tion.
    If I were at Mic­ro­soft I know what I’d do: ask Bill Gates for a few hun­dred million and start up a new divi­sion aimed at Inter­net colla­bo­ra­tive ser­vi­ces. Put a fire­wall bet­ween it and the Office and Win­dows teams. If it ends up com­pe­ting with Office, so be it.

  4. John Ballantrae says:

    They have the option of stri­ving to make their cus­to­mers strong.
    I don’t buy MS Word because it’s bloa­ted and has fea­tu­res I would never use, and it’s just too anno­ying with its million and one options that I have to labour first to find so I can turn the dam­ned things off because I don’t want it making all these deci­sions like inden­ting and auto­ma­ti­cally num­be­ring the next para­graph. It doesn’t make me feel weak, but it sure doesn’t make me strong.
    I read your “How To Be Crea­tive” and I am stron­ger, and moti­va­ted, and ins­pi­red though the word has been wor­ked to death, and would part with cash for more of it.
    Can Mic­ro­soft pro­duce soft­ware whose begin­ning and end point is inc­rea­sed strength of the user?
    Yours,
    John Ballantrae

  5. Dawn Baird says:

    We orde­red some blog cards recently from Gaping Void. They are exce­llent qua­lity — highly recommended!