<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: mary jo’s “microsoft 2.0″ book</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gapingvoid.com/2007/09/27/mary-jos-microsoft-2-0-book/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/09/27/mary-jos-microsoft-2-0-book/</link>
	<description>&#34;cartoons drawn on the back of business cards&#34;</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 22:18:51 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DrSnowboard</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/09/27/mary-jos-microsoft-2-0-book/comment-page-1/#comment-20071</link>
		<dc:creator>DrSnowboard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 23:10:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3999#comment-20071</guid>
		<description>&quot;I see Microsoft&#039;s future less in terms of their two big cash cows [Windows and Office], and more in terms of their relationships with their 750,000 partners. These relationships are the Golden Goose, not the commercial bundles of ones &amp; zeroes.&quot;
Well, if their relationship with their customers is based on Vista, then perhaps yes, best to nurture their partners.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“I see Microsoft’s future less in terms of their two big cash cows [Windows and Office], and more in terms of their relationships with their 750,000 partners. These relationships are the Golden Goose, not the commercial bundles of ones &amp; zeroes.”<br />
Well, if their relationship with their customers is based on Vista, then perhaps yes, best to nurture their partners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Peter Reed</title>
		<link>http://gapingvoid.com/2007/09/27/mary-jos-microsoft-2-0-book/comment-page-1/#comment-20070</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Peter Reed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 19:48:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gapingvoid.com/?p=3999#comment-20070</guid>
		<description>Microsoft&#039;s moniker has lasted far beyond the &quot;micro&quot; and the &quot;soft&quot;. International Business Machines, however, are still international, still doing business, and probably still machines. I see Microsoft&#039;s future as a holding company ripe for re-branding in the now services orientated market place where &quot;plug and play&quot; server capacity is becoming a reality due to the likes of VMware who are software agnostics. The revolution will be commoditised.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft’s moniker has lasted far beyond the “micro” and the “soft”. International Business Machines, however, are still international, still doing business, and probably still machines. I see Microsoft’s future as a holding company ripe for re-branding in the now services orientated market place where “plug and play” server capacity is becoming a reality due to the likes of VMware who are software agnostics. The revolution will be commoditised.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
