September 27, 2007

dinosaurspeak revisited

zzzzazzdggg72.jpg

gaping­void is the per­fect web­site to get your daily blog­ging fix. Filled to the brim with hila­rious car­toons, it also offers timely and insight­ful com­men­tary on the new rea­li­ties of adver­ti­sing and mar­ke­ting. Indeed, some peo­ple would say it’s just not the blo­gosphere without gaping­void to enhance their qua­lity blog­ging expe­rience. Start your day the switched on way– subsc­ribe here to get gaping­void on your RSS fee­der today!
I wrote the pre­ce­ding para­graph to illus­trate the inte­llec­tual ban­kruptcy of what I call “Dino­saurs­peak”. That rather socio­pathic com­bi­na­tion of being com­ple­tely focu­sed on cus­to­mer bene­fit and yet com­ple­tely sel­fish at the same time.
And yeah, if it doesn’t work on gaping­void, it ain’t going to work on your pro­duct, either.
What is inte­res­ting to me is that this style of lan­guage was pretty uni­ver­sal only a few years ago. Sure, you had a few mave­ricks out there sti­rring things up, but most exter­nal busi­ness com­mu­ni­ca­tion was pretty much stuck in firehose mode.
When mar­kets become smar­ter and fas­ter than the com­pa­nies ser­vi­cing said mar­kets, lan­guage chan­ges. Of course it does.

[Ori­gi­nally pos­ted Novem­ber 5th, 2004.]

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

12 Responses to “dinosaurspeak revisited”

  1. John says:

    Thanks. As time goes on, maybe we can tell sto­ries that inte­rest peo­ple ins­tead of bar­fing on them.
    xoxoxo johnonsales

  2. Kimber says:

    Actually, John, some peo­ple will pay big money to get bar­fed on.
    Not that I’m spea­king from per­so­nal expe­rience of course…

  3. “THOUGHT: the future of adver­ti­sing is clients inc­rea­singly asking their agen­cies to help re-invent not just their brands, but their actual com­pa­nies. The future is agen­cies being inc­rea­singly una­ble to deli­ver on this.“
    Why hasn’t anyone been paying atten­tion? That is where we are.
    The client mar­ket in many cases is also fas­ter and smar­ter than the agency, etc.

  4. Eric says:

    I am against anti-dinosaur speak in theory, but something about it makes me feel com­for­ta­ble. Too much is no good, but a little bit ain’t bad.

  5. Oswegan says:

    Buil­ding traf­fic beco­mes a trmen­dous amount of work, espe­cially when its not your day job. I also don’t think over­mar­ke­ting works that well — as you are saying.
    It seems you have to take sort of a “build it and they will come” approach to this thing, other­wise it stops being fun and starts sme­lling a lot like work.
    ~Oswegan

  6. Anthony says:

    Honestly, I read the first para­graph and my heart jum­ped in my throat that you had been gob­bled up by a giant old-world media com­pany and had just been repla­ced by a team of staff wri­ters. or a staff of stick­bugs with bayo­nets at a key­board. same dif­fe­rence.
    Good call on the ditching of dino­saur speak. It’s tome for some genuine tal­king on these boxes we’ve set up.

  7. tomdog says:

    Hugh, how would you rew­rite the first para­graph then?

  8. ansgar says:

    I just like this car­toon, does it have anything to do with dino­saur speak though?

  9. neelakantan says:

    This is a phe­no­me­non I saw when I was in the US. Every adver­ti­se­ment, star­ting from banks and ending in medi­ci­nes follow the same pat­tern — dino­saur speak. I was sur­pri­sed, since back home in India, ads are never like that. Con­si­de­ring the “dif­fe­rence” in the audience, who are osten­sibly well infor­med, I was sur­pri­sed to see that here. Now I got it. It is just herd mentality…

  10. B.L Ochman says:

    There are *so many dino­saurs* out there. some­ti­mes dea­ling with them feels Sysi­fu­sian (if that’s a word.)

  11. John says:

    I’m glad I don’t have to pay you a com­mis­sion every time I quote this cartoon.

  12. Catherine says:

    i read the first para­graph and nearly had a heart attack! thank god the follo­wing bits explained!