September 2, 2007

mea culpa. quechup.com

Yours Truly just got hit by the Quechup sting..

If you’ve recei­ved an e-mail from them, on mine or anyone else’s behalf, please delete imme­dia­tely.
I’m really sorry about that, Folks. Not to men­tion, mor­ti­fied and emba­rras­sed.
Fuc­king scum­bags. I am utterly livid.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

37 Responses to “mea culpa. quechup.com”

  1. alec muffett says:

    Yeah, Hugh, I was won­de­ring about that. Didn’t seem your style, and I found a rant about them and their pro­cess on http://microformats.org/wiki/social-network-anti-patterns which sticks the knife in fairly deeply.
     – alec

  2. No-one attaches any blame to you. It got a bunch of folk on the con­ti­nent last month. I had the same pro­blem about 18 months ago with another ser­vice. Utterly emba­rras­sing but peo­ple are for­gi­ving when they know when you’ve been hoodwinked.

  3. Ben Askins says:

    I got on email from them on your behalf ear­lier today, thought it was a little odd but went ahead and sig­ned up. I’m hoping those fuc­kers haven’t spam­med my entire address book.

  4. I also thought it didn’t sound like you, so dele­ted it… I’m just glad you didn’t know my *clean* email address ;-)

  5. Ah, well. That’s what I get when I check my email before chec­king my feeds. Shit.

  6. David Parmet says:

    And I thought you wan­ted to be super spe­cial inter­net friends with me… *sniff*

  7. sig says:

    Hehe, ok, moral is trust twit­ter / feeds more than mail :)
    Good thing their data­base has been acting up for hours so they did not get me!

  8. Hrishi says:

    I know the fee­ling David.
    Sob.

  9. I sig­ned up via your invite and was about to see if any of my con­tacts were already on too. Luc­kily I got dis­trac­ted with something.
    Good job too.

  10. Man, you really got me sca­red for a minute!

  11. SethE says:

    I think we have to remem­ber that pre-web2 mar­ke­ting tech­ni­ques rely lar­gely on, whether mali­cious or not, tric­king peo­ple. As someone who’s com­pany has been under­going an online tran­si­tion, I can unders­tand having to reign in your baser instincts(or in Quechup’s case, not). Let’s face it, yes­ter­day the Q-folks got a shit­load of hits,which in an old-world sense is impor­tant, but a sim­ple Goo­gle search now reveals a rather stag­ge­ring ons­laught of hate and anger, which will quickly become an ons­laught of nothing­ness and deadness.

  12. Misty Olen says:

    Yes, I got one of these emails also and thought I would check it out since you were “recom­men­ding” it. Through the sign up pro­cess I won­de­red what the hell you liked about it because it see­med pretty lame. Glad you pos­ted this!

  13. Keith Handy says:

    Shit, I should have loo­ked at gaping­void before accep­ting the invite! How did the site get all those email addres­ses from you in the first place? I haven’t used the “check for friends” form so hope­fully I haven’t added to the damage in any way.

  14. No worries, I had a nig­gling doubt after clic­king through to the site. Didn’t look 2.0 enough for you to be wildly supporting/promoting it!
    Glad I chec­ked.
    No harm done… but we do need to use the word “sch­muck” more often! :)

  15. > Hehe, ok, moral is trust twit­ter / feeds more than mail :)
    Also, don’t enter your user/password for X on anything other than the login page of X.
    Same goes for web­pa­ges offe­ring to check your email for you, or web-based FTP inter­fa­ces that can upload stuff to your home­page for you.. you don’t know what else they’re going to do with your account info.
    Regards, Martin

  16. Average Jane says:

    I’d already heard about it, so I figu­red that’s what hap­pe­ned. Heck, I didn’t even know you had my e-mail address!

  17. Rob La Gesse says:

    I got about 14 of these yes­ter­day (only three of them from you, Hugh!). Any­way, it was enough of them that I igno­red it :)
    Rob

  18. Andres B says:

    I don’t unders­tand how anyone lets Quechup, Face­books and friends get into their email accounts.
    First of all, not every­body on my address book is a friend, nor “frien­da­ble”. Much less all the road­kill still in my inbox.
    Do you really want to “quechup” with xcvbsdfgwert@pharmacy.com?

  19. Dave Armstrong says:

    I didn’t get one! I didn’t get one! Ha de Ha de Ha Ha. Nah Nah de Nah … Oh wait. Nevermind.

  20. Tom Tac says:

    I saw it and said “Lets check Hugh’s web site first — after all, the Web can do –use­ful– things too …“
    It’s a relief to find out they are (quote) scum­bags. Now I won’t bother to sign with them.

  21. Damian says:

    Damn.
    I thought to myself, ooh, the mighty Hugh wants to invite little old ME to some cool new social net­work. That has to be good.
    I even emai­led a geek friend to boast.
    Now I feel unwan­ted, unlo­ved and silly.
    DAMN YOU MACLEOD. ;)

  22. Stuart Mudie says:

    I was more offen­ded by the clumsy use of “invite” as a noun ins­tead of “invia­tion” in the sub­ject of the email: “Invite from Hugh MacLeod”.

  23. Phil says:

    They say there’s no such thing as bad publi­city…
    I sig­ned up to lin­ked in a while back and they gave the option to check my email account to see if any of my con­tacts were already on lin­ked in — I chose not to give them my email user­name / pass­word
    trust no-one

  24. hugh macleod says:

    Thanks for being so kind and sup­por­tive, Every­body.
    I am still fuming about it, though… [Sigh]

  25. Marti says:

    Hell, I was just happy to get mail from you! LOL Hope you have a great week!

  26. Brian Sexton says:

    I am sorry to hear that you got nai­led by this, Hugh. This makes me glad to be not into the whole social this-and-that site trend.
    I unders­tand why you might want to expose your address book — to search for friends and acquain­tan­ces. As a rule, I do not enter anyone else’s e-mail address in any form on any Web site other than an e-mail ser­vice (e.g., Gmail) without per­mis­sion and I can­not recall the last time I made an excep­tion to that rule, but I think I unders­tand what it is you were trying to accom­plish by pro­vi­ding your address book to this Web site in this case.
    What I do not unders­tand, though, is why you trus­ted that site or its peo­ple — or why you would trust any site or any site’s peo­ple, aside from e-mail ser­vi­ces (e.g., a ser­vice that aggre­ga­tes e-mail from mul­ti­ple accounts) — with your e-mail pass­word. What did they do to con­vince you to entrust such sen­si­tive infor­ma­tion? How did they gain that level of trust from you?

  27. It’s dis­gra­ce­ful when that hap­pens. Didn’t Adriana suf­fer the same fate with something simi­lar a while back?
    For­tu­na­tely I dele­ted Hugh’s and CC Chapman’s invi­tes to Quetchup because I’m suf­fe­ring from social net­work fati­gue.
    Loo­king on the bright side — Quetchup must now be offi­cially fuc­ked. They can’t pos­sibly hope to sur­vive this kind of bad publicity.

  28. As I was sig­ning up in a bit of a daze this mor­ning I was thin­king it all see­med a bit strange. Luc­kily I pop­ped by your blog just after and can­ce­lled the account.
    I won­der how long they will hang on for now…

  29. hamish says:

    Hmmm. Not only is it emba­rras­sing, although their bad beha­viour is not your res­pon­si­bi­lity, but doesn’t this vio­late a LOT of Euro­pean data use laws. They are in gene­ral stric­ter than the the USA equi­va­lents, and I am sure that they have not though about this in detail.
    law­yer­fest, methinks. (If you are in the UK or Europe…)

  30. Phil Gomes says:

    I got one of these too… Didn’t seem your style.

  31. Timmy D says:

    Yeah, I got yours, and chec­ked my con­tact list and got hit too. Stu­pid. I really should know bet­ter. It’s pretty shifty to spam ever­yone when all you’re doing is chec­king your address book for others you know in the sys­tem, though.

  32. Richard Hare says:

    Oops, they got me too..!

  33. Silvana says:

    You sent me an invi­ta­tion, I accep­ted,
    they have spam my all con­tact list I feel really bad.
    Should have known bet­ter.
    Next time i will be very very carefull

  34. Alan says:

    So you’re human after all?
    It got me too. Ser­ves me right for igno­ring my ins­tincts. Les­son lear­ned, no real harm, no real foul. What’s a little spam bet­ween friends?

  35. Michelle says:

    I abor­ted the whole thing at regis­tra­tion.. YET… they still spam­med hun­dreds in my con­tact list. It was very early in the mor­ning, when I ope­ned the email and began regis­te­ring, perhaps I let something slip but I don’t think so.
    Very disap­poin­ting and so com­ple­tely emba­ras­sing. I’m not going to beat myself up over it and don’t you either Hugh.

  36. HughC says:

    Somewhat iro­nic that I should receive an invite from you since I’ve been ban­ned from com­men­ting on the ‘void for quite some time. Maybe this’ll prove me wrong.
    Life’s rich tapestry and all that …

  37. Gary Valan says:

    Hi Hugh
    I sig­ned up as soon as you sent me the invite and my gmail mail list got com­man­dee­red by these, sad to say, less than hono­ra­ble peo­ple. I for­got to do my usual due dili­gence.
    Here’s my let­ter to one of their mana­ge­ment types and sorry in advance for a long note:
    “Guys
    I was invi­ted by a blog­ging acquain­tance, Hugh Mac­Leod to join your site.
    Sadly I did without doing pro­per due dili­gence and the iDate owners, mar­ke­ting geniu­ses and your soft­ware desig­ners, a bunch of bot­tom feeders-let me be polite and not express my fee­lings, have serious scre­wed me over either inten­tio­nally or inad­ver­tently. First of all I assu­med it was some sort of a social net­wor­king site and Quechup tur­ned out to be another spam engine. The fact that I was asked a bunch of per­so­nal details should have set off alarm bells but having wor­ked non-stop for 18+ hours I sig­ned on.
    I sig­ned up as a hete­ro­se­xual and most hete­ros typi­cally would like to meet a WOMAN, unless you play for both teams, which I don’t. So why the heck would you all send it to my entire frea­king gmail email list where I have all my professional/business collea­gues. And you did not seek my per­mis­sion either.
    This is abso­lu­tely unac­cep­ta­ble and if you do not remove my name from your mem­bership rolls and DELETE ALL MY con­tacts I will inform (whether or not they pay any atten­tion to my email) all the major web 2.0 soft­ware review sites inc­lu­ding Techc­runch, Gigaom and other even more nas­tier review sites — its your call. I will do this by
    Fri­day Sept 7th unless you do as I ask and send me mail to con­firm that you have dele­ted my name and my gmail con­tacts from your data­base.
    Gary Valan”