August 17, 2007

blogging isn’t dead, it’s just a subset of something much larger and more important

zzzzzz7654195.jpg
It seems that my last post, “Why We’re All Blog­ging Less”, got a lot of pic­kup in the blo­gosphere. Some peo­ple infe­rred that I was down on blog­ging, or that I thought blog­ging was dead, or even that I was quit­ting blog­ging alto­gether. All untrue. So I thought I should cla­rify:
I remem­ber Robert Hughes, the great art cri­tic saying in his won­der­ful book, “The Shock Of The New” that the Con­cep­tual Art scene that emer­ged in the 1960s-1970s was actually good for “Pain­ting”.
Why? Because with every­body else scat­te­ring bits of string around gallery floors and calling it “Art”, or cove­ring them­sel­ves with but­ter, rolling them­sel­ves in the grass and calling it “Art”, the only peo­ple left pain­ting were those, as Hughes put it, “who still actually wan­ted to paint”.
And paint they did. Hence the big pain­ting revi­val in the early 1980s. Artists like Julian Sch­na­bel, Fran­cisco Cle­mente, Bas­quiat, Keith Haring etc.
I feel simi­larly about blogs. With new tools like Face­book and Twit­ter sprin­ging up, there’s no need to have a blog unless you really want to, unless you really want to devote that kind of time and effort to it.
As I’ve said more than once before, “Blog­ging isn’t for every­body, Web 2.0 is for every­body”.
Blog­ging isn’t dead. Far from it. It’s just a sub­set of something much lar­ger and more impor­tant. Time to quote Clay Shirky YET AGAIN. From 2004:

“So for­get about blogs and blog­gers and blog­ging and focus on this — the cost and dif­fi­culty of publishing abso­lu­tely anything, by anyone, into a glo­bal medium, just got a whole lot lower. And the effects of that inc­rea­sed pool of poten­tial pro­du­cers is going to be vast.”

Twit­ter. Face­book. Jaiku. Word­press. Mova­ble Type. Wha­te­ver. Vive la dif­fe­rence.
Hope that helps…

26 Responses to “blogging isn’t dead, it’s just a subset of something much larger and more important”

  1. Great post, Hugh. I con­si­der myself a hybrid — am I cove­red in but­ter and grass while I paint? — and by that, I avail of the tools that help me reach the humans, whe­re­ver they may be. So, I’ll con­ti­nue to blog, for love of the medium, but if you’re unlucky enough to follow me on Twit­ter, you know I’m a storm over there as well.
    Praise the Bas­quiats *and* the string sprinklers!

  2. marcel weiß says:

    Hugh, you mise­rably fai­led in kee­ping your blog in ‘lame mode’. :D
    great post indeed.

  3. You nai­led it again.

  4. Blog­ging isn’t dead — but I do think there is an oppor­tu­nity for it to evolve. As you said — Twit­ter, Face­book etc are now doing much of the heavy lif­ting in terms of publishing The Stuff. Blogs perhaps need to evolve more towards cura­ting or media­ting the stuff that is out there — par­ti­cu­larly as the stuff is beco­ming more micro, frag­men­ted and emphe­me­ral. Anthony May­field pos­ted about cura­ting recently — I think he is on the right track. http://tinyurl.com/38qq9e
    Media­tion in social media is an inte­res­ting and impor­tant area that the peo­ple currently or for­merly known as A-List blog­gers should turn their atten­tion to http://tinyurl.com/2qmxme

  5. So many peo­ple schoo­led in tra­di­tio­nal media are quick to dis­miss blogs and Face­book.
    I sus­pect a lot of it is because they are sca­red, and the rea­son for that is that they can’t be bothe­red to look at the posi­ti­ves and the ways they can use for posi­ti­ves to their advan­tage.
    I use blogs, Face­book and Twit­ter along­side my day job as a Web Pro­du­cer, and they’ve all pro­vi­ded value for me. I wouldn’t have known about this post without Twit­ter for example…

  6. I said much the same with a post back on the 9th where I sug­ges­ted that Face­book could be the best thing that has hap­pe­ned for blog­ging
    http://www.winextra.com/2007/08/09/facebook-the-best-thing-to-happen-to-blogging/

  7. Seth says:

    Thanks for the follow up, Hugh. As a rela­ti­vely new blog­ger the last post was rather depres­sing. But I think I came to the conc­lu­sion that even in the Web 2.0 era, an entire medium can’t begun and end in less than a decade. I think there’s still lots of unk­nown terri­tory to be char­ted out in the world of blog­ging. In fact, I think it might bene­fit greatly from losing it’s tech­no­lo­gi­cal “novelty” aspect and beco­ming just another means of expres­sion akin to what hap­pend to film in the early days. In other words I don’t think Ulys­ses has been blog­ged yet(Gee, I hope that sounds as pro­found as I wan­ted it to)!

  8. skinnyninja says:

    Good post. Just because the inter­net chan­ges and the medium shifts to some new device doesn’t mean there is a shor­tage of demand for cer­tain mes­sa­ges. There is a tre­men­dous mar­ket out there for Hugh’s mes­sage and the exact medium he uses is only of minor impor­tance.
    I follow Gaping­void because it’s cool and clever.…not because it’s a blog. (Duh.)

  9. …“the only peo­ple left pain­ting were those, as Hughes put it, “who still actually wan­ted to paint”.”
    Abso­lu­tely right. But there are still lots of peo­ple pain­ting stuff I wouldn’t let within 100 yards of my sit­ting room wall — they might be pas­sio­nate about it, but they’re just not very good. I think it’s the same with blog­ging.
    Oh, and the other thing that’s the same is that (to your point no.4 in the pre­vious post) there’ll always be some idiot who looks at a Hock­ney and says, “That’s crap. My three year old could do better…”

  10. Gabriel says:

    With such an appea­ling title, I was seriously disap­poin­ted that “something much lar­ger and more impor­tant” than blog­ging was…wait for it…drumroll please…other forms of blog­ging.
    Oh well, maybe there’s nothing more impor­tant than blogging.

  11. Juho says:

    Oh yes, well put if only a part of the lar­ger pic­ture. ;) Sorry, couldn’t resist.
    But yeah, more seriously, it’s all just dif­fe­rent forms of self-expression and ways to expose those expres­sions to like-minded peo­ple.
    It’s all get­ting easier and easier to do, and the pent-up demand for it from the times of the read-only web is star­ting to dis­si­pate.
    This must be the first time in modern his­tory when serious media inno­va­tions *didn’t* ori­gi­nate with the porn industry but real peo­ple. Con­su­mers, as they say. ;)

  12. jeremy says:

    There it is! This is exactly what I nee­ded after your last post. I knew I had to con­ti­nue on my blog­ging jour­ney, I just couldn’t figure out why. Thanks for the pick-me-up.

  13. Tish Grier says:

    It really *is* a mat­ter of what we want to use, when we want to use it, as much as whom we may want to reach. Even two years ago, what we used was pretty limi­ted.…
    That’s why when some serious peo­ple have said “social media’s dead!” (something of an extra­po­la­tion of the “blogging’s dead” thing) I had to laugh – it’s really only begin­ning.
    Although all the social net­wor­king might put some of us way over the edge ;-)

  14. Shelley says:

    Mayhap blog­ging is just inju­red. Poor thing is lim­ping along on a leg half che­wed off by a hungry VC that jum­ped out at it from the last Techc­runch party; VC high on jello shots with “Love, Michael” scraw­led across its head in inde­li­ble black ink.
    Maybe blog­ging is stretched thin and hard to see; pulled tight by gras­ping hands, all des­pe­rate for a piece of the good times.
    Perhaps weblog­ging has gone into hiding, and if we go over to tripod.com and search on “rain­bow uni­corns”, we can find sha­des of weblogs past hid­den among the blin­king stars and dan­cing ponies.
    Then again, I heard a rumor blog­ging was bought by Tri­pAd­vi­sor for three million dollars. And change. We offe­red to throw in Dave Winer, too, but that made them scream and they ran away.
    Oh, and Web 2.0 was yes­ter­day – today’s web is Web 9.75.

  15. I thought this would be another boring “blog about blog­ging” post when I saw it on Tech­Meme.
    They also thought pain­ting would die when pho­to­graphy came around. Great ana­logy. Pain­ting will never die! I teach oil pain­ting clas­ses and love pas­sing the torch. I think one thing you mis­sed, blog­ging is about inde­pen­dence.
    Where a string-dangler may depend more on the bureauc­racy of the museum/gallery/academic, the pain­ter can roll up a dozen crea­tions under one arm and sail to Tahiti. Maybe not the best ana­logy, but the advan­tage the pro­fes­sio­nal blog­ger has: domain “ownership” with total con­trol of con­tent, adver­ti­sing, and even the abi­lity to switch hosts, pre­ser­ving inbound links, Goo­gle juice, etc.

  16. Jen says:

    I find it amu­sing what an effect your words have on the mas­ses. What was it like to rea­lise you can sway minds at pen/keystroke?
    I don’t mean that in a bad way, most of the time it’s nice to see the world from a dif­fe­rent angle. A rea­son why I keep loo­king back here.
    But I do like the car­toons too. :}

  17. Andrew says:

    For me, the growth of the dif­fe­rent ser­vi­ces allows me to split my con­tent a bit. ‘real blog posts’ go on my real blog — snip­pets of information/links/pictures go on my tum­blog, pure book­marks into my del.icio.us, and very little thoughts (along with what I’m doing, thin­king, eating, drin­king) go onto Jaiku.
    This means that when (well, if) you go to my weblog, you get the con­tent that’s had real thought put into it — no link posts, no cute pic­tu­res, no ran­dom thoughts about break­fast.
    My blog is bene­fi­ting from this, I think :)

  18. TechHairBall says:

    Blog­ging, currently is like Car’s of 1970’s, the best is yet to come.

  19. deb schultz says:

    wise and sage thoughts as usual — it is the drive to com­mu­ni­cate at the core — use wha­te­ver tools ya got any­way you want to — be it indie blog­ger or big cor­po­ra­tion — other­wise, we all should just go back to “mon­key speak”

  20. K says:

    I love posts like your pre­vious one.
    Anyone who gives up on blog­ging
    ’cause you said so
    (yes, even you, being Hugh baby),
    will give up when it gets “hard” any­way.
    Might as well save them time.

  21. Maybe true at the indi­vi­dual level. Not true in business.

  22. Douglas Karr says:

    It’s impor­tant to note that, on the tech­ni­cal side, blog­ging is is evol­ving as well. Con­tent Mana­ge­ment Sys­tems and Blogs used to be dif­fe­rent tech­no­lo­gies; howe­ver, with the search engine advan­ta­ges of blog­ging — Con­tent Mana­ge­ment sys­tems are now adop­ting that tech­no­logy mains­tream.
    It might be more accu­rate to state, “Every­body else is blog­ging more!”. :)

  23. Dalingka Gruptwaff says:

    “Blog­ging isn’t dead. Far from it. It’s just a sub­set of something much lar­ger and more impor­tant.”
    Heheh! Right. That’s almost word-for-word the same man­tra we chan­ted about the Source’s POST boards (’84), Delphi’s SIGs (’88), GEnie’s Round­ta­bles (’92), CompuServe’s Forums (’99), AOL’s Com­mu­ni­ties (’02), etc.
    Keep repea­ting it, Hugh. Ah, yes, that’s right. You’re fee­ling very, very rela­xed. Your eye­lids want to close. You’re get­ting sleepy, droopy, drowsy. As I count back­wards from ten to one.…

  24. Hugh,
    It’s great to see that you made it home safely and that you are back on top blog­ging. As always a great post, i’ll look for­ward to the next time your in the sta­tes for another geek din­ner.
    Cheers,
    Adam

  25. hugh macleod says:

    Gabriel, you “disap­poin­ted” com­ment pro­ves my point… that we’re already taking the con­cept of “Cheap & Easy Glo­bal Media” for gran­ted. 20 years ago this would have been unheard of.

  26. sezam says:

    Great post Hugh.Simple as that