August 12, 2007

why we’re all blogging less

dorothy335.jpg
[“Dorothy”. One of my fave car­toons from the early days. NYNY, 1998.]
A com­mon con­ver­sa­tion thread I’m hea­ring a lot among the vete­ran blog­gers, is how we all seem to be blog­ging a lot less. The rea­sons are nume­rous; here’s a short list of the main ones I’m pic­king up.
1. We got busy. For many of us, blog­ging crea­ted oppor­tu­ni­ties for us in the offline world, just like the early blog evan­ge­lists pre­dic­ted. And as we found out the hard way, it’s actually quite hard to do stuff and blog about it at the same time. As my father, a very smart and obser­vant man once quip­ped, “A lot of these blog­gers seem to have a lot of time on their hands”. That may have been true in 2002, back when the reces­sion was still on. It’s cer­tainly less true with a lot of peo­ple I know.
2. Sco­ble quit Mic­ro­soft. Just kid­ding.
3. Blog­ging isn’t for every­body. Web 2.0 is for every­body. Kee­ping a half-decent blog going is very time-consuming work. So of course there was a mar­ket for more time-friendly Web 2.0 apps, like Face­book and Twit­ter. That doesn’t mean blogs will go away. It just means more oppor­tu­ni­ties for peo­ple to create and use new tools. The web stands still for nobody etc.
4. Believe it or not, some of us have bet­ter things to do than to be con­ti­nually jus­tif­ying our­sel­ves to a crowd of passive-aggressive, self-loathing, loser fuck­tards. Thank­fully these folk are a mino­rity, but their one skill-set in life seems to be in the less-than-noble art of “using up too much oxy­gen”. Which makes “Enga­ging in The Con­ver­sa­tion” a lot less appea­ling for the others. Life is short.
5. The future we spent a long time evan­ge­li­zing has already arri­ved. Blogs are not the future. Blogs are the pre­sent. So we’re all loo­king for new things to keep our rest­less brain cells occu­pied. I was recently tal­king to Adriana Lukas about this very same sub­ject. She’s get­ting more into her “next big thing”, namely, “VRM”.
6. They said what they had to say, then moved on. It hap­pens all the time with book wri­ters, why not the same with blog­gers?
[Bonus Link] B.L .Och­man: “Reports of Blogging’s Death Are Greatly Exaggerated.”

46 Responses to “why we’re all blogging less”

  1. Hugh, some inte­res­ting thoughts and got me thin­king!
    I won­der if another rea­son is that for many peo­ple they found that they did not get the audience and rea­ders they thought they would get and lost the will to keep pum­ping out thoughts when only a hand­ful of peo­ple actually cared what they had to say based on how few peo­ple stop­ped by?
    Gary

  2. Richard says:

    Not that I was ever a par­ti­cu­larly pro­li­fic blog­ger to start with, but I’m in a dry patch at the moment too. I’d give 3 reasons:

    1. I got busy. To put it more simply, I got a job.
    2. It’s sum­mer. It’s warm out, there are beaches not too far away, plea­sure boats on the har­bour, etc. Frankly, given a choice bet­ween sit­ting inside wri­ting and sit­ting outside socia­li­sing, I know which one I pick.
    3. It’s per­so­nal. I do have the urge to write, but I do not have the con­nec­ted urge to publish it under my name. There is plenty going on in my head, plenty I’d like to write about, plenty I’d like to get feed­back about, but very little of it is stuff I want to say to ‘the public’. I either want to say it directly to the peo­ple con­cer­ned, or I want to dis­cuss it with friends I trust and respect.

    One other thing, which doesn’t fit into the list above, is that my blog is on a cou­ple of pla­nets, and I’m aware that personal/random-life-thoughts stuff is going to get dis­tri­bu­ted rela­ti­vely widely and repu­blished in pla­ces where it may not be appro­priate or wel­come. I’ve heard simi­lar com­ments from other peo­ple — obviously, this may not apply so much to A-listers…

  3. VRM? Any idea how long that’s been around as both a con­cept and tech­no­logy play?

  4. Max Kaizen says:

    Guilt swiftly exor­ci­sed.
    Amen

  5. Very true words, as always!
    I was thin­king of something cle­ver to write but to busy I’m afraid ;)

  6. faizan says:

    Nice buddy. I like it so much. Come on keep it up :)

  7. Adriana says:

    Amen. Well put. :)

  8. Let us do it for (Open)Money
    In the recent Gno­me­dex there was a talk about Open­Mo­ney. It was bit con­fu­sed and too con­fu­sing — yet very inte­res­ting.
    Just a few cen­tu­ries back, prin­ting and publishing were the domains of the govern­ment and the church. Now we know how blogs has pushed publishing to frin­ges.
    Open­Mo­ney has the poten­tial to take the con­cept of cen­trally con­tro­lled Money to the frin­ges.
    What is the bene­fit you might ask. Well a lot of dis­rup­tion and wealth unloc­king — just like blogs unloc­ked expres­sion and “fin­ding mea­ning”.
    When I was lis­te­ning to the Gno­me­dex talk, your car­toon — ‘Let us open­source our Sex lives’ came to my mind.
    I’m wri­ting this in the hope that some A-lister sees Open­Mo­ney as the Next Big Thing. And opens the Pandora’s box.
    –Balaji
    Chennai

  9. hugh macleod says:

    Balaji, that’s a bit naughty [I usually delete off-topic comments/plugs], but what the hell…

  10. alan p says:

    Thoughts re post:
    1. Re: Busy yes — but also, there is far more com­pe­ti­tion for atten­tion out there — I would bet that it takes more time now for simi­lar impact.
    3. Face­book saves time! No ways!!! Its v inef­fi­cient at mes­sa­ging and data hand­ling even vs Web 1 tech (eg Yahoo Groups) and does not have the reach of an Open Sys­tem such as a blog. It’s just todays noo media dar­ling, dah­ling :-)
    As for Twit­ter — yup, saves time — but does less.
    4. The f*cktards will be with us always
    5. I recall VRM in the late 80’s and late 90’s reprise…nice to know its on a re-release :)
    6. Possibly…everyone has a novel and a bell curve inside them.…

  11. Net says:

    Hugh, I fully agree. I have thought for the past two weeks of why I haven’t been fee­ling to write anything on my blog. I rea­li­zed — I just don’t feel for it, it is really not that impor­tant and at the moment Twitter/ Face­book are bet­ter out­lets for my impulses.

  12. Blogs are the start, not the end.

  13. Mack Collier says:

    “It’s sum­mer. It’s warm out, there are beaches not too far away, plea­sure boats on the har­bour, etc. Frankly, given a choice bet­ween sit­ting inside wri­ting and sit­ting outside socia­li­sing, I know which one I pick.”
    I con­ti­nue to be fas­ci­na­ted at how just a year ago, ever­yone rea­dily offe­red this as the expla­na­tion for why blog­ging had sud­denly slo­wed down. I remem­ber seve­ral blog­gers I regu­larly read lea­ving a ‘See you in Sep­tem­ber’ post, in June.
    But this year, it’s all because blog­ging itself has slo­wed down, and is no lon­ger the ‘shiny new toy’. Ah well, at least it’s bet­ter than having the bian­nual A-Lister/Z-Lister dustup.

  14. Liz Strauss says:

    It is sum­mer. I don’t doubt that some are too busy and ths some have out­grown blog­ging. It’s quite clear that some who came first want to be the first to move on. But Mack has a point there, it’s still sum­mer, as sum­mer was last year.…

  15. thom singer says:

    I know some blog­gers who found their blogs became “work” once they found an audience. What star­ted as fun, or a way to pro­mote their offline busi­ness, became a res­pon­si­bi­lity once they had hun­dreds of rea­ders expec­ting insight­ful, ins­pi­ring and inte­res­ting posts on a regu­lar basis. One friend said “I have grown to hate my blog”, and he has not pos­ted more than once in two months.
    Plus, for some it was cool to say they had a blog, as folks did not know about blogs. Now it is com­mon, and thus some need to move on to avoid being average.

  16. boyanother says:

    great blog dawg!great cartoons!!!!

  17. It hap­pens all the time with a new tool, toy, abi­lity, super­po­wer, wha­te­ver. For a while the focus is on the “thing” and some peo­ple learn how to use the “thing” to pro­duce some ama­zing results.
    After a while, the focus beco­mes more on results than the “thing”. Some peo­ple incor­po­rate that “thing” as one arrow in their qui­ver — some con­ti­nue to use just that one tool, toy or wha­te­ver. Some get bored with the whole mess and move on.
    I was invol­ved in the popu­la­ri­za­tion of the coaching move­ment in the mid-90’s. Seve­ral of us star­ted a pro­fes­sio­nal asso­cia­tion, cre­den­tia­ling, the whole bit. After a few years I noti­ced that many of the folks who were there at the start no lon­ger spent most of their time (or got most of their income) from coaching — they had branched off to wri­ting, spea­king, con­sul­ting, wha­te­ver.
    I think this is a fami­liar pattern.

  18. I’m with Mack and Liz on the gene­ral sen­ti­ment of this being the sum­mer sea­son and folks fee­ling quite Euro­pean about things.
    As for #3, I think every­body is into blog­ging these days and thus there is less exc­lu­si­vity asso­cia­ted with it. Although when I hear peo­ple refer to posts as BLOGS I know they might be into them while still not ‘get­ting’ what they’re into ;-) And for many the actual con­ver­sa­tion is still quite elu­sive… I will leave you all to pon­der this point.
    Happy sum­mer, Hugh.

  19. You got it, Hugh. I insist that blogs writ­ten by wri­ters are not really blogs, just a medium for wri­ting. Wri­ting is wri­ting, period. As you know, I go on hia­tus regularly.

  20. The future for blogs, and sort of everything, is going to come down to either crea­ting or being part of on-line social clus­ters or fee­ding stand-alone con­tent to these clus­ters (what I call con­tent worms). If you have blog, espe­cially of you are an A-lister, now’s the time to work out if you want to evolve it into a clus­ter — pos­sibly morphing twit­tery, face­booky stuff into this — or ins­tead focus on crea­ting con­tent worms.
    See http://tinyurl.com/2yfdmh.
    Hugh, I figure your all new Gaping­Void, to be unvei­led in Sep­tem­ber, might be going the clus­tery way? Myself — I’m going to focus on con­tent worms and look to join other people’s clusters.

  21. Rex Hammock says:

    My blog is still the “core” of my online iden­tity. And I think I am enga­ged in a con­ver­sa­tion as much as I ever was. Howe­ver, I find that pos­ting links (via del.icio.us/rexblog) repla­ces about 50% of what I once blog­ged about and twit­ter (twitter.com/rexhammock) repla­ces about 25% more. And since I aggre­gate both of those on my blog, I can post still “blog” but not “blog” — if you know what I mean. (I hope you do, because I’m not sure anyone else does.) I think if I could draw pic­tu­res on the back of busi­ness cards, that would replace another 20% of my blog­ging — you’ve already cor­ne­red that niche, howe­ver. :)

  22. momo says:

    Peo­ple are fic­kle, maybe?

  23. Leah says:

    After nearly four years of blog­ging, I’m fin­ding the need for allo­wing myself a week hia­tus here, a month hia­tus there to be gro­wing all the time. There has been a good deal of #1, but defi­ni­tely Twit­ter and del.icio.us have taken some of the old con­tent.
    Also the part where having a per­so­nal life star­ted get­ting in the way of wri­ting a per­so­nal blog, which Acci­den­tally Jewish is. That said, this wee­kend I star­ted two more blogs for sma­ller, more focu­sed dis­cus­sions after get­ting asked this week, “Why don’t you ever blog about that?”
    *shrug*
    and, you know, it’s August.

  24. Keith Handy says:

    I love #4. I think I’ll quote that the next time I get an “uncons­truc­tive” com­ment (to put it nicely).

  25. Alan says:

    My per­so­nal rea­so­ning is thus:
    I used to blog more and read more blogs back in law school (2004 – 2005). I had “free” time then. Most of the blogs I read were writ­ten by fellow law stu­dents.
    We all gra­dua­ted (pre­su­mably) and got jobs (again, pre­su­mably) and now do not have nearly as much “free” time (thrice, pre­su­mably) and/or inte­rest in main­tai­ning a blog.
    Mine used to actually have “con­tent”. Nowa­days it’s redu­ced to inter­mit­tent upda­tes about my per­so­nal life. I might say I only main­tain it because I’m a nar­cis­sis­tic asshole but I still hold out hope for more subs­tan­tive con­tent. *shrug* Plus it’s still fun for me.

  26. Robert says:

    I got lost at Richard’s worm clus­ter thin­gi­mi­jigs!
    I am defi­na­tely out of this conversation.

  27. Hugh,
    I think less blog­ging is hap­pe­ning for many of the rea­sons you men­tio­ned.
    As well as noting the relent­less com­pe­ti­tion when other peo­ple state that they just got 100,000 hits in 7 days and I just coun­ted 20 on all of my sites! That alone makes me feel like a fai­lure!
    Blog­ging is not new any­more, but it is still a good way to reach out and mar­ket your­self and just connect…with any quan­tity of audience. Hell, at least someone is lis­te­ning.
    Blog­gings pre­sent state may be ana­lo­gous to a marriage where you have to work at it as oppo­sed to the one night stand of twit­ter, or other 2.0 tricks (so to speak).
    Also, rea­lize that peo­ple who have been blog­ging are ‘ahead of the curve.’ You are essen­tially very high tech and con­nec­ted on many other fronts.
    You have been doing it for years and now it is ‘mains­tream.’
    The­re­fore, pro-bloggers are on to the next fas­ter, swee­ter ‘hit’whatever that may be.
    Adrienne

  28. K says:

    Oh, crap.
    So since I’m still pos­ting every day (on 3 dif­fe­rent blogs) that means
    1) I’m not busy (good to know, should start a few more pro­jects then)
    2) I’m dea­ling with the Sco­ble situa­tion (Hugh, baby, if you need help… drop me a line sweetheart, I’ll make you for­get all about him)
    3) I haven’t figu­red out Web 2.0 (guilty as char­ged, ‘course I haven’t figu­red out how to pro­perly mode­rate my com­ments yet either)
    4) I enjoy tal­king to fuck­tards (actually I simply ignore them, see #3)
    5) I’m living in the past (where I’m 20 and a size zero… what’s wrong with that again?)
    6) I have a lot more crap to say and no, I’m not moving anywhere

  29. Tim Walker says:

    “Believe it or not, some of us have bet­ter things to do than to be con­ti­nually jus­tif­ying our­sel­ves to a crowd of passive-aggressive, self-loathing, loser fuck­tards.”
    If it’s all right with you, I’m just going to quote this (with attri­bu­tion, of course!) the next time the oppor­tu­nity pre­sents itself in my com­ment threads. Could be a while — or, given the nature of things, could be tomorrow …

  30. JimH says:

    Finally got around to blog­ging, and already feel like I’m over it after a hand­ful of posts. Can’t sleep any fas­ter so something’s gotta give. Thanks for let­ting some air back into the room.

  31. Karen says:

    Vel­ve­teen Rab­bit.
    How we do anything is how we do everything.
    We change the chan­nel.
    We punch a dif­fe­rent but­ton.
    We trade in the old.
    We quit.

  32. #3 — sure, blog­ging isn’t for ever­yone, as ever­yone can’t write. Twitter’s fine for ADD-like upda­tes of what’s inte­res­ting or in your face at pre­sent, but blog­ging affords you to think. To craft words together in a way that enga­ges. Web 2.0 has its place, but it has less poten­tial to con­nect me to others with “What? You too?” moments than blogs do.

  33. Great post. I think there’s another ele­ment in play here. In my opi­nion, even if this is the 10th anni­ver­sary of “blog­ging” it is still extre­mely new for most peo­ple. Its not like you, or me, or Sco­ble or *most* blog­gers were wri­ting 800‑2000 words or more PER DAY before the plat­forms came to be.
    I firmly believe we are at the apex of blog­ging popu­la­rity, and many “esta­blished brands” of blog­ging will dec­rease the quan­tity of wri­ting they do, if not stop alto­gether. If you look at this in an abs­tract, it seems highly unli­kely and highly impro­ba­ble that a few million peo­ple truly have an aching need to write this much…

  34. manpageman says:

    Isn’t VRM just being a com­pe­tent cus­to­mer?
    Caveat emp­tor, and all that.

  35. KG says:

    Thanks for this post. You’re hel­ping me put words to the pink elephant that’s been in my blog­ging room lately. ;)
    Ah, August. And it’s been such an August-y August for me. I’d like to think that this is what is cau­sing my blog­ging mojo to float away, but for me (and perhaps others), it’s more likely that:
    1. Just as what is “cool” con­ti­nues to change, so will everything that human beings find inte­res­ting con­ti­nue to change. It’s not that we are fic­kle, it’s that this is how things are. We and the world are in cons­tant flux — life is cons­tant change, big and small. Go with the flow.
    2. With that being said, I’m kee­ping my blog even though I haven’t been pos­ting much lately. Everyone’s points about the con­ver­sa­tion con­ti­nuing to morph is right on. Blog­ging is a vital part of my con­ver­sa­tions. It’s the only way I can keep in touch with some peo­ple, too. I’m not clo­sing this door, though I am sup­ple­men­ting it with Twit­ter, now Face­book (who knows what is next).
    3. We’re not robots (yet?), we’re human. This is good. Who can keep up mas­sive post out­bursts for years? Burn-out is real.
    When coo­ler weather visits in a month or so, I still think I might start blog­ging more again. We’ll see.
    P.S. Loo­king for­ward to your mys­te­rious Sep­tem­ber announcement…

  36. Lon­ger com­ment pos­ted here. Glad you sur­vi­ved the trip — even if the South wasn’t worthy of your whirl­wind tour.

  37. Chuck Nyren says:

    Just never stop crea­ting cartoons.

  38. Good thoughts.. It really makes me won­der if it’s too late to get into the game. Hope you don’t mind I lin­ked to this in my blog since it got my gears wor­king about things.

  39. John Unger says:

    I kinda saw this coming last year, but it’s been get­ting more and more real lately. I’ve got at least six “active” blogs but rarely get to focus on more than one at a time. That suits me okay, because I like to switch the focus now and then. Whatever’s hot at the moment gets my atten­tion.
    But this sum­mer has been off the hook. I’m swam­ped with sales, clients, media requests, per­so­nal con­ver­sa­tions and pro­jects in deve­lop­ment. It’s a funny dicho­tomy… the more I have to blog about, the less time there is to do it.
    Per­so­nally, I miss blog­ging more. I actually enjoy it. Twitter’s okay, but doesn’t seem (yet) to gene­rate the kind of bene­fits that blog­ging has. Face­book lea­ves me cold because it’s too much of a pain to add peo­ple, etc. Most of my time online seems to be about email now… because that’s the best way to close the deal usually (for me).

  40. James T says:

    hmm; blog­ging or tal­king; blog or phone ? Yes one can get either, but does that mean using it every­day or every hour ? The novelty must adjust and perhaps the more fran­tic, daily-updated blog is some­ti­mes too much. bring on slowblog…

  41. There’s something about the rush of cha­sing a topic that’s being widely dis­cus­sed that gives you an adre­na­line boost. But after 200 adre­na­line boosts, the jolt isn’t as noti­cea­ble. Either you get past the adre­na­line phase, or you look for a big­ger jolt elsewhere.
    I still love the focus, struc­ture and inte­rac­tion of blog­ging. Some days, though, it feels way too much like work.…

  42. Neil K says:

    Blog­ging does take an effort whe­reas many of the current vogues of face­book, twit­ter etc are low-input and you don’t have to think that deeply. But the rewards are in pro­por­tion to the effort — face­book tends to con­nect you to peo­ple you know, while blog­ging can con­nect you with totally dif­fe­rent peo­ple that you would never encoun­ter.
    One thing that does lend cre­dence to the notion that blog­ging is on the wane is the mains­tream media telling us that it’s a key influen­cer of the upco­ming elec­tion. When they get to trum­pet somethings power it’s usually on the way down.

  43. Jim Treacher says:

    7. Plain old fati­gue. It can get tiring, being expec­ted to have an opi­nion on every little thing. Peo­ple need a break now and then.

  44. Chuck Adkins says:

    Believe it or not, some of us have bet­ter things to do than to be con­ti­nually jus­tif­ying our­sel­ves to a crowd of passive-aggressive, self-loathing, loser fuck­tards
    Don’t mince words now! ;) :D :-P