July 1, 2007

e.r.p. being built around social media, not the other way around?

hierarchy28879.jpg
My friend, Shel Israel is doing some con­sul­ting work for the large Ger­man ERP soft­ware firm, SAP. To aid the cause I ans­we­red ten ques­tions about social media that he e-mailed to me. Here they are below:
1. You’ve been around the social media scene for a long time. How has it emer­ged from your pers­pec­tive?
It has emer­ged very une­venly, yet cons­tantly. Six years of blog­ging later, and I still am utterly una­ble to pre­dict what or who is going to be “the next big thing”. Will Twit­ter win? Or Jaiku? Something else? Nobody knows. A year ago MyS­pace loo­ked uns­top­pa­ble. Now there’s Face­book. Three years ago Lin­ke­dIn was all the rage. What will hap­pen to Goo­gle in 10 years? Your guess is as good as mine. Some­ti­mes it’s just easier to wait for the future to arrive on your doors­tep than to try to fore­see events.
2. Where do you think social media will be going over the next 5 – 10 years?
I think it will con­ti­nue to gra­vi­tate to where it has always gra­vi­ta­ted towards i.e. Fas­ter, Chea­per and Easier.
The most inte­res­ting thing to me recently has watching the pea­king of blogs. For a cou­ple of years there they were the big­gest story in media. Now their cul­tu­ral influence seems a lot sma­ller. Peo­ple finally figu­red out that yes, doing a blog well is actually very time con­su­ming. Not every­body wants to be Robert Sco­ble- Hell, I’m not sure if Sco­ble wants to be Sco­ble all the time, either [Joke!]. Which crea­ted a lot of oppor­tu­ni­ties for less time-consuming web pro­ducts.
This is us seeing Social Media evol­ving way from the time-guzzling “Cele­brity Model”, where peo­ple emu­late “broad­cas­ters” on a small scale, towards something that is far more use­ful to most peo­ple i.e. something that allows peo­ple to make friends and talk to their friends more easily.
This is why I find Face­book so inte­res­ting. The fact that it was inven­ted by college stu­dents doesn’t sur­prise me.
Think about it. Every college kid has a tight-knit group of friends [Think, for exam­ple, Ani­mal House or St. Elmo’s Fire}. Face­book was desig­ned from the very begin­ning to allow groups of pre-existing friends like these to com­mu­ni­cate with each other bet­ter. Quite dif­fe­rent from the “broad­cast model” of blogs. It’s more colle­giate.
3. How is social media emer­ging in the UK and EU v the US?
The UK blog­ging scene always struck me as rela­ti­vely sma­ller and gee­kier than the US scene. Brits have always struck me as more cau­tious at embra­cing the inter­net com­pa­red to the Ame­ri­cans, and I ima­gine this will con­ti­nue. That being said, the Lon­don Face­book net­work is the second lar­gest in the world, big­ger than New York’s. I’m gues­sing this means they don’t mind using social media for the FRIENDS THEY ALREADY HAVE, and are less willing to use Social Media to make new “online friends”. Then again, the French really took to blog­ging, I sup­pose because it’s an ideal medium for peo­ple with strong opi­nions– and the French do like a good, strong con­ver­sa­tions. The Ger­mans I unders­tand never took to blog­ging on the same level as the French or the Brits, howe­ver I’m told they’re really into Wiki­pe­dia– a more colla­bo­ra­tive medium that res­pects and defers to autho­rity.
I met a lot of really great blog­gers in Den­mark, the cou­ple of times I’ve been there. Really smart and pas­sio­nate. I sup­pose when you live in a very small country with few resour­ces, the incen­tive to adopt an extre­mely cheap and easy glo­bal medium is huge. Simi­lar to why it helps to learn English.
4. Let’s narrow the con­ver­sa­tion down to busi­ness. Are Euro­pean busi­nes­ses
embra­cing social media? What about just in the UK?

E-mail is a part of office life. Nobody ques­tions its func­tion [even when one has 800 unread e-mails wai­ting in one’s inbox]. We’re not quite at that stage yet with Social Media. The vibe I get from cor­po­ra­tes who ask me ques­tions at con­fe­ren­ces is not one of cer­tainly and enthu­siasm, but more of a head-scratching, “Well, every­body else seems to be doing it, this is kinda the future, so I sup­pose I should be paying more atten­tion, but…” I hear the word “But” a lot. It’s still early days. In five years time I expect to be hea­ring “But” a lot less.
5. What tools are they embra­cing? Do various cul­tu­res impact the tools that
are gai­ning in popu­la­rity?

They are embra­cing all sorts of tools. There a lot of them out there, and nobody, repeat nobody can pre­dict how much trac­tion they’ll even­tually get inside a com­pany cul­ture. So what the savvy social soft­ware engi­neer will do is try lots of things and see which snow­ball rolls all the way down the hill, rather than put all of the eggs into a sin­gle, over­si­zed bas­ket.
6. Do you see a dif­fe­rence in the way glo­bal enter­pri­ses are embra­cing
social media v. small to medium sized busi­nes­ses?

Big busi­nes­ses will always have trou­ble with anything that sub­verts hie­rarchies, for hie­rarchy is the glue that holds large orga­ni­za­tions together. Small busi­nes­ses have an easier time with blogs and what­not, for there are fewer layers to keep happy. Secondly, small com­pa­nies are for the most part pri­vate com­pa­nies. Large com­pa­nies gene­rally have public sha­rehol­ders. Dif­fe­rent rules apply.
7. What similarities/differences do you see bet­ween C-level accep­tance of
social media and mid-management?

Mid-Management is in the unfor­tu­nate situa­tion of wan­ting to “get it”, kno­wing it’s the future, whilst at the same time, they’re paid to main­tain the sta­tus quo. One thing mana­ge­ment often unde­res­ti­ma­tes is JUST HOW DISRUPTIVE social soft­ware is. I see lots of pain in that future. Hope­fully it’ll end up being worth it in the long run.
The main impact Social Media has brought to me was seeing my busi­ness model, over a period of about five years, evol­ving from a “Hie­rarchy” pri­vi­lege model to what Jon Hus­band calls a “Wirearchy” model.
I star­ted my career in the adver­ti­sing busi­ness, wor­king as a “crea­tive”. Back in the 1990s, there was very much a pyramid-shaped hie­rarchy in that industry, with “rock stars” on the top, and the “grunts” on the bot­tom. Every creative’s busi­ness model see­med to be about get­ting the rock stars to notice you. In order to get paid noti­ceably more money you had to do all the nor­mal stuff– win awards, land a job in a “sexy” agency, get your ad on to The Super­bowl etc. Ever­yone knew who the rock stars were. Ever­yone knew what they were up to. And all you could do is hope­fully one day get the oppor­tu­nity to make your mark, the same way the rock stars had– INSIDE the exis­ting pyra­mid.
Now, as a blog­ger, I feel com­ple­tely obli­vious to all that. Now I have a uni­que social net­work, kept cohe­rent with Social Soft­ware, where the busi­ness model is not about rising up some ima­gi­nary sta­tus lad­der, but “mashing up” peo­ple I know.
For exam­ple, I have peo­ple in my net­work who work in the wine busi­ness. I have peo­ple in my net­work who work for Mic­ro­soft. So maybe one day I’ll end up doing something wine-related with Mic­ro­soft. Or not.
Sud­denly I find myself without “50 peo­ple who want to take my job”, simply because what I do is uni­que to myself, uni­que to my own social net­work. It’s as uni­que as any human fin­ger­print. And the posi­tive effect is has had on my own per­so­nal sense of sove­reignty is stag­ge­ring.
So let’s say over the next, I dunno, ten, twenty, fifty years, this social net­work para­digm gets more pre­va­lent. Will we still need large com­pa­nies? Will we still be able to com­pete with all that unwieldy, energy-guzzling, cal­cif­ying cor­po­rate struc­ture? Or will everything become “a loose con­fe­de­ra­tion of skunk works”?
It’s too early to tell, of course. Ins­tead, focus on this: The main story about social soft­ware is not about how it allows you to carry out exis­ting com­pany func­tions, just more quickly and easily. It’s big­ger than that. In the future, com­pa­nies will grow around social soft­ware, not the other way around. And your client, SAP, had bet­ter be ready for this. Because it’s already star­ting to hap­pen.
8. What are the big­gest barriers to social media accep­tance in EU busi­ness?
The barriers are the same as they’ve always been. Dino­saurs have a lot of money and power. And dino­saurs don’t like dying.
9. How is social media chan­ging cul­ture?
Social media can only change the cul­ture to the extent that it can change the nature of work. Which, as it’s already star­ting to hap­pen on a huge scale, is actually quite a lot.
10. Addi­tio­nal Com­ments?
One more thought, which per­tains directly to your client. I firmly believe that the line that sepa­ra­tes social media and ERP is going to start get­ting VERY blurry, and really soon. I can see a not-to-distant future where even the lar­ger ERP solu­tions are built around social soft­ware, not the other way around. And I can see that day arri­ving in under five years. We live in inte­res­ting times.
[UPDATE:] Sigurd pipes in on Point Num­ber 10:

As soft­ware “models real life as we see it” the ERP train pic­ked up the well struc­tu­red pro­ces­ses and left the loose ends to fight for them­sel­ves. But yes­ter­day Hugh argued “that the line that sepa­ra­tes social media and ERP is going to start get­ting VERY blurry, and really soon… I can see a not-to-distant future where even the lar­ger ERP solu­tions are built around social soft­ware, not the other way around”. And I agree simply for the rea­son that they should be one, there are no rea­sons why the world puts a line in the sand bet­ween struc­tu­red and loose ends pro­ces­ses.
Actually it boils down to the defi­ni­tion of what “social soft­ware” is.
Social soft­ware “ena­bles peo­ple to ren­dez­vous, con­nect or colla­bo­rate”.
But a short cir­cuit hap­pens in our brains when we “see” what social soft­ware is using those three terms: It invo­kes the image of an open mar­ket­place or gathe­ring where the effi­ciency requi­res free­dom and little struc­ture and thus quite the oppo­site of what ERP entails.

[UPDATE:] SAP’s Tho­mas Otter pipes in about the false dis­tinc­tion bet­ween “busi­ness soft­ware” and “con­su­mer soft­ware”:

Crea­ting barriers to entry through com­ple­xity is not a via­ble stra­tegy. Crea­ting com­pe­ti­tive advan­tage through sim­pli­city and fun is. Wid­gets, mashups, tag­ging, com­mu­nity and so on are not just cute. They are fun­da­men­tal to the future of enter­prise appli­ca­tions. It isn’t just the tech­no­logy, it is the mindset.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

10 Responses to “e.r.p. being built around social media, not the other way around?”

  1. LEELEE says:

    what do you think about http://www.zooped.com ?

  2. Great post Hugh!
    You are right on that how mgmt accepts social media is a big deal. There have been a few posts around this over the last cou­ple of months, busy vs burst work styles.

  3. shel israel says:

    These are just great, Hugh. Now I can go to my site and dec­lare Hugh was the first.

  4. Hugh:
    Two thoughts and a half. (1) There are a lot of smart peo­ple blog­ging on Bel­gium, some of those you might con­si­der friends from Mic­ro­soft (that was the half thought, BTW, the ubi­qui­tous Mic­ro­soft men­tion here…) and in Italy; (2) SAP seems to be a bit resis­tant to new busi­ness prac­ti­ces, inc­lu­ding deve­lop­ment for online appli­ca­tions [WSJ article with paid subsc­rip­tion here http://tinyurl.com/yqgprb ]. This may help you ans­wer the #10 why? ques­tion by Dennis.

  5. rik says:

    This is one of the most inte­res­ting and insight­ful things I’ve read on any blog in a long time. Thanks Hugh!

  6. Simone says:

    Hi Hugh, great post but I’m kinda pis­sed off cause you never con­si­der ita­lian blog­gers. C’mon, show us some love! :-)

  7. Mike says:

    Hugh,
    Great insights as usual. Having just retur­ned from Geneva I can unders­core that peo­ple in Wes­tern Europe clearly are sharp in social media and it is pic­king up steam.

  8. Thomas Otter says:

    Hugh,
    Thought­ful stuff.
    The lines bet­ween ERP and social soft­ware are already blu­rring. At sapphire in Atlanta SAP demoed an pro­cu­re­ment pro­cess that relied on infor­mal net­works and other “social” prin­ci­ples.
    Wikis have become mis­sion cri­ti­cal sup­port appli­ca­tions in many orga­ni­sa­tions, and the inte­gra­tion bet­ween ERP and social media tools is on the rise.
    The abi­lity the lar­ger soft­ware firms’ capa­bi­lity to adapt has been unde­res­ti­ma­ted before, and I expect mic­ro­soft IBM SAP and others to be key pla­yers in this emer­ging world.
    I sense a post is coming on this.
    Thomas