June 18, 2007

yes. i am on twitter.


follow gaping­void at http://twitter.com

The plan is; I shall reserve gaping­void for car­toons and the lon­ger, “subs­tan­tive” posts. The day-to-day minu­tiae [inc­lu­ding tra­vel details when I’m on the road] and ran­dom links etc I shall move over to Twit­ter. Either click on the link at the bot­tom of the blue Twit­ter badge on my side­bar, or follow this link to my Twit­ter page. Thanks.
[SLAVE TO FASHION:] Yes, I’ve joi­ned Face­book as well.

"Hugh's Daily Cartoon" Newsletter. A new cartoon sent out every weekday morning to your inbox [RSS version here.]. A wee chuckle to start your day off right etc.

10 Responses to “yes. i am on twitter.”

  1. Twit­ter is beyond blog­ging, it’s fast lane com­mu­ni­ca­tion, a dee­per chan­nel, a link and insight archi­ver, micro-journaling.
    Twit­ter is good for SEO.
    Twit­ter for­ces us wind­bag blog­gers to be brief, pithy, laser focu­sed. To express a pro­found sta­te­ment in 140 cha­rac­ters is good dis­ci­pline for us all.
    Micro con­tent and mobile com­pu­ting are the future. We must start now to get good at short com­mu­ni­ca­tions and pre­sen­cing stream pro­mo­tions. It’s like mar­ke­ting haiku: buil­ding cre­di­bi­lity, gro­wing a Follo­wer com­mu­nity, ran­ting crea­ti­vely, pro­mo­ting your Twit­ter page in blog com­ments, etc.
    Twit­ter trolls and spam­mers?
    We got rid of them a while back. You mis­sed the vio­lence and explo­sions.
    :^)
    http://twitter.com/vaspers

  2. James Spinks says:

    The down­side of Twit­ter is that there’s no com­ments or track­back equi­va­lents for peo­ple you don’t already follow.

  3. Thomas says:

    I was won­de­ring if you would jump on board.

  4. Basti Hirsch says:

    @James jaiku.com may help with that then.

  5. shannon says:

    re: 2008 twit­ter twit — Someone is grumpy today. Do you really think Cum­bria is the ans­wer though, its a bit harsh?

  6. david brain says:

    Cool. Can you car­toon on twitter?

  7. Since I moved here from SF 5 years ago, I think your pre­dic­tion is a bit out-dated :)

  8. Chris says:

    Twit­ter seems to have a way of alie­na­ting a large part of a blog audience, the rea­ders, (as oppo­sed to the ‘par­ti­ci­pa­tors’, who join in the con­ver­sa­tion via com­ments or blog­ging).
    Loo­king at some of your posts on twit­ter Hugh, espe­cially the ‘dis­cuss’ ones, I’d be inte­res­ted in follo­wing the con­ver­sa­tion. Howe­ver, twit­ter seems to be such a limi­ted for­mat, it cons­trains real dis­cus­sion and splin­ters the audience somewhat.
    And sadly, I kind of miss the ran­dom stuff that disap­pears when a blog­ger dis­co­vers twit­ter. Cala­ca­nis and Sco­ble being prime exam­ples of this.

  9. I think twit­ter is defi­ni­tely more of a one-way com­mu­ni­ca­tion. But I love the way I am get­ting ran­dom SMS mes­sa­ges, I hope my friends are enjo­ying mine as well..

  10. You made my day, Hugh. To quote Tom Rob­bins’ Swit­ters from Fierce Inva­lids Home From Hot Cli­ma­tes, your Twit­ter ran­dom link took “the cake, the pie, the whole damn patis­se­rie”. I’m all … a’twitter!